Interleukin-10-Treated Dendritic Cells Modulate Immune Responses of Naive and Sensitized T Cells In Vivo  Gabriele Müller, Anke Müller  Journal of Investigative.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 141, Issue 2, Pages e2 (August 2011)
Advertisements

Cheng-Ming Sun, Edith Deriaud, Claude Leclerc, Richard Lo-Man  Immunity 
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Peptide Immunization Indicates that CD8+ T Cells are the Dominant Effector Cells in Trinitrophenyl-Specific Contact Hypersensitivity  Stefan Martin, Michael.
Identification of CD3+CD4−CD8− T Cells as Potential Regulatory Cells in an Experimental Murine Model of Graft-Versus-Host Skin Disease (GVHD)  Fumi Miyagawa,
Immunologic Characterization of HIV-Specific DNA Vaccine
Dissolving Microneedle Delivery of Nanoparticle-Encapsulated Antigen Elicits Efficient Cross-Priming and Th1 Immune Responses by Murine Langerhans Cells 
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2009)
Zeinab Khalil  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Self-Antigen Presentation by Keratinocytes in the Inflamed Adult Skin Modulates T-Cell Auto-Reactivity  Michael Meister, Amel Tounsi, Evelyn Gaffal, Tobias.
Antigen-Specific Peripheral Tolerance Induced by Topical Application of NF-κB Decoy Oligodeoxynucleotide  Iwao Isomura, Kunio Tsujimura, Akimichi Morita 
Volume 141, Issue 2, Pages e2 (August 2011)
Γδ T Cells Augment Rejection of Skin Grafts by Enhancing Cross-Priming of CD8 T Cells to Skin-Derived Antigen  Azad Rahimpour, Stephen R. Mattarollo,
Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Inhibition of Cathepsin S Reduces Allogeneic T Cell Priming but Not Graft-versus-Host Disease Against Minor Histocompatibility Antigens  Hisaki Fujii,
The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Is Involved in UVR-Induced Immunosuppression  Fatemeh Navid, Anika Bruhs, Winfried Schuller, Ellen Fritsche, Jean Krutmann,
Langerhans Cells Are Required for UVR-Induced Immunosuppression
Granulocyte–Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Gene Transfer to Dendritic Cells or Epidermal Cells Augments Their Antigen-Presenting Function Including.
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 1997)
Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Mediate Oral Tolerance
T helper17 Cells Are Sufficient But Not Necessary to Induce Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease  Cristina Iclozan, Yu Yu, Chen Liu, Yaming Liang, Tangsheng.
Induction of GVHD-Like Skin Disease by Passively Transferred CD8+ T-Cell Receptor Transgenic T Cells into Keratin 14-Ovalbumin Transgenic Mice  Akihiko.
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
Urupongsa Ausaneya, Akira Kawada, Yoshinori Aragane 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Impaired Th2 Subset Development in the Absence of CD4
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (September 2004)
Activation of the Arylhydrocarbon Receptor Causes Immunosuppression Primarily by Modulating Dendritic Cells  Anika Bruhs, Thomas Haarmann-Stemmann, Katrin.
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Down-Regulation of IL-4 Gene Transcription and Control of Th2 Cell Differentiation by a Mechanism Involving NFAT1  Alexander Kiani, João P.B Viola, Andrew.
CD4+ T Cells in Lymph Nodes of UVB-Irradiated Mice Suppress Immune Responses to New Antigens Both In Vitro and In Vivo  Shelley Gorman, Jamie W.-Y. Tan,
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Benno Weigmann, Elizabeth R
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Invariant NKT Cells Suppress CD8+ T-Cell–Mediated Allergic Contact Dermatitis Independently of Regulatory CD4+ T Cells  Anne Goubier, Marc Vocanson, Claire.
Interleukin-18 and the Costimulatory Molecule B7-1 Have a Synergistic Anti-Tumor Effect on Murine Melanoma; Implication of Combined Immunotherapy for.
Shelley Gorman, Melinda A. Judge, Prue H. Hart 
Production and Pharmacologic Modulation of the Granulocyte-Associated Allergic Responses to Ovalbumin in Murine Skin Models Induced by Injecting Ovalbumin-
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Contact Hypersensitivity in MHC Class II-Deficient Mice Depends on CD8 T Lymphocytes Primed by Immunostimulating Langerhans Cells  Anne Bouloc, Andrea.
CD8+ Cytotoxic T Cells Induce Relapsing Colitis in Normal Mice
Fetal Calf Serum-Free Generation of Functionally Active Murine Dendritic Cells Suitable for In Vivo Therapeutic Approaches  Gabriele Müller, Anke Müller,
Imiquimod Enhances the Systemic Immunity Attained by Local Cryosurgery Destruction of Melanoma Lesions  Pedro Redondo, Julio del Olmo, Ascensión López-Diaz.
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Ana Belén Blázquez, Lloyd Mayer, M. Cecilia Berin  Gastroenterology 
Timothy J. Paradis, Susan H. Cole, Robin T. Nelson, Ronald P. Gladue 
Volume 119, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
CTLA-4 Regulates Induction of Anergy In Vivo
Agatha Schwarz, Anika Bruhs, Thomas Schwarz 
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
In Vivo Expansion of Regulatory T cells With IL-2/IL-2 mAb Complexes Prevents Anti- factor VIII Immune Responses in Hemophilia A Mice Treated With Factor.
Deficient Contact Hypersensitivity Reaction in CD4−/− Mice Is Because of Impaired Hapten-Specific CD8+ T Cell Functions  Pierre Saint-Mezard, Cyril Chavagnac,
UVA-Induced Immune Suppression Through an Oxidative Pathway
Epicutaneous Application of CpG Oligodeoxynucleotides with Peptide or Protein Antigen Promotes the Generation of CTL  Sandra K. Klimuk, Hossain M. Najar,
Antigen-Specific Suppression of a Primed Immune Response by Dendritic Cells Mediated by Regulatory T Cells Secreting Interleukin-10  Ela Martin, Brendan.
Interleukin-21 Inhibits Dendritic Cell-Mediated T Cell Activation and Induction of Contact Hypersensitivity In Vivo  Donald C. Foster, Ralf Paus  Journal.
Formation of Antigenic Quinolone Photoadducts on Langerhans Cells Initiates Photoallergy to Systemically Administered Quinolone in Mice  Akihiro Ohshima,
Quinolone-Photoconjugated Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II-Binding Peptides with Lysine are Antigenic for T Cells Mediating Murine Quinolone.
Volume 38, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Toll-Dependent Control Mechanisms of CD4 T Cell Activation
Luk Van Parijs, Alexander Ibraghimov, Abul K. Abbas  Immunity 
CpG Immunostimulatory Sequences Enhance Contact Hypersensitivity Responses in Mice  Hitoshi Akiba, Masataka Satoh, Keiji Iwatsuki, Dominique Kaiserlian,
Mattias Svensson, Asher Maroof, Manabu Ato, Paul M. Kaye  Immunity 
Patrizia Stoitzner, Christoph H
Hapten-Specific Tolerance Promoted by Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide
Dendritic Cells Require T Cells for Functional Maturation In Vivo
MDSC-derived IL-6 enhances tumor progression through the inhibition of tumor-specific TH1 development and of their helper activity for CD8+ T cells. MDSC-derived.
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
UV Exposure Boosts Transcutaneous Immunization and Improves Tumor Immunity: Cytotoxic T-Cell Priming through the Skin  Pamela Stein, Gerd Rechtsteiner,
Presentation transcript:

Interleukin-10-Treated Dendritic Cells Modulate Immune Responses of Naive and Sensitized T Cells In Vivo  Gabriele Müller, Anke Müller  Journal of Investigative Dermatology  Volume 119, Issue 4, Pages 836-841 (October 2002) DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.00496.x Copyright © 2002 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 IL-10 DC prevent induction of OVA-specific immune responses. CD4+ T cells from naive DO11.10 mice were transferred to syngeneic BALB/c mice. Two days later recipients were treated with either IL-10-treated or untreated, OVA-pulsed or unpulsed DC as described. Eight days later mice were immunized with OVA323-339 in IFA subcutaneously and lymph node cells were prepared 10 d later. Proliferation was induced by addition of OVA323-339 peptide to the cultures and thymidine incorporation was determined after 3 d. Results shown are representative of five experiments with five mice per group. Groups are mice receiving naive CD4+ T cells and unpulsed DC (naive T cells/DC), mice receiving naive CD4+ T cells and DC-OVA (naive T cells/DC-OVA), mice receiving naive CD4+ T cells and DC-OVA-IL10 (naive T cells/DC-OVA-IL10), mice receiving naive CD4+ T cells and DC-IL10 (naive T cells/DC-IL10) and mice receiving naive CD4+ T cells and OVA peptide in IFA intraperitoneally (OVA-IFA i.p. = tolerance control). Error bars represent SEM. *p <0.05 versus DC control. Statistical significance was determined by t test. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2002 119, 836-841DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.00496.x) Copyright © 2002 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 OVA-pulsed IL-10-treated DC induce antigen-specific tolerance in naive T cells in vivo. CD4+ T cells from naive DO11.10 mice were transferred to syngeneic BALB/c mice. Two days later recipients were treated with either IL-10-treated or untreated, OVA-pulsed as described. Eight days later mice were immunized with OVA323-339 in IFA subcutaneously and CD4+ T cells were isolated from lymph node and spleen cells 10 d later. CD4+ T cells were restimulated in vitro with OVA-pulsed epidermal cells. After a rest period and addition of IL-2 to cultures (2 U per ml) CD4+ T cells were restimulated with OVA-pulsed epidermal cells and thymidine incorporation was determined after 3 d. Results shown are representative of five experiments with five mice per group. Groups are mice receiving naive CD4+ T cells and DC-OVA and mice receiving naive CD4+ T cells and DC-OVA-IL10. Error bars represent SEM. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2002 119, 836-841DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.00496.x) Copyright © 2002 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 IL-10 DC downmodulate preexisting OVA-specific immune responses in vivo. CD4+ T cells from DO11.10 mice that had been immunized with OVA peptide in IFA in vivo as described were transferred to syngeneic BALB/c mice. Two days later recipients were treated with either IL-10-treated or untreated, OVA-pulsed as described. Lymph node cells from recipients were prepared after 8 d. Proliferation was induced by addition of OVA323-339 peptide to the cultures and thymidine incorporation was determined after 3 d. Results shown are representative of five experiments with five mice per group. Groups are background proliferation of lymph nodes from naive transgenic animals stimulated with OVA peptide in vitro (naive CD4+ T cells), mice receiving primed CD4+ T cells and unpulsed DC (primed T cells/DC), mice receiving primed CD4+ T cells and DC-OVA (primed T cells/DC-OVA), mice receiving primed CD4+ T cells and DC-IL-10 (primed T cells/DC-IL-10) and mice receiving primed CD4+ T cells and DC-OVA-IL-10 (primed T cells/DC-OVA-IL-10). Error bars represent SEM. *p <0.05 and **p <0.005 versus DC control. Statistical significance was determined by t test. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2002 119, 836-841DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.00496.x) Copyright © 2002 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 OVA-pulsed IL-10-treated DC induce antigen-specific tolerance in sensitized T cells in vivo. CD4+ T cells from DO11.10 mice that had been immunized with OVA peptide in IFA in vivo as described were transferred to syngeneic BALB/c mice. Two days later recipients were treated with either IL-10-treated or untreated, OVA-pulsed or unpulsed DC as described. CD4+ T cells were isolated from lymph node and spleen cells from recipients after 8 d and were restimulated in vitro with OVA-pulsed epidermal cells. After a rest period and addition of IL-2 to the cultures (2 U per ml) CD4+ T cells were restimulated with OVA-pulsed epidermal cells and thymidine incorporation was determined after 3 d. Results shown are representative of five experiments with five mice per group. Groups are mice receiving primed CD4+ T cells and DC-OVA and mice receiving primed CD4+ T cells and DC-OVA-IL10. Error bars represent SEM. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2002 119, 836-841DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.00496.x) Copyright © 2002 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 OVA-pulsed IL-10-treated DC prevent induction of OVA-specific footpad swelling. CD4+ T cells from DO11.10 mice were transferred to syngeneic BALB/c mice. Two days later recipients were treated with either IL-10-treated or untreated, OVA-pulsed or unpulsed DC as described. Eight days later mice were immunized with OVA323-339 in IFA subcutaneously. Ten days later, mice were injected into the footpad with 30 µg OVA323-339 in IFA intradermally, or just IFA on the contralateral foot. Footpad swelling was determined 48 h later and was calculated by deducting background swelling of IFA-injected footpads from specific swelling reaction of the contralateral foot. Results shown are representative of three sets of experiments with five mice per group. Groups are mice receiving OVA peptide intra peritoneally (i.p. peptide), mice receiving naive CD4+ T cells and DC-OVA (naive T cells/DC-OVA), mice receiving naive CD4+ T cells and DC-OVA-IL-10 (naive T cells/DC-OVA-IL-10), mice receiving naive CD4+ T cells and DC-IL-10 (naive T cells/DC-IL-10), mice receiving naive CD4+ T cells and unpulsed DC (naive T cells/DC), and mice receiving only naive CD4+ T cells (naive T cells). Error bars indicate SEM. *p <0.05 versus DC control. Statistical significance was determined by t test. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2002 119, 836-841DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.00496.x) Copyright © 2002 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 OVA-pulsed IL-10 DC downmodulate OVA-specific footpad swelling in mice injected with presensitized T cells in vivo. CD4+ T cells from DO11.10 mice that had been immunized with OVA peptide in vivo as described were transferred to syngeneic BALB/c mice. Two days later recipients were treated with either IL-10-treated or untreated, OVA-pulsed or unpulsed DC as described. Eight days later, mice were injected into the footpad with 30 µg OVA323-339 in IFA intradermally, or just IFA on the contralateral foot. Footpad swelling was determined 48 h later. Results shown are representative of three sets of experiments with five mice per group. Groups are mice receiving primed CD4+ T cells and DC-OVA (primed T cells/DC-OVA), mice receiving primed CD4+ T cells and DC-OVA-IL10 (primed T cells/DC-OVA-IL10), mice receiving primed CD4+ T cells and DC-IL10 (primed T cells/DC-IL10), mice receiving primed CD4+ T cells and unpulsed DC (primed T cells/DC), and mice receiving just primed CD4+ T cells (primed T cells). Error bars indicate SEM. *p <0.05 versus DC control. Statistical significance was determined by t test. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2002 119, 836-841DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.00496.x) Copyright © 2002 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 IL-10-treated DC inhibit footpad swelling after antigen restimulation in vivo. CD4+ T cells from DO11.10 mice that had been immunized with OVA peptide in IFA in vivo as described were transferred to syngeneic BALB/c mice. Two days later recipients were treated with either IL-10-treated or untreated, OVA-pulsed or unpulsed DC as described. Mice were injected with OVA323-339 in IFA subcutaneously after 8 d. Ten days later mice were injected into the footpad with 30 µg OVA323-339 in IFA intradermally, or just IFA on the contralateral foot. Footpad swelling was determined 48 h later. Results shown are representative of five experiments with five mice per group. Groups are mice receiving unpulsed DC, mice receiving DC-IL10, mice receiving DC-OVA, and mice receiving DC-OVA-IL10. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2002 119, 836-841DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.00496.x) Copyright © 2002 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Experimental systems. (A) CD4+ T cells of naive DO11.10 mice were purified and injected intravenously into naive BALB/c mice (5 × 106 cells per mouse). Mice were injected intravenously with 5 × 105 DC 48 h later. After a rest period of 8 d mice were sensitized by subcutaneuos injection with 30 µg OVA323-339 peptide in IFA. Ten days later mice were either sacrificed to obtain lymph node cells for in vitro analysis or injected into the footpad with 30 µg OVA323-339 peptide in IFA for analysis of DTH reactions in vivo. (B) CD4+ T cells of presensitized DO11.10 mice were injected intravenously into naive BALB/c mice (5 × 106 cells per mouse). Mice were injected intravenously with 5 × 105 DC 48 h later. After a rest period of 8 d mice were either sacrificed to obtain lymph node cells for in vitro analysis or injected into the footpad with 30 µg OVA323-339 peptide in IFA for analysis of DTH reactions in vivo. To analyze whether the effects seen were long lasting, some mice were rechallenged with antigen at day 10 (A) or day 20 (B) and DTH experiments and in vitro analysis were performed 10 d later. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2002 119, 836-841DOI: (10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.00496.x) Copyright © 2002 The Society for Investigative Dermatology, Inc Terms and Conditions