Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dkk1-induced inhibition of Wnt signaling in osteoblast differentiation is an underlying mechanism of bone loss in multiple myeloma  Ya-Wei Qiang, Bart.
Advertisements

Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling mediates transforming growth factor-β1-driven podocyte injury and proteinuria  Dan Wang, Chunsun Dai, Yingjian Li, Youhua.
Sp1 Suppresses miR-3178 to Promote the Metastasis Invasion Cascade via Upregulation of TRIOBP  Hui Wang, Kai Li, Yu Mei, Xuemei Huang, Zhenglin Li, Qingzhu.
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Modulation of K-Ras-Dependent Lung Tumorigenesis by MicroRNA-21
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Yu-Hsin Chiu, Jennifer Y. Lee, Lewis C. Cantley  Molecular Cell 
Laminin γ2 Mediates Wnt5a-Induced Invasion of Gastric Cancer Cells
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 142, Issue 3, Pages e2 (March 2012)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages (November 2005)
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (August 2007)
PIAS1 Promotes Lymphomagenesis through MYC Upregulation
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Inhibition of KLF4 by Statins Reverses Adriamycin-Induced Metastasis and Cancer Stemness in Osteosarcoma Cells  Yangling Li, Miao Xian, Bo Yang, Meidan.
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (September 2016)
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
MiR-135b Stimulates Osteosarcoma Recurrence and Lung Metastasis via Notch and Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling  Hua Jin, Song Luo, Yun Wang, Chang Liu, Zhenghao.
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
SGK3 Mediates INPP4B-Dependent PI3K Signaling in Breast Cancer
FOXO3a Is Activated in Response to Hypoxic Stress and Inhibits HIF1-Induced Apoptosis via Regulation of CITED2  Walbert J. Bakker, Isaac S. Harris, Tak.
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages (December 2014)
Essential Role of TGF-β Signaling in Glucose-Induced Cell Hypertrophy
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (February 2017)
Figure 1. RSPO3 expression is upregulated in bladder cancer
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (November 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages (March 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Hung-Chun Chang, Leonard Guarente  Cell 
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Fan Yang, Huafeng Zhang, Yide Mei, Mian Wu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (June 2016)
Merlin/NF2-Lin28B-let-7 Is a Tumor-Suppressive Pathway that Is Cell-Density Dependent and Hippo Independent  Hiroki Hikasa, Yoshitaka Sekido, Akira Suzuki 
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Oliver I. Fregoso, Shipra Das, Martin Akerman, Adrian R. Krainer 
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages e4 (March 2019)
Xu-Yun Zhao, Siming Li, Guo-Xiao Wang, Qi Yu, Jiandie D. Lin 
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 547-560 (April 2015) TGIF Governs a Feed-Forward Network that Empowers Wnt Signaling to Drive Mammary Tumorigenesis  Ming-Zhu Zhang, Olivier Ferrigno, Zhe Wang, Mutsuko Ohnishi, Céline Prunier, Laurence Levy, Mohammed Razzaque, Williams C. Horne, Damian Romero, Guri Tzivion, Frédéric Colland, Roland Baron, Azeddine Atfi  Cancer Cell  Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 547-560 (April 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.002 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Interaction of TGIF with Axin1/Axin2 (A) HEK293T cells were transfected with Myc-Axin2 in the presence or absence of Flag-TGIF and treated with control or Wnt3a conditioned media (CM) for 1 hr. Lysates were subjected to anti-Flag immunoprecipitation (IP) followed by immunoblotting (IB) with anti-Myc. In this and all the following experiments, expression of proteins under investigation was determined by direct immunoblotting. (B and C) HEK293T cells were transfected with pG5E1β-Luc together with Gal4-Axin2 and VP16-TGIF mutants (B) or Gal4-TGIF and VP16-Axin2 mutants (C). Luciferase activity was measured, and data were expressed as mean ± SD of three independent samples. (D) HEK293T cells were transfected with Flag-TGIF in the absence or presence of Myc-Axin1 and treated with control or Wnt3a CM for 1 hr. Cell lysates were subjected to anti-Myc immunoprecipitation followed by immunoblotting with anti-Flag. (E) MCF7 or HMLE cells were treated with control or Wnt3a CM for 1 hr, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with IgG or anti-TGIF before being analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-Axin1, anti-Axin2, or anti-TGIF. (F) HMLE cells were treated with Wnt3a CM for the indicated times, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-TGIF before being analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-Axin1 or anti-Axin2. See also Figure S1. Cancer Cell 2015 27, 547-560DOI: (10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 TGIF Interferes with the Nucleocytoplasmic Transit of Axin1/Axin2 (A) COS-7 cells were transfected with Flag-Axin2 and GFP-TGIF and immunostained with anti-Flag and DAPI. Scale bars, 100 μM. (B) Wild-type or Tgif1−/− MEFs were immunostained with anti-Axin2 and DAPI. Scale bars, 100 μM. (C) Cytoplasmic or nuclear fractions from wild-type or Tgif1−/− MEFs were immunoblotted with anti-Axin1 or anti-Axin2. Purity of the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions was verified by immunoblotting using anti-Lamin B or anti-α-tubulin. (D and E) Lysates from wild-type or Tgif1−/− MEFs were immunoprecipitated with anti-β-catenin (D) or anti-CRM1 (E) and analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. See also Figure S2. Cancer Cell 2015 27, 547-560DOI: (10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 TGIF Interferes with β-Catenin Degradation (A) Lysates from Tgif1+/+ or Tgif1−/− MEFs were immunoprecipitated with IgG or anti-β-catenin and analyzed by immunoblotting using the indicated antibodies. (B) MCF7 cells were transfected with HA-β-catenin or HA-β-catenin.S33Y in the absence or presence of Flag-TGIF, and cell lysates were immunoblotted with anti-HA or anti-Flag. (C) HEK293T cells were transfected with Flag-β-catenin together with Myc-βTRCP and increasing amounts of Flag-TGIF. Association of β-catenin with βTRCP was analyzed by blotting anti-Myc immunoprecipitates with anti-Flag. (D) MCF7-Dox-Myc-TGIF cells were cultured with or without doxycycline (Dox) for 48 hr. Association of β-catenin with βTRCP was determined by blotting anti-βTRCP immunoprecipitates with anti-β-catenin. (E) Tgif1+/+ or Tgif1−/− MEFs were cultured with control or Wnt3a CM for the indicated times, and lysates were immunoblotted with anti-β-catenin, anti-Axin2, or anti-TGIF. (F) Tgif1+/+ or Tgif1−/− MEFs were treated with vehicle or MG132 for 12 hr, and cell lysates were subject to immunoblotting using anti-β-catenin. (G) Expression of β-catenin was analyzed using extracts from mouse mammary glands with the indicated genotypes. (H) Analysis of active (nonphosphorylated) β-catenin levels in mammary glands from Tgif1+/+ or Tgif1−/− mice by immunohistochemistry. The percentage of stained cells in at least 20 independent fields is indicated. The line inside the box shows median percentage. The top and bottom of the box represent upper (third) and lower (first) quartile percentages, respectively. The lines above and below the box show maximum and minimum percentages, respectively. Scale bars, 50 μM. See also Figure S3. Cancer Cell 2015 27, 547-560DOI: (10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 TGIF Promotes Wnt Signaling (A and B) MCF7 or HMLE cells stably expressing control (sh.Luc) or TGIF (sh.TGIF) shRNAs were cultured with control or Wnt3a CM for 24 hr. Expression of Wnt target genes was analyzed by qRT-PCR (A), and the expression of CyclinD1 or TGIF was determined by immunoblotting (B). (C and D) Expression of Wnt target genes in the mammary glands of mice with the indicated genotypes (eight in each group) was analyzed by qRT-PCR (C), and the expression of CyclinD1 was assessed by immunoblotting (D). (E and F) MWT23 cells stably expressing empty vector or TGIF were treated with vehicle or tamoxifen (Tam) for 5 days, expression of Wnt target genes was analyzed by qRT-PCR (E), and the expression of CyclinD1 or TGIF was determined by immunoblotting (F). Results in (A), (C), and (E) are expressed as mean ± SD of three independent samples. See also Figure S4. Cancer Cell 2015 27, 547-560DOI: (10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 TGIF Is a Wnt Target Gene (A) Expression of TGIF or β-catenin was assessed by immunoblotting using extracts from mammary glands of MMTV-Wnt1 or Dkk1 mice or liver from Ctnnb1 conditional knockout. (B) HMLE cells were left untreated or treated with control or Wnt3a CM for 24 hr, and chromatin was immunoprecipitated with anti-β-catenin, anti-TCF4, or IgG. Bound chromatin (in control cells) was amplified by PCR and analyzed by 2% agarose gel (left). Bound chromatin in control or Wnt3a-treated cells was analyzed by qRT-PCR. (C and D) HMLE-Dox-HA-β-catenin (C) or HMLE-Dox-Myc-DN-TCF4 (D) cells were treated with or without Dox for 48 hr before being cultured with or without Wnt3a CM for 16 hr. Expression of TGIF protein and mRNA was measured by immunoblotting and qRT-PCR, respectively. (E) MCF7 cells were left untreated or were treated with Wnt3a for different times, and expression of TGIF was assessed by immunoblotting. (F) Expression of TGIF and β-catenin in tissue microarrays including 173 human breast cancer samples was analyzed by immunohistochemistry. The percentages of samples with high expression of TGIF and β-catenin in TNBC and non-TNBC subtypes are shown. Scale bars, 50 μM. (G) MCF7 cells were stably transfected with doxycycline-inducible TGIF (two independent populations) or empty vector and treated with or without Dox for 48 hr. Expression of β-catenin or TGIF was determined by immunoblotting. (H) Kaplan-Meier graph representing the probability of cumulative recurrence-free survival in TNBC patients according to the TGIF expression, low (128) versus high (255). Results in (B)–(D) (right) are expressed as mean ± SD of three independent samples from representative experiments performed at least three times. See also Figure S5. Cancer Cell 2015 27, 547-560DOI: (10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Tgif1 Deletion Blocks Wnt1-Induced Mammary Tumors (A) Tgif1+/+, MMTV-Wnt1;Tgif1+/+, or MMTV-Wnt1;Tgif1−/− mice were photographed 3 weeks after the tumors became palpable. (B and C) MMTV-Wnt1 mice with Tgif1+/+, Tgif1+/−, or Tgif1−/− genotypes were palpated twice weekly from puberty onward for 60 weeks, and dates of tumor incidence were recorded (B). For comparison, tumor volumes at sacrifice were shown (C). (D) Whole-mount staining of mammary glands from 4-month-old virgin mice with the indicated genotypes. (E) H&E staining of mammary glands from mice with the indicated genotypes three weeks after tumor formation. Scale bars, 500 μM for (D) and 200 μM for (E). See also Figure S6. Cancer Cell 2015 27, 547-560DOI: (10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 TGIF Promotes Mammary Tumors by a Mechanism Dependent on Its Ability to Antagonize Axin1/Axin2 (A) Flip-In MWT23 or MWT37 cells carrying one or two copies of TGIF were treated with vehicle or Tam for 5 days. Expression of TGIF was assessed by immunoblotting. (B) Cells (as in A,105) were implanted into mammary fat pad of FVB mice, and tumor volumes were measured at the indicated times. (C) MWT23 cells stably expressing the indicated shRNAs were treated with vehicle or Tam for 5 days. Expression of Axin1, Axin2, or β-catenin was assessed by immunoblotting. (D) Cells (as in C, 5 × 105) were transplanted into mammary fat pad of FVB mice, and tumor volumes were measured at the indicated times. Results in (B) and (D) are expressed as mean ± SD of measurements obtained with six animals in each group. See also Figure S7. Cancer Cell 2015 27, 547-560DOI: (10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 TGIF Promotes Wnt1-Induced Mammary Tumor Formation by a TGF-β-Independent Mechanism (A and B) MWT23 or MWT37 cells stably expressing empty vector, HA-DN-TβRII, or HA-β-catenin.S33Y (A) or empty vector, HA-TGIF, or HA-TGIFΔAxin2 (B) were treated with vehicle or Tam for 5 days. Expression of transfected proteins was determined by immunoblotting (left). Cells (5 × 105) were transplanted into mammary fat pad of FVB mice, and tumor volumes were measured at the indicated times (right). (C) A model depicting the link of TGIF to the Wnt signaling network. Results in (A) and (B) are expressed as mean ± SD of measurements obtained with six animals in each group. See also Figure S8. Cancer Cell 2015 27, 547-560DOI: (10.1016/j.ccell.2015.03.002) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions