Multi-degree-of-freedom systems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aircraft Stability and Control AE 1350 Lecture Notes #11
Advertisements

Timothy Burkhard - Phil Barat - John Gyurics
Frequency response When a linear system is subjected to a sinusoidal input, its steady state response is also a sustained sinusoidal wave, with the same.
Principles of Flight-4. StallingThis diagram has been shown before. It is the graph of co- efficient of lift and angle of attack. From it you can determine.
Gust Load Alleviation Using Nonlinear Reduced Models For Control Law Design N.D.Tantaroudas K.J. Badcock, A. Da Ronch University of Liverpool, UK Bristol,
March 10, Dynamics & Controls 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Section 8.1/8.2 Matrix Solutions to Linear Systems Inconsistent and Dependent Systems.
1)Aileron 2)Elevator 3)Rudder Aileron Ailerons can be used to generate a rolling motion for an aircraft. LOCATION: Ailerons are small hinged sections.
LOAD ALLEVIATION ON WIND TURBINE BLADES USING VARIABLE AIRFOIL GEOMETRY Thomas Buhl, Mac Gaunaa, Peter Bjørn Andersen and Christian Bak ADAPWING.
2nd Degree Polynomial Function
February 24, Dynamics & Controls 1 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
AAE 3521 AAE 352 Lecture 08 Matrix methods - Part 1 Matrix methods for structural analysis Reading Chapter 4.1 through 4.5.
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 12
Purdue Aeroelasticity 4-1 AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 4 Reading:
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 7 – Control effectiveness (2)
“Adde parvum parvo magnus acervus erir” Ovid Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 16
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 17
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 12
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 11 Swept wing aeroelasticity Reading Sections 3.1 through Purdue Aeroelasticity.
Aeroelasticity (made simple)
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 28, 29,30-Unsteady aerodynamics 1 Purdue Aeroelasticity.
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 23 Representing motion with complex numbers and arithmetic 1 Purdue Aeroelasticity.
© 2009 Aviation Supplies & Academics, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The Pilot’s Manual – Ground School Aerodynamics Chapter 1 Forces Acting on an Airplane.
AAE556 – Spring Armstrong AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 5 Reading: text pp
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE556 Lectures 34,35 The p-k method, a modern alternative to V-g Purdue Aeroelasticity 1.
Mr Barton’s Maths Notes
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Mr Barton’s Maths Notes
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 6-Control effectiveness
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 21
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 6
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lectures 22, 23
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Algebra 7. Solving Quadratic Equations
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 6 – Multi-DOF systems
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 18
Aircraft Stability and Control
Polynomial Functions 2.3.
Copyright 2008-Purdue University
Real Numbers Lesson 1.1.
Alfred Lynam February 7, 2008 Dynamics and Control Architecture of Control System: Controller Prototypes AAE 450 Spring 2008 Dynamics and Control.
DYNAMICS & CONTROL QDR 1 TEAM 4
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 7-Control effectiveness
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Purdue Aeroelasticity
representing Linear functions
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 22
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Purdue Aeroelasticity
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 24
Mr Barton’s Maths Notes
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 8
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lectures 10 and 11
Rocket Stability Practice Problems LabRat Scientific © in 20 in
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 10
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 9
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 13
Jayme Zott Aerothermodynamics Aerodynamic Loads Special thanks to Alex Woods, CJ Hiu and the entire trajectory group AAE 450 Spring 2008.
Question 4.
Dynamics & Controls PDR 2
AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Lecture 4
Degrees of Freedom.
Presentation transcript:

Multi-degree-of-freedom systems AAE 556 Aeroelasticity Multi-degree-of-freedom systems With feedback control AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Goals Demonstrate how to increase divergence q of MDOF systems by adding a feedback control loop Define stability conditions for controlled MDOF systems Reading - Multi-degree-of-freedom systems - TAW p.76-85 AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Use the 2 DOF aeroelastic wing model add control surfaces Torsional springs wing tip wing root degrees of freedom AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Add an aileron to outboard panel 2 added aileron AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Static equilibrium - an end view aileron deflection adds lift and pitching (torsional) moment AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Estimators for aileron aero co-efficients CLd and CMACd Define the flap-to-chord length ratio as E Limiting cases? AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Big letter, little letter? The flap-to-chord ratio determines the value of aileron aero derivatives Big letter, little letter? All-movable section Nose-down pitch center of pressure behind ¼ chord AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Changes in lift and pitching moment on outboard panel 2 aileron AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

A closer look – the full equation set Aileron input AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Applied torsional loads - math expressions Divide load matrix by KT so that AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Gather together the terms in the loads matrix AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Final equation set outputs inputs AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Divergence condition We have applied an aileron deflection Nothing about divergence has changed - why? AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

A feedback control law what is it? Nature already has a feedback relationship between aerodynamic loads and structural deflection - that is why part of the aero load is on the left-hand side of the equilibrium equation Let’s put in an artificial feedback relationship of our choosing AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

What difference does this make? This term is out of place. How did it get here again? It belongs over here with these guys. AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Get the aileron control moment into the “correct” form notice the minus sign AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Reduce the equations to nondimensional form The term G1 is called k in the notes, page 78 AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Has the Divergence dynamic pressure changed? Compute the Determinant Why?? AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Expand the stability determinant Polynomial 2nd order AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Crossing points are different Plot the Stability Determinant vs. dynamic pressure parameter for different values of G1 Crossing points are different Positive values of G1 mean that the aileron increases load in response to positive q AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

A closer look at the first crossing point Negative aileron action, load reduction AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8

Summary When a control surface is added, its deflection creates just another load - unless… the control surface deflection responds to surface deflection – using a control law that we choose. A feedback control law changes Mother Nature’s aeroelastic feedback process and the divergence dynamic pressure changes AAE556 – Spring 2008 - 8