Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (November 2005)
Advertisements

Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 2003)
The Humoral Immune Response Is Initiated in Lymph Nodes by B Cells that Acquire Soluble Antigen Directly in the Follicles  Kathryn A. Pape, Drew M. Catron,
A B C Supplementary Figure 1 Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6
Mouse Lymphoid Tissue Contains Distinct Subsets of Langerin/CD207+ Dendritic Cells, Only One of Which Represents Epidermal-Derived Langerhans Cells  Patrice.
Volume 37, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
by Herbert Bosshart, and Ruth F. Jarrett
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages (September 2015)
Frederic Geissmann, Steffen Jung, Dan R. Littman  Immunity 
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 1998)
Mouse Lymphoid Tissue Contains Distinct Subsets of Langerin/CD207+ Dendritic Cells, Only One of Which Represents Epidermal-Derived Langerhans Cells  Patrice.
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 1996)
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Thorsten Buch, Frédéric Rieux-Laucat, Irmgard Förster, Klaus Rajewsky 
Medullary Thymic Epithelial Stem Cells Maintain a Functional Thymus to Ensure Lifelong Central T Cell Tolerance  Miho Sekai, Yoko Hamazaki, Nagahiro Minato 
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 68, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Thomas R Malek, Aixin Yu, Vladimir Vincek, Paul Scibelli, Lin Kong 
Designing and Maintaining the Mature TCR Repertoire
B Cells Acquire Particulate Antigen in a Macrophage-Rich Area at the Boundary between the Follicle and the Subcapsular Sinus of the Lymph Node  Yolanda.
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
IL-10-Producing Langerhans Cells and Regulatory T Cells Are Responsible for Depressed Contact Hypersensitivity in Grafted Skin  Ryutaro Yoshiki, Kenji.
Label-Retaining Cells (Presumptive Stem Cells) of Mice Vibrissae Do Not Express Gap Junction Protein Connexin 43  Maja Matic, Marcia Simon  Journal of.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Targeted Complementation of MHC Class II Deficiency by Intrathymic Delivery of Recombinant Adenoviruses  Ronald Rooke, Caroline Waltzinger, Christophe.
B-1a and B-1b Cells Exhibit Distinct Developmental Requirements and Have Unique Functional Roles in Innate and Adaptive Immunity to S. pneumoniae  Karen.
Absence of Cutaneous TNFα-Producing CD4+ T Cells and TNFα may Allow for Fibrosis Rather than Epithelial Cytotoxicity in Murine Sclerodermatous Graft-Versus-Host.
Volume 34, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Interleukin-1β But Not Tumor Necrosis Factor is Involved in West Nile Virus-Induced Langerhans Cell Migration from the Skin in C57BL/6 Mice  Scott N.
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Susan V Outram, Alberto Varas, Carmen V Pepicelli, Tessa Crompton 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 75, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (June 1997)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 1999)
Manuela Tavian, Catherine Robin, Laure Coulombel, Bruno Péault 
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2004)
Positive Selection of Dendritic Epidermal γδ T Cell Precursors in the Fetal Thymus Determines Expression of Skin-Homing Receptors  Na Xiong, Chuhlo Kang,
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Murine Epidermal Label-Retaining Cells Isolated by Flow Cytometry do not Express the Stem Cell Markers CD34, Sca-1, or Flk-1  Michael R. Albert, Ruth-Ann.
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 1996)
Kai M Müller, Carrie J Luedecker, Mark C Udey, Andrew G Farr  Immunity 
Intrathymic T Cell Development and Selection Proceeds Normally in the Absence of Glucocorticoid Receptor Signaling  Jared F Purton, Richard L Boyd, Timothy.
Volume 71, Issue 7, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 1997)
CD83 Expression Influences CD4+ T Cell Development in the Thymus
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (September 1997)
A Function of Fas-Associated Death Domain Protein in Cell Cycle Progression Localized to a Single Amino Acid at Its C-Terminal Region  Zi Chun Hua, Sue.
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
David A Schwarz, Carol D Katayama, Stephen M Hedrick  Immunity 
Cell-Autonomous Defects in Dendritic Cell Populations of Ikaros Mutant Mice Point to a Developmental Relationship with the Lymphoid Lineage  Li Wu, Aliki.
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Dendritic Cells Require T Cells for Functional Maturation In Vivo
Depletion of UCP1 and Myf5 population reduced xenograft growth.
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 803-814 (June 2002) Identification and Characterization of Thymic Epithelial Progenitor Cells  Andrea R. Bennett, Alison Farley, Natalie F. Blair, Julie Gordon, Linda Sharp, C.Clare Blackburn  Immunity  Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages 803-814 (June 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00321-7

Figure 1 MTS20 and MTS24 Expression during Thymus Ontogeny The second to fourth pharyngeal arch regions were dissected from E9.5 to E11.5 mouse embryos (A), or individual thymi were dissected from E12.5 to E17.5 embryos (B and C) and dissociated to single-cell suspensions or embedded for cryosectioning before staining. E17.5 thymi were depleted of CD4+ and CD8+ cells before flow cytometric analysis. (A) Flow cytometric analysis showing MTS20 and MTS24 staining in the second to fourth pharyngeal arch region (E9.5 to E11.5). (B) Flow cytometric analysis showing MTS20 and MTS24 staining in the developing thymus (E12.5 to E17.5). (C) Flow cytometric analysis showing pan-cytokeratin (Pan K) staining in the developing thymus (E12.5 to E17.5). (D) Immunohistochemical analysis showing MTS20, MTS24, K5, K8, Pan K, 4F1, and control (neg) staining in the common thymus/parathyroid primordium at E11.5. For (A) and (B), red line represents MTS20, blue line represents MTS24, black line represents isotype control. For (C), solid line represents anti-pan-cytokeratin; dotted line represents isotype control. (D) Scale bars, 100 μm. (A), (B), and (D) are representative of at least three separate experiments. (C) is representative of two experiments. For (A), mean ± SD (%): E9.5, MTS20, 5.2 ± 0.7, MTS24, 7.8 ± 3.7; E10.5, MTS20, 6.7 ± 0.6, MTS24, 7 ± 1; E11.5, MTS20, 1 ± 0.7, MTS24, 0.7 ± 0.8. For (B), mean ± SD (%): E12.5, MTS20, 34 ± 8.4%, MTS24, 35 ± 9.7%; E14.5, MTS20, 9 ± 1.2, MTS24, 17 ± 2.1; E17.5, MTS20, 1 ± 0.3, MTS24, 1.6 ± 0.1. Immunity 2002 16, 803-814DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00321-7)

Figure 2 Cellular Composition of the Thymic Primordium Thymi were dissected from E12.5 embryos and prepared as in Figure 1. (A) Left panel, staining with MTS24 and anti-rat IgG2a-FITC. Center panel, staining with MTS20 and anti-rat IgM-PE. Right panel, double stain; MTS20 and MTS24 are coexpressed; no single-positive populations were detected. (B) Pan-cytokeratin (Pan K) is expressed by 78%, K5 by 61%, and K8 by 37% of thymus primordium cells. (C) Left panel, double stain with anti-K5 (PE) and anti-K8 (FITC) showing K5+8+ and K5+8− populations. Right panel, double stain with anti-pan-cytokeratin (Pan K; PE) and anti-K8 (FITC) showing Pan K+8+ and Pan K+8− populations. (D) Left panel, 4F1 staining; right panel, double stain of 4F1 (PE) and MTS24 (FITC). (E) Fluorescence confocal microscopy analysis showing MTS20, MTS24, Pan K, K5, K8, MTS10, and isotype control staining (neg) in the E12.5 thymus primordium. (B) Dotted line represents isotype control, and solid line represents test antibody. (A and D) Dead cells were excluded by gating out 7-AAD positive cells. (B and C) Ungated samples shown. (E) Scale bars, 100 μm. (A)–(E) are representative of at least three separate experiments. For (A), mean ± SD: MTS20, 34 ± 8.4%; MTS24, 35 ± 9.7%. For (B), mean ± SD: pan K, 74.2 ± 20; K5, 68.5 ± 17; K8, 44.1 ± 5. For (D), mean ± SD: 4F1, 37 ± 6.7%. Immunity 2002 16, 803-814DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00321-7)

Figure 3 Characterization of Purified MTS20+24+ Cells (A) MTS20+24+ cells were purified by flow cytometry, then stained for expression of K5 and K8. The MTS20+24+ population expresses both K5 and K8. (B) Purified MTS20−24− cells were stained for expression of K5 and K8. K5 is expressed by 80% and K8 by 10% of MTS20−24− cells. (C) MTS20+24+ cells were snap frozen immediately after purification and analyzed by immunohistochemistry using anti-pan-cytokeratin (Pan K), MTS10, 4F1, or secondary antibody Immunity 2002 16, 803-814DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00321-7)

Figure 4 Analysis of Grafts Recovered from nude Mice Thymic primordia were dissected from E12.5 embryos and partitioned into MTS20+24+ and MTS20−24− fractions by flow cytometric sorting. Defined numbers of purified cells and primary embryonic fibroblasts were mixed, reaggregated for 24–48 hr in vitro, then grafted under the kidney capsule of nude mice, and left for 3 weeks before analysis. (A) MTS20+24+ cell graft, MTS20−24− cell graft site. (B) Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained section of graft and graft site from (A). (C) MTS20+24+ cell graft stained for pan-cytokeratin (Pan K), 4F1, MTS10, MHC Class II, Thy-1, or secondary Ab only (neg). (A) Scale bars, 1 mm; (B and C) scale bars, 100 μm. Arrows in (A) and (B) point to graft site and to filter paper marking graft site. Box in (B) is area shown in (C). (A), (B), and (C) are representative of at least three experiments. Grafts contained 80,000, 12,500, and 12,500 (shown) MTS20+24+ cells, and 25,000, 12,500, and 12,500 (shown) MTS20−24− cells. Immunity 2002 16, 803-814DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00321-7)

Figure 5 MTS20+24+ Cells Confer Thymus Function on nude Mice Grafts were established as described in Figure 4 and left for 3 weeks (A) or 12–18 weeks (B) before analysis. For analysis, cells were recovered from the graft or pooled from the axillary, inguinal, and popliteal lymph nodes and analyzed for CD3, CD4, and CD8 expression. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of cells recovered from MTS20+24+ cell graft seeded with CD4−8− thymocytes, showing development of CD4 and CD8 single- and double-positive populations. (B) CD4+ and CD8+ T cell populations in the lymph nodes of nude mice grafted with 500 MTS20+24+ cells or intact E12.5 thymus lobes. CD4+ T cell population in the lymph nodes of nude mice grafted with 100,000 dissociated and reaggregated whole E12.5 thymus cells. No distinct T cell populations in lymph nodes from unmanipulated control nude mice. Figures refer to percentage of lymphoid cells in the upper right quadrant of each graph. MTS20+24+ cell grafts, n = 7; whole E12.5 thymus lobe grafts, n = 7; dissociated and reaggregated whole E12.5 thymus cell grafts, n = 9; unmanipulated mice, n = 15. Immunity 2002 16, 803-814DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00321-7)