NEASC Self –Study Appraisal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Entry Requirements for U.S. Accreditation Hellenic American Union, Athens, Greece October, 2007 Jean Avnet Morse President Middle States Commission.
Advertisements

Standard 13 Related Educational Activities. What does it cover? The institutions programs or activities that are characterized by particular content,
Frameworks for Assessment of Student Learning: Questions of Concept, Practice, and Detail Christine Siegel, Ph.D. Associate Professor of School Psychology.
Instructor Teaching Impact. University Writing Program 150 sections of required writing courses per semester, taught by Instructors and GTAs 33 Instructors–
Commission for Academic Accreditation 1 Accreditation and Academic Quality King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals Faculty Workshop Accreditation,
Accreditation Strategy for the BYU CE En Dept. Presentation to External Review Board October 20, 2000.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Guide to Evidence for WASC Accreditation Dr. Robert Gabriner City College of San Francisco Student Learning Outcomes Workshop Strand 3.
Program-level Outcomes Assessment RSC FORENSIC SCIENCE.
Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges of the Western Association of Schools and Colleges.
Direct vs Indirect Assessment of Student Learning: An Introduction Dr. Sheila Handy, Chair Business Management and Co-Chair University Assessment Committee.
Globe University Minnesota School of Business Collaborating with Workforce Centers.
Middle States Accreditation at UB Jason N. Adsit Director, Teaching and Learning Center Michael E. Ryan Director, University Accreditation and Assessment.
Student Learning Outcome Assessment: A Program’s Perspective Ling Hwey Jeng, Director School of Library and Information Studies June 27,
Highlights from Dr. Robin Dasher-Alston To Periodic Review Report Committee November 24, 2003.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
UCF University-wide System for Assessing Student Learning Outcomes Dr. Julia Pet-Armacost Assistant VP, Information, Planning, and Assessment University.
ABET is Coming! What I need to know about ABET, but was afraid to ask.
PRESIDENT’S Campus forum November 9, Dr. Shirley Wagner and Dr. Paul Weizer NEASC Self Study Co-Chairs Key Elements of the Self Study Process Demystifying.
Guide to Evidence for WASC Accreditation Dr. Robert Gabriner City College of San Francisco Student Learning Outcomes.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Accreditation 2007 Undergraduate Council September 26, 2005.
Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, & Students 1. Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students (#82) INTENT STATEMENTS 4.1.
What are students able to demonstrate upon completion of a course? (Not about what instructors provide) Use specific and simple action verbs. Example:
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
Anna Parkman New Faculty Orientation ◦ ACCOUNTABILITY in Higher Education ◦ ASSESSMENT as validation of learning ◦ ASSESSMENT & ACCREDITATION ◦
Performance-Based Accreditation
Dr Camille B. Kandiko King’s College London
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
NCATE Unit Standards 1 and 2
Accreditation and Assessment at Whatcom Community College
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Direct vs Indirect Assessment of Student Learning: An Introduction
Data You Can Use for Accreditation
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
Eastern’s Assessment System
Indirect and Direct Evidence
Quality Assurance of Higher Education Programs:
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
Preparing for the NWCCU 10-year Self-Study
Curriculum and Accreditation
Programme Review Dhaya Naidoo Director: Quality Promotion
Presentation to Board of Trustees
WASC Self Study: A First Look
HLC/Strategic Planning Update Professional Development and Assessment Day August 15, 2017.
Governance and leadership roles for equality and diversity in Colleges
Assessment Committee Meeting Continuous Program Improvement
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Middle States Update to President’s Cabinet October 8, 2018
Assessment Leadership Day Continuous Program Improvement
Program Assessment Processes for Developing and Strengthening
Internship Bill of Rights
PORTERVILLE COLLEGE ACCREDITATION OVERVIEW Fall 2017
Eligibility Requirements and Commission Policies
The Heart of Student Success
UPRM Self-Study for MSCHE
EDUCAUSE MARC 2004 E-Portfolios: Two Approaches for Transforming Curriculum & Promoting Student Learning Glenn Johnson Instructional Designer Penn State.
Task Force Orientation
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Development of Internal Quality Assurance and its Challenges in Taiwan Higher Education from University and Students’ Perspectives Angela Yung Chi Hou.
NEASC Standards Meeting 3/2/17.
Open Forum Founder’s Hall 12/5/2016
Open Forum SC Sprague Carleton 10/19/2017
Key Elements of the Self Study Process
Institutional Self Evaluation Report Team Training
Get on Board: Reaffirmation 2016
Presentation transcript:

NEASC Self –Study Appraisal

Appraisal The Heart of the Document Make sure that the self-study content includes all students, all locations, all modalities of instruction, and any planned substantive changes. Full- and parttime, residential and commuter, off-campus, correspondence, and online students Services and programs are held to the same standard of quality, no matter where in the institution they take place.

Appraisal A thorough analysis and evaluation of institutional practices in a given area, recognizing both achievements and areas for improvement. It should include sufficient evidence so that the reader understands the basis on which the evaluation has been made. This critical and candid self-judgment forms the single most significant internal activity in the entire self-study process. Requires deliberation and critical thinking. The visiting team and the Commission will pay particular attention to the judgments made in the Appraisal section, for these provide insight into the internal planning and management of the institution's resources to achieve its objectives. Equally important, the Appraisal section demonstrates the accuracy of the institution's selfimage and its integrity in identifying areas for improvement.

WHAT ARE THE STANDARDS FOR ACCREDITATION? An articulation by the higher education community of what a college or university must do in order to deserve the public trust Quality assurance Quality improvement A framework for institutional development and self-evaluation candor candor candor candor candor candor candor candor

General Advice Periodically re-read the standard Begin with Evidence Include all operations Include all student bodies and programs Tell our unique story Gather material for the workroom now Start working with Kirby to be sure the documents are online

DOCUMENTS OF APPRAISAL Reviews of mission statement Board self-evaluations Studies of student achievement and success Evaluations of advising system Analyses of student participation in athletics, arts, student government Satisfaction surveys, course evaluations Evaluations of management information systems, reliability, security Cost/revenue studies by location, program, mission element Evaluations of use and effectiveness of policies and procedures Program reviews of academic and non-academic units Placement studies of graduates Studies of alumni accomplishments, IT proficiency, AHANA programs Impact studies of endowment, community service, financial aid Analysis of retention and graduation of specific populations (e.g., firstgeneration,transfer students, online students, athletes) Records and reports regarding institutional handling of student complaints

Methods that can provide DIRECT EVIDENCE of student learning • Locally developed tests administered program- or institution-wide • Standardized tests • Pre- and post-tests • Essay tests blind scored across units • Internally and externally juried review of student projects, internships • Performance on national licensure examinations • Collections of student work (e.g., portfolios) • Course-embedded assessment

Methods that can provide INDIRECT EVIDENCE of student learning • Alumni and employer surveys • Student surveys, focus groups • Exit interviews with graduates • Participation rates in internships, study abroad, other enrichment programs • Graduate follow-up studies • Percentage of students who go on to graduate school • Admission rates to selective programs at the higher degree • Student performance in disciplinary and professional competitions • Retention and transfer studies; job placement statistics

Simply collecting evidence of student learning is insufficient.

UPCOMING DEADLINES and dates Dec 5, 2016 - First Open Forum 1-3 (Founders Hall) Jan 30, 2017- Standards team appraisal statements due March 2, 2017- Meeting of all standards chairs and teams March 6, 2017- 2nd Open Forum April 13, 2017- Standard teams projection statements due