The Swedish Higher Education Sector

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bologna Process at the University of Helsinki University of Helsinki June 2005
Advertisements

Faculty of Health & Social Work Using Credit for Good Curriculum Design Presentation Revisit original objectives Impact of Credit on the Curriculum Who.
Axel Aerden 17 April Set up in the framework of the Bologna Process Bi-national organisation Established by treaty Safeguards for independence procedures,
Tempus Bitola, 8/ pag. 1 Quality Assurance at Ghent University (Flanders)
Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.
“Articulating the work on NQF, QA and recognition ” JULY 2008, Cetinje.
Tempus Workshop Zagreb pag. 1 Quality Assurance in Higher Education Flanders in a European Context.
HRK HRK Hochschulrektorenkonferenz 1 Higher Education in Germany Current Status and Challenges German-South African Rectors’ Forum 15 April 2013, Leipzig.
EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSURANCE of Norwegian Higher Education
University of Vienna Rectorate – Office of the Rectorate May 30, 2008 Claudia Kögler University of Vienna, Office of the Rectorate.
The quality assurance system in Sweden Håkan Hult Linköping University Gdansk March 13, 2009.
The participation of Polytechnics in the European Higher Education Area
Bologna Process in Finland (Observations on the Bologna Process in Russia) Dr. Carita Blomqvist Head of Unit Recognition and international comparability.
Quality assurance in higher education in Croatia – standards, procedures, results Đurđica Dragojević & Emita Blagdan Agency for Science and Higher Education.
Challenges of Higher Education in Cyprus Efstathios Michael Senior Education Officer Department of Higher and Tertiary Education Ministry of education.
CYPRUS-AUSTRIA JOINT COMMITTEE MEETING 6-7 October 1011 “ Collaboration between Austrian and Cypriot Organizations ” Dr Despina Martidou-Forcier Acting.
HOW CAN YOU HELP EMU TOWARDS INSTITUTIONAL EVALUATION BY EUA?
The evaluation of research units at HCERES
BOLOGNA PROCESSES On June 19, 1999, 29 European Ministers of Education signed a declaration in the oldest town of Bologna. By signing the document the.
Quality Assurance System in Croatia – National Council for Higher Education Aleksa Bjeliš Zagreb, 29 May 2004.
Rogaška Slatina 30. november- 1. december 2007 ESTABLISHING EXTERNAL QA SYSTEM IN SLOVENIA Franci Čuš Marinka Drobnič Košorok.
Validation of Non-formal Adult Education courses REACTION No CP LT-GRUNDTVIG-G1.
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
1 External evaluation of Higher Education in the Netherlands and Flanders (case NVAO) Dr ir Guy Aelterman Graz, 11 May 2006.
Quality Assurance in the European HEA Enrique Lopez-Veloso University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain Agustin Merino National Team of Bologna Experts.
Ministry of Education and Research Sweden Changing direction of the national QA system for HEI in Sweden Greater autonomy means increased responsibility.
“Modernizing the 3rd cycle at the University of Prishtina and Developing a PhD Program at the Faculty of Economics” Project number:
Akkreditierungsrat The German System of Accreditation Franz Börsch Accreditation Council Office SYSTEM OBJECTIVES STANDARDS PROCEDURE.
Overview of developments of HE reforms in Montenegro Podgorica, September 28, 2007 (Tempus SCM CO32B06 “West Balkan Bologna Promoters Network”)
University of Zagreb Aleksa Bjeliš Vice-rector for science and development 29 October 2004.
BOLOGNA PROCESS Operates following the mission of “creation of academic community of teachers, researchers, artists, and students, incorporated.
Quality Assurance at the University of Arts in Belgrade Novi Pazar, 14 th February 2011 Olga Stanković General Secretary.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN BULGARIAN HIGHER EDUCATION Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov Sofia University March 30, 2012.
WHAT MAKES A SUCCESSFUL QUALITY ASSURANCE AGENCY? CEENQA WORKSHOP FRIDAY, 23 MAY 2014 Hotel Sirius-Pristina.
 Miločer, July 5,  The Law on Higher Education was adopted by the Parliament in October 21, 2003  This Law regulates the bases of higher education,
Legal framework for student participatiing in decison making process in Serbia V. Dondur University of Belgrade-Faculty of physical chemistry CAQA, HERE.
Strengths and weaknesses of the implementation of the Bologna Process: Spain Round Table Bratislava,10-12 October Guillermo Bernabeu, University of Alicante.
Quality Assurance Agency in the Republic of Moldova PhD Nadejda Velico, Head for higher education department, Ministry of Education Ministry of Education,
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
1 FIRST STAGE OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM IN CROATIA – TASKS OF AUTHORISED BODIES.
An overview in slides. A: the intergovernmental process Step 1: Sorbonne Declaration 1998 Step 2: Bologna Declaration 1999 Step 3: Prague Communiqué 2001.
Professor Bob Johnson, Commissioner for Credit Rating, ECBE European Council for Business Education ECBE Accreditation.
Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman /27 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY.
University of Tirana. The University of Tirana was founded on 16 September 1957 under the name of State University of Tirana. The State University of.
Golden Sands – 16 June 2009 By Magda Kirsch (Educonsult Hans Daale (LEIDO) 1 QA in HE - Varna 2009.
Bologna Process in Croatia Melita Kovačević University of Zagreb Consortia Meeting of the Tempus Project UM-JEP Moving Ahead with the Bologna Process.
The Bologna Process at the University of Helsinki University of Helsinki
Four CPRs.: Crosscutting issues Almaty, April 17, 2006.
The Bologna Process in Finland and at Åbo Akademi University Timetable Feed-back from the universities on the PM from the Ministry of Education.
Andy Gibbs Yerevan 2009 Winter School “Promoting European Dimension in Higher Education”
Institutional development and evaluation 09. June 2016.
Some business of External QA: Transparency (reports), measuring impacts, follow up implementation, expected benefits, strategies for the future Josep Grifoll.
Higher Education in Azerbaijan Quality Assurance Arrangements Helsinki, 10 June 2016.
Higher Education and Training Awards Council
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
High quality Doctoral programmes
Reforming higher education in Europe, The Role of Qualifications Frameworks Mogens Berg Former chair of the Bologna Working Group Belgrade, 1 November.
From Quality Control to Quality Development
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
From programme accreditation to quality assessment of study programme groups Heli Mattisen
SUPERVISION IN DOCTORAL EDUCATION AT UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA
Bulgaria Higher Education System
Bishkek, March 10th, 2017 Ole Espen Rakkestad, NOKUT
Quality Assurances System. Where we came from and where we are now
Key Results of the Twinning Project AZ-ad-EHEA Baku 29 August 2017 Helka Kekäläinen, PhD Heli Mattisen, PhD Project Leaders.
Indicators&Criteria in External Quality Assessment
Student Involvement in Quality Assurance in Higher Education
Reforming higher education in Europe, The Role of Qualifications Frameworks Mogens Berg Former chair of the Bologna Working Group Yerevan, 8 September.
Presentation transcript:

The Swedish Higher Education Sector April 2017 KTH Lennart Ståhle

What is a University? The ”Guild nature of” mediveal European universities: The word ”university” ”universitas” in mediveal latin means ”guild” and a correct translation of ”universitas magistrorum et scolarium” is the ”guild of teachers and students”. Early universities up to 1800 were education institutions. Research is introduced relatively late in the university system. Is the 200 year ”Berlin contract” of freedom of speech, teaching and research is it thereatend by the moves toward more autonomy? 2019-09-09

University autonomy – academic freedom University autonomy refers to the governace of the institution. In the European debate it ususally refers to autonomy from the state. Academic freedom refers to postion of the individual teacher and or resercher with in the system. An autonomus institution can threaten the academic freedom but so can also centrally governed institution. 2019-09-09

The Swedish higher education sector 14 Universities 14 UniversityColleges 4 Art Colleges 13 ”Semi-private” institutions There is no formal accreditation of institutions. The government decides about the foundation of state institutions. The Swedish Higher Education Authority decides about accreditation of degrees. 2019-09-09

Higher education institutions - universities A university is a HEI that has been given the right to award doctoral degrees in all subjects and at all faculties. A university has also consequently the right to award bachelors and masters degrees in all subjects and at all faculties. Universities have also the right to award professional degrees according the decision of The Swedish National Agency for Higher Education 2019-09-09

University colleges 14 University colleges (UC) A University college is a HEI that has been given the right to award degrees a undergraduate level. UC´s have also the right to award professional degrees according the decision of The Swedish Higher Education Authority. They have also the possibility to award PhD´s within a defined area of research. 2019-09-09

Colleges of art 4 University colleges of Art. All situated in Stockholm Speccialised in one art form each: dance, music, paniting, opera, crafts / design, and film / radio/ television production They have all right to award a Bachelors and a Masters degree in art Small in number of students 600 - 35 Art education is also carried out at some universities and university colleges. 2019-09-09

Students The Sector is still growing when it comes to number of students, staff and economy. 357 000 students at first and second cycles programmes and 70 000 degrees 19 000 students at third cycle (PhD programmes) and 3 300 2 500 PhD degrees 2019-09-09

”Semi – private” instituions 13 institutions of varied size Two of them former state institutions: Chalmers Institute of Technolgy and The University College of Jönköping One: Stockholm School of Business is the oldest independent HE institution 10 rather small institutions: 2 nursing schools (belonging to The Red Cross and a private hospital, 1 design school and 7 schools closely connetected to religious (Christian) churches. They have the right to award specific degrees according to the Higher Education Ordinance after application to the goverment and accreditation. 2019-09-09

Staff Research and teaching staff: 29 200 5 089 professors - 25% vomen 8 581 senior lecturers - 46% women 2019-09-09

Students 343 344 students - 60% women, 40% men. 18 433 PhD students - 47% women, 53% men. 2019-09-09

The Bolognadeclaration The degree structure should be transparent and internationally comparable The degree struture should be divided in two/ three cycles ECTS should be introduced to enhance student mobility Obstsacles for mobility of students and staff should e removed The European cooperation in quality assurance should increase The European dimension in Higher Education 2019-09-09

University Diploma (120 ECTS) University Diploma In Fine Arts First cycle: University Diploma (120 ECTS) University Diploma In Fine Arts Bachelor (180 ECTS) Bachelor in Fine Arts 20 Professional Degrees (120 – 180 ECTS) 2019-09-09

Master (60 ECTS) in Fine Arts Master (120 ECTS) Second cycle: Master (60 ECTS) Master (60 ECTS) in Fine Arts Master (120 ECTS) Master (120 ECTS) in Fine Arts 15 Professional Degrees (60 and 120 ECTS) 2019-09-09

Licentiate degree (2 years) Doctoral degree (4 years) Third cycle Licentiate degree (2 years) Doctoral degree (4 years) 2019-09-09

The degree system and Bologna process 2019-09-09

The standard consists of - a general discription ”Scope” - Outcomes Every degree has a ”standard”, decided by thr government in an annex to the Higher Education Ordinance. The standard consists of - a general discription ”Scope” - Outcomes - Knowledge and understanding - Competence and skills - Judgement and approach - Independent project (degree project) 2019-09-09

The degree diploma should contain: The name of the degree The level of the degree The courses The name of the Higher Education Institution where the courses have been examined A Diploma supplement should be attached to the degree diploma 2019-09-09

Higher education degrees 46 887 General degrees (Diploma, Bachelor and Master) 1 815Diploma 56% women - 44% men 28 475 Bachelor 64% women - 36% men 16 607 Master 47% women -53% men 972 Art degrees 59% women - 41% me 33 014 Professional degrees 67% women – 33% men 2 835 PhD degrees 47% women – 53% men 2019-09-09

Governance state institutions Higher Education Act (decided by the parliamnet) Higher Education Ordinance (decideed by the government) 2019-09-09

Funding – state institutions It is the parliament, after proposal from the government (MOE), who decides about the budget to the institutions. Student numbers and performance determine funding for undergraduate teaching. The oucomes of quality evaluations are also an important factor. Fundin postgraduate programmes and research performanceindicators: publications, external funding. 2019-09-09

Governance – governing body All institutions must have a governing board of 15 persons: 8 members appointed by the government after suggestion form the HEI (rector) 3 representatives of the academic staff 3 representatives of the students and The rector 2019-09-09

The governing board decides about: The over all budget of the institution The organisation Budget proposals to the government The annual report and Proposal for the position as rector The board has no influence in academic matters 2019-09-09

Governance ”semi – private” institutions No regulations from the state except for admission rules. Annual contract with the state about their education (according to HEO) and the reimbursement for their accreditated education. 2019-09-09

Quality Assurance – Why? Increasing competition nationally and internationally Expectations from stakeholders The rapid growth of Higher Education and investment in HE demands that quality must be shown International mobility and recognition of degrees 2019-09-09

HOW CAN YOU PROVE QUALITY? Quality of a course Quality of a programme Quality of a degree Quality of an institution HOW CAN YOU PROVE QUALITY? Quality assurance’ is a generic term in higher education which lends itself to many interpretations: It is not possible to use one definition to cover all circumstances. 2019-09-09

That this work is developed at all levels in the institution. It is you as a HEI that have the responsibility to develop your own quality assurance system. To prove quality you must show that you have developed an internal quality assurance process. You must show that your institution contiuning work with quality assurance questions and That this work is developed at all levels in the institution. 2019-09-09

External Quality asuurance Carried out by an external independent body Diffirent ways to organise the quality assurance nationally. In Sweden the government has given the task to the Swedish Authority of Higher Education. 2019-09-09

The Swedish case Four pahses/ cycles of QA. QA is focussed on education and teaching. The institutions do carry out evaluation of research and administration. A modern quality assurance system includes all aspects of the operations of the institution. 2019-09-09

First phase Quality assurance and evaluation was introduced in 1993. The office of the University Chancellor (UC) was given the task. Evaluation of quality assurance systems of the institutions. - Self evaluation - External panel with students - Written report to the UC with recommendation. - Decsion by the UC: acceptable or non acceptable. Good examples. 2019-09-09

Second Phase QA system based on accreditation and control. The system looked into the prerequisites and processes: - Teacher competence including gender composition - Physical facilities - Internationalisation - Teaching methods Thematic studies: internationalisation, equuality, student participation etc. 2019-09-09

Important components: - Self evaluation - Peer review - Site visits with interviews - Written report to the UC If quality was considered to be in danger or insuffcient the right to award a degree could be withdrawn. 2019-09-09

Third phase Three main components: Granting degree awarding powers (accreditation) Evaluation of study programs and courses leading up to a degree. Evaluation of PhD programs should be included. 2019-09-09

Peer review with assessment panels: Subject experts Students Representatives from working life 2019-09-09

The students’ degree projects Self-evaluations of higher education institutions Student experiences Questionnaires sent to alumni Web based interviews (Site visits) 2019-09-09

The result of the assesment: The panel of assessors should give an overall appraisal of the study programme’s quality on a three-level scale: Very high quality High quality Inadequate quality The formal decision is made by the University Chancellor. 2019-09-09

Follow-up after one year. If the assessment of a study programme reveals inadequate quality, the HEIs right to award the degree is questioned. Follow-up after one year. If no improvement – The Agency withdraws the HEIs right to award the degree. 2019-09-09

Fourth phase Examination of the quality assurance system for education Accreditation of new programmes Review of existing programmes Thematic reviews Proposal from the government: Evaluation of research 2019-09-09