Enhancement of BLM-DNA2-Mediated Long-Range DNA End Resection by CtIP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplementary Figures
Advertisements

Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages e7 (September 2017)
BRCA1 Is Associated with a Human SWI/SNF-Related Complex
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Reconstitution of an Argonaute-Dependent Small RNA Biogenesis Pathway Reveals a Handover Mechanism Involving the RNA Exosome and the Exonuclease QIP 
Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40  John R Glover, Susan Lindquist  Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages e4 (July 2018)
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Dimers Probe the Assembly Status of Multimeric Membrane Proteins 
UV-Induced RPA1 Acetylation Promotes Nucleotide Excision Repair
Feng Zhang, Jiazhong Shi, Chunjing Bian, Xiaochun Yu  Cell Reports 
Sherilyn Grill, Valerie M. Tesmer, Jayakrishnan Nandakumar 
Volume 91, Issue 2, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (June 2016)
SUMO Signaling by Hypoxic Inactivation of SUMO-Specific Isopeptidases
Class C Vps Protein Complex Regulates Vacuolar SNARE Pairing and Is Required for Vesicle Docking/Fusion  Trey K. Sato, Peter Rehling, Michael R. Peterson,
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Monica Kong-Beltran, Jennifer Stamos, Dineli Wickramasinghe 
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 69, Issue 3, Pages e5 (February 2018)
The Role of NEDD1 Phosphorylation by Aurora A in Chromosomal Microtubule Nucleation and Spindle Function  Roser Pinyol, Jacopo Scrofani, Isabelle Vernos 
Javier Sánchez-Pozo, Alexander J. Baker-Williams, Mark R
The Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Interacts with RNA to Suppress Transcription-Coupled 3′ End Formation  Syuzo Kaneko, James L. Manley 
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Frida E. Kleiman, James L. Manley  Cell 
The Gemin5 Protein of the SMN Complex Identifies snRNAs
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Autoantigen La Promotes Efficient RNAi, Antiviral Response, and Transposon Silencing by Facilitating Multiple-Turnover RISC Catalysis  Ying Liu, Huiling.
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
SUMOylation of Psmd1 Controls Adrm1 Interaction with the Proteasome
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages e3 (February 2019)
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Mst1 Is an Interacting Protein that Mediates PHLPPs' Induced Apoptosis
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Eaf3 Chromodomain Interaction with Methylated H3-K36 Links Histone Deacetylation to Pol II Elongation  Amita A. Joshi, Kevin Struhl  Molecular Cell  Volume.
Two Distinct Modes of ATR Activation Orchestrated by Rad17 and Nbs1
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Shrestha Ghosh, Baohua Liu, Yi Wang, Quan Hao, Zhongjun Zhou 
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Regulation of Yeast mRNA 3′ End Processing by Phosphorylation
14-3-3γ phosphorylated at S59 by Lats2 in response to UV damage.
Sebastian Rumpf, Stefan Jentsch  Molecular Cell 
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Antonio Porro, Sascha Feuerhahn, Joachim Lingner  Cell Reports 
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
Figure 6. Protein-protein interactions
Mapping the Pirh2 and p73 interaction sites.
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
CDK Phosphorylation of Translation Initiation Factors Couples Protein Translation with Cell-Cycle Transition  Tai An, Yi Liu, Stéphane Gourguechon, Ching.
Volume 15, Issue 19, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Presentation transcript:

Enhancement of BLM-DNA2-Mediated Long-Range DNA End Resection by CtIP James M. Daley, Judit Jimenez-Sainz, Weibin Wang, Adam S. Miller, Xiaoyu Xue, Kevin A. Nguyen, Ryan B. Jensen, Patrick Sung  Cell Reports  Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 324-332 (October 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.048 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 21, 324-332DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.048) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Effects of CtIP on DNA Unwinding by BLM-RPA and Resection by BLM-RPA-DNA2 (A) The effect of CtIP (20, 40, or 60 nM) on the unwinding of 2-kb dsDNA (0.5 nM ends) by BLM (5 or 10 nM) and RPA (200 nM) was examined. The incubation time was 20 min. In lane 1, the DNA was heat denatured (HD). (B) CtIP (20, 40, or 60 nM) was incubated with BLM (20 nM) and RPA (20 or 50 nM) and the DNA substrate for 20 min. (C) Sae2 (20 or 60 nM) or CtIP (20 or 60 nM) was incubated with Sgs1 (20 nM), yeast RPA (100 nM), and the substrate for 20 min. (D) BLM (20 nM) and RPA (100 nM) were incubated with the DNA substrate for 2 min. Then, a 10-fold excess of unlabeled DNA was added with CtIP (115 nM). The average of three experiments is shown, and error bars represent 1 SD (the error bars are smaller than the graph symbol at some data points). (E) Reconstituted resection assay in which BLM (20 nM), RPA (200 nM), and DNA2 (30 nM) were incubated with the substrate with or without CtIP (80 nM). The products identified by the bracket were quantified. The error bars in the graphs represent the SD of results from three independent experiments. Cell Reports 2017 21, 324-332DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.048) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Interaction of BLM with CtIP (A) Amylose pull-down was performed with extracts from cells expressing 2xMBP- and HA-tagged CtIP and BLM. The target protein was detected by blotting with anti-HA antibodies. 2xMBP-BRCA1 was included as a positive control for CtIP pull-down. (B) Immunoprecipitation with CtIP antibodies was performed, and co-immunoprecipitating BLM was detected by western blotting with anti-BLM antibodies. Immunoprecipitates were washed with buffer containing the indicated KCl concentration. (C) CtIP immobilized on anti-FLAG resin was incubated with HIS-tagged BLM, and proteins were eluted from the resin and analyzed by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie blue staining. S, supernatant; W, wash; E, eluate. (D) CtIP and BLM deletion mutants used. (E and F) Pull-down using full-length CtIP (E) or deletion mutants (F) deletion mutants immobilized on FLAG beads as in (C). (G) CtIP deletion mutants were tested for their effect on BLM-mediated DNA unwinding as in Figure 1A using 12 nM BLM, 200 nM RPA, and 15, 30, or 60 nM of the CtIP species. Error bars indicate one SD. Cell Reports 2017 21, 324-332DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.048) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Effect of CtIP on DNA2 Activity (A) The Y substrate (2.5 nM; with the radiolabel denoted by the asterisk) was incubated with DNA2 (2 nM), alone or with RPA (5 nM) and/or CtIP (40 nM). Error bars indicate one SD. (B) Same as (A), but note the position of the radiolabel (denoted by the asterisk) in the substrate. (C) Same as (A), but note the radiolabel (denoted by the asterisk) in the substrate. The DNA2 concentration was 5 nM. Error bars indicate one SD. (D) Same as (A), except Sae2 (40 nM), yeast Dna2 (2 nM), and yeast RPA (5 nM) were tested. Error bars indicate one SD. Cell Reports 2017 21, 324-332DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.048) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Testing of the CtIP-L27E Mutant (A) CtIP or CtIP-L27E (20, 40, or 60 nM) was incubated with BLM (5 nM) and RPA (200 nM) as in Figure 1A. The p values testing for statistical significance between wild-type (WT) and L27E were 0.35, 0.49, and 0.46 for each concentration of CtIP. (B) CtIP-L27E (40 nM) was incubated with DNA2 (2 nM) as in Figure 3A. The p values were 0.49, 0.50, 0.49, and 0.46 for each time point. (C) CtIP or CtIP-L27E (45 nM), BLM (30 nM), DNA2 (30 nM), and RPA (200 nM) were incubated with the internally radiolabeled 2-kb dsDNA substrate as in Figure 1E. (D) Model showing roles of CtIP in both initiation of resection by MRN and long-range resection mediated by BLM-DNA2. Error bars indicate one SD. Cell Reports 2017 21, 324-332DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.048) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions