Pervasive Targeting of Nascent Transcripts by Hfq

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Microprocessor Activity Controls Differential miRNA Biogenesis In Vivo
Advertisements

Volume 20, Issue 13, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 59, Issue 3, Pages (August 2015)
Roger B. Deal, Steven Henikoff  Developmental Cell 
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Transient N-6-Methyladenosine Transcriptome Sequencing Reveals a Regulatory Role of m6A in Splicing Efficiency  Annita Louloupi, Evgenia Ntini, Thomas.
Volume 68, Issue 1, Pages e5 (October 2017)
Hi-C Analysis in Arabidopsis Identifies the KNOT, a Structure with Similarities to the flamenco Locus of Drosophila  Stefan Grob, Marc W. Schmid, Ueli.
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
MYO5A Gene Is a Target of MITF in Melanocytes
John T. Arigo, Kristina L. Carroll, Jessica M. Ames, Jeffry L. Corden 
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Adrien Le Thomas, Georgi K. Marinov, Alexei A. Aravin  Cell Reports 
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
An RpaA-Dependent Sigma Factor Cascade Sets the Timing of Circadian Transcriptional Rhythms in Synechococcus elongatus  Kathleen E. Fleming, Erin K. O’Shea 
Sean A. Lynch, Shawn K. Desai, Hari Krishna Sajja, Justin P. Gallivan 
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
NanoRNAs Prime Transcription Initiation In Vivo
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Alterations in mRNA 3′ UTR Isoform Abundance Accompany Gene Expression Changes in Human Huntington’s Disease Brains  Lindsay Romo, Ami Ashar-Patel, Edith.
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e4 (May 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
DNA Looping Facilitates Targeting of a Chromatin Remodeling Enzyme
Polycomb Responds to Low Levels of Transcription
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (July 2017)
Nicholas R. Pannunzio, Michael R. Lieber  Cell Reports 
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (November 2017)
Fig. 3 Conserved genomic association of PRC1 activity in different leukemic cells. Conserved genomic association of PRC1 activity in different leukemic.
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e7 (August 2018)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (October 2018)
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Nucleoporin Nup98 Associates with Trx/MLL and NSL Histone-Modifying Complexes and Regulates Hox Gene Expression  Pau Pascual-Garcia, Jieun Jeong, Maya.
Sean A. Lynch, Shawn K. Desai, Hari Krishna Sajja, Justin P. Gallivan 
ChAP-MS: A Method for Identification of Proteins and Histone Posttranslational Modifications at a Single Genomic Locus  Stephanie D. Byrum, Ana Raman,
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Multiplex Enhancer Interference Reveals Collaborative Control of Gene Regulation by Estrogen Receptor α-Bound Enhancers  Julia B. Carleton, Kristofer.
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages e8 (May 2019)
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
Condensin and Hmo1 Mediate a Starvation-Induced Transcriptional Position Effect within the Ribosomal DNA Array  Danni Wang, Andres Mansisidor, Gayathri.
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (June 2018)
Mutant TERT promoter displays active histone marks and distinct long-range interactions: A, cell lines that were used in the study with their origin and.
Volume 150, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Composition and Function of Mutant Swi/Snf Complexes
Presentation transcript:

Pervasive Targeting of Nascent Transcripts by Hfq Tracy K. Kambara, Kathryn M. Ramsey, Simon L. Dove  Cell Reports  Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 1543-1552 (May 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.134 Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2018 23, 1543-1552DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.134) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Hfq Associates with Hundreds of Nascent Transcripts in P. aeruginosa (A) Schematic of ChIPPAR approach. (B) Hfq-V enrichment peaks at the indicated genomic locations in mid-log grown cells prior to rifampicin treatment (−rif) or following rifampicin treatment (+rif). Genomic location in base pairs is provided at the top of each of the three panels. Genes are indicated by yellow bars at the bottom of each panel. Significantly enriched peaks are indicated by dark gray boxes below the read density plot (red lines within these dark gray boxes indicate site of maximum enrichment). (C) Effect of rifampicin on enrichment of Hfq-V at 200 locations as determined by ChIP-seq. Maximum fold enrichment of Hfq-V at 200 most highly enriched regions in cells that were not treated with rifampicin (−rif, dark red bars) overlayed with fold enrichment at the corresponding genomic location in cells following rifampicin treatment (+rif, light red bars). (D) Fold enrichment of Hfq-V at the indicated locations as determined by ChIP-qPCR in cells with (+) or without (−) rifampicin (rif). Throughout the figures, error bars denote SD. (E) Western blot analysis of the effect of rifampicin treatment (indicated +rif) on the abundance of Hfq-V. RNAP α subunit was used as a loading control. (F) Location of Hfq-V enrichment peaks in a 1 kb window relative to the predicted translation start (indicated ATG) of closest gene. Peaks are shown from top to bottom in decreasing order of maximum fold enrichment. Darker color represents greater fold enrichment values according to the key at the bottom of the figure. See also Figures S1 and S4 and Tables S1 and S2. Cell Reports 2018 23, 1543-1552DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.134) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Crc Associates with Nascent Transcripts Targeted by Hfq (A) Crc-V enrichment peaks at the indicated genomic locations in mid-log grown cells prior to rifampicin treatment (−rif) or following rifampicin treatment (+rif). Genomic location in base pairs is provided at the top of each of the three panels. Genes are indicated by yellow bars at the bottom of each panel. Significantly enriched peaks are indicated by dark gray boxes below the read density plot (red lines within dark gray boxes indicate site of maximum enrichment). (B) Fold enrichment of Crc-V at the indicated locations as determined by ChIP-qPCR in cells with (+) or without (−) rifampicin (rif). (C) Western blot analysis of the effect of rifampicin treatment (indicated +rif) on the abundance of Crc-V. RNAP α subunit was used as a loading control. (D) Location of Crc-V enrichment peaks in a 1-kb window relative to the predicted translation start (indicated ATG) of closest gene. Peaks are shown from top to bottom in decreasing order of maximum fold enrichment. Darker color represents greater fold enrichment values according to the key at the bottom of the figure. See also Figure S2 and Table S3. Cell Reports 2018 23, 1543-1552DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.134) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Hfq and Crc Influence One Another’s Association with Nascent Transcripts (A) Fold enrichment of Crc-V at the indicated locations determined by ChIP-qPCR in cells with or without hfq. Values obtained with PAO1 Crc-V cells are indicated WT (dark blue bars), whereas values obtained with PAO1 Δhfq Crc-V mutant cells are indicated Δhfq (light blue bars). (B) Western blot comparing Crc-V abundance in cells used for qPCR in (A). (C) Fold enrichment of Hfq-V at the indicated locations determined by ChIP-qPCR in cells with or without crc. Values obtained with PAO1 Hfq-V cells are indicated WT (dark red bars), whereas values obtained with PAO1 Δcrc Hfq-V mutant cells are indicated Δcrc (light red bars). (D) Western blot comparing Hfq-V abundance in cells used for qPCR in (C). RNAP α subunit was used as a loading control (B and D). Cell Reports 2018 23, 1543-1552DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.134) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 rbsB Is Subject to Control by Hfq and Crc (A) β-Galactosidase activity of PAO1 wild-type (WT), PAO1 Δcrc, and PAO1 Δhfq mutant cells containing a plasmid harboring an rbsB-lacZ translational fusion. (B) β-Galactosidase activity of PAO1 wild-type (WT), PAO1 Δcrc, and PAO1 Δhfq mutant cells containing a plasmid harboring a rbsB-lacZ transcriptional fusion. (C) Western blot of RbsB-V abundance in cells containing the native rbsB CA site. Cells used are PAO1 RbsB-V (WT), PAO1 Δcrc RbsB-V (Δcrc), PAO1 Δhfq RbsB-V (Δhfq), and PAO1 Δcrc hfq RbsB-V (Δcrc hfq). PAO1 wild-type cells (indicated cntrl) do not contain RbsB-V and were used as a negative control. Bar graph shows quantitation of RbsB-V abundance in indicated cells relative to levels in WT from a representative experiment performed with biological triplicate samples. (D) Western blot of RbsB-V abundance in cells of the indicated strain background containing the mutant rbsB CA site (CA∗). Cells used are PAO1 CA∗ RbsB-V (CA∗), PAO1 Δcrc CA∗ RbsB-V (Δcrc CA∗), PAO1 Δhfq CA∗ RbsB-V (Δhfq CA∗), and PAO1 Δcrc hfq CA∗ RbsB-V (Δcrc hfq CA∗). PAO1 wild-type cells (indicated cntrl) were used as a negative control. Bar graph shows quantitation of RbsB-V abundance in indicated cells relative to levels in CA∗ from a representative experiment performed with biological triplicate samples. (E and F) Enrichment of Hfq-V (E) or Crc-V (F) as determined by ChIP-qPCR in cells containing either the WT or mutant rbsB CA motif sequence. Enrichment at bkdA1 was assessed as a negative control. See also Figure S3. Cell Reports 2018 23, 1543-1552DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.134) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions