Julio Vazquez, Andrew S Belmont, John W Sedat  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mitosis and Meiosis Aims:
Advertisements

Cell Division and Mitosis
Meiosis Notes:
1.7 Cell Division.
Meiosis and Sexual Life Cycles. A life cycle is the generation-to- generation sequence of stages in the reproductive history of an organism it starts.
MITOSIS.
Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Visualization of trans-Homolog Enhancer-Promoter Interactions at the Abd-B Hox Locus in the Drosophila Embryo  Matthew Ronshaugen, Mike Levine  Developmental.
Cellular Division Mitosis and Meiosis.
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 13, Pages (July 2016)
A Family of Zinc-Finger Proteins Is Required for Chromosome-Specific Pairing and Synapsis during Meiosis in C. elegans  Carolyn M. Phillips, Abby F. Dernburg 
Caenorhabditis elegans TAC-1 and ZYG-9 Form a Complex that Is Essential for Long Astral and Spindle Microtubules  Martin Srayko, Sophie Quintin, Anne.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Abby F. Dernburg, John W. Sedat, R.Scott Hawley  Cell 
10-2 Cell Division.
Naomi R. Stevens, Hélio Roque, Jordan W. Raff  Developmental Cell 
10-2 Cell Division.
Rapid De Novo Centromere Formation Occurs Independently of Heterochromatin Protein 1 in C. elegans Embryos  Karen W.Y. Yuen, Kentaro Nabeshima, Karen.
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Nikhila S. Tanneti, Kathryn Landy, Eric F. Joyce, Kim S. McKim 
Mitosis & Meiosis Mr. Davis.
General Animal Biology
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
Sequential Protein Recruitment in C. elegans Centriole Formation
Lecture 6: Cell division
Tendon Cell Array Isolation Reveals a Previously Unknown Fibrillin-2-Containing Macromolecular Assembly  Timothy M. Ritty, Robyn Roth, John E. Heuser 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 24, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (July 2015)
Stages of Meiosis Chapter 10.
Volume 22, Issue 20, Pages (October 2012)
Large Cytoplasm Is Linked to the Error-Prone Nature of Oocytes
A Component of C. elegans Meiotic Chromosome Axes at the Interface of Homolog Alignment, Synapsis, Nuclear Reorganization, and Recombination  Florence.
Differential Activation of the DNA Replication Checkpoint Contributes to Asynchrony of Cell Division in C. elegans Embryos  Michael Brauchle, Karine Baumer,
Volume 89, Issue 2, Pages (April 1997)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Kami Ahmad, Steven Henikoff  Molecular Cell 
Self-Organization of MTOCs Replaces Centrosome Function during Acentrosomal Spindle Assembly in Live Mouse Oocytes  Melina Schuh, Jan Ellenberg  Cell 
Intrinsically Defective Microtubule Dynamics Contribute to Age-Related Chromosome Segregation Errors in Mouse Oocyte Meiosis-I  Shoma Nakagawa, Greg FitzHarris 
Order and Disorder in the Nucleus
Juan Guan, Harrison Liu, Xiaoyu Shi, Siyu Feng, Bo Huang 
Geoffrey J. Guimaraes, Yimin Dong, Bruce F. McEwen, Jennifer G. DeLuca 
Steven Z. DeLuca, Patrick H. O'Farrell  Developmental Cell 
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
The Mitotic Arrest in Response to Hypoxia and of Polar Bodies during Early Embryogenesis Requires Drosophila Mps1  Matthias G. Fischer, Sebastian Heeger,
Volume 20, Issue 17, Pages (September 2010)
Modes of Protein Movement that Lead to the Asymmetric Localization of Partner of Numb during Drosophila Neuroblast Division  Bingwei Lu, Larry Ackerman,
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
CHAPTER 13 MEIOSIS AND SEXUAL LIFE CYCLES
Kinetochore Dynein Is Required for Chromosome Motion and Congression Independent of the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhenye Yang, U. Serdar Tulu, Patricia Wadsworth,
Peripheral, Non-Centrosome-Associated Microtubules Contribute to Spindle Formation in Centrosome-Containing Cells  U.S. Tulu, N.M. Rusan, P. Wadsworth 
A Chromatin Insulator Determines the Nuclear Localization of DNA
Mariola R. Chacón, Petrina Delivani, Iva M. Tolić  Cell Reports 
Conversion of Quiescent Niche Cells to Somatic Stem Cells Causes Ectopic Niche Formation in the Drosophila Testis  Phylis Hétié, Margaret de Cuevas, Erika.
Nicole M. Mahoney, Gohta Goshima, Adam D. Douglass, Ronald D. Vale 
Section A: The Key Roles of Cell Division
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2003)
Paracrine Signaling through the JAK/STAT Pathway Activates Invasive Behavior of Ovarian Epithelial Cells in Drosophila  Debra L. Silver, Denise J. Montell 
Volume 24, Issue 13, Pages (July 2014)
Mi Hye Song, L. Aravind, Thomas Müller-Reichert, Kevin F. O'Connell 
Asymmetric Segregation of PIE-1 in C
Transcriptional and Developmental Functions of the H3
TAC-1, a Regulator of Microtubule Length in the C. elegans Embryo
Abby F. Dernburg, John W. Sedat, R.Scott Hawley  Cell 
Melina Schuh, Christian F. Lehner, Stefan Heidmann  Current Biology 
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Presentation transcript:

The Dynamics of Homologous Chromosome Pairing during Male Drosophila Meiosis  Julio Vazquez, Andrew S Belmont, John W Sedat  Current Biology  Volume 12, Issue 17, Pages 1473-1483 (September 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01090-4

Figure 1 Tracking Homologous Chromosome Pairing Live in the Male Drosophila Germline (A) Chromosomal location of the lacO arrays used in this study (only mapped inserts are shown; see the Experimental Procedures). (B–L) Pairing patterns in the male germline. The number and location of lacO sites is shown above the micrographs. (B and C) In spermatogonia, nuclei from a line heterozygous for three inserts have three distinct spots (B). A higher magnification view is shown in (C). Note that this particular insert on the X is less bright than the autosomal inserts, probably due to internal deletions in the lacO array, and can therefore be recognized. (D–F) The “somatic” pairing of homologous chromosomes in spermatogonia homozygous for a lacO insert on chromosome 2. Note the presence of nuclei with both paired and unpaired chromosomes. (F) shows an enlarged view of a portion of (D). (G–I) Homologous chromosome pairing in spermatocyte nuclei homozygous for a single insert. Fluorescence images show a field of nuclei at (G) different stages of development or representative nuclei at stages (H) S2 or (I) S5. Note the pairing of homologs in early G2 and their separation in late G2. (J–L) The separation of sister chromatids in a line heterozygous for a chromosome with two inserts. Panels show a field of nuclei at (J) different stages or a group of representative nuclei at stage (K) S2 or (L) S5. In early G2, sisters are generally paired, and there is no interaction between different inserts. The arrow in (K) shows two resolved sister loci. In late G2, sisters are separated at all loci. The developmental stages have been described [36]. Each panel is a projection of several optical sections. The location of second chromosome lacO inserts is (D–F and G–I) 57A or (A and B and J–L) 60A and 60F. The location of the X-chromosome insert shown in (A) and (B) was not determined. Distances between GFP spots are consistent with a 30 nm fiber configuration for spermatocyte chromosomes, organized into a random coil ([40] and data not shown). Heterochromatin is represented as a filled box, centromeres are represented as open circles, and lacO inserts are represented as filled circles. In all examples, chromosomes have replicated and consist of two sister chromatids (not shown in diagram). The scale bar represents 5 μm. Current Biology 2002 12, 1473-1483DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01090-4)

Figure 2 Simultaneous Separation of Homologs and Sister Chromatids Occurs before the G2/M Transition (A) A cyst with chromosomes in the process of separation. The line was homozygous for a single insert at position 57A, as diagrammed above the micrograph. Arrows indicate nuclei in which a single chromatid has separated. (B–E) Nuclei heterozygous for a single lacO insert at position 60F were examined in an aly2/aly2 background. Chromatids are paired in early (B and C) G2 and are separated in (D and E) late G2. The scale bar represents 5 μm. Current Biology 2002 12, 1473-1483DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01090-4)

Figure 3 Chromatid Separation Occurs at the S2b/S3 Transition (A–F) (A) A transgenic line heterozygous for a single lacO array at position 57A was analyzed by (B and D) DIC or (C–F) fluorescence microscopy. Stages correspond approximately to (B and C) S2, (D and E) S3, and (F) S5. The scale bar represents 5 μm. Current Biology 2002 12, 1473-1483DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01090-4)

Figure 4 Chromatid Separation Occurs Soon after the Formation of Chromosome Territories Live spermatocytes homozygous for a lacO insert at 57A were stained with Hoechst 33342 to simultaneously detect chromatin and bound GFP-Lac repressor protein (chromatin: red, GFP: green, overlap: yellow). (A–C) A field of nuclei showing either (A) GFP labeling only or (B and C) GFP and Hoechst. (D–J) Representative nuclei at different stages of development. In early stages, chromosomes were generally paired, with ≥95% of nuclei showing a single dot (stage S2a, [D]). (E–G) At the S2b/S3 transition (the earliest stage with distinct chromosome territories), both paired and unpaired chromosomes can be observed. In the later stages (S4 and later, [H–J]) with clearly defined nuclear territories, individual chromatids can be observed. (H) shows a field with two nuclei. (I)–(J) show a magnified view of the two chromosome 2 territories from the nuclei in (H). Note the extensive separation of chromatids in late G2 within the entire chromosome territory. The scale bar represents 5 μm. Current Biology 2002 12, 1473-1483DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01090-4)

Figure 5 Pairing Patterns of Centromeric Regions (A–G) Centromeres were labeled with (A–G) CID-GFP and simultaneously labeled with (B–G) Hoechst 33342. (A) Nonhomologous associations of centromeres in early G2. Examples of nuclei at stage S2, showing different numbers and sizes of dots and indicating the clustering of nonhomologous centromeres (1–3 dots), as well as the separation of homologous centromeres (>4 dots). (B and C) The variable numbers of CID-GFP spots present in early stages get resolved into four spots, as chromosome territories become distinct in early S3. Soon afterwards, individual spots duplicate (arrow in [D]). (E–G) In mature spermatocyte nuclei (late S3–S6), eight centromeric spots can generally be observed, with two spots per chromosome territory. The inset in (F) is a different view of the area indicated by the arrow to show the presence of three GFP spots. CID-GFP is shown in green, chromatin is shown in red, and the overlap is shown in yellow. The scale bar represents 5 μm. Current Biology 2002 12, 1473-1483DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01090-4)

Figure 6 Chromosome Dynamics during the First Meiotic Division Nuclei from a line heterozygous for a double insert on chromosome 2 were tracked by time-lapse microscopy from late prophase through telophase of meiosis I. (A) A diagram of the location of lacO sites (cytological location: 54A and 60F). (B–D) Time-lapse images of a cluster of spermatocyte nuclei at different stages of prometaphase. Images were collected at 10-min intervals. Note the breakdown of the nuclear envelope and the dispersion of nuclear GFP-Lac I in the cytoplasm. (E and F) (E) Three nuclei at or near metaphase. A magnified view of the indicated chromosomes (arrow) is shown in (F). Spots of similar intensities most probably belong to the same chromatid. (G and H) (G) The same cells at telophase. Note the reappearance of nuclear GFP-Lac repressor in the six newly formed secondary spermatocyte nuclei. A magnified view of the indicated nucleus is shown in (H). The arrowhead points to the sister nucleus carrying the unlabeled homolog. Current Biology 2002 12, 1473-1483DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01090-4)

Figure 7 A Model for Meiotic Pairing in Male Drosophila (A) A summary of spermatocyte development. Only nuclei are outlined. Shading indicates chromatin. The formation of chromosome territories marks the beginning of stage S3 [36]. (B) A model for meiotic chromosome pairing in male Drosophila. Pairing patterns of one telocentric and one metacentric chromosome are represented, with their euchromatic regions shown in red and blue, respectively. Heterochromatin is shown in gray. Centromeres are represented as filled circles. We propose that homologous interactions in the euchromatin are responsible for the initiation of meiotic pairing early during spermatocyte development, while heterochromatic regions associate nonspecifically. Separation (sorting) of chromosomes into distinct territories at the beginning of stage S3 in mid-G2 disrupts nonspecific heterochromatic interactions between nonhomologous chromosomes while preserving interactions between heterochromatic regions on homologous chromosomes. At this stage, there is extensive separation of homologs and sister chromatids along the euchromatic chromosome arms. Homologous centromeres also separate, possibly due to microtubule forces (arrows), while sister centromeres remain tightly paired until the second meiotic division. We propose that, in late G2, homologous chromosomes are held together by a non-sequence-specific mechanism (e.g., heterochromatic interactions or chromatid entanglement). These interactions are terminated at anaphase I. Current Biology 2002 12, 1473-1483DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01090-4)