Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages e4 (February 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comprehensive Analysis of Tissue-wide Gene Expression and Phenotype Data Reveals Tissues Affected in Rare Genetic Disorders  Ariel Feiglin, Bryce K. Allen,
Advertisements

M. Fu, G. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Zhang, Z. Huang, B. Yu, F. Meng 
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages (February 2016)
Low Dimensionality in Gene Expression Data Enables the Accurate Extraction of Transcriptional Programs from Shallow Sequencing  Graham Heimberg, Rajat.
Ruth B. McCole, Jelena Erceg, Wren Saylor, Chao-ting Wu  Cell Reports 
John S. Tsang, Margaret S. Ebert, Alexander van Oudenaarden 
Noninvasive Molecular Monitoring in Multiple Myeloma Patients Using Cell-Free Tumor DNA  Giulia Biancon, Silvia Gimondi, Antonio Vendramin, Cristiana.
Christopher R. Cabanski, Vincent Magrini, Malachi Griffith, Obi L
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (February 2017)
Conserved Seed Pairing, Often Flanked by Adenosines, Indicates that Thousands of Human Genes are MicroRNA Targets  Benjamin P. Lewis, Christopher B. Burge,
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages e7 (July 2018)
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Crop Photosynthetic Capacity from Leaf Reflectance Spectra  David Heckmann, Urte Schlüter, Andreas P.M. Weber 
Hi-C Analysis in Arabidopsis Identifies the KNOT, a Structure with Similarities to the flamenco Locus of Drosophila  Stefan Grob, Marc W. Schmid, Ueli.
N6-Methyladenosines Modulate A-to-I RNA Editing
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 11, Pages (June 2017)
Pejman Mohammadi, Niko Beerenwinkel, Yaakov Benenson  Cell Systems 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Translation of Genotype to Phenotype by a Hierarchy of Cell Subsystems
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
A Statistical Description of Plant Shoot Architecture
Yang Liu, Perry Palmedo, Qing Ye, Bonnie Berger, Jian Peng 
Target-Specific Precision of CRISPR-Mediated Genome Editing
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Mapping Global Histone Acetylation Patterns to Gene Expression
Andrew D. Bosson, Jesse R. Zamudio, Phillip A. Sharp  Molecular Cell 
Mapping Gene Expression in Two Xenopus Species: Evolutionary Constraints and Developmental Flexibility  Itai Yanai, Leonid Peshkin, Paul Jorgensen, Marc W.
TED-Seq Identifies the Dynamics of Poly(A) Length during ER Stress
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Fast, Quantitative and Variant Enabled Mapping of Peptides to Genomes
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
John S. Tsang, Margaret S. Ebert, Alexander van Oudenaarden 
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 18, Issue 10, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Sonal S. Joshi, Victoria H. Meller  Current Biology 
NF-κB Dynamics Discriminate between TNF Doses in Single Cells
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages e6 (February 2018)
Systems-wide Identification of cis-Regulatory Elements in Proteins
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Baekgyu Kim, Kyowon Jeong, V. Narry Kim  Molecular Cell 
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages e4 (October 2017)
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Comprehensive Analysis of Tissue-wide Gene Expression and Phenotype Data Reveals Tissues Affected in Rare Genetic Disorders  Ariel Feiglin, Bryce K. Allen,
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2017)
Volume 122, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages (April 2016)
Gene Density, Transcription, and Insulators Contribute to the Partition of the Drosophila Genome into Physical Domains  Chunhui Hou, Li Li, Zhaohui S.
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages e4 (February 2019)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages e4 (July 2017)
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Volume 26, Issue 12, Pages e5 (March 2019)
Maria S. Robles, Sean J. Humphrey, Matthias Mann  Cell Metabolism 
Network-Based Coverage of Mutational Profiles Reveals Cancer Genes
Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation of Human lincRNA Gene Expression
Marijn T.M. van Jaarsveld, Difan Deng, Erik A.C. Wiemer, Zhike Zi 
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Comprehensive Profiling of HIV Antibody Evolution
Joana Pinto Vieira, Julien Racle, Vassily Hatzimanikatis 
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages e3 (December 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 182-193.e4 (February 2017) Explicit Modeling of siRNA-Dependent On- and Off-Target Repression Improves the Interpretation of Screening Results  Andrea Riba, Mario Emmenlauer, Amy Chen, Frederic Sigoillot, Feng Cong, Christoph Dehio, Jeremy Jenkins, Mihaela Zavolan  Cell Systems  Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 182-193.e4 (February 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.01.011 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Systems 2017 4, 182-193.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.01.011) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Design of PheLiM The input consists of transcripts, siRNA sequences, and associated phenotype measurements. siRNA sequences are used to predict off-target downregulation with a miRNA target prediction tool and on-target repression with a linear model that takes into account the position-dependent nucleotide composition, overall A/U content and self-folding energy of the siRNA, the accessibility of the target site, and the stability of the siRNA-target duplex. Gene contributions to phenotype are inferred by partial least-squares regression on a training subset of siRNAs, and principal components are selected such as to maximize the correlation of predicted and measured phenotypes obtained with a seed-disjoint, validation set of siRNAs. The final predictions of gene contributions to the phenotype are obtained by averaging models obtained with different partitions of the siRNAs into training and validation sets. Cell Systems 2017 4, 182-193.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.01.011) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Evaluation of the Accuracy with which Computational Methods Identify the Targeted Pathway Predictions of the indicated computational methods—PheLiM (this study) gespeR (Schmich et al., 2015), mean (see text), HayStack (Buehler et al., 2012), and RSA (König et al., 2007)—were obtained for the four siRNA screening experiments. (A and B) The concordance between a method’s predictions and the expected KEGG pathway was evaluated by the number (A) and the significance of the enrichment (−log10(p value) of the hypergeometric test) (B) of genes from the expected KEGG pathway. (C and D) The total protein-protein interaction score (C) and mean length (number of links) (D) of all the shortest protein-protein interaction paths that linked a predicted gene to genes in the expected pathway in the STRING database (Szklarczyk et al., 2015). (E) The significance of the enrichment (−log10(p value) of the hypergeometric test) of genes found by CRISPR screening to contribute to the phenotype (Table S1) among the top predictions of individual methods. The pathway genes in the top 300 predictions for each method are listed in Table S6. Cell Systems 2017 4, 182-193.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.01.011) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Features Influencing the Relative Performance of Computational Methods (A) Scatterplots of gene contributions to the phenotype estimated by PheLiM and gespeR from BMP and NF-κB screens carried out with low and high concentrations of stimulant. Pearson correlations are consistently high for PheLiM’s estimates but vary over a wide range for gespeR’s estimates. The correlations for the genes from the expected pathway (in red) are significantly higher than for other genes (in black) (p values from the Fisher z transformation: 2.65e-12 for BMP and 3.43e-9 for NF-κB). (B) Comparison between PheLiM and gespeR using off-target predictions by TargetScan (Agarwal et al., 2015), seed-MIRZA-G (Gumienny and Zavolan, 2015), and PITA (Kertesz et al., 2007). (C) Reproducibility of estimated gene contributions to the phenotype generated by gespeR and PheLiM. 30 partitions of the siRNA set into seed-disjoint subsets were generated, predictions were obtained separately with each method for the two subsets, and the distribution of correlation coefficients of gene contributions to phenotype inferred from the two subsets is shown. Cell Systems 2017 4, 182-193.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.01.011) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison of PheLiM and CRISPR/Cas9 Targets Scatterplots of PheLiM and CRISPR scores inferred for individual genes in the four experimental conditions. Red dots identify genes within the targeted pathways and blue dots identify the genes with the highest 100 PPI scores with all genes in the targeted pathway. Black lines separate top 1% targets inferred with the two methods and the black arc shows the 1% contour line of the two-dimensional histogram of scores. Cell Systems 2017 4, 182-193.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.01.011) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Identification of Pathways Involved in a Wide Range of Phenotypes Plots show the normalized ratio of the contribution to (A) SMAD2 translocation, (B) survival of myeloma cells, and (C) the number of cells of genes within a specific pathway compared to all other genes on the x axis and the p value calculated through the Browne-Forsythe (BF) test on the y axis (Brown and Forsythe, 1974; Levene, 1961) (pathways with p values in the variance test < 0.005 are marked in red). In (C), because the correlations between the gene-specific contributions to cell numbers inferred from the three infections were high, the average gene contributions were used in the BF test. (D) Pairwise Pearson correlations between gene contributions to the number of cells (left) and frequency of infection (right) in the three infection systems. Venn diagrams show the overlap between the sets of 100 genes with highest absolute contributions to the respective phenotype in individual siRNA screens. Cell Systems 2017 4, 182-193.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.01.011) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Pathways and Genes Contributing Most to the Infection with Brucella abortus, Bartonella henselae, and Salmonella typhimurium (A, C, and E) Pathways inferred by the variance test on PheLiM results to contribute most to infection (marked in red are pathways with p values < 0.005 in the variance test). (B, D, and F) STRING graph of protein-protein interactions for top 100 genes inferred by PheLiM to be associated with the infection process. Only proteins with at least one connection are shown. Cell Systems 2017 4, 182-193.e4DOI: (10.1016/j.cels.2017.01.011) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions