CIRAS FINAL CONFERENCE

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

5/30/2014 Aosta, May 24th 2012 SESAMO: a decision support system for the Multi Criteria Analysis Fiorella GRASSO, Stefano MARAN (PP3) Project Final Meeting.

Advertisements

Ministry of Health Anna Starzewska-Sikorska, Ph.D. Coordinator of environmental part of Programme Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas, Katowice POLISH.

CIRAS PROJECT OVERVIEW

Multi‑Criteria Decision Making

Evaluating public RTD interventions: A performance audit perspective from the EU European Court of Auditors American Evaluation Society, Portland, 3 November.

Training of Trainers Workshop Reference Centres and Regional Partners in the Performance Review and Assessment of Implementation of the Strategy (PRAIS)

WORKSHOP ON SIMPLIFICATION - HORIZONTAL ISSUES Heber McMahon Principal Officer Finance Division, Ireland.

DECISION MAKING. What Decision Making Is?  Decision making is the process of identifying problems and opportunities, developing alternative solutions,

CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT

«Enhance of ship safety based on maintenance strategies by applying of Analytic Hierarchy Process» DAGKINIS IOANNIS, Dr. NIKITAKOS NIKITAS University of.

Robustness in assessment of strategic transport projects The 21st International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making Jyväskylä June

ECTS definition : Student centred system, Student centred system, Based on student workload required to : Based on student workload required to : Achieve.

1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants

VTT-STUK assessment method for safety evaluation of safety-critical computer based systems - application in BE-SECBS project.

KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM & MINERALS DHAHRAN, SAUDI ARABIA ARE-512 Life Cycle Costing – Cost Data Bank For By G. C. SOFAT S.K. TYAGI Presented.

TYNDP SJWS #3 Demand TYNDP – 3 rd SJWS 08 March 2012 ENTSOG offices -- Brussels.

1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 System evaluation and sampling – first.

UNIT 9: An Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management Plan.

Paris Project Meeting January 2012 Item – Statistics Objective 5 B. Proia With financial support from Criminal Justice Programme 2008 European Commission.

Round Table 3Fault Statistics in Distribution Networks Addressed issues: Network reliability – Security of supply Application to maintenance and renewing.

1 PRODUCTION OF A MANUAL FOR STATISTICS ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN HOUSEHOLDS MESH PROJECT 3 rd Working Meeting Vienna, 4 rd October 2012 WP3: Draft Manual.

The TIDE impact assessment methodology TIDE Final Conference Barcelona, September 2015 Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy Oliver.

The 6th European Conference on Intellectual Capital

MAINTENANCE STRATEGY SELECTION BASED ON HYBRID AHP-GP MODEL SUZANA SAVIĆ GORAN JANAĆKOVIĆ MIOMIR STANKOVIĆ University of Niš, Faculty of Occupational Safety.

IPA Funds Monitoring and Evaluation December Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.

BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

4-1 Copyright  2009 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Managerial Problem Solving by Wood Slides prepared by Robert Wood, Julie Cogin and Jens Beckmann.

Methodology used by SWIFTLY Green 26th November 2015 Gernoth Götz, Prof. Markus Hecht Berlin Institute of Technology (Technische Universität Berlin) Contact:

1 Mag. Johannes Reichl Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz Opportunities for Gas Utilities through the EU Energy Efficiency Policy.

FROM GAPS TO CAPS Risk Management Capability Based on Gaps Identification in the BSR Project Lead Partner: Fire and Rescue Department under the Ministry.

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RISK ASSESSMENT SUPPORT Risk Reduction Assessment (RRA) Manager – presentation of the core tool features 2nd Stakeholders’ Workshop.

Table of contents: Preliminary concepts Why proofing legislation against crime? The CRAM Final remarks 1 PROOFING LEGISLATION AGAINST CRIME: THE RESULTS.

CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE RISK ASSESSMENT SUPPORT CIRAS PROJECT OVERVIEW 2nd Stakeholders’ Workshop Aschaffenburg, November, 26th, 2015 Jaime Martín, Project.

Building an ENI CBC project

Information ITIL Technology Infrastructure Library ITIL.

LAA Judging Criteria & Process

STRATEGIC ACADEMIC UNIT “PEOPLE & TECHNOLOGIES”

ADVANCED RESEARCH WORKSHOP Azores, 28th June 2016

3rd International Scientific Conference on "Energy and Climate Change"

General information Type of the project Aim of the project Idea

Analysis of climate change mitigation tools in Ukraine

BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module V Safety classification of structures, systems and components Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015.

Leader ECA audit findings and possible simplification

CIRAS FINAL CONFERENCE

Introducing… the concept.

Improvement Selection:

Internal assessment criteria

Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy Priorities

Optimal marketing strategy: A decision-making with ANP and TOPSIS

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

Barcelona, May 14, 2003 Session 5; Block 1; Paper 5

Performance Framework

Closed Loop Wind Farm Control

Additional Exam Questions from other sources and some I made up!

Finnish Case Study: Bayesian Network Modelling

VCE: Systems Engeneering.

Road Traffic and Injury Prevention Programme

Joint Research Centre The European Commission’s in-house science service.

Meeting of the Strategic Development Group Brussels, 3 July 2008

LAA Judging Criteria & Process

Planning for IT Audit Session 4.

Decision Making Template.

WP4 Proposed Structure of the Outcome “Tool Kit and Recommendations”

Introduction to Value Tree Analysis

Silvia Losco, ISTAT, Strategies and approaches for managing risks in the official statistics production: ISTAT experience in the.

COST-BENEFIT ASSESSMENT (CBA)

CIRAS FINAL CONFERENCE

INTEGRATED RESULTS 2nd Stakeholders’ Workshop

State University of Telecommunications

The Marine Strategy Framework Directive

Presentation transcript:

CIRAS FINAL CONFERENCE MAHP - Qualitative Criteria Assessment Katowice, June, 8th, 2016 Peter Klein, CESS Centre for European Security Strategies

Qualitative Criteria Assessment A Utility Function based method used in other environments as well CIRAS offers two methods to assess qualitative criteria An innovative method developed within the project which we called MAHP MAHP is a modification of the AHP concept introduced by Thomas Saaty in the 1990s MAHP will be explained in more details

MAHP Functional Block The MAHP FB implements a new methodology to assess and compare different security measures alternatives along non-quantifiable criteria in an more objective and reliable way than before. This is necessary because complex security installations mostly have political, social, psychological etc. influences which are as essential as the quantifiable ones.

A hierarchical tree of qualitative criteria is constructed with: MAHP Functional Block For this comparison and assessment: A hierarchical tree of qualitative criteria is constructed with: The root as qualitative top goal A subdivision into categories as nodes below the root A further subdivision as single criteria as nodes below the categories The security measures alternatives as leaves below the criteria How does such a tree look like?

MAHP Functional Block Construction of a MAHP tree

MAHP Functional Block Main steps for assessment What to do with this tree? We follow a unique and transparent method: Assign to each category under the root a relative weight indicating the relevance. Assign to each criterion under a category a relative weight in the same way indicating the relevance of this criterion. Assign to each security measures alternative under a criterion a relative contribution (referring only to this criterion).

This is the heart of the MAHP method. See two examples now. MAHP Functional Block The assignments described before are the basis for the calculation of the total relative contribution of each alternative. How will the assignments be done? How will the calculations of the contributions be done? This is the heart of the MAHP method. See two examples now. More will be shown on our stands!

MAHP Functional Block

MAHP Functional Block

Thank you for your attention! Peter Klein CESS GmbH klein@cess-net.eu www.cirasproject.eu Co-funded by the Prevention, Preparedness and Consequence Management of Terrorism and other Security-related Risks Programme of the European Union (HOME/2013/CIPS/AG/4000005074)