Kinnelon School District Department of Special Services

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
Understanding Special Education services SPECIAL EDUCATION REFERRAL PROCESS.
The Acronyms of Student Services- I&RS, IEP, and 504
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy IEP vs Section 504 is the part of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 that applies to persons (including students) with.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Intervention and Referral Services (I&RS)
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
PPS Department Update Denise Doolittle, Director Paul Pattavina, Supervisor Lori Secchiaroli, Supervisor December 15, 2014.
Teachers directing the work of paraprofessionals
Intervention and Referral Services Linda Remolino, LPC, NCC Director of School Counseling North Plainfield School District.
Comprehensive Guidance and Counselling South Shore Regional School Board May, 2010.
Bibb County School District Program for Exceptional Children Paired Zone Meeting November 7 and 9, 2011.
ED 315 Inclusive Practices for Students w/ Learning Problems.
Special Education Briefing April 10, 2015 HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HawaiiPublicSchools.org.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Program Guidelines for Students who are Visually Impaired PRESENTATION TO: California Transcribers.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting October 4, 2012 Creating Effective Student Support Teams.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
1 Coordinated Program Review: School Staff Overview Sutton Public Schools Frequently Asked Questions: Faculty Information
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT Chapter One.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
RTI stands for Response to Intervention. It is a four tiered process designed to meet the needs of struggling students. W HAT IS RTI??
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
Department of Exceptional Student Education The School District of Palm Beach County.
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
And Amendments to the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education Effective December 8, 2010.
SPECIAL EDUCATION UPDATE Board of Education Presentation
Service Delivery Solutions: 3:1 Workload Model for Speech-Language Specialists, Occupational Therapists, and Physical Therapists *INTRO: CHRISTIE*
Understanding the IEP Process
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Department of Exceptional Student Education
Related Services: The What, The How, The Why
The ABCs of Student Support Services
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Blackhawk School District
1:1 Aides 1/29/2016.
Brodhead, Cox, and Quigley (2018)
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
ABC Unified School District
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Presentation transcript:

Kinnelon School District Department of Special Services Best Practices Kinnelon School District Department of Special Services

Task The purpose of this audit was to examine the quality, efficiency, and overall effectiveness of available programs and services for students with disabilities currently operating in the Kinnelon Public School district.

Areas of Study NJ State Code Compliance   Referral Process, De-classification and Patterns Special Education Eligibility Curriculum and Program Effectiveness

  Parent Satisfaction Staff Satisfaction Related Service Recommendations and Delivery Staffing  

Sources of Information Comprehensive review of special education files   Paper review of special education programs Observation of representative special education programs Review of state test scores Review of district classification percentage Staffing numbers and ratios

Completion of Staff Surveys for the following personnel: Administrators General Education Teachers Special Education Teachers Related Service Providers Child Study Team Review of Special Education Processes and Implementation 

Completion of Parent Survey  Open Group Special Education Parent Night Interviews of staff

Commendations The Kinnelon Superintendent and Board of Education had the foresight to examine themselves through this review Kinnelon has an experienced and dedicated staff that takes pride in their role Kinnelon ranks favorably when compared with similar districts in most categories Kinnelon demonstrates a strong commitment to provide special education services in the least restrictive environment and within district

Findings

Special Education Programs The school district offers in district programs for special needs students from ages 3 to 21  Programming is available for mild to severely disabled students Each building has support services within the general education programs

Resource Room programs provide pull out replacement instruction at each level, as well in- class support Classes dedicated to the needs of students with Autism or Language/ Learning Disabilities are available throughout the district.   The district has committed itself to providing for the needs of all students in the Least Restrictive Environment

A willingness to provide very low student/staff ratios   Students requiring reading intervention have access to the Fundations program in general education and Edmark Reading and Wilson instruction within special education. Related services (OT, PT and speech) are available within each building. A district Behaviorist and Teacher of the Deaf are available

Child Study Team services are appropriate within each building Child Study Team services are appropriate within each building. Each building has a Learning Consultant and Psychologist. A district Social Worker is available as needed   The District Social Worker also functions as a Transition Coordinator developing simulated work experiences within the High School. Students may receive vocational assessments through a private agency.

District Comparisons The district’s classification rate is somewhat higher than the state mean as well as the average for comparable districts. The district compares favorably in its cost per pupil Most cost comparisons place Kinnelon in the average range when compared to similar districts

Parent and Staff Opinions Commitment to student success Strong desire for inclusive education High expectations Desire for increased accountability Need for more staff development

Open Parent Meeting Sixteen parents attended the meeting. They were articulate, respectful, and openly shared their experiences They described the past environment as adversarial in nature and litigious in response to parent requests Procedural violations in respect to consideration of private assessments; transportation; IEP participants; timelines; and access to assistive technology General dissatisfaction with Wilson Reading Access to Board Certified Behavioral Analysts (BCBA) Do not feel that all students must participate in Driver’s Ed

Student Record Review

Over 20% Student Records Reviewed Selected student records were reviewed utilizing a compliance checklist in accordance with   the requirements of N.J.A.C. 6A:14 and evidence based research practices Records were selected on a random basis and represented multiple ages, classifications, school placements, and case managers. The sample also ensured representation across gender, disability, and ethnicity.

IEP Indicators The following IEP indicators were reviewed for compliance and to identify trends.   • Identification & Referral • Initial Evaluation & Eligibility • Required Components • Miscellaneous

Special Education Highly Regulated Special education is one of the most highly regulated areas in education Difficult if not impossible to achieve 100% percent compliance. Best practice indicates that noncompliance should be less than 3%.

Areas Identified As Non-Compliant Referral information inconsistent or incorrect Excusal process for Required members at IEP meetings incorrect Procedural errors throughout process Paperwork missing or incomplete in files

Goals do not relate to the Present Levels of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFP) Non-measurable goals and objectives Missing components of transition planning Progress reports missing form the files Missing access log for files

Commendations Of all the records reviewed, all students had IEPs that are current Developing a confidentiality policy governing the contents of counseling sessions within the schools in accordance with professional code of ethics

Impressions and Recommendations The fact that some areas reviewed have been flagged as areas of concern suggests a need for a comprehensive school district plan to provide training and monitoring focused on identified procedural issues, IEP development and implementation.

Recommendations

Professional Development There is a strong desire and need for increased professional development for all staff members Child study team members and related service providers require staff development to assure the utilzation of correct procedures for referral, eligibility, development of IEPs, placement determinations and monitoring implementation of programs

General and Special education teachers require increased professional development in the areas of instructional strategies and student assessment All staff require professional development in the areas of Intervention and Referral Services, RTI, and Student learning styles/differences Parent Information Nights should be conducted to better inform parents of district procedures and options

Procedures and Accountability A district Special Education Procedural Manual should be developed establishing and outlining correct procedures for referral, eligibility, placement and monitoring and IEP development Building and District level administrators should work with the Child Study Teams in establishing an accountability system that monitors student progress and NJ Special Education Code compliance

Establish an accountability system among building, supervisory and district staff that embraces joint ownership of special education programs and services; monitors student growth and assures compliance with code requirements

Personnel Strengthen building based ownership, management and oversight of special education programs and services Closely review and monitor staff ratios in the areas of non-instructional services Consider employing or assigning responsibility to a Transition Coordinator

The department and district should be commended for their dedication to maintaining students with disabilities in district within the Least Restrictive Environment.   This requires a commitment to continue low student/staff ratios; and providing staff with access to current training on addressing the educational needs of our most challenging students.

Renewed training in the various models for implementing In-class support programs. This training is best provided through ongoing coaching of each pair of In-class support teachers.   Life Skills instruction at the High School needs to be more enriched in supplies, space and transition opportunities. Job development within the community is necessary

Questions and Comments