Enter Your Work Unit Here Enter Date Here

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Area Page - Work in Progress.
Advertisements

QPSC Overall KDA Based on Q38 – Intention to Leave.
2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
The Power of Employee Engagement
CREATING A CULTURE THAT ENGAGES AND RETAINS MILLENNIALS Like us and check in on facebook at DaleCarnegieNY Tweet during the workshop at #DaleCarnegie.
TalentMap 1 York Community Services: November 1-12, TalentMap Athabasca University – Spring TalentMap Employee Survey Results Presentation.
UHCL Support Staff Association (SSA) and Professional and Administrative Staff Association (PASA) In consultation with Dr. Lisa M. Penney RAs: Lisa Sublett,
2010 Annual Employee Survey Results
Dear User, This presentation has been designed for you by the Hearts and Minds Support Team. It provides a template for presenting the results of the SAFE.
1 WRS Feedback Overview. 2 Agenda Introduction to WRS Assessment Feedback Report Developmental Planning Best Practices Summary/Wrap Up.
Department of Administration Employee Relations Committee 2012 Survey.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Employee engagement Guide Global Human Resources June 2014.
Engagement at The Health Trust Presented by Quantum Workplace 2014 Executive Report - The Health Trust.
Blended Learning: Finding the Right Mix Work Expectations Profile  Explores the “psychological contract” of needs and expectations between employees.
12-14 Pindari Rd Peakhurst NSW 2210 p: e: Employee Survey Links2Success.
© British Telecommunications plc 1 Accountability OEB Top Level Flash Results January 2011.
A. P. Moller - Maersk Employee Engagement Survey 2011 MDSI Corporate IT-Admin; RVA018 - Roberto - Valenciano Report.
Overview of the 21 st century workplace  Organizations must adapt to rapidly changing society.  Economy is global and driven by innovation and technology.
Hawaiian Airlines Na Leo Survey 2010 Your Results.
OneVoice W Group Results 16 June 2014 Human Resources Employee Engagement.
Chapter 9 Review How can you measure employee engagement levels over time?
1 The 7 Elements of a High Performance Healthcare Team Cohesiveness Healthy Climate Team Members’ Contribution.
Today’s Agenda: Team Member Updates Employee Survey Results 360 Leader Feedback Other Items.
2009 Annual Employee Survey U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)
2012 Employee Engagement Survey September What is Employee Engagement? Employee engagement is about: Motivated employees Employees who are passionate.
2016 Duck River EMC Employee Survey
Performance Management
Welcome Michele & Nikki will be with you in a few moments.
Gallup Employee Engagement Survey 2015
DATA SNAPSHOT Part II Prepared by Cori Herbst-Loehr
Performance Management and Employee Development
The High Cost of Low Morale
Items in red require your input
Empower Managers to Take Ownership of Employee Engagement
10 Managing Employee Retention, Engagement, and Careers
Culture Survey This document provides examples of how we analyze and report our clients’ culture survey data. It includes data from several clients in.
Engagement Discussion A3
How to “Really” Put Your Employees First
Administrative Faculty Evaluation Workshop 2017
Employee Engagement Survey Education Session #3
Survey of Organizational Excellence
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT & PERFORMANCE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR
Attitudes and Job Satisfaction
The Business Case for Investing in Employee Engagement
Social Services Union County
Items in red require your input
7-2 Leadership Goals Describe the need for leadership skills and the characteristics of an effective leader. Identify the human relations skills needed.
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY RESULTS
Items in red require your input
Employee Survey in the Foreign Service
Employee Engagement Survey
Items in red require your input
Just-in-Time Management Advice
Sharing Your School Climate Data with YOUR FAMILIES
Engagement Follow-up Resources
Safer Culture, Better Care
The Business Case for Investing in Employee Engagement
Empire Southwest 2017 Companywide EOS Results.
Before you begin… If you are prepared to share your team’s survey results prior to receiving the overall Business Unit results, simply modify this presentation.
Before you begin… If you are prepared to share your team’s survey results prior to receiving the overall Business Unit results, simply modify this presentation.
ClimateQUAL at Illinois
Engagement Follow-up Resources
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
Departure View Glossary
2007 Faculty & Staff Denison Organizational Culture Survey
Sharing Your School Climate Data with YOUR FAMILIES
Presentation transcript:

Enter Your Work Unit Here Enter Date Here Items in red require your input!! Please refer to the resource “A Guide to Understanding and Sharing Your Survey Results” for information found in this template. Specifically, refer to page 13 “Sharing Your Survey Results” for instructions on how to fill-out and complete this template for your Results Rollout Session with your work unit. Enter Your Work Unit Here Enter Date Here

Today’s Agenda ⬖ Review the Press Ganey Employee Voice Model ⬘ Present and discuss work unit results ⬗ Discuss next steps

High Performance Organization Employee Voice Model Organization Domain Manager Employee High Performance Organization Engagement Workforce All of the items on the survey come together in our Employee Voice Model, which is the foundation for the survey. Along the left side of the model there are three domains: Organizational, Manager, and Employee The Organization Domain reflects the degree to which your employees feel connected to the overall organization. The Manager Domain reflects the degree to which your employees feel connected to their supervisor/manager. The employee domain reflects the degree to which your employees feel connected to their colleagues and jobs.

Engagement Score Engagement Score Enter # Here Organization Domain Work Unit Average Engagement Score Enter # Here Organization Domain Manager Domain Employee Domain DESCRIPTION The Engagement Score indicates the degree of commitment team members feel toward the organization. Work units that are very connected to the organization will have a very strong level of commitment.

Team Index Score Enter Work Unit Here Enter Team Index Score Here (I, II, or III) DESCRIPTION The Team Index Score is a team outcome metric based on items that most powerfully impact team performance. INDEX TEAM INDEX PERFORMANCE POWER ITEM SCORE Team Index I Above Average Performance 5.0 − 4.15 Team Index II Average Performance 4.14 − 3.80 Team Index III Below Average Performance 3.79 or below

Team Index Score Power Item Domain Different work units work well together in this organization. Organization This organization conducts business in an ethical manner. This organization provides high-quality care and service. This organization supports me in balancing my work life and personal life. My pay is fair compared to other healthcare employers in this area. This organization treats employees with respect. This organization provides career development opportunities. The person I report to treats me with respect. Manager I am satisfied with the recognition I receive for doing a good job. I am involved in decisions that affect my work. I respect the abilities of the person to whom I report. The person I report to is a good communicator. My work unit works well together. Employee I like the work I do. My job makes good use of my skills and abilities. Team Index Score Based on the 15 Power Items; the items that most powerfully impact team performance Cross section of ORG, MGR and EMP items Who “owns” the Tier Score? Answer: The team Reason: Fosters work unit accountability for self-regulation; managers facilitate team improvement and report on team progress.

Enter Leader Index Score Here Enter Work Unit Here Enter Leader Index Score Here Please remind the group that we share and review the results first, then come back to action plan. DESCRIPTION The Leader Index Score represents team members’ readiness to engage in feedback and action planning. The score is assigned through calculations on a 100-point scale from survey items specific to manager performance. INDEX READINESS SCORE High readiness 90 – 100 Moderately high readiness 80 – 89 Moderate readiness 70 – 79 Moderately low readiness 60 – 69 Low readiness 0 – 59

Leader Index Score Leader Index Items Domain The person I report to treats me with respect. MGR The person I report to encourages teamwork. I am involved in decisions that affect my work. I respect the abilities of the person to whom I report. The person I report to is a good communicator. The person I report to cares about my job satisfaction. Manager-employee relationship Based on 6 Manager Domain Items Used consistently across all PG clients Reported on a 100 point scale; higher scores indicate a stronger manager-employee relationship Who “owns” the APR score? Answer: The manager Reason: Fosters individual accountability for leader improvement.

Our Strengths Item Domain Enter Strength Here Enter Domain Here

Clarification of Results - Strengths ⬖ Did any of our strengths surprise you? ⬘ What strengths do we want to continue to build upon as a team?

Our Concerns Item Domain Enter Concern Here Enter Domain Here

Clarification of Results - Concerns ⬖ Did any of our concerns surprise you? ⬘ If we could improve one concern, which concern would you focus on?

Next Steps ⬖ Summarize Feedback ⬗ Hold Action Planning Session ⬘ Share Action Plan with Team ⬙ Regularly Review Action Plan