Crohn’s Disease Biologic Pathway

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) Immunomodulatory and immunosuppresive Xenobiotic – Gold salts – Azathioprine – Methotrexate Biological.
Advertisements

Methotrexate Indications and Approaches
Immunomodulators and Biologics Maria T. Abreu, MD University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, Florida.
Peter R. McNally, DO, FACP, FACG Lone Tree, Colorado
Cure’s GTX Licensing Opportunity
Colitis in the Very Young
Management of Inflammatory bowel disease 8/12/10.
SUA
A patient with severe Crohn's disease, an ileal stricture and proximal dilation on CTE should have medical therapy first Uma Mahadevan MD Professor of.
Thiopurines still have a role in the management of pediatric IBD Athos Bousvaros MD, MPH Associate Director, IBD program Boston Children’s Hospital.
What do we do when the patient loses their response to an anti-TNF: Minor tweaks or major treatment changes? Robert N. Baldassano, MD Colman Professor.
Emerging treatments in Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis
End points in IBD treatment Mucosal healing Vs Symptom relief Jose Francis Lakeshore Hospital Kochi.
The Patient With Pyoderma Gangrenosum Maria T. Abreu, MD Chief, Division of Gastroenterology University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, Florida.
When can we use combination therapy for our pediatric IBD patients? Athos Bousvaros MD, MPH Advances in IBD Dec 2014.
Asymptomatic UC patients on an immunomodulator with persistent moderate mucosal inflammation should either add a biologic or switch to a biologic William.
Biologics: Indications and Approaches Russell D. Cohen, MD, AGAF, FACG Professor of Medicine, Pritzker School of Medicine Director IBD Center Co-Director.
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatment. Epidemiology Clinical Laboratory Imaging Pathology Response to treatment IBD.
(Date of presentation) (Name of presenter) UK IBD audit Biological therapies audit 2014 Comparison of (Your site name) results against the national results.
Management of men and women over 50yrs who have sustained a fragility fracture: 2011 draft guidance Fragility fracture definition: Fracture site excluding.
Medical Management of Ulcerative Colitis Conrad Beckett Bradford Royal Infirmary M62 Course March 2006.
William J. Sandborn, MD Chief, Division of Gastroenterology
Controversies and challenges in the clinical care of patients with IBD: You can’t always get what you want! Stephen B. Hanauer, MD University of Chicago.
“Antibiotics and corticosteroids: Indications and approaches”
The only end-points of therapy that matter are mucosal healing, normal blood work, and negative radiologic studies. Robert N. Baldassano, MD Colman Family.
(Date of presentation) (Name of presenter) UK IBD audit Biological therapies audit 2014 Comparison of (Your site name) results against the national results.
IBD Cases Stephen B. Hanauer, MD Professor of Medicine Feinberg School of Medicine Medical Director, Digestive Health Center.
You Can Never Stop a Biologic
Natalizumab- Unmet Need in the Management of Crohn’s Disease Doug Wolf, M.D. Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates July 31, 2007.
Should we change how we position biologics in ulcerative colitis? Bruce E. Sands, MD, MS Chief of the Dr. Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology.
Planning for Biosimilars: Infliximab Professor Ray Fitzpatrick Secondary Care lead Keele University Clinical Director of Pharmacy Royal Wolverhampton NHS.
William J. Sandborn, M.D., Brian G. Feagan, M.D., Paul Rutgeerts, M.D., Ph.D., Stephen Hanauer, M.D., Jean-Frederic Colombel, M.D., Bruce E. Sands, M.D.,
(Date of presentation) (Name of presenter) UK IBD audit Biological therapies audit 2015 Comparison of (Your site name) results against the national results.
(Date of presentation) (Name of presenter) UK IBD audit Biological therapies audit 2015 Comparison of (Your site name) results against the national results.
Xavier Roblin, MD, PhD 1, M. Rinaudo, MD 2, E. Del Tedesco, MD 1, J.M. Phelip, MD, PhD 1, C. Genin, MD, PhD 2, L. Peyrin-Biroulet, MD, PhD 3 and S. Paul,
GASTROENTEROLOGY 2008; 134 :688–695 소화기내과 R4 이 재 연.
R3. 최태웅 / Pf. 김효종 Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 19 FEB 2016 DOI: /apt.13547
N Engl J Med 2012;367: Dae youn.kim/Prof.Chang hyun Lee.
BACKGROUND  Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC)  Medical emergency  I.V corticosteroid : mainstay management the past 40 years  One-third of patients.
Hepatitis B virus infection in renal transplant recipients
(Date of presentation) (Name of presenter) UK IBD audit Biological therapies audit 2016 Comparison of (Your site name) results against the national results.
1st draft IBS/IBD Cross CCG pathway
Dr Gill Watermeyer IBD Clinic Division of Gastroenterology
Psychiatric Treatment
Biological therapies audit 2016
P0866 Combination of Low dose Thiopurine and Allopurinol in patients with ulcerative colitis Please export the Keynote document as a PDF (File – Save as.
ULCERATIVE COLITIS Dr.Mohammadzadeh.
CASE DISCUSSION: Crohn's disease patient with bad perianal disease- are new therapies any help? Alana Wichmann, APN, MSN, FNP, Advanced Practice Nurse,
Onderzoek met geneesmiddelen
Optimizing Use of Biological Agents in Ulcerative Colitis
Changing the IBD Paradigm
Complicated Cases in Ulcerative Colitis
Optimizing Patient Outcomes in IBD
Pathways in Managing Ulcerative Colitis
Managing IBD.
Incidence and importance of antibody responses to infliximab after maintenance or episodic treatment in Crohn’s disease  Stephen B Hanauer, Carrie L Wagner,
WORCESTERSHIRE PATHWAY for use of CYTOKINE MODULATORS in
Raymond Cross, MD, MS, AGAF Associate Professor of Medicine
Biotherapeutics.
Association of Trough Serum Infliximab to Clinical Outcome After Scheduled Maintenance Treatment for Crohn’s Disease  Elana A. Maser, Renata Villela,
Trial protocol and outline Dr Miles Parkes
Methotrexate for Ulcerative Colitis: To Use or Not to Use?
ADAb: anti-drug antibody.
Pathogenesis of IBD, and the Role of Biologic Therapies
Phase III randomized controlled trial to compare biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) with innovator infliximab in patients with active Crohn’s disease: 1-year.
Presentation data from US VICTORY Consortium
Presentation data from US VICTORY Consortium
Northern Cancer Alliance Colorectal Symptoms Assessment Pathway
Risk factors for postoperative infection after lower gastrointestinal surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Findings from a large epidemiological.
Patient Heterogeneity in CD
Presentation transcript:

Crohn’s Disease Biologic Pathway Anti-TNFs in Crohn’s Disease used for: Severe active CD: HBI = >8 CDAI = >300 Inadequate response for tolerance of contraindication to conventional therapies Chronic active CD with failure to control with immunosuppression Consider earlier biological use in the young (<40), those with fulminant disease or those with anastomic recurrence despite immunosuppression. Treatment should be started with the least expensive appropriate drug. Consider IFX for – penetrating/fistulating disease, patient with poor compliance/difficulties administering S/C. Anti-TNF therapy should be given as a planned course until failure. Reassess at 12 months and continue therapy only if evidence of on-going active disease (clinical /lab tests/investigations) Biosimilar anti-TNF may be prescribed (switching of stable patients should be discussed with the patient) Golimumab is not licensed in CD. Pathway A Crohn’s Disease Biologic Pathway Severe active Crohn’s (TA 187, TA 456) Failure or intolerance of immunosuppression Adalimumab SC , Infliximab IV, ustekinumab Active Fistulating (TA 187, TA 352, TA 456) Infliximab = 1st Line Consider Adalimumab/Vedolizumab/ ustekinumab Assess response at 12 weeks = NICE REVIEW Review may be at 16-20 weeks for vedolizumab Clinical response (HBI) Bloods +/- faecal calprotecin Good Response Poor Response Primary Non-Response Add/optimize immunosuppressant (if suitable + not already on) Optimise Anti-TNF (drug trough + antibody levels ) Alternative biologic Vedolizumab (TA 352) or ustekinumab (TA 456) Surgery Good Clinical Response Assess response after 8 - 16/52 eg. repeat drug and antibody levels Continue scheduled prescribing + clinical review for response Poor Response Clinical response (HBI) Faecal calprotectin Colonoscopy/Radiology (Small Bowel) Reassess response at 12/12 = NICE REVIEW Alternative biologic Vedolizumab (TA 352) Clinical Trial Surgery Remission* Partial/Incomplete Response No Response Consider stopping biologic + maintaining immunosuppressant Continue + optimise biologic therapy +/- immunosuppressant. Consider switching therapy. Switch to alternative biologic Vedolizumab (TA 352) or ustekinumab (TA456) *Remission for biologic cessation is defined as asymptomatic and biochemical and /or radiological evidence of healing.

Ulcerative Colitis Biologics Pathway NICE CG 166 Pathway B Ulcerative Colitis Biologics Pathway NICE CG 166 Moderately to severe active UC Acute severely active UC, if not responding to IV steroids Anti-TNF (TA329) Infliximab(IV), Golimumab (s/c), Adalimumab (s/c) Vedolizumab (IV) (TA342) Infliximab (IV) (TA 183) 5mg/kg at week 0, 2, 6 Ciclosporin (IV) 2mg/kg 24 hours IV Consider giving second dose at week 1 if patient has high CRP and low serum albumin Assess response by 12/52 Assess response by 12/52 Assess response daily Assess response daily Clinical response (simple colitis index) Bloods +/- Faecal calprotectin Poor Response Clinical Response Clinical Response Poor Response Clinical Response Optimise Anti-TNF (trough + Ab levels) Add/optimize immunosuppressant Consider a Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Wean steroids Commence Azathioprine Commence oral Ciclosporin (5mg/kg in two divided doses) Commence Azathioprine Co-trimoxazole 960mg/3 times a week Prophylaxis (if on dual Rx) Oral Ciclo = 3-6/12 Clinical Response Colectomy Repeat cycle x2 times if needed to optimise Assess response after 4-8/52 No benefits switching between Ciclo and IFX if fail one therapy (Master EA, 2008) Continue scheduled prescribing + clinical review (Drug + Ab monitoring if loss of response) Poor Response Remission for UC: Total or partial Mayo score <2 (no score >1) + steroid free Response in UC: Total Mayo <3 Partial Mayo <2 Assess response at 3/12 Alternative Biologic Clinical Trial Surgery Assess response by 12/52 Poor Response Response Colonoscopy/ sigmoidoscopy Calprotectin Clinical Response Alternative Biologic Therapy Stop Ciclosporin + continue Aza Remission Partial/Incomplete Response No Response Consider stopping biologic + maintaining immunosuppressant Optimise biologic + immunosuppresent Alternative biologic/ surgery Partial Response = optimise therapy Response No response = Colectomy

Loss or poor response to biologic anti-TNF therapy Pathway C Loss or poor response to biologic anti-TNF therapy Confirmation of IBD flare Faceal calprotectin Endoscopic/radiological evidence Bloods Exclude alternative pathology Stricture Cancer Infection IBS Anti-TNF drug trough level Undetectable Anti TNF drug trough level Detectable Anti TNF drug antibody may be positive or negative Anti-TNF drug antibodies Detectable Anti –TNF drug antibodies Undetectable Drug being neutralised by drug antibodies Insufficient drug available Check adherence Increased drug clearance Low drug trough & antibody low/undetectable Low drug trough & high antibody Trough level within or therapeutic range & loss of clinical response Anti – TNF antibody level >10 Stop anti- TNF Switch drug Anti-TNF antibody level <10 Add/optimise immunosuprresant Increase dose/frequency of anti -TNF Improve adherence If adherence is good Reduce time between doses or increase drug dose Increase drug dose/frequency/add in immunosuppression/ ??switch to alternative biologic Consider switch to alternative biologic (in or out of class) Switch to an alternative biologic out of class Antibodies The precise level of antibody significance is currently undefined. A low level of antibody can be clinically significant if it is neutralizing the drug An antibody level greater than 40 is unlikely to be cleared by immunosuppression or anti-TNF dose adjustment. Following anti-TNF dose adjustment/adding in immunosuppressant Repeat clinical review and antibody & drug trough level testing after 2-4 months If response = continue therapy and review after 6 months If partial response = optimise biologic therapy/immunosupression (following further drug level and antibody testing) If no response = consider entry in to clinical trial/alternative biologic/surgery