Integrating climate change adaptation in disaster risk reduction

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moving the process forward Sálvano Briceño UN/ISDR.
Advertisements

Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
Integrating climate change adaptation in disaster risk reduction
Integrating climate change adaptation in disaster risk reduction
Integrating climate change adaptation in disaster risk reduction
Risk and Resilience: A Canadian Perspective on Climate Change Adaptation Donald S. Lemmen, PhD Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Directorate Natural.
Adaptation to Climate Change
1 UNISDR Secretariat Asia and Pacific IAP meeting 25 March Learning from the HFA progress review.
REGIONAL ANALYSIS ON DISASTER RISK REDUCTION EDUCATION IN THE ASIA PACIFIC REGION IN THE CONTEXT OF HFA PRIORITY 3 IMPLEMENTATION Bangkok, March 2009 Prepared.
Toolkit for Mainstreaming HIV and AIDS in the Education Sector Guidelines for Development Cooperation Agencies.
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
Margaret Barihaihi National Programme Coordinator, World Vision - ACCRA Uganda.
Integrating DRR into the CCA/UNDAF Process Introduction of new guide.
Global Assessment Report and need for Regional Assessment Report Meeting of the ISDR Asia Partnership, September September 2011 Pattaya, Thailand.
Environment and Disaster Planning Hari Srinivas, GDRC Rajib Shaw, Kyoto University Contents of the presentation: -What is the problem? -Precautionary Principles.
Livia Bizikova and Laszlo Pinter
“Clouds but little rain…” Views from the Frontline A local perspective of progress towards implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action
Outline Why a Climate Smart Disaster Risk Management (CSDRM) approach? Development of the CSDRM Approach The ‘Three Pillars’ of the Approach Applications.
Tools for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction: Guidance Notes for Development Organisations Charlotte Benson and John Twigg Presented by Margaret Arnold.
ACCRA Who we are, what we do and where we work. Why should you be interested? How can you contribute?
Saving lives, changing minds. Presentation title at-a-glance info (in slide master) Myanmar Climate Change Training Presentation title at-a-glance.
UN Women & Japan Regional Conference on Gender and Disaster Risk Reduction UN Women.
What Next? Photo: Jodi Bieber/Save the Children. © National Nutrition Council, Madagascar Building on our unique contribution, achievements & learnings,
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
Gender-Responsive NAP Processes
Introduction Social ecological approach to behavior change
Joint Principles for Adaptation (JPAs) By Marlene/Rudolf
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Account Management Overview
Using evidence to review and moderate students’ progress against the Teachers’ Standards Explain that students should have provided their TP files and.
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Presentation title 5. Overview of the process to formulate and implement NAPs: process, 2 objectives, guidelines, the NAP-SDG iFrame, upcoming SBI assessment.
HEALTH IN POLICIES TRAINING
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
UNECE Work Session on Gender Statistics, Belgrade,
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
TSMO Program Plan Development
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
ISO 9001:2015 Revision Explaining the Key Changes
DAFF CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE 11 – 12 August 2011
Gender Equality Ex post evaluation of the ESF ( )
Module 5 The Climate Expert and your role as a consultant
Partnerships and networks
Results of the Organizational Performance
Integrated DRR and CCA Mainstreaming TOOL OUTLINE
4.2 Identify intervention outputs
Considerations in Development of the SBSTA Five Year Programme of Work on Adaptation Thank Mr. Chairman. Canada appreciates this opportunity to share.
Community-based adaptation & Communicating climate change
Gender Advisory Support to CSUD Project
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
Foundation module 3 Programme design.
Chapter 5: Water management and adaptation
Community-based adaptation & Communicating climate change
What is new in the Sphere Handbook 2018 and how to get benefit from it
Information and outreach
Environment and Development Policy Section
SUSTAINABLE TOURISM HANDBOOK FOR EASTERN AFRICA: Aims and objectives
Time Scheduling and Project management
The GEF Public Involvement Policy
National Health Policy and Strategic Shifts
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Mainstreaming Climate Change Adaptation
Integrating climate change adaptation in disaster risk reduction
Community Engagement and Participation
Integrating climate change adaptation in disaster risk reduction
Guiding Principles for Climate Risk Management Initiatives
Integrating climate change adaptation in disaster risk reduction
Integrating climate change adaptation in disaster risk reduction
Presentation transcript:

Integrating climate change adaptation in disaster risk reduction Module 5 Guiding principles for integrating adaptation in disaster risk reduction

Welcome to e-Learning on integrating climate change adaptation in disaster risk reduction! This module is part of an e-Learning package on integrating climate change adaptation in disaster risk reduction. The package includes five modules: Concepts in disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation Understanding vulnerability Introduction to disaster risk reduction Introduction to climate change adaptation Guiding principles for integrating adaptation in disaster risk reduction We recommend that you work through the modules in the specified order. To access the other e-Learning modules, please visit the: e-Learning Center - Integrating climate change adaptation in disaster risk reduction NOTE: You will need a user name and password to access the e-Learning Center. If you do not have an account, please contact: MinervaSupport@care.ca COPY TO ALL MODULES

Who are the e-Learning modules for? How were they developed? The e-Learning modules are designed for disaster risk reduction (DRR) practitioners. This includes practitioners within CARE, as well as our civil society and government partner organizations. They were developed by Raks Thai Foundation and CARE, with significant inputs from CARE experts on climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction, and most importantly from practitioners engaged in DRR initiatives in Country Offices across the Asia Pacific Region, as well as in Raks Thai Foundation. Practitioner perspectives were gathered through two workshops. An initial workshop was conducted to develop the overall framework and brainstorm on key content. In the second workshop, the draft modules were tested and feedback was gathered. The current version reflects inputs from both workshops. The modules reflect CARE’s current thinking on integrating adaptation in DRR initiatives. They should be considered as working versions. Our approach will be tested and refined as we develop more experience in this area. Please send any feedback on these modules to Bruce Ravesloot: ravesloot@careclimatechange.org COPY TO ALL MODULES

Synergies and differences You can move through the module at your own pace. Introduction We estimate that this module will take you approximately 1 hour to complete. However, everyone learns at a different speed, so you should feel comfortable moving at your own pace. The map on the right helps you to track your progress through the module. Where you are will be highlighted in orange. We recommend that you go through the module in sequence, however you will have the option of jumping forwards or backwards by clicking on the map. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review COPY TO ALL MODULES Self-Evaluation At any point, you can go back to the previous slide by clicking the back arrow.

Are you ready? Then let’s get started! Throughout the module, you’ll find links to key definitions and documents. This e-Learning module is designed to be as clear and user-friendly as possible. So, as we introduce different concepts, we’ll use simple language and examples to promote understanding. However, we will also provide links to ‘official’ definitions for those who prefer this approach, as well as to documents that provide a more comprehensive overview. Any time you see underlined text in the module, you can click to access the official definition. Are you ready? Then let’s get started! COPY TO ALL MODULES WITH UPDATE

Module 5 Guiding principles for integrating adaptation in disaster risk reduction

Synergies and differences Learning Objective for Module 5 Introduction The learning objective for this module is to introduce a set of guiding principles for integrating adaptation in DRR. The module begins with a review of the synergies and differences between DRR and adaptation. The synergies between the two approaches are further elaborated in a set of guiding principles for integrating adaptation in DRR. The main topics covered in this module are shown in the map. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences In the preceding modules, we’ve discussed concepts and practice in adaptation and DRR. Now we’ll explore how we go about integrating adaptation in DRR. Introduction To review: Disaster risk reduction (DRR) is an approach where disaster risk is systematically assessed, and addressed through the development of activities that will increase the resilience of the community. Adaptation to climate change is a process of reducing vulnerability to the impacts of climate change. It includes reducing risks of climate-related disasters, but it also includes actions to improve resilience of livelihoods, build local capacity and address the underlying causes of vulnerability. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Climate change has significant implications for disaster risks. Introduction As a result of climate change, climate-related hazard events are projected to become more frequent and more severe. Climate change also creates ongoing stress on people’s livelihoods through changing conditions, including temperature and rainfall patterns. This places people, particularly poor and marginalized groups, in a position of increasing vulnerability. The impacts of climate change also include increased uncertainty in weather patterns and trends in extreme events. As a result, we can no longer use the experiences of the past to predict what will happen in the future. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences This leads us to why it is important to integrate climate change adaptation in DRR. Introduction Climate change increases both the probability of hazard events and people’s vulnerability. In order for DRR initiatives to be effective, they must be designed taking these changes in context into account. To ensure that DRR initiatives sustainably reduce vulnerability, they must also consider future climate scenarios and how these will affect both vulnerability and disaster risks. Integrating adaptation into DRR initiatives is a process of taking the changing context and future scenarios into account. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation Integrating adaptation in DRR initiatives will improve their effectiveness and sustainability.

Synergies and differences To begin, we’ll look at the synergies and differences between the two approaches. Introduction While there are significant synergies between disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation, there are also some key differences. Understanding the distinctions between the two approaches is very important to recognize what we need to do differently in order to integrate adaptation in our DRR work. With an understanding of the differences, we can focus our attention on the synergies, which provide us with a critical basis for integrating the two approaches. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences There are synergies and differences in many different dimensions of adaptation and DRR. Introduction Time scales Level of intervention Knowledge applied Funding Why integrate adaptation Synergies and Differences Synergies and differences Types of hazards Actors Guiding principles Onset speed of hazards Methods and tools Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation Definition of impact Risk approach Vulnerability approach Motivations Click on the orange boxes to see the synergies and differences for each of the different dimensions.

Synergies and differences To move forward on integrating adaptation in DRR, we need to build on the synergies between the two approaches. Introduction Adaptation can be integrated in DRR by building on the following synergies: Focus on reducing vulnerability to both climate change and disasters. Planning based on local knowledge as well as scientific information, including future climate projections. Build capacity to respond to known hazards as well as to manage changing risks and uncertainty. Address the underlying causes of vulnerability, including gender inequality and insecure rights. To help in putting this into practice, we’ll explore a set of principles that can guide practitioners in working with these synergies. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

To support the process of integrating adaptation in DRR, we’ve come up with a set of guiding principles. Introduction These principles are designed to guide systematic integration of adaptation to climate change in disaster risk reduction throughout the project cycle, building on the synergies between the two approaches. The principles provide an overall framework and rationale for the integration process. In this coming slides, we’ll introduce the principles and explain why they are important. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation REFLECTION As you go through the principles, consider whether they contain new ideas, or if they are things you already take into account in your work. Make note of those that are new for future reference.

Synergies and differences Guiding Principle #1 Introduction Plan integrated adaptation and DRR initiatives based on comprehensive, participatory and gender-sensitive analysis of vulnerability to disasters and climate change. WHY? In order to plan effective and sustainable actions to reduce vulnerability to disasters and climate change, we must first understand the dynamics of vulnerability – who is vulnerable, to what, and why. This requires an investment in analysis, using participatory methods to ensure that vulnerable people have a voice in the process. Understanding the gender dimensions of vulnerability is a key element of the approach. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Guiding Principle #2 Introduction Integrated analysis and planning process, combining local knowledge with scientific climate information. WHY? DRR is often planned largely based on local knowledge. In order to integrate adaptation, we need to understand how climate change is and will affect the current situation. To do this, we need to use scientific climate information in combination with local knowledge. This means that to get to the right actions, we need to combine bottom-up, community-based analysis and planning processes with top-down, science- and policy-based processes. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Guiding Principle #3 Introduction Actions to reduce vulnerability to climate change and disasters identified based on: observed and historical climate and disaster information; future climate projections; and consideration of interactions of different hazards. WHY? One of the main things that we need to understand about climate change is that we can no longer rely on the past to predict what will happen in the future. The past and current context provides a starting point, but we need to use the best available future climate projections to understand how things are changing. We also need to look at how different hazards interact, and how actions to address one hazard may affect the ability to manage another. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Guiding Principle #4 Introduction Meaningful participation of multiple stakeholders throughout the project/program cycle. WHY? This principle is not specific to adaptation and DRR initiatives, but it becomes even more important with the evolving challenges of climate change and disasters. Meaningful participation requires a partnership approach. It also requires that we give all stakeholders, including the most vulnerable people and communities, the opportunity to influence the process and decisions that are made. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Guiding Principle #5 Introduction Embed immediate DRR results and initiatives in a longer-term programmatic approach to reducing vulnerability to disasters and climate change. WHY? Climate change means that disaster risks will change. What works today to reduce vulnerability to disasters may not work in the future. A longer-term programmatic approach that takes climate change into account will result in DRR results that are more sustainable. It also provides more scope for addressing the underlying causes of vulnerability. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Guiding Principle #6 Introduction Target the most vulnerable communities and people to disasters and climate change. WHY? Within communities and even within households, some people are more vulnerable than others to disasters and climate change. For the same reasons they are particularly vulnerable, these groups – women, children, the elderly and marginalized groups – may not benefit from DRR and adaptation efforts if their needs and priorities are not explicitly taken into account. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Guiding Principle #7 Introduction Incorporate actions to enhance community food and livelihood security through reduced vulnerability to climate change and disasters. WHY? Climate change and disasters affect different dimensions of food and livelihood security. Integrating adaptation in DRR requires a holistic approach that addresses these different dimensions. This will likely require an approach that cuts across different sectors. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Guiding Principle #8 Introduction Incorporate actors and actions at multiple levels: community, regional, national and international. WHY? While DRR actions have often been targeted at the community level, it is very important to look at higher levels to ensure that the appropriate policies are in place and that relevant actors have the capacity to act. Our DRR and adaptation efforts therefore may need to incorporate advocacy at higher levels to create an enabling environment for local action. Capacity building for actors at higher levels may also be needed. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Guiding Principle #9 Introduction A process-oriented approach incorporating specific strategies to address known hazards and flexibility to manage evolving hazards and emerging priorities. WHY? Because climate change means that disaster risks will change over time, there is a need to adopt a process-oriented and flexible approach that builds capacity to deal with a range of different scenarios. At the organizational level, flexibility will allow adjustments to the approach to deal with changes in context. For people, focusing on reducing vulnerability through increased capacity will build resilience for the long term. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Guiding Principle #10 Introduction Empower all stakeholders with information, knowledge and capacity to integrate DRR and CCA. WHY? Following from the last principle, in order to manage the uncertainty associated with climate change and how it will affect disaster risks, people must be empowered with access to information, skills to use the information and capacity to make appropriate decisions to manage risks. This applies at all levels – national governments, local governments and civil society organizations, communities and individuals. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Guiding Principle #11 Introduction Ongoing monitoring of changing climate and disaster risks (locally, nationally and internationally) and of progress in reducing vulnerability to climate change and disasters. WHY? In order to ensure that DRR approaches continue to be appropriate as disaster risks evolve, ongoing monitoring of disaster and climate risks and of vulnerability is necessary. This is important both to track changes in the context and to ensure that actions are effectively reducing vulnerability over time. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Guiding Principle #12 Introduction Adopt a continuous learning approach by incorporating reflection and learning processes, and seeking support from others when needed. WHY? There is limited practical experience in integrating adaptation in DRR. In order to ensure that we’re getting it right, we need to continuously learn from our experiences, adjust our approach as necessary and document our reflections so that others can learn from our mistakes and successes. This will also allow us to contribute to the broader knowledge base on adaptation and DRR. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Want to learn more about implementing the guiding principles? Introduction This e-Learning process has provided a brief overview of the guiding principles. To support you in putting these principles in practice, we’ve developed a handout that you can download and use as you move forward in integrating adaptation in your DRR work. The handout can be downloaded here. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Let’s review the key learning points for this module. Introduction There are some differences between DRR and adaptation in different aspects of the approaches. It is important to understand these distinctions in order to recognize what we need to do differently to integrate adaptation into our DRR work. There are also significant synergies between the two approaches. Focusing on these synergies is a good starting point for integrating adaptation in DRR. The guiding principles provide a basis to build on these synergies. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Ready to review your knowledge? Introduction In this module, we’ve explored the synergies and the differences between adaptation and DRR, and have introduced a set of guiding principles for integrating adaptation in DRR. Next, you’ll have a chance to review your knowledge before moving on to the next module. Ready? If you feel you’re ready for the knowledge review, click on the forward arrow. Not quite there yet? If you’d like to go through any part of the module again before moving on to the knowledge review, click on the appropriate box in the map. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation

Synergies and differences Both local and scientific knowledge Knowledge Review Question 1 Introduction Which of the following types of knowledge are important in integrating adaptation in the planning of DRR initiatives? Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences Local knowledge Scientific knowledge Both local and scientific knowledge Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation Click on the appropriate box to indicate your answer.

Synergies and differences Knowledge Review Question 2 Introduction TRUE OR FALSE? In terms of disaster risks, the past provides a good indication of what will happen in the future. Why integrate adaptation Synergies and differences TRUE FALSE Guiding principles Knowledge Review Self-Evaluation Click on the appropriate box to indicate your answer.

You can exit the module by pressing the Esc key. Congratulations! You have completed the e-Learning process! You have reached the end of Module 5, the last of the e-Learning modules in this package. Please send any feedback on these modules to Bruce Ravesloot: ravesloot@careclimatechange.org Thank you for your participation! We hope that this has been a useful learning experience. You can exit the module by pressing the Esc key.