V.V. Sargsyan, G.G. Adamian, N.V.Antonenko

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Influence of the neutron-pair transfer on fusion V. V. Sargsyan*, G. G. Adamian, N. V. Antonenko In collaboration with W. Scheid, H. Q. Zhang, D. Lacroix,
Advertisements

Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams
Reaction dynamics of light nuclei around the Coulomb barrier Alessia Di Pietro INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud ARIS 2014Alessia Di Pietro,INFN-LNS.
Single Neutron Stripping Reactions for Structural Study of 23 O Ravinder Kumar Department of Physics Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra Kurukshetra -
Pavel Stránský 29 th August 2011 W HAT DRIVES NUCLEI TO BE PROLATE? Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Alejandro.
Microscopic time-dependent analysis of neutrons transfers at low-energy nuclear reactions with spherical and deformed nuclei V.V. Samarin.
The Dynamical Deformation in Heavy Ion Collisions Junqing Li Institute of Modern Physics, CAS School of Nuclear Science and Technology, Lanzhou University.
John Daoutidis October 5 th 2009 Technical University Munich Title Continuum Relativistic Random Phase Approximation in Spherical Nuclei.
RFSS: Lecture 9 Nuclear Reactions

Higher Order Multipole Transition Effects in the Coulomb Dissociation Reactions of Halo Nuclei Dr. Rajesh Kharab Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University,
1 Role of the nuclear shell structure and orientation angles of deformed reactants in complete fusion Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Flerov Laboratory.
Particle Interactions
EURISOL User Group, Florence, Jan Spin-Dependent Pre-Equilibrium Exciton Model Calculations for Heavy Ions E. Běták Institute of Physics SAS,
25 9. Direct reactions - for example direct capture: Direct transition from initial state |a+A> to final state B +  geometrical.
Lecture 10 Energy production. Summary We have now established three important equations: Hydrostatic equilibrium: Mass conservation: Equation of state:
Cross section for potential scattering
XII Nuclear Physics Workshop Maria and Pierre Curie: Nuclear Structure Physics and Low-Energy Reactions, Sept , Kazimierz Dolny, Poland Self-Consistent.
Nuclear deformation in deep inelastic collisions of U + U.
Isotope dependence of the superheavy nucleus formation cross section LIU Zu-hua( 刘祖华) (China Institute of Atomic Energy)
Wolfram KORTEN 1 Euroschool Leuven – September 2009 Coulomb excitation with radioactive ion beams Motivation and introduction Theoretical aspects of Coulomb.
Nuclear Models Nuclear force is not yet fully understood.
Isospin mixing and parity- violating electron scattering O. Moreno, P. Sarriguren, E. Moya de Guerra and J. M. Udías (IEM-CSIC Madrid and UCM Madrid) T.
POPULATION OF GROUND-STATE ROTATIONAL BANDS OF SUPERHEAVY NUCLEI PRODUCED IN COMPLETE FUSION REACTIONS A.S. Zubov, V.V. Sargsyan, G.G. Adamian, N.V.Antonenko.
Breakup effects of weakly bound nuclei on the fusion reactions C.J. Lin, H.Q. Zhang, F. Yang, Z.H. Liu, X.K. Wu, P. Zhou, C.L. Zhang, G.L. Zhang, G.P.
Coupling of (deformed) core and weakly bound neutron M. Kimura (Hokkaido Univ.)
Some aspects of reaction mechanism study in collisions induced by Radioactive Beams Alessia Di Pietro.
Fission Collective Dynamics in a Microscopic Framework Kazimierz Sept 2005 H. Goutte, J.F. Berger, D. Gogny CEA Bruyères-le-Châtel Fission dynamics with.
Symmetries and collective Nuclear excitations PRESENT AND FUTURE EXOTICS IN NUCLEAR PHYSICS In honor of Geirr Sletten at his 70 th birthday Stefan Frauendorf,
Application of correlated states of interacting particles in nonstationary and modulated LENR systems Vladimir I.Vysotskii Kiev National Shevchenko University,
Lecture 23: Applications of the Shell Model 27/11/ Generic pattern of single particle states solved in a Woods-Saxon (rounded square well)
Nucleon DIffusion in Heavy-Ion Collisions
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Extreme independent particle model!!! Does the core really remain inert?
For each nucleon Why an optical model ? A 1 nucleons A 2 nucleons N=A1+A2 equations to solve.... N body problem one body problem a particle with a mass.
Fusion, transfer and breakup of light weakly bound nuclei at near barrier energies. Paulo R. S. Gomes Univ. Fed. Fluminense (UFF), Niteroi, Brazil Eurisol.
Shape evolution of highly deformed 75 Kr and projected shell model description Yang Yingchun Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai, August 24, 2009.
Fusion of light halo nuclei
The Ideal Diatomic and Polyatomic Gases. Canonical partition function for ideal diatomic gas Consider a system of N non-interacting identical molecules:
Faddeev Calculation for Neutron-Rich Nuclei Eizo Uzu (Tokyo Univ. of Science) Collaborators Masahiro Yamaguchi (RCNP) Hiroyuki Kamada (Kyusyu Inst. Tech.)
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 The Deuteron Deuterium (atom). The only bound state of two nucleons  simplest.
Time dependent GCM+GOA method applied to the fission process ESNT janvier / 316 H. Goutte, J.-F. Berger, D. Gogny CEA/DAM Ile de France.
Dynamical Model of Surrogate Reaction Y. Aritomo, S. Chiba, and K. Nishio Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Tokai, Japan 1. Introduction Surrogate reactions.
Production mechanism of neutron-rich nuclei in 238 U+ 238 U at near-barrier energy Kai Zhao (China Institute of Atomic Energy) Collaborators: Zhuxia Li,
Lecture 4 1.The role of orientation angles of the colliding nuclei relative to the beam energy in fusion-fission and quasifission reactions. 2.The effect.
Pairing Evidence for pairing, what is pairing, why pairing exists, consequences of pairing – pairing gap, quasi-particles, etc. For now, until we see what.
Determining Reduced Transition Probabilities for 152 ≤ A ≤ 248 Nuclei using Interacting Boson Approximation (IBA-1) Model By Dr. Sardool Singh Ghumman.
V. Nuclear Reactions Topics to be covered include:
Extracting β4 from sub-barrier backward quasielastic scattering
Two-body force in three-body system: a case of (d,p) reactions
The role of isospin symmetry in medium-mass N ~ Z nuclei
Shape parameterization
Probing Nuclear Skins through Density Form Factors
Open quantum systems.
Yuliya Aksyutina for the LAND-R3B collaboration Motivation
Evolution of octupole collectivity in 221Th
Fusion of Heavy Ions Students: Paduraru Catalin (Univ. of Bucharest, RO) Sporea Ciprian (West Univ. of Timisoara, RO) Pasca Horia (“Babes-Bolyai” Univ.,
Peripheral collisions Hans-Jürgen Wollersheim
Satoshi Adachi Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP),
Neutron Stars Aree Witoelar.
Nuclear Chemistry CHEM 396 Chapter 4, Part B Dr. Ahmad Hamaed
Nuclear Reactions --Part 2
Nuclear Physics, JU, Second Semester,
a non-adiabatic microscopic description
Parametrisation of Binding Energies
Superheavy nuclei: relativistic mean field outlook
Fusion and neutron transfer reactions with weakly bound nuclei within time-dependent and coupled channel approaches VIACHESLAV SAMARIN Flerov Laboratory.
PHL424: Rutherford scattering discovery of nucleus
Chapter 4 Mechanisms and Models of Nuclear Reactions
Breakup of weakly bound nuclei and its influence on fusion
The fission rate in multi-dimensional Langevin calculations
Presentation transcript:

Role of neutron transfer and deformation effect in capture process at sub-barrier energies V.V. Sargsyan, G.G. Adamian, N.V.Antonenko International Workshop: Nuclear Reactions on Nucleons and Nuclei Messina - October 24-26, 2017

Outline Quantum Diffusion Approach: Formalism Role of deformations of colliding nuclei Role of neutron pair transfer Summary

The quantum diffusion approach based on the following assumptions: QD Model The quantum diffusion approach based on the following assumptions: The capture (fusion) can be treated in term of a single collective variable: the relative distance R between the colliding nuclei. The internal excitations (for example low-lying collective modes such as dynamical quadropole and octupole excitations of the target and projectile, single particle excitations etc. ) can be presented as an environment. Collective motion is effectively coupled with internal excitations through the environment.

QD Model The full Hamiltonian of the system: The internal subsystem Sargsyan, EPJ. A 45 (2010) Sargsyan, EPJ. A 47 (2011) Sargsyan, PRC 77 (2008) The full Hamiltonian of the system: The collective subsystem (inverted harmonic oscillator) The internal subsystem (set of harmonic oscillators) Coupling between the subsystems (linear coupling)

Potential Nucleus-nucleus interaction potential: Adamian, Int. J. Mod. Phys E 5 (1996). Nucleus-nucleus interaction potential: Double-folding formalism used for nuclear part: Nucleus-nucleus potential: density - dependent effective nucleon-nucleon interaction Woods-Saxon parameterization for nucleus density Coulomb interaction:

Capture cross-section The capture cross-section Sum of partial capture cross-sections --- the reduced de Broglie wavelength --- the partial capture probability at fixed energy and angular momenta The capture is calculated by integration of the propagator:

Capture probability The expression for the propagator: Dadonov, Tr. Fiz. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR 167 (1986). The expression for the capture probability: The first and second moments are influenced by the internal excitations!

Realistic nucleus-nucleus potential  inverted oscillator The real interaction between the nuclei can be approximated by the inverted oscillator. The frequency of oscillator is found from the condition of equality of classical action

Effect of orientation The lowest Coulomb barrier The highest Coulomb barrier At fixed bombarding energy the capture occurs above or below the Coulomb barrier depending on mutual orientations of colliding nuclei !

Effect of orientation

Calculated results Raman, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 78 (2001) The experimental data at energies ~10 MeV below and ~25 MeV above the barrier is well described ! Sargsyan et. al., PRC 85, 037602 (2012)

Calculated results Raman, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 78 (2001) The experimental data at energies ~10 MeV below and ~25 MeV above the barrier is well described ! dashed curves represent the calculations by Wong’s formula

Calculated results Raman, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 78 (2001) The experimental data at energies ~10 MeV below and ~25 MeV above the barrier is well described ! dashed curve represents the calculation by Wong’s formula

Role of neutron transfer Reactions with 2 neutron transfer

Role of neutron transfer Why the influence of the neutron transfer is strong in some reactions, but is weak in others ?

Role of neutron transfer The importance of 2n transfer channel in capture. Enhancement or suppression ? Model assumptions Sub-barrier capture depends on two-neutron transfer with positive Q-value. Before the crossing of Coulomb barrier, 2-neutron transfer occurs and lead to population of first 2+ state in recipient nucleus (donor nucleus remains in ground state). Because after two-neutron transfer, the mass numbers, the deformation parameters of interacting nuclei, the height and shape of the Coulomb barrier are changed.

Reactions with 2n transfer 40Ca(β2=0) + 96Zr(β2=0.08) 42Ca(β2=0.247) + 94Zr(β2=0.09) 18O(β2=0.1) + 74Ge(β2=0.283) 16O(β2=0) + 76Ge(β2=0.262)

Reactions with two neutron transfer

Reactions with 2n transfer 40Ca(β2=0) + 238U(β2=0.286) 42Ca(β2=0.247) + 236U(β2=0.282) 32S(β2=0.312) + 232Th(β2=0.261) 34S(β2=0.252) + 230Th(β2=0.244) The data of 40Ca + 238U is reproduced taking into account the 2n transfer ! At low energies the excitation function of 32S + 232Th reaction is underestimated !

Reactions with 2n transfer 40Ar(β2=0.25) + 238U(β2=0.286) 42Ar(β2=0.275) + 236U(β2=0.282) 34S(β2=0.11) + 238U(β2=0.286) 36S(β2=0.168) + 236U(β2=0.282)

Enhancement or suppression ? If deformation of the system decreases due to neutron transfer, capture cross section becomes smaller!

Predictions 50Ti(β2=0) + 238U(β2=0.286) 52Ti(β2=0.233) + 236U(β2=0.282) 50Ti(β2=0) + 244Pu(β2=0.293) 52Ti(β2=0.233) + 242U(β2=0.292) At energies ~10 MeV below and above the barrier the capture is practically the same !

Predictions 50Ti(β2=0) + 248Cm(β2=0.297) 52Ti(β2=0.233) + 246U(β2=0.298) 50Ti(β2=0) + 250Cf(β2=0.299) 52Ti(β2=0.233) + 248Cf(β2=0.31) 51V(β2=0.26) + 249Bk(β2=0.297) 53V(β2=0.265) + 247Bk(β2=0.299) At energies ~10 MeV below and above the barrier the capture is practically the same !

Summary The quantum diffusion approach is applied to study the capture process in the reactions at sub-barrier energies. The behavior of experimental excitation function above and below the Coulomb barrier is well described. The static quadrupole deformations of interacting nuclei play an important role in capture process at sub-barrier energies. The change of capture cross section after neutron transfer occurs due to change of deformations of nuclei. The neutron transfer is an indirect effect of quadrupole deformation. Neutron transfer can enhance, suppress or weakly influence the capture cross section.

C. J. Lin & H. Q. Zhang reactions

The equation for the collective momentum contains dissipative kern and random force: One can assumes some spectra for the environment and replace the summation over the integral: --- relaxation time for the internal subsystem

The analytical expressions for the first and second moments in case of linear coupling Functions determine the dynamic of the first and second moments --- are the roots of the following equation

Initial conditions for two regimes of interaction 1. 2. rex rin Rint Ec.m. > U(Rint) -- relative motion is coupled with other degrees of freedom Ec.m. < U(Rint) -- almost free motion Nuclear forces start to act at Rint=Rb+1.1 fm, where the nucleon density of colliding nuclei reaches 10% of saturation density.