Key outcomes of the 77th and 78th meetings of the Executive Committee South Asia Ozone Officers Network Meeting Agra, India, 23-26 May 2017

Outline of presentation ExCom meetings and membership in 2016 and 2017 Issues considered and decisions taken at the 77th meeting Issues considered and decisions taken at the 78th meeting Matters for consideration at the 79th and 80th meetings Guides prepared by the Secretariat Separate presentation on criteria for funding HFC phase-down (document 78/5) 28/04/2017

ExCom meetings in 2016 76th (first) 77th (last) Date 9-13 May 28 November - 2 December Venue Montreal Membership Article 5: Argentina, Cameroon, China, Egypt, India, Jordan, Mexico (Chair) Non-Article 5: Austria (Vice-Chair), Belgium, Canada, Germany, Japan, Russian Federation, United States of America 28/04/2017

ExCom meetings in 2017 78th 79th 80th Date 4 to 7 April 3 to 7 July 13 to 17 November Venue Montreal Bangkok Membership Article 5: Argentina, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Cameroon, China, Lebanon (Vice-Chair), Mexico, Nigeria Non-Article 5: Australia, Austria (Chair), Belgium, Germany, Japan, Slovakia, United States of America 28/04/2017

ExCom meetings in 2017 (decisions 77/59 and 77/60) A four-day special meeting would be held early in 2017 to address matters related to the Kigali Amendment arising from decision XXVIII/2, and potential additional contributions Two meetings from 2017 onwards, preferably in the second or third week of June for the first meeting, and in late November or the first week of December for the second meeting, with the possibility of holding an additional brief meeting if required (project proposals or specific requests from the MOP) Agency progress reports considered at the first meeting of the year if the first meeting starts on or after 1 July 9/5/2019

Items considered at the 77th meeting Status of contributions and disbursements Status of resources and planning including tranche submission delays Monitoring and evaluation Programme implementation including agency progress reports as at December 2015 Country programme data and prospects for compliance 2017-2019 business plans Project proposals including and also CAP, core unit costs of agencies US$92.1 million plus US$12.7 million support costs approved for 133 investment projects and work programme activities in 66 countries Policy issues: 28th MOP, operation of the ExCom, incremental costs for heat exchanger manufacturing lines Accounts of the Multilateral Fund, Secretariat budget Production sector

Country programme data Importance of timely accurate CP data: Sole source of HCFC sector consumption data in A5 countries Needed for various Secretariat’s analysis to help ExCom decision making process Allows timely assessment of countries’ prospects of compliance and progress in consumption reduction Letters were sent to the governments of countries with outstanding 2014 and 2015 CP data reports, urging them to submit the reports as soon as possible, noting that, without them, the relevant analyses of ODS consumption and production levels could not be undertaken by the Secretariat (decision 77/15) 28/04/2017

Monitoring and Evaluation 2016 consolidated project completion report (PCR) (decision 77/4) Outstanding PCRs must be submitted to the 79th meeting or reasons for not doing so and the schedule for their submission Lessons learned in PCRs should be clear, well written and thorough Lessons learned should be taken into consideration when preparing and implementing future projects Final report on the evaluation of HCFC phase-out projects in the refrigeration and air-conditioning manufacturing sector (decision 77/6) ExCom invited bilateral and implementing agencies to apply, when appropriate, the findings and recommendations of the evaluation in the design and implementation of projects under stage II of the HPMPs. Monitoring and evaluation work programme for 2017 (decision 77/7) Second phase of the evaluation of chiller projects TOR and budget for the evaluation of the refrigeration servicing sector will be submitted to the 79th meeting At the 76th meeting the Executive Committee approved tranches of several HPMPs on the understanding that funds would be withheld by the Treasurer pending the submission by the relevant implementing agencies of: HCFC consumption verification reports (Bhutan, Cambodia, Chad, the Congo, Haiti, Pakistan, Sao Tome and Principe and South Africa); confirmation of the signature of agreements between the Government and UNEP (Chile, Guatemala and Honduras); or HCFC consumption verification report and confirmation that the regulatory environment for the safe use of hydrocarbon (HC) refrigerants called for in decision 72/32(b) was in place (Ghana). Funding withheld pending verification reports or the meeting of specific conditions The representative of the Secretariat informed the Committee that subsequent to the issuance of the document, UNDP, on behalf of the Government of Ghana, had confirmed that a regulatory environment for the safe use of hydrocarbon was in place in the country. As a result, Ghana had met the pending conditions stipulated in decision 72/32(b). Noting that an earlier discussion had indicated that pending verification reports was one of the reasons for project delays, one member requested that lessons learned from previous projects be taken into account by the Secretariat and bilateral and implementing agencies during the planning of tranche distribution. The representative of the Secretariat indicated that this already took place for new proposals, pursuant to a decision taken by the Executive Committee in relation to the 20 per cent disbursement threshold. The Executive Committee decided to urge UNEP, UNIDO and the Governments of Haiti, Sao Tome and Principe, and South Africa to submit their HCFC consumption verification reports as soon as possible, and UNEP and the Governments of Chile and Honduras to sign agreements for the implementation of their HCFC phase-out management plans as soon as possible, so that activities could be implemented without further delay. 9/5/2019

Consolidated progress report ExCom decided inter alia: Bilateral and implementing agencies were urged to complete and submit, by January 2017, as many reports as possible on surveys of ODS alternatives to enable the Secretariat to provide an analysis of the results of such surveys for consideration by the ExCom at its 78th meeting (decision 77/8(h))   No more than two institutional strengthening projects should be ongoing at the same time (decision 77/8(i) Serbia - Noting that the Government had agreed for UNEP to use direct implementation to implement the HPMP and urging the Government of Serbia to work with UNEP and UNIDO to expedite the completion of activities so that the third (2016) tranche could be submitted to the 79th or 80th meeting with the understanding that the 20 per cent disbursement threshold could be achieved FYR Macedonia Noting that the 20 per cent disbursement threshold had not be achieved and urging the Government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to work with UNIDO to complete activities so that the seventh (2016) tranche could be submitted to the 79th meeting, on the understanding that the 20 per cent disbursement threshold could be achieved. Turkey Noting that there had been security issues and change in the Government and urging the Government of Turkey to work with UNIDO to expedite implementation so that the third (2016) tranche could be submitted to the 79th or 80th meeting on the understanding that the 20 per cent disbursement threshold could be achieved.

Tranche submission delays Issue considered at each meeting Impact of delayed submissions Ozone layer and environment, and climate if HCFC phase-out is delayed Increased risk of non-compliance, although IAs had indicated unlikely impact on compliance, and/or related countries were in compliance with control targets Impact on business planning including the carry-over from one triennium to the next 49 out of 91 activities were not submitted to the 77th meeting because: Government decisions; endorsements; changes in the NOU; structural change (21) Lack of mandatory verification report (19) Funds from previous tranches still available; delays from the previous tranche (10) Disbursement of previous tranche below the 20 per cent threshold (8) Delays in implementation of investment components (5) Security issues (5) Signing of agreements (4) Lead agency not ready for submission (4) Progress and/or financial reports not submitted (2) Letters were sent to Governments urging them to address underlying issues including three SEAP countries (decision 77/3) 28/04/2017

2017-2019 business plans ExCom endorsed the 2017-2019 consolidated business plan of the Multilateral Fund (decision 77/27) Adjusted based on the proposals made by the Secretariat, the addition to the 2017 business plan of the HPMPs and IS projects from the 2016 business plan that had been deferred at the 77th meeting, and the values for HPMPs approved or revised in principle at the 77th meeting (decision 77/27(a)(b)) Implementing agencies would provide a detailed report to the 79th meeting on the feasibility studies of using not-in-kind technologies (decision 77/27(e)) Performance indicators were approved for UNDP, UNEP, UNIDO and the World Bank (decisions 77/29(b), 77/30(b), 77/31(b), and 77/32(b)). Serbia - Noting that the Government had agreed for UNEP to use direct implementation to implement the HPMP and urging the Government of Serbia to work with UNEP and UNIDO to expedite the completion of activities so that the third (2016) tranche could be submitted to the 79th or 80th meeting with the understanding that the 20 per cent disbursement threshold could be achieved FYR Macedonia Noting that the 20 per cent disbursement threshold had not be achieved and urging the Government of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to work with UNIDO to complete activities so that the seventh (2016) tranche could be submitted to the 79th meeting, on the understanding that the 20 per cent disbursement threshold could be achieved. Turkey Noting that there had been security issues and change in the Government and urging the Government of Turkey to work with UNIDO to expedite implementation so that the third (2016) tranche could be submitted to the 79th or 80th meeting on the understanding that the 20 per cent disbursement threshold could be achieved.

Issues identified during project review Funding withheld pending verification reports or meeting specific conditions (decision 77/33) At the 76th meeting several HPMPs were approved on the understanding that funds would be withheld by the Treasurer pending the submission of verification reports, or signature of agreements The ExCom urged agencies and governments that had not fulfilled those conditions to do so as soon as possible, so that HCFC phase-out activities could be implemented without further delay Temporary manufacturing of high GWP-based refrigeration and air conditioning equipment at enterprises that received funding to convert to low-GWP alternatives (decision 77/35) Relevant agencies were requested to assess during project preparation, the availability of the chosen technology in the country, and not to pay any incremental operating costs until it had been verified that the enterprises concerned were using the approved technology Governments were encouraged, with the assistance of agencies, to consider taking measures, if possible, to aid the introduction of low-GWP technology in applications covered under the respective sector and/or sub-sector 28/04/2017

Projects approved at the 77th meeting Approved in principle Stage I of the HPMP for South Sudan Stage II of HPMPs for nine countries (including Malaysia) Stage I/stage II tranches of HPMPs for 35 countries (including Thailand (3rd tranche)) Preparation of stage II of HPMPs in three countries Funding verification reports for HPMPs for nine countries IS renewals for 34 countries (including Fiji, Viet Nam 28/04/2017

Incremental costs for the conversion of heat-exchanger manufacturing lines in enterprises converting to HC-290 technology (decision 77/58) The Secretariat and the bilateral and implementing agencies would use the technical information contained in the annex to document 77/69 as a reference when assessing the incremental costs of converting heat-exchanger lines during the conversion of HCFC‑22-based air-conditioners to the use of HC‑290, HFC‑32 and R‑452B refrigerants. Aim - to assist countries in preparing high quality submissions in accordance with the Executive Committee’s expectations Part 3 of the guide that provided advice on the specific performance indicators required in section 10 of the IS report. Advice on the standard expected for a satisfactory rating for the four overall performance indicators (section 12) - implementing agencies should discuss the standard for the ratings with countries. The guide was developed in order to provide implementing agencies and Article 5 countries with clear advice on submitting requests for the renewal of institutional strengthening (IS) projects and instructions on how to complete the “Terminal report and request for extension of institutional strengthening (IS) funding”(Annex I to the present document). The guide applies to stand-alone IS projects and not to IS projects which have been integrated into HCFC phase-out management plans (HPMPs). Important to complete IS renewal request including the summaries of the action plan, terminal report, draft views of the Executive Committee, and the government endorsement. Views of the Executive Committee would include any issue that should be brought to the attention of the country concerned. Comments welcome. . 9/5/2019

Issues arising from the 28th MOP (decision 77/59) A four-day special meeting would be held early in 2017 to address matters related to the Kigali Amendment arising from decision XXVIII/2, and potential additional contributions to the Multilateral Fund. The Secretariat was requested to prepare and agenda for the meeting, and a document containing preliminary information in response to decision XXVIII/2 ExCom members of the 77th meeting were invited to share information on, but not limited to, the five issues, no later than 31 January 2017 on an exceptional basis owing to the limited time until the end of 2016. US $27 million additional contributions to the Fund Accepted, with appreciation, the additional contributions to provide fast-start support for implementation of the Kigali Amendment, noting that funding was one-time in nature and would not displace donor contributions Available for Article 5 countries that had an HFC consumption baseline year between 2020 and 2022; had formally indicated their intent to ratify the Kigali Amendment; and take on early HFC phase-down obligations to support their enabling activities The Secretariat would develop a document describing procedures for accessing the additional fast-start contributions The Treasurer would communicate with contributing countries on procedures for making the additional contributions available to the Fund The Secretariat would report on the additional contributions received separately from the pledged contributions to the Fund. 9/5/2019

Items considered at the 78th meeting Status of additional contributions to the Multilateral Fund Available information on HFC consumption and production including surveys on ODS alternatives Information relevant to the development of cost guidelines for HFC- phase down Draft criteria for funding Enabling activities Institutional strengthening Identification of issues relating to HCFC phase-out activities Key aspects relating to HFC-23 by-product control technologies Procedures for countries to access additional contributions for enabling activities Status of resources and planning: report on balances and availability of resources; update on 2016-18 business plans; tranche submission delays. Last one is increasingly important. Not expecting a discussion on surveys of ODS alternatives 9/5/2019

Status of additional contributions (decision 78/1) The ExCom noted the report by the Treasurer on the status of the additional contributions and noted with appreciation the status of pledged additional contributions distributed among the 16 non-Article 5 Parties to provide fast-start support for implementation of the Kigali Amendment The Treasurer would report on the additional contributions received separately from other pledged contributions to the 79th meeting References: documents 78/3 and Corr.1, and paragraph 14 to 18 of document 78/11) 9/5/2019

Report on available information on HFC consumption and production in Article 5 countries (decision 78/2) Analysis based on TEAP Task Force reports and preliminary information from surveys on ODS alternative Agencies were urged to work with relevant Article 5 countries to complete and submit, no later than 8 May 2017, as many surveys on ODS alternatives as possible Agencies were requested to return to the 81st meeting unspent balances for those surveys that had not been submitted to either the 79th or 80th meetings References: documents 78/4 and Corr.1, and paragraph 19 to 25 of document 78/11) 9/5/2019

Enabling activities and institutional strengthening (decision 78/4) Enabling activities and Institutional strengthening were considered together Secretariat would prepare a document providing draft guidelines on enabling activities for consideration at the 79th meeting, taking into account the discussions at the 78th meeting ExCom would consider increasing funding for institutional strengthening at a future meeting in accordance with paragraph 20 of decision XXVIII/2 References: documents 78/6 and 78/7 and paragraph 100 to 108 of document 78/11) 9/5/2019

Identification of issues to be considered in relation to existing HCFC phase-out activities No decision on the matter References: document 78/8 and 78/7 and paragraph 109 to 111 of document 78/11 9/5/2019

Key aspects related to HFC-23 by-product control technologies (decision 78/5) Urgency of taking action to enable countries to meet the HFC-23 reporting and control obligations by 1 January 2020 Invited all HCFC-22 producing parties to provide on a voluntary basis, information on quantities of HFC-23 in facilities producing HCFC-22; experience in controlling/monitoring HFC-23 by-product emissions, including policies and regulations and the related costs, no later than 15 May 2017 Secretariat would continue to explore whether there were HFC- or other HCFC-producing facilities that generated HFC-23 emissions and to report back to ExCom by 31 May 2018. Consideration of the need for a desk/field study at the 79th meeting References: documents 78/9 and Corr.1, and paragraph 112 to 122 of document 78/11) 9/5/2019

Sub-group on the Production Sector Article 5 members: Argentina, China, Lebanon, Mexico Non-Article 5 members: Australia, Austria, Germany, United States of America Work would begin at the 79th meeting, when the facilitator of the group would also be chosen 9/5/2019

Procedures for accessing additional contributions for enabling activities Draft procedures for Article 5 countries that have HFC consumption baseline years from 2020 to 2022 in accessing additional contributions for enabling activities (documents 78/10 and Corr.1) Describes funding modalities for enabling activities Presents enabling activities that may facilitate fast-start actions for the implementation of the Kigali Amendment Presents the requirements for submission of funding requests Proposes other enabling activities related to the production sector and demonstration projects for alternatives to HFCs The issue would be revisited at the 79th meeting References: documents 78/10 and Corr.1, and paragraph 125 to 133 of document 78/11) 9/5/2019

Matters for the 79th and 80th meetings Agenda items of a “regular” meeting Status of additional contributions to the Fund Report on surveys on ODS alternatives (update) Policy matters related to the Kigali Amendment: follow-up of discussions at the 78th (and 79th) meetings Pending issues on cost guidelines e.g., eligible incremental costs, energy efficiency, capacity building to address safety, disposal, eligibility of Annex F substances subject to high-ambient-temperature exemptions, enabling activities HFC-23 by-product control technologies Procedures for accessing additional contributions for enabling activities Report to the 29th MOP Status of resources and planning: report on balances and availability of resources; update on 2016-18 business plans; tranche submission delays. Last one is increasingly important. Not expecting a discussion on surveys of ODS alternatives 9/5/2019

Guides prepared by the Secretariat The preparation of stage I of HPMPs The presentation of tranches of HPMPs (updated as of August 2016) Project preparation of stage II of HPMP Presentation of stage II of HPMPs Presentation of tranches of HPPMP Preparation of surveys of ODS alternatives Secretariat's country programme data reporting system Guide for the submission of institutional strengthening (IS) projects Part 1: checklist for the submission of a renewal request Part 2: instructions for filling out the IS reporting format and submission of the report and renewal request Part 3: advice on objectives, indicators and performance indicators Part 4: summary of rules and policies for the funding of IS projects Part 5: sources of information Annex I: terminal report and request for extension of IS funding 27/04/2017

Further information on ExCom decisions All decisions can be found in the reports of ExCom meetings www.multilateralfund.org A summary of decisions of each meeting is published following the meeting (www.multilateralfund.org) and distributed through CAP Official letters to each country, sent by the Secretariat on behalf of the ExCom, referring to any decision pertaining to that country 9/5/2019

Thank you! 9/5/2019