A Parent Training and Information Center Collaboration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The No Child Left Behind Act and Title 1 Schools What Parents Should Know and Do.
Advertisements

EARLY START Federal and State Requirements. What Is Early Start Frequently asked Questions Frequently asked Questions Which children are served? What.
Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.
Infinite Campus Elementary Parent Portal
NH’s PTI Program and Part C Office: Collaborating for the Benefit of Families Presented by: Michelle Lewis (NH PTI Director, ICC Chair)
OSEP QUARTERLY CALL WITH PARENT CENTERS PART B FINAL REGULATIONS RELATED TO PARENTAL CONSENT FOR THE USE OF PUBLIC BENEFITS OR INSURANCE Office of Special.
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Pre-service Performance Standard Selection Process (c) At least 10 percent of the total number of enrollment opportunities in each grantee.
UNDERSTANDING SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING How to account for IDEIA funds.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Recent Findings and Resources for Early Childhood Intervention Programs Deborah.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
California Children Services A Comprehensive Overview Barbara Sheehy, Administrator.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Office of Special.
Fall  Please do not start screening children until they have had 2 weeks to adjust to being in Head Start/ Early Head Start  Screenings are to.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
The Individual Education Plan (IEP): Guaranteeing your rights in special education Spirit Lake Consulting, Inc.
Delaware Child Outcomes Part C and 619 Collaboration Measuring Child and Family Outcomes July 30, 2010 Arlington, Virginia.
SPECIAL EDUCATION A REVIEW OF:  CHILD FIND/ SPED PROCESS  FERPA AND CONFIDENTIALITY  LENGTH OF SCHOOL DAY.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Developing Strong Transition Protocols Infant Toddler Program, Head Start and Early Childhood Special Education Shannon Dunstan Idaho State Department.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Building Successful Collaboration between Parent Centers.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Confidentiality and HIPAA For Mentors. Basic confidentiality requirement for Mentors It is expected that all Mentors having access to client and personnel.
SPCAA Head Start & Early Head Start Mental Health and Disability.
Stafford County Public Schools Parent Resource Center Promoting cooperative partnerships between families of children with special needs, schools, and.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
District Validation Review (DVR) Nonpublic School Preparation Information Division of Special Education.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting Lynch Elementary August 23, :45-6:15Cafeteria.
Post-Secondary Transition
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Manager Technology for Home
Carmen M. Sanchez Education Program Specialist
Impact Aid Training September 25, 2017.
Student Data Privacy and Security
2016 ESE Parent Survey Results
PRESENTATION TITLE Subhead presenter date
Foster Care - Youth Satisfaction Survey 2015
New Significant Disproportionality Regulations
Technology Solutions for Early Childhood Symposium
SPECIAL EDUCATION A REVIEW OF: CHILD FIND/ SPED PROCESS
Annual TITLE-I MEETING august 25, 2016
Karen Ann Breslow, MA, SELPA Program Coordinator
Act Early Ambassadors and Parent Centers:
Family Engagement Coordinator Meeting July 25, 2018
The State of Autism Services in Texas
TEA Corrective Action Plan
Carmen M. Sánchez February 6, 2018
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
SPECIAL EDUCATION REQUIRED TRAINING
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Monitoring Child Outcomes: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Overview and Update June 2018
A non-profit organization providing support to North Carolina parents and professionals for more than 25 years.
Personnel data report Susan Bobbitt-Voth, Presenter
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Measuring Outcomes for Programs Serving Young Children with Disabilities Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC at FPG/UNC June 2,
Student Data & Privacy.
Using Family Survey Data for Program Improvement
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Family Engagement Policy
Gateway High School-Alt.Ed Annual Title 1 Parent Workshop
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
Welcome to Murphy High School’s Annual Title I Parent Meeting
Family Guide: Understanding Transition Team Members’ Responsibilities
Alignment Across the Ages
Presentation transcript:

A Parent Training and Information Center Collaboration OSEP California Verification Visit Parent Survey Report – IDEA Part B An Overview of Responses A Parent Training and Information Center Collaboration Beginning on August 13, 2010, the Survey was announced a number of times through listservs, via California PTIs’ digital newsletters, at trainings and during one-to-one telephone calls. The distribution lists included individuals on the California PTIsʼ email lists (approximately 20,000 email addresses); California Family Empowerment Centers, Family Resource Centers, SELPAs, school districts, early intervention, professional associations, family support networks, mental health agencies, county offices of education, and many others. We distributed hard copies of the Survey during trainings, information fairs and conferences. PTI employees entered the paper copy survey responses into the Survey Monkey instrument. The Survey closed for public input on September 3, 2010. PTIs had until Wednesday, September 8, to input the hard copy responses.

1. Your Child's Age *See PDF Page 1 of 12

1. Your Child's Age *See PDF Page 2 of 12 Response Count 2,078; answered question 2,078; skipped question 1 *See PDF Page 2 of 12

2. County Where You Live See PDF Page 2 of 12

2. County Where You Live *See PDF Page 3 of 12

2. County Where You Live *See PDF Pages 3 & 4 of 12

3. Ethnicity *See PDF Page 4 of 12

4. I know how to get information about the special education services in my State. *See PDF Page 5 of 12

5. If yes, I can obtain the information from: (Please select all that apply) *See PDF Page 5 of 12

5. If yes, I can obtain the information from: (Please select all that apply) *See PDF Page 5 of 12

6. Within the last year, I received a copy of my rights under the Local School District’s/LEA’s special education program under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) the Federal special education law for providing special education services to children with disabilities. Part B of IDEA is the section of the law covering school aged children (ages 3 - 22). See PDF Page 6 of 12

7. If yes, who gave you this information? *See PDF Page 6 of 12

7. If yes, who gave you this information? *See PDF Page 6 of 12

8. If yes, was an explanation of your rights provided, if needed? *See PDF Page 7 of 12

9. Within the past year, I have asked for: (Please select all that apply.) *See PDF Page 7 of 12

10. Each of the concerns that I have raised in the State Complaint was addressed in the decision letter/letter of finding. *See PDF Page 8 of 12

11. I have experienced or observed special education practices that I believe were not in compliance with Part B of IDEA. *See PDF Page 8 of 12

12. Based on my experiences with the special education services in my State, I feel the areas that are most effective are: (Please select the top three.) *See PDF Page 9 of 12

12. Based on my experiences with the special education services in my State, I feel the areas that are most effective are: (Please select the top three.) *See PDF Page 9 of 12

12. Based on my experiences with the special education services in my State, I feel the areas that are most effective are: (Please select the top three.) *See PDF Page 9 of 12

13. Based on my experiences with the special education services in my State, I feel the areas that need most improvement are: (Please select the top three) *See PDF Page 10 of 12

13. Based on my experiences with the special education services in my State, I feel the areas that need most improvement are: (Please select the top three) *See PDF Page 10 of 12

13. Based on my experiences with the special education services in my State, I feel the areas that need most improvement are: (Please select the top three) *See PDF Page 10 of 12

14. I know how to get the results of the U. S 14. I know how to get the results of the U.S. Department of Education's evaluation of my State's performance under the federal special education laws (i.e., the State's Determination). *See PDF Page 11 of 12

15. I know how to get the results of the State’s evaluation of my Local School District’s/LEA’s performance under the special education laws (i.e., the LEA’s Determination). *See PDF Page 11 of 12

16. I think my Local School District/LEA in my State is providing the special education services and supports that my child needs. *See PDF Page 11 of 12