Lesson 11: Focus-Ring of Truth

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Summary-Response Essay
Chapter 1, Section 2 Answers to review for worksheet pages
The UNA University Writing Center Writing & Research Process Workshop Series Dr. Robert T. Koch Jr. Director, University Writing Center University of North.
Introduction to Theory & Research Design
Objective 6.01 Objective 6.01 Explain the abilities to communicate effectively in a technological world Technical Report Writing List the part of a technical.
B121 Chapter 3 Learning Skills. Reading and note taking Identify your own reading strategies A reading strategy is an operation you put into action according.
Summary-Response Essay Responding to Reading. Reading Critically Not about finding fault with author Rather engaging author in a discussion by asking.
Thesis Statement-Examples
Cat 2 Non Experimental Research Projects Day Competition 2009.
RECOGNIZING, ANALYZING, AND CONSTRUCTING ARGUMENTS
Le parc japonais est beau et calme La fille japonaise est belle mais bavarde Ritsurin Park, Takamatsu.
Introductions and Conclusions CSCI102 - Systems ITCS905 - Systems MCS Systems.
Writing Exercise Try to write a short humor piece. It can be fictional or non-fictional. Essay by David Sedaris.
Writing a Formal Lab Report Mrs. Storer Chemistry.
Applying Principles of Learning Diane Ebert-May Department of Plant Biology Michigan State University Assessment.
Aim : How do you conduct a presentation that will adequately help others to understand your research study? (article/project) Do Now: What do you know?Do.
Fahim Haider Jafari PhD. Learning Objectives Describe what is critical thinking Describe what is lateral thinking Use critical and lateral thinking in.
Contents and Format of APA Papers. Who is your audience? Your audience is a group of colleagues. Write your paper so that it could be understood by students.
HOW TO WRITE A LAB REPORT Mrs. Stewart Biomedical Central Magnet.
Advanced Placement Programming
Chapter 1 Logic and Proof.
Chapter 1, Section 2 Answers to review for worksheet pages
Significance of Findings and Discussion
How to write a paper in APA-style?
Writing Scientific Research Paper
Format of Research Samuel T. Ramos, Jr. MCM
Technical Writing Objective 6.01 Explain the abilities to communicate effectively in a technological world.
INTRO TO ARGUMENT AND RHETORIC
Using Victorian Curriculum to plan Visual Arts & Visual Communication learning Webinar, 10 November 2016.
AP® Research Student Workbook Activity Slides 2015
Remove this white box to use the template
Document Based Question
January 20, 2017.
Outline What is Literature Review? Purpose of Literature Review
Title of your science project
Academic Rubric Slides
Active Reading strategies.
Essay 4: Response Essay Responding to Reading.
Introduction to Scientific Inquiry
Introduction to Scientific Inquiry
Big Idea 4: Synthesize Ideas — Moving from AP Seminar to AP Research
Introduction to Scientific Investigations
Lesson 11: Learning Goals
Passage Types Question Types
Section 1 – Identification and Evaluation of Sources
Lesson 14: Learning Goals
Long-Essay Question (LEQ). The Rubric 1. Acceptable Thesis – 1 point possible 2. Argument Development using the Targeted Historical Thinking Skill – 2.
L1:Situating the Approach for Your QUEST
Lesson 8: Learning Goals
Lesson 8: Focus What do you think is meant by the term literature review, and what purpose does it serve in academic research?
What processes do scientists use when they perform scientific investigations? Chapter Introduction.
Understanding the Parts of a Research Paper
Parts of an Essay Ms. Ruttgaizer.
The Scientific Method.
Designing an Experiment
Synthesis.
Parts of an Essay.
Journal What do you think makes for a good speech/speaker? List and explain at least three things.
Developing Academic Paragraphs
Critical Reading with AVID
Remove this white box to use the template
FCAT Science Standard Arianna Medina.
Reading Section.
Lesson 14: Focus 1. Why will you not perform well on the academic paper if you simply describe, analyze, evaluate, and synthesize the knowledge base of.
Structure of a manuscript
L1:Situating the Approach for Your QUEST
L16: Big Idea 5-Team, Transform, Transmit-Performance Assessment Task-The Presentation & Oral Defense.
Lesson 8: Focus What do you think is meant by the term literature review, and what purpose does it serve in academic research?
Presentation transcript:

L11: Big Idea 4-Synthesize Ideas-Organizing and Discussing the Results of Your Method

Lesson 11: Focus-Ring of Truth Indicate on the associated chart the number of a particular statement that is TRUE by placing that number within the ring and indicate the number of a statement that is FALSE by placing it far outside the ring. You can place the number of a statement that you are unsure is TRUE or FALSE right outside the line of the circle.

Ring of Truth Statements 1. In social sciences, the results component is where you evaluate your hypotheses. 2. Most academic papers contain discussion components that tie the results or evidence back to the original question, hypothesis, or assumptions as well as linking it to the findings of other studies. 3. It is acceptable to qualify your claims when discussing your results (using such words as some, probably, most often, and may. 4. When describing your results in a paragraph, it is a “best practice” for the results to be described in order of most importance to least importance. 5. If tables and figures are used to organize a student’s results, such should not repeat the same information already given in the text of the manuscript. 6. In humanities-based research, limitations and implications are not included in the discussion component of the paper.

Ring of Truth Statements (Cont.) 7. Historical academic papers often include results and a discussion of the results throughout the paper instead of distinct results and discussion sections. 8. When including figures, charts, and graphs to organize your results, the labeling of such images is the same regardless of the discipline. 9. Historical and humanities-based research papers can contain graphs and data tables. 10. It is acceptable to determine which results to present by deciding which are relevant to the question(s) presented in the introduction, irrespective of whether or not the results support the hypothesis(es). The results component does not need to include every result you obtained or observed.

Ring of Truth 4 6 9 8 3 1 2 7 10 5

Results and Discussion in the Academic Paper In the Academic Paper, you must have the following elements: Results, Product, or Findings Presents the findings, evidence, results, or product. Discussion, Analysis, and/or Evaluation Interprets the significance of the results, product, or findings; explores connections to original research question/project goal. Discusses the implications and limitations of the research or creative work. Remember, these academic paper components are not sections; they are components of the paper that can either be organized into sections or found throughout the paper. Remember, these academic paper components are not sections; they are components of the paper that can either be organized into sections or found throughout the paper. Each discipline is different in how such components or elements are organized in scholarly research papers. Regardless of the organization, you should always help students evaluate the strength of these components using the rubric for the Academic Paper.

How Do Results and Discussions Appear Differently for Each Discipline? Each discipline values/emphasizes information pertaining to the results differently. Each discipline discusses and evaluates the results differently (inductive versus deductive reasoning). Results and discussion elements appear different in academic papers from discipline to discipline.

Helping You Understand You must be able to identify different organizing principles for the results and discussion elements of academic papers in order to determine your own organizing principles. The organization and discussion of the results should do the following: connect back to the research question and purpose of inquiry acknowledge the limitations and implications of the conclusions they are making. The way your results are presented and discussed will either enhance or detract from the credibility of your argument or conclusion.

Humanities Results and Discussion After the 2 sections of the literature review, the author generates claims and provides evidence for such claims using the interpretive framework established in the literature review. This happens in several paragraphs over the next four pages.

Science/Engineering Results and Discussion In the science/engineering paper, the results are provided in several sections, organized into tables or graphs and then are discussed in a different section, several pages thereafter.

Humanities vs. Science Academic Paper Title Discipline Associated with Academic Paper Brief Description of Organizing Principles of the Results and Discussion Components To House a Moor and End a Marsh: Jane and Imperialism through Liminal and Structural Processes in Jane Eyre Humanities Claims and evidence are provided one at a time to establish an original argument or conclusion throughout the remainder of the paper. Interpretation of the findings happens alongside the results. A Plan for Conversion of Stormwater to Groundwater Recharge on the Utah Science/Engineering  Results are described succinctly, with data organized into tables and graphs. The results are discussed or interpreted in sections following the visualization of the data. Again, emphasize how these examples are generalities and not hard and fast rules.

Discovering Organizing Principles for Results and Discussion Elements 1. In your table group, spend 10–15 minutes reading the results and discussion components of the academic paper assigned to your group. 2. In your table and on chart paper, record a brief explanation of the organization or structure of these components. Be prepared to share how the structure of these components of the paper meets the requirement for the student to: Present the findings, evidence, results, or product; Interpret the significance of the results, product, or findings; Explore connections to the original research question or project goal. Discuss the implications and limitations of the research or creative work. 3. Record the differences in structure and organizing principles for these three papers in the table from the previous section.

Organizing Principles Academic Paper Title Discipline Associated with Academic Paper Brief Description of Organizing Principles of Results and Discussion Elements Implementation of a Ten-Tone Equal Temperament System Art   Following Sweden’s Success: Promoting Intercultural Citizenship in the United States History Victim Worthiness: The Effect of Media Coverage on the Portrayal of Homicide Victims Social Science

Reflection-Include your response in your Trello. What strategy will you use to determine the organizing principles of the results and discussion components of an academic paper?