Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Advertisements

Force limits and layout design.

Self-folding triangular devices at two scales.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Demonstrations integrated system tests.

Technologies in the integrated gripper:

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Nonlinear passive wrist.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

Robot surface tension experiments.

TPAD training protocol.

System setup and results of a representative participant in a single training session. System setup and results of a representative participant in a single.

Scaling up forces with arrays of Peano-HASEL actuators.

Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using hydrogel and aluminum electrodes. Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

Crystal structure of HCMV Pentamer.

Ex vivo testing of the soft robotic devices.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Group data during free walking between sessions 1 and 16.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

The foldable robotic arm with seven modules assembled in series.

AEGIS intelligent targeting compared with blind targeting.

Prosthesis grasping and control.

Comparison of repertoire distributions to baseline.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

A shared-control method for effective bimanual robot manipulation.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Soft robotic VAD implementations, control schemes, and HF models.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Technologies in the integrated gripper:

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Illustration of the addressable wireless folding concept.

Force limits and layout design.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Effect of slenderness on optimal shapes.

Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model. Soft robotic device applied to the left side in a coronary ligation HF model.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Brain-computer interfaces.

Details of an implementation of a mechanism within the control chambers for selective lengthening of the sides of the soft robot. Details of an implementation.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using hydrogel and aluminum electrodes. Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Schematic representation of MT sorting under a given electric field.

Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. Soft robotic device applied to the RV in a pressure overload model of RHF. (A.

Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.

Quadcopter equipped with dual-stiffness origami arms.

Fig. 2 2D QWs of different propagation lengths.

Universal soft robotic activation based on reversible assembly.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Fig. 3 ET dynamics on the control and treatment watersheds during the pretreatment and treatment periods. ET dynamics on the control and treatment watersheds.

Growth enables a soft robot to move its tip through constrained environments and to form 3D structures defined by the path of its tip. Growth enables a.

Laboratory tests. Laboratory tests. (A) Time lapse of the landing process, refilling process, and subsequent launch. (B) Comparison of position and velocity.

Jetting phase analysis.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

Fig. 5. High burdens of AA signature mutations and predicted immunogenicity in Taiwan HCCs. High burdens of AA signature mutations and predicted immunogenicity.

Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Force and angular speed profiles in the normal collision (contact angle, 90°) at 1.2 m/s for the naked and origami-protected configurations on the rough.

Force and angular speed profiles at a contact angle of 30° and initial speed 1.2 m/s for fixed and rotary configurations on rough and smooth surfaces.

Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Presentation transcript:

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments. Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments. (A) Flat gripper array: measurements taken in one quadrant, assuming symmetry. Labeled vertices B to E correspond to loading scenarios in (B) to (E), respectively. (F) Curved gripper array: measurements taken in two quadrants, assuming symmetry. Labeled vertices G to J correspond to loading scenarios in (G) to (J). (K) The residuals between the model and data for all loading planes. Additional loading scenarios and limit surfaces are included in the Supplementary Materials. Hao Jiang et al. Sci. Robotics 2017;2:eaan4545 Copyright © 2017 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.