Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Discussion and Conclusion of Conference Call on February19] Date Submitted: [September 2012] Source: [Huan-Bang Li(1), Seung-Hoon Park(2), Zeria Eldad(3), Jinyoung Chun(4), Igor Dotlic(1), Suhwook Kim(4)] Company [(1)=NICT, (2)=Samsung, (3)=Inter Digital, (4)=LGE] Address [3-4 Hikarino-oka, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan] Voice:[+81 468475104], FAX: [:[+81 468475431], E-Mail:[lee@nict.go.jp] Re: [Information and discussion on UWB] Abstract: [UWB Regulation and consideration on UWB Channelization for TG15.8 Peer Aware Communications] Purpose: [This document is to provide a general review of IR-UWB for PAC] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.

Discussion and Conclusion of Conference Call on February19 Huan-Bang Li*1, Seung-Hoon Park*2, Zeria Eldad*3, Jinyoung Chun*4, Igor Dotlic*1, Suhwook Kim*4 *1=NICT, * 2=Samsung, *3=Inter Digital, *4=LGE

Purpose of This Document <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> Purpose of This Document This document summarize the discussion and conclusion of the conference call of IEEE 802.15.8 on February 19. <author>, <company>

5.2 Common communication mode <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> 5.2 Common communication mode Original description: A common communication mode in each frequency band shall be supported. Agreed description on common mode: Common mode (e.g., for discovery and communication) shall be supported for interoperability. Common mode used in different frequency bands needs not necessarily be the same. <author>, <company>

9.4.2.1. Simulation parameters for discovery <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> 9.4.2.1. Simulation parameters for discovery Agreed description: PHY interface abstraction - Common PHY mode: The received Es/N0 can be used in the PER(Packet Error Rate) curves provided in DCN13-0058 to know the value of PER of discovery signal sent by BPSK and 1/2 coding rate. Such PER curves were obtained assuming using convolution code and a packet length of 150 bytes at AWGN channel. Assuming bit errors in a packet are independent and uniformly distributed, the PER curves for a packet length of 16 bytes are obtained as                         PER' = 1-(1-PER)(16/150) . Optionally and in addition, proposers may provide results with their own PHY interface abstraction. <author>, <company>

9.4.3.1. Simulation parameters for communication <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> 9.4.3.1. Simulation parameters for communication Agreed description: Traffic Full buffer (for high data rate) - latency is not measured at this parameter. Poisson (for low and mid date rate) - Inter arrival time : mean 10 msec PHY interface abstraction Perfect rate adaptation with target PER 0.1 - Common PHY mode : The received Es/N0 can be used in the PER(Packet Error Rate) curves provided in DCN13-0058 to know the value of PER of different coding and modulation schemes. Such PER curves were obtained assuming using convolution code and a packet length of 150 bytes at AWGN channel. Assuming bit errors in a packet are independent and uniformly distributed, the PER curves for a packet length of M bytes are obtained as - Optionally and in addition, proposers may provide results with their own PHY interface abstraction. Packet (MPDU) length for Poisson model - 64 bytes (for low data rate) - 512 bytes (for mid data rate)     [SE1] <author>, <company>

9.4.3.2. Simulation scenario for communication <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> 9.4.3.2. Simulation scenario for communication Agreed description: Two step uniform random drop model is assumed as following way: - a) A PD transmitter is dropped in the area of 500×500 m2 with uniform distribution. - b) A certain number of PD receivers are dropped with uniform random distribution within a distance d<100 m from the PD transmitter. A unicast scenario is mandatory, and additional scenarios such as multicast, group-cast or multi-hop are up to proposers. - c) The process described in a) and b) is repeated until a total number of PD transmitters reaches to Nt.  [SE1] <author>, <company>

9.4. System-level simulation (MAC) <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> 9.4. System-level simulation (MAC) Agreed description: Other editorial modifications proposed in 13-0099-01.  [SE1] <author>, <company>

Clarification needed for the following <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> Clarification needed for the following Shadowing may be included (added) in a path loss model (to count for effects of surroundings), only when such path loss model is a simplification, like the formula given by Prof. Lee. The path loss models in the channel model document do not require shadowing, except for the UWB band. In other words, if you do not find shadowing in clause 2.2.6 is because shadowing is not required to be added.  [SE1] <author>, <company>

Conclusion Remarks Remained issues related to TGD were discussed. Resolved most of the issues. Final approval is required at the face-to-face meeting. Re-scheduling of the start of formal proposal needs to be discussed at the face-to-face meeting.