Voting Fairness.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Which units are you most interested in covering? Unit A –Management Science Unit B – Growth Unit C – Shape and Form Unit D – Statistics.
Advertisements

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference.
Voting Methods Continued
Math 1010 ‘Mathematical Thought and Practice’ An active learning approach to a liberal arts mathematics course.
IMPOSSIBILITY AND MANIPULABILITY Section 9.3 and Chapter 10.
Chapter 1: Methods of Voting
Mathematics The study of symbols, shapes, algorithms, sets, and patterns, using logical reasoning and quantitative calculation. Quantitative Reasoning:
VOTING SYSTEMS Section 2.5.
Math for Liberal Studies.  We have studied the plurality and Condorcet methods so far  In this method, once again voters will be allowed to express.
 1. The majority criterion  2. Condorcet’s criterion  3. independence of irrelevant alternatives criterion  4. Monotonicity criterion.
Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Michelle Blessing February 23, 2010 Michelle Blessing February 23, 2010.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
The Plurality Method The Borda Count Method
Fair Elections Are they possible?. Acknowledgment Many of the examples are taken from Excursions in Modern Mathematics by Peter Tannenbaum and Robert.
CRITERIA FOR A FAIR ELECTION
Homework Discussion Read Pages 48 – 62 Page 72: 1 – 4, 6 TEST 1 ON THURSDAY FEBRUARY 8 –The test will cover sections 1.1 – 1.6, and 2.1 – 2.3 in the textbook.
1 The Process of Computing Election Victories Computational Sociology: Social Choice and Voting Methods CS110: Introduction to Computer Science – Lab Module.
How is this math? Mathematics is essentially the application of deductive reasoning to the study relations among patterns, structures, shapes, forms and.
Social choice (voting) Vincent Conitzer > > > >
Section 1.1, Slide 1 Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 11.2, Slide 1 11 Voting Using Mathematics to Make Choices.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting The Paradoxes of Democracy Vote! In.
CPS Voting and social choice Vincent Conitzer
Slide 15-1 Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. SEVENTH EDITION and EXPANDED SEVENTH EDITION.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 15 Section 2 - Slide Election Theory Flaws of Voting.
May 19, 2010Math 132: Foundations of Mathematics 12.5 Homework Solutions 27. (a) 28. (b) 29. (d) 30. (e) 53. Positive Correlation, Weak 54. Negative Correlation,
Ch Voting Preference tables E, F, G, and H are running for math club president If everyone is asked to rank their preferences, how many different.
The Mathematics of Voting Chapter 1. Voting theory: application of methods that affect the outcome of an election. Sec 1: Preference Ballots and Schedules.
Chapter 15 Section 1 - Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference.
Math for Liberal Studies.  We have seen many methods, all of them flawed in some way  Which method should we use?  Maybe we shouldn’t use any of them,
Section 1.1, Slide 1 Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 11.1, Slide 1 11 Voting Using Mathematics to Make Choices.
Voting Tie Breakers. With each method described – plurality method, Borda count method, plurality with elimination method, and pairwise comparison method.
Fairness Criteria and Arrow’s Theorem Section 1.4 Animation.
Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem. Question: Is there a public decision making process, voting method, or “Social Welfare Function” (SWF) that will tell us.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved Flaws of Voting Methods.
Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.2 Flaws of Voting.
14.2 Homework Solutions Plurality: Musical play Borda count: Classical play Plurality-with-elimination: Classical play Pairwise Comparison: Classical play.
The mathematics of voting The paradoxes of democracy.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference.
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan Voting and Social Choice Majority Rule and Condorcet’s Method Other Voting Systems for Three.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 1.Conclusion - 2Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting CONCLUSION Elections, Fairness,
Fairness Criteria Fairness Criteria: properties we expect a good voting system to satisfy.Fairness Criteria: properties we expect a good voting system.
Voting System Review Borda – Sequential Run-Off – Run-Off –
My guy lost? What’s up with that….  In the 1950’s, Kenneth Arrow, a mathematical economist, proved that a method for determining election results that.
1.
1 The Process of Computing Election Victories Computational Sociology: Social Choice and Voting Methods CS110: Introduction to Computer Science – Lab Module.
Plurality and Borda Count Method
1 The Mathematics of Voting
1.
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
8.2 Voting Possibilities and Fairness Criteria
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
Lecture 1: Voting and Election Math
Warm Up – 5/27 - Monday How many people voted in the election?
Warm Up – 1/23 - Thursday How many people voted in the election?
Social Choice Theory [Election Theory]
Section 15.2 Flaws of Voting
5-2 Election Theory Flaws of Voting.
Voting systems Chi-Kwong Li.
Voting and social choice
Plurality with Elimination
Warm Up – 1/27 - Monday Who wins by Plurality with Elimination?
Voting Methods Introduction.
Voting Pairwise Comparison.
Quiz – 1/24 - Friday How many people voted in the election?
Flaws of the Voting Methods
CPS Voting and social choice
Arrow’s Conditions and Approval Voting
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan
Presentation transcript:

Voting Fairness

Fairness T. Serino If you haven’t noticed by now, elections are for more than just electing our president or our mayor. Elections of various kinds can play an important role in our lives. Choosing the right “representative” whether it be for a political office, president of a school club, a company logo, the MVP of a league, or the site of the next Olympic Games is very important to various groups of people. Because of its importance, we strive to use voting systems that are FAIR.

Fairness The Majority Criterion The Condorcet Criterion T. Serino We have discussed some weaknesses in the voting systems we’ve learned throughout this topic. To decide which systems are most fair, we use four specific criteria called the “fairness criterion.” The four fairness criterion are: The Majority Criterion The Condorcet Criterion The Monotonicity Criterion The Independence-of-Irrelevant-Alternatives Criterion (IIA)

Fairness T. Serino Both the Plurality method and the Plurality with Elimination method will always satisfy this criterion. Unfortunately, the Borda Count method and the Pairwise Comparison method can both violate this criterion. Does not necessarily violate the criterion

Fairness T. Serino (Head-to-Head criterion) Pairwise comparison is the only method studied that is guaranteed to satisfy the Condorcet Criterion. Plurality, Borda Count, and Plurality with Elimination Methods can all violate the Condorcet Criterion. Does not necessarily violate the criterion

Fairness T. Serino Plurality Method is the only method studied that is guaranteed to satisfy the Monotonicity Criterion. Borda Count, Plurality with Elimination, and Pairwise Comparison can all violate the Monotonicity Criterion. Does not necessarily violate the criterion

Fairness T. Serino Unfortunately, every voting method studied can violate the IIA Criterion. Does not necessarily violate the criterion

Fairness T. Serino In 1949, mathematical economist Kenneth Arrow showed that it is actually impossible for any democratic voting method to simultaneously satisfy all of the fairness criterion. Ironically, making decisions in a consistently fair way is inherently impossible in a democratic society.

Fairness T. Serino Note: Although this table makes the Borda count method seem to be the worst method, Borda count is considered to be one of the most fair methods covered.

athematical M D ecision aking