Daphne C. Lainson Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh Overview of USPTO Patent Statistics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interdisciplinary approach to health promotion Marek Jankowski Amsterdam, 2010 Polish Society for Health Programs 1.
Advertisements

Speeding It Up at the USPTO
Doing your Master in Jordan. Title of Presentation | Seite 2 1.faculty-building (to be confirmed by your university) 2.Scholarship of excellence (average.
Union Members in 2009 Jim Walker Economist Bureau of Labor Statistics January 29, 2010.
The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National Reputation By Successfully Serving its Region The University of Texas at El Paso Building a National.
National Economic Conditions John Weinberg August 11, 2010.
1 Geneva, October 2008 YUN Young-Woo IP INFORMATION & WIPO STANDARDS.
For Improvement of IP Infrastructure For Improvement of IP Infrastructure Japan Patent Office.
The IP Experts 1 BY P. KANDIAH KASS INTERNATIONAL SDN BHD SHAPING BUSINESS STRATEGY THROUGH COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE STRATEGIC USE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
PCT – Statistics Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group Sixth Session Geneva, May 21 to 24, 2013.
United States Patent and Trademark Office – IP5 Foundation Projects: why are they necessary for work sharing and what challenges are IP5.
PCT – Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Nineteenth Session Canberra, February 8 to 10, 2012.
WIPO Patent Information Services
WHY?WHAT?HOW?WHERE? Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.19/02/2007 Patents in the Electronic (and IT) Industries Olivier Sacroug European Patent Attorney Katzarov.
Global Business Solutions for Patent Prosecution Niclas Morey Geneva, 22 September 2011 Director International Organisations, Trilateral and IP5 European.
Eugen Stohr Director International Legal Affairs, PCT
Support program for SME IP activity in Japan Naohiko YOKOSHIMA WIPO forum on intellectual property and small and medium-sized enterprises 13 September.
1 Ignacio de Castro WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center Solving Disputes: The Services of the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO-INSME Training.
1 ACS Statistical Issues and Challenges: One-, Three-, and Five-year Period Estimates Michael Beaghen U.S. Census Bureau New Jersey State Data Center Annual.
CALENDAR.
1 1  1 =.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt Time Money AdditionSubtraction.
1 The Backlog Issue and the JPO's Effort Koichi Minami Deputy Commissioner Japan Patent Office.
KIPO’s Policies on IP Marketplace Choongjae Lee Intellectual Property Promotion Division KIPO (Korean Intellectual Property Office)
Understanding Multiyear Estimates from the American Community Survey Updated February 2013.
11 Update from the USPTO Trademark News and Initiatives Deborah S. Cohn Commissioner for Trademarks January 31, 2012.
Internet Survey Method in the 2010 Census and Challenges to the 2015 Census in Japan Population Census Division, Statistics Bureau of Japan Hideki Koizumi.
1 Building Use Study Plattsburgh City School District Advisory Committee Meeting September 18, 2013 Castallo and Silky- Education Consultants Bill Silky.
Port Authority Update March 15, 2012 Ryan Wolfe Director of Campus Services.
Presented by : Yoel Finkel Central Bureau of Statistics, Israel OECD STESEG Meeting, Paris, Sept Credit-Card Purchases as a Short-Term Indicator.
Net Price Calculator Presented by American Student Assistance.
© 2008 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice Better business outcomes equal better.
National Health Expenditures per Capita,
PCT – Statistics Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Working Group Seventh Session Geneva, June 10 to 13, 2014.
PCT – Statistics Meeting of International Authorities Twenty-First Session Tel Aviv, February 11 to 13, 2014.
Area under curves Consider the curve y = f(x) for x  [a, b] The actual area under the curve is units 2 The approximate area is the sum of areas.
Youth Outcome Questionnaire & Arkansas Indicators Compliance Rates and Satisfaction with Services Kazi Ahmed Paula Stone October 18, 2012.
Employment Ontario Program Updates EO Leadership Summit – May 13, 2013 Barb Simmons, MTCU.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fifth Edition
Prof.ir. Klaas H.J. Robers, 14 July Graduation: a process organised by YOU.
Media Channel Study Media Channel Study - 1 Contents Main Objectives2 Survey Method3 Media Channels Studied4 Executive Summary5 Detailed Findings6.
1 © 2004, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 1 v3.1 Module 9 TCP/IP Protocol Suite and IP Addressing.
RCE Backlog Sample: New case inventories at the end of each fiscal quarter from the fourth quarter of 2009 through August 8, Output: The total number.
School Completers and Early Leavers – What Next? Department of Education and Skills CSO Administrative Data Seminar 20 th February Nicola Tickner.
What the quarterly Labour Force Survey can tell us about the economic circumstances of people with sight loss Sue Keil RNIB.
The Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences AIPLA S PRING M EETING 2012 James Donald Smith Chief Administrative Patent Judge Board of Patent Appeals.
United States Patent and Trademark Office – 1 Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Application Filings and Examiner Production. UPR Applications Filed
The United States Patent and Trademark Office March 15, 2005 BCP Customer Partnership Meeting.
THE STATE OF THE PATENT SYSTEM BACKGROUND FOR RULE PROPOSALS Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association “Washington and the West” Conference January.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office July 19, 2005 The National Association of Patent Practitioners 2005 Patent Practice Update.
Boston Patent Law Association Joseph Rolla – Deputy Commissioner for Patent Examination Policy.
Patent Quality Assurance Program. 2 Office of Patent Quality Assurance (OPQA) Deputy Commissioner for Patent Operations Office of Patent Quality Assurance.
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Eighth Session Geneva May 26 to 29, 2015.
The New USPTO Rules and their Impact on Biomedical Patent Prosecution Mojdeh Bahar, J.D.,M.A. Technology Licensing Specialist Office of Technology Transfer.
A View from Both Worlds: USPTO and the Federal Labs Mojdeh Bahar, J.D.,M.A. Technology Licensing Specialist Office of Technology Transfer National Institutes.
1 Innovation & knowledge indicators  INTERNATIONAL PATENTS  OTHER INDICATORS OF INNOVATION, KNOWLEDGE AND HUMAN CAPITAL.
PPH from the JPO Point of View Yutaka Niidome Deputy Director Japan Patent Office AIPLA PPH Users Meeting May 19, 2010.
1 PPAC Patents Operations Update Peggy Focarino Deputy Commissioner for Patents July 8, 2010.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office January 27, 2005.
US Patent Application Drafting Center Presentation ppt Patent Stats That Can Help Your Practice Electronic & Computer Law Committee Manny Schecter.
Patents, Trade Secrets and Unfair Competition
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Tenth Session
Timeliness of patent data OECD nowcasting exercise
What can patent litigation tell us about patent examination?
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Eleventh Session
Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association
PCT Statistics PCT Working Group Twelfth Session
Presentation transcript:

Daphne C. Lainson Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh Overview of USPTO Patent Statistics

Main Source of USPTO statistics USPTO Statistics can be found at Includes: Data Visualization Center – Patents Dashboard – monthly summaries of various statistics Calendar Year Patent Statistics Fiscal Year Patent Statistics Statistics are generated by the Patent Technology Monitoring Team (PTMT) Four Office Statistics Report 2010 (FOSR) can be found at Cooperation of the USPTO, EPO, JPO and KIPO 2

Pendencies (as of October 2011) 3 N.B. These averages are calculated over a three month period First Office Action Pendency – average time from the filing date to the date a First Office Action is mailed by the USPTO Current: 26.9 months USPTO target: 10 months by 2015 Total Pendency – average time from filing date to final disposition (i.e. issued or abandoned). Abandonment for the filing of an RCE is treated as a disposition and stops the pendency clock Current: 33.9 months USPTO target: 20 months by 2015 Total Pendency including RCEs – average time from filing date to final disposition, irrespective of any intermediate abandonments due to the filing of a RCE Current: 41 months No target stated

Pendencies (as of October 2011) 4 N.B. These averages are calculated over a one month period Total Pendency excluding non RCEs – average time from filing date to ultimate disposal for only those applications for which one or more RCEs were filed. Does not include applications with a Continuation, Continuation- in-part or Divisional in the chain Current: 63.1 months No target stated Pendency from RCE to next Office Action – average time from RCE filing to the mailing of next office action Current: 4.5 months No target stated

Pendencies (as of October 2011) 5 Pendency from filing to Board Decision – average time from filing of application until a decision date of the BPAI. Only includes application for which there was an appeal to the BPAI Current: 81.8 months No target stated Pendency of Continuations – average time from filing of earliest parent application to disposal of the last continuation application. Does not include continuation-in- part, divisional or applications with an RCE Current: 80.5 months No target stated Pendency of Divisionals – average time from filing date of earliest parent application to disposal of last application in the chain Current: 81.3 months No target stated N.B. First average is calculated over a three month period. The last two averages are calculated over a one month period

Pendency trends (as of October 2011) 6

Pendencies by technology center (as of September 2011) 1 st Office Action Pendency (months) Total Pendency (months) 1600 – Biotechnology and Organic Chemistry – Chemical and Materials Engineering – Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security – Computer Networks, Multiplex communication, Video Distribution, and Security – Communications – Semiconductors, Electrical and Optical Systems and Components – Transportation, Construction, Electronic, Commerce, Agriculture, National Security and License & Review – Mechanical Engineering, Manufacturing, Products

Pendency trends (as of September 2011) 8

9

Miscellaneous USPTO Statistics 10 October 2010October 2011 Patent Examiners on Staff6,2926,664 Average No. of Actions per Disposal (Total actions divided by total disposals including abandonment for purpose of RCE for fiscal year) Application Backlog (applications awaiting First Office Action)716,428671,409 Allowance rate (number of applications divided by number of disposals – including abandonment for RCE as disposal) 40.5%46.7% Allowance rate excluding RCEs (does not include the abandonment for RCEs as a disposal) 60.0%64.7%

Number of Utility Patents Granted at the USPTO in N.B. Country of origin is based on first named inventor. Population data based on July 2011 estimates obtained from the CIA World Factbook at

Number of Applications for Utility Patents filed at the USPTO in N.B. Country of origin is based on first named inventor. Population data based on July 2011 estimates obtained from the CIA World Factbook at

Four Office Statistics Report - Highlights At the end of the year 2009, 85 percent of the 7.3 million patents in force worldwide, were valid in the Four Offices jurisdictions. 13

Four Office Statistics Report - Highlights Higher number of entries into national phase at the EPO can be partially explained by the unique structure of the EPC and a large number of member states 14

Four Office Statistics Report - Highlights The value next to the name of each bloc is the proportion of the overall number of distinct referenced priorities for the bloc that generated families using the PCT i.e. it represents the use of the PCT route to generate families at home. The value next to the arrows shows the share of total patent family flows that used the PCT system i.e. it represents the use of the PCT system to generate patent families abroad. 15

© AIPLA Thank you.