Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages (April 2010)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FMRP suppresses dendritic Arc protein levels.
Advertisements

Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (May 2011)
Sami Boudkkazi, Aline Brechet, Jochen Schwenk, Bernd Fakler  Neuron 
Efficient, Complete Deletion of Synaptic Proteins using CRISPR
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Zinc Dynamics and Action at Excitatory Synapses
Endocannabinoids Control the Induction of Cerebellar LTD
Ca2+/Calcineurin-Dependent Inactivation of Neuronal L-Type Ca2+ Channels Requires Priming by AKAP-Anchored Protein Kinase A  Philip J. Dittmer, Mark L.
Pathway-Specific Trafficking of Native AMPARs by In Vivo Experience
Volume 78, Issue 1, Pages (April 2013)
Alternative N-Terminal Domains of PSD-95 and SAP97 Govern Activity-Dependent Regulation of Synaptic AMPA Receptor Function  Oliver M. Schlüter, Weifeng.
LTP Requires a Unique Postsynaptic SNARE Fusion Machinery
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 56, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages (April 2011)
Andres Barria, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Jason Aoto, Christine I. Nam, Michael M. Poon, Pamela Ting, Lu Chen 
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
The Retromer Supports AMPA Receptor Trafficking During LTP
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 68, Issue 5, Pages (December 2010)
Carleton P. Goold, Roger A. Nicoll  Neuron 
Differential Expression of Posttetanic Potentiation and Retrograde Signaling Mediate Target-Dependent Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity  Michael Beierlein,
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 92, Issue 1, Pages (October 2016)
Laura A. DeNardo, Joris de Wit, Stefanie Otto-Hitt, Anirvan Ghosh 
Role of AMPA Receptor Cycling in Synaptic Transmission and Plasticity
Volume 123, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages (November 2013)
Zhenglin Gu, Jerrel L. Yakel  Neuron 
Experience-Dependent Equilibration of AMPAR-Mediated Synaptic Transmission during the Critical Period  Kyung-Seok Han, Samuel F. Cooke, Weifeng Xu  Cell.
Volume 57, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages (April 2009)
Bo Li, Ran-Sook Woo, Lin Mei, Roberto Malinow  Neuron 
Tiago Branco, Kevin Staras, Kevin J. Darcy, Yukiko Goda  Neuron 
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 60, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 151, Issue 7, Pages (December 2012)
Michael Leitges, Judit Kovac, Markus Plomann, David J. Linden  Neuron 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 51, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 80, Issue 4, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 78, Issue 3, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 58, Issue 5, Pages (June 2008)
Erika D. Nelson, Ege T. Kavalali, Lisa M. Monteggia  Current Biology 
Selective modulation of AMPAR-mediated transmission in 4E-BP2−/− mice.
Obligatory Role of NR2A for Metaplasticity in Visual Cortex
Ca2+/Calcineurin-Dependent Inactivation of Neuronal L-Type Ca2+ Channels Requires Priming by AKAP-Anchored Protein Kinase A  Philip J. Dittmer, Mark L.
Subunit-Specific Rules Governing AMPA Receptor Trafficking to Synapses in Hippocampal Pyramidal Neurons  Song-Hai Shi, Yasunori Hayashi, José A. Esteban,
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Arc/Arg3.1 Mediates Homeostatic Synaptic Scaling of AMPA Receptors
Volume 26, Issue 8, Pages e6 (February 2019)
A Cdh1-APC/FMRP Ubiquitin Signaling Link Drives mGluR-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity in the Mammalian Brain  Ju Huang, Yoshiho Ikeuchi, Marcos Malumbres,
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages e3 (January 2019)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Yang Z. Huang, Enhui Pan, Zhi-Qi Xiong, James O. McNamara  Neuron 
Sami Boudkkazi, Aline Brechet, Jochen Schwenk, Bernd Fakler  Neuron 
Postsynaptic Complexin Controls AMPA Receptor Exocytosis during LTP
Presentation transcript:

Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages 191-197 (April 2010) Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein Is Required for Synapse Elimination by the Activity- Dependent Transcription Factor MEF2  Brad E. Pfeiffer, Tong Zang, Julia R. Wilkerson, Makoto Taniguchi, Marina A. Maksimova, Laura N. Smith, Christopher W. Cowan, Kimberly M. Huber  Neuron  Volume 66, Issue 2, Pages 191-197 (April 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.017 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 MEF2 Activation Induces Functional and Structural Synapse Elimination in Wild-Type but Not Fmr1 KO Neurons (A) Experimental recording configuration. Organotypic hippocampal slice cultures from p6–7 wild-type (WT) or Fmr1 KO mice were biolistically transfected with MEF2-VP16-ER™ and treated with 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) for 24–48 hr to induce MEF2-VP16-ER™ activation. Synaptic function was measured using dual simultaneous whole-cell patch-clamp recordings of transfected and neighboring untransfected CA1 neurons. (B1 and B2) Representative traces of mEPSCs (B1; scale bar = 10 pA/500 ms) and evoked AMPAR mediated EPSCs (B2; scale bar = 50 pA/10 ms) from a simultaneous recording from an untransfected and a neighboring MEF2-VP16-ER™ transfected WT neuron. (B3) Pharmacologically isolated NMDAR-mediated EPSCs from untransfected and neighboring MEF2-VP16-transfected WT neurons (scale bar = 50 pA/50 ms). (C) Average mEPSC frequency, mEPSC amplitude, evoked AMPAR-mediated EPSC amplitude, and paired-pulse ratio (amplitude EPSC2/EPSC1) from untransfected WT and MEF2-VP16-ER™-transfected cells. Group data of pharmacologically isolated, evoked, NMDAR-mediated EPSC amplitudes from untransfected and neighboring MEF2-VP16-transfected WT neurons. In this and all figures, averages are plotted + SEM and n (# of cell pairs) is indicated on each bar. ∗p < 0.05. (D) Transfection of WT slice cultures with MEF2ΔDBD-VP16-ER™, a DNA binding-deficient mutant of MEF2, and treatment with 4OHT does not alter excitatory synaptic transmission. Plotted are average mEPSC frequency, mEPSC amplitude, evoked EPSC amplitude, and paired-pulse ratio from untransfected and MEF2ΔDBD-VP16-ER™-transfected Fmr1 KO neurons. (E and F) MEF2-VP16-ER™ transfection into Fmr1 KO slice cultures. (E1 and E2) Representative traces of mEPSCs (E1; scale bar = 10 pA/500 ms) and evoked EPSCs (E2; scale bar = 50 pA/10 ms) from a simultaneous recording of an untransfected and neighboring MEF2-VP16-ER™-transfected Fmr1 KO neuron. (E3) Pharmacologically isolated NMDAR-mediated EPSCs from untransfected and neighboring MEF2-VP16-transfected Fmr1 KO neurons (scale bar = 50 pA/50 ms). (F) Plotted are average mEPSC frequency, mEPSC amplitude, evoked AMPAR-mediated EPSC amplitude, and paired-pulse ratio from untransfected and MEF2-VP16-ER™-transfected Fmr1 KO neurons. Group data of pharmacologically isolated, evoked, NMDAR-mediated EPSC amplitudes from untransfected and neighboring MEF2-VP16-transfected Fmr1 KO neurons. (G) MEF2-VP16 reduces average dendritic spine number of wild-type neurons but not of Fmr1 KO neurons. ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (H) Representative images of apical dendrites from wild-type or Fmr1 KO CA1 pyramidal neurons in slice cultures transfected with GFP alone or MEF2-VP16 + GFP for 36 hr. Scale bar = 10 μm. Neuron 2010 66, 191-197DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.017) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Inhibition of Endogenous MEF2 Function Enhances Synapse Number in Wild-Type but Not in Fmr1 KO Neurons (A) Representative traces of mEPSCs (upper; scale bar = 10 pA/500 ms) and evoked EPSCs (lower; scale bar = 50 pA/10 ms) from a simultaneous recording from an untransfected and neighboring MEF2-Engrailed (MEF2-EN) transfected WT neuron. (B) Average (±SEM) mEPSC frequency, mEPSC amplitude, evoked EPSC amplitude, and paired-pulse ratio from untransfected WT and MEF2-EN-transfected cells. Averages are plotted + SEM and n (# of cell pairs) is indicated on each bar. ∗p < 0.05. (C and D) MEF2-EN transfection into Fmr1 KO slice cultures. (C) Representative traces of mEPSCs (upper; scale bar = 10 pA/500 ms) and evoked EPSCs (lower; scale bar = 50 pA/10 ms) from a simultaneous recording of an untransfected and neighboring MEF2-EN-transfected Fmr1 KO neuron. (D) Average (±SEM) mEPSC frequency, mEPSC amplitude, evoked EPSC amplitude, and paired-pulse ratio from untransfected and MEF2-EN-transfected Fmr1 KO neurons. Neuron 2010 66, 191-197DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.017) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 MEF2 Levels and MEF2-Induced Transcription Are Normal in Fmr1 KO Hippocampal Neurons (A) Hippocampal lysates from WT and Fmr1 KO littermates (P12–14) were probed for the major MEF2 isoforms: MEF2A and MEF2D. (B) Quantification of MEF2A and MEF2D levels (average ± SEM; normalized to β-tubulin) WT and Fmr1 KO hippocampi (n = 6 mice from each genotype). (C) Dissociated hippocampal neurons (7–8 days in vitro) from WT and Fmr1 KO mice were transfected with MEF2-VP16-ER™, the MEF2 transcriptional reporter, MRE-GFP, and mCherry (transfection indicator), treated 16–24 hr with vehicle or 4-OHT, then imaged live. Scale bar = 100 μm. (D) Group data of tamoxifen-induced MRE-GFP-positive WT and Fmr1 KO neurons expressed as a ratio of total number of transfected (mCherry-positive) neurons (mean ± SEM; ∗∗∗p < 0.001). The number of cells per condition > 200 for each condition, n = 3 cultures. (E) Neuronal depolarization of hippocampal slice cultures from WT and Fmr1 KO was induced for the indicated times with high K+ (55 mM KCl), isotonic media which activates MEF2-mediated transcription (Flavell et al., 2006). Quantitative real-time PCR reveals similar activity-dependent induction of the MEF2 transcript Nurr77 in WT and Fmr1 KO cultures (plotted are average (±SEM); n = 3 cultures [mice] for each time point). (F) PC12 cells were transfected with MEF2-VP16-ER™ and treated with tamoxifen for the indicated times. Endogenous mRNA levels of Nurr77 and Fmr1 were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. MEF2 activation of PC12 cells effectively induces Nurr77 transcription (F1), but not Fmr1 (F2), indicating that Fmr1 is not a target gene regulated by MEF2 activation over the 8 hr time period analyzed. Plotted are averages (±SEM) of Nurr77/GAPDH or Fmr1/GAPDH mRNA. Neuron 2010 66, 191-197DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.017) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Acute Postsynaptic Coexpression of MEF2 and FMRP Are Required for Functional Synapse Elimination (A) Acute transfection of constitutively active MEF2 (MEF2-VP16) into wild-type (WT) hippocampal slice cultures results in a decrease in synaptic transmission 16–30 hr posttransfection as measured by evoked EPSCs and mEPSC frequency. (B) In contrast, acute transfection of MEF2-VP16 into Fmr1 KO hippocampal slice cultures has no effect on any measure of synapse function. (C) Transfection of Fmr1 KO slice cultures with wild-type (wt) FMRP-GFP alone for 16–48 hr had no effect on evoked EPSCs or mEPSC frequency. (D) Cotransfection of wtFMRP-GFP together with MEF2-VP16 into Fmr1 KO neurons (16–30 hr) reduced EPSC size and mEPSC frequency. (E and F) Cotransfection of I304N FMRP (E) or ΔRGG-FMRP (F) together with MEF2-VP16 (16–30 hr) had no effect on evoked EPSCs or mEPSCs. For all experiments (A–F) mEPSC amplitudes and paired-pulse facilitation of evoked EPSCs were unaffected by transfection. Plotted in all graphs is the average (±SEM). ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Neuron 2010 66, 191-197DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.017) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions