Comparison of 36 assisted reproduction laboratories monitoring environmental conditions and instrument parameters using the same quality-control application Giles A Palmer, Caroline Kratka, Sarah Szvetecz, Geraldine Fiser, Stephen Fiser, Cody Sanders, Giles Tomkin, Mary Ann Szvetecz, Jacques Cohen Reproductive BioMedicine Online Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 63-74 (July 2019) DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.204 Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 (A) Total number of data entries per domain. Data were not differentiated by laboratory but represent the input of all laboratories; (B) the total number of parameters designated towards each instrument domain. Data were not differentiated by laboratory but instead represent the input of all laboratories. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2019 39, 63-74DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.204) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Parameter distribution by both instrument domain and participating laboratory. All laboratories were anonymized by one or more letters before the study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2019 39, 63-74DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.204) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
Figure 3 The effects of altitude on mean carbon dioxide reading in incubators. The correlation coefficient for a linear relationship was 0.373. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2019 39, 63-74DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.204) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
Figure 4 (A) Example of discrepancy between refrigerator display temperature and measured temperature; (B) example of discrepancy between surface hood display temperature and measured temperature. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2019 39, 63-74DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.204) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions
Figure 5 Mean average data scores: mean average data points in order of descending number of instruments present in the anonymized laboratories. Yellow bars represent clinics that submit data to The Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2019 39, 63-74DOI: (10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.204) Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions