NAPAC’19 SPCC Mtg Tasks Tor Raubenheimer June 14, 2019

Tasks for the SPC SPCC/1 – Telcom, Fall, 2018 Review and finalize Main Classifications (MC) and Sub-classifications Select members of the Scientific Program Committee (SPC) SPCC/2 – January 16-17, 2019 Agree to synoptic table Select invited orals from those proposed by SPCC / SPC / OC Select Opening/Closing plenary topics/speakers Discuss Industry and Special Session speakers SPCC/3 – June 14-15, 2019 Select contributed orals from submitted abstracts Select Session Chairs Finalize any outstanding program issues May have an early review of contributed abstracts (?April?) to facilitate visa applications

NAPAC Goals NAPAC is a US domestic conference aimed at students, postdocs, technicians, engineers, and early career scientists who may have limited approval for foreign travel. The character of the meeting is different from IPAC with attendance of ~500 people and ~100 students. Goals: Provide a broad view of AS&T with updates current advances Provide opportunity for early career members of the field to discuss their work and engage with more senior researchers Provide educational opportunities new members of the field Provide an opportunity to develop new contacts and strengthen existing collaborations 

Invited Program 1/2

Invited Program 2/2

SPCC #3 Priority Setting Preference Counts per SPC/OC member (votes over 5 in one MC highlighted) SPC/OC Member First Prefs Second Prefs MC1 MC2 MC3 MC4 MC5 MC6 MC7 MC8 Alexander Zholents 4 5 6 Alysson Gold Angeles Faus-Golfe Carl Bernhardt Schroeder 1 Kazuhito Ohmi 3 Mei Bai 7 10 Michael Spata Patric Muggli 2 Philippe Regis-Guy Piot Pietro Musumeci Robert Edward Laxdal Sarah M. Cousineau Sergei Nagaitsev Tor Raubenheimer Wolfram Fischer

Oral Speaking Allocations Possible allocation of MC's and invited / contributed 2 hr sess 1.5 hr sess hrs Invited Contributed % MC1 2 4 8 0.105263 MC2 3 6 12 0.157895 MC3 MC4 MC5 1 5 10 0.131579 MC6 5.5 0.144737 MC7 MC8 3.5 0.092105 total 16 38 37 78

Other issues Abstract re-categorization – should address this early Late abstracts – only know of one additional one but … CERN – Discussion at IPAC’19 was good however the impact for us is less clear. Hopefully, less of an issue in the future. DPB thesis prize – DPB EC first ignored questions reqarding time for awards and then stated that they did not want space for a prize/award; now want space for a talk. Asking us to fit something in for the Thesis prize. IEEE awards get 12+3 minutes. Schedule for side meetings, breakfasts, etc

APS DPB Thesis Prize

Abstract categories Lots of cathode abstracts. Where do they go? In addition, there are 12 cathode or gun related abstracts in MC2 and another 15 in MC3 Some of these are focused on specific electron linacs (LCLS-II, BNL, UED) and some are more abstract. I tried to roughly catagorize them below with a suugestion of how to allocate. The allocate roughly keeps the same number of abstracts in each MC2 and MC3 however there are some photocathode programs that are clearly aimed at FELs now in MC3.