Sotiris Vlachos BGV Status and Plans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Advertisements

Clara Gaspar on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration, “Physics at the LHC and Beyond”, Quy Nhon, Vietnam, August 2014 Challenges and lessons learnt LHCb Operations.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
Luminosity Monitor Commissioning MICE Collaboration Meeting March 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.
The performance of LHCf calorimeter was tested at CERN SPS in For electron of GeV, the energy resolution is < 5% and the position resolution.
VELO Testbeam 2006 Tracking and Triggering Jianchun (JC) Wang Syracuse University VELO Testbeam and Software Review 09/05/2005 List of tasks 1)L0 trigger.
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, for the LHCb Collaboration, 16 December 2014
Beam profile measurements based on modern vertex detectors and beam-gas interactions Slides from: Colin Barschel - TIPP 2014 third international conference.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
Intercalibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Using Neutral Pion Decays 1 M. Gataullin (California Institute of Technology) on behalf of the.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
The CDF Online Silicon Vertex Tracker I. Fiori INFN & University of Padova 7th International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Particle Physics Villa.
Start Counter Collaboration Meeting September 2004 W. Boeglin FIU.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
FIT (Fast Interaction Trigger) detector development for ALICE experiment at LHC (CREN) Institute for Nuclear Research (INR RAS) National Research Nuclear.
3D Event reconstruction in ArgoNeuT Maddalena Antonello and Ornella Palamara 11 gennaio 20161M.Antonello - INFN, LNGS.
Charmonium Production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Interactions Presented by Wolfgang Gradl for the HERA-B
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
FPD STATUS Carlos Avila Uniandes/UTA 1. FPD overview 2. Roman pot and detector status 3. FPD readout integration status 4. Software status 5. Stand-alone.
9/17/2008TWEPP 2008, R. Stringer - UC Riverside 1 CMS Tracker Services: present status and potential for upgrade Robert Stringer University of California,
FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
RD51 GEM Telescope: results from June 2010 test beam and work in progress Matteo Alfonsi on behalf of CERN GDD group and Siena/PISA INFN group.
Mike AlbrowFP420 – May Timing and Pile-up Considerations 1 Pile-up in trigger and pile-up off-line (HLT) very different issues. Here I consider.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L1/L2 Trigger Algorithms L1-DAQ Trigger Farms, July 22, 2002 F.Teubert on behalf of the Trigger Software.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
LHCb Alignment Strategy 26 th September 2007 S. Viret 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Aras Papadelis, NIKHEF Jaarvergadering 19/12/06 1 Fresh results from the LHCb Vertex Locator test beam Aras Papadelis Ann Van Lysebetten, Anne Keune, Eddy.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
High Energy Physics experiments.
Results achieved so far to improve the RPC rate capability
Commissioning and Calibration Strategies for Micromegas Vertex Tracker
M. Kuhn, P. Hopchev, M. Ferro-Luzzi
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Beam Gas Vertex – Beam monitor
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
ALICE – First paper.
The Status of the Data Analysis of the Beam Test at FZJ
CLAS12 software workshop
Luminosity Monitor Status
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
Jet reconstruction in ALICE using the EMCal
HARPO Analysis.
Overview of CLAS12 Calibration
CMS Feedback on the High pileup (PU) Fill
The LHC collider in Geneva
Quarkonium production in ALICE
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Special Considerations for SIDIS
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Low Level HLT Reconstruction Software for the CMS SST
USCMS Hans Wenzel and Nick Leioatts
LHCb Alignment Strategy
Status of CMS-PPS timing detectors
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
LHCb Trigger LHCb Trigger Outlook:
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Luminosity Measurement in the
T. Laštovička / M. Ferro-Luzzi
First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator
Presentation transcript:

Sotiris Vlachos BGV Status and Plans

The BGV core Team BE-BI-BL LHCb M. Ferro-Luzzi B. Dehning C. Barschel A. Alexopoulos E. Bravin B. Würkner Q. Veyrat S. Vlachos (+ considerable support from the BE-BI community) LHCb M. Ferro-Luzzi C. Barschel O. Girard G. Haefeli P. Hopchev R. Jacobsson A. Kuonen M. Rihl (+ considerable support from the LHCb community) Full collaborator list: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/BGV/Project_Organization#Author_List 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Demonstrator built around Beam 2, in Pt4 Beam Gas Vertex Detector Non destructive beam size measurement for HL-LHC not limited by accelerator luminosity Tracks from beam-gas interactions to reconstruct beam spot, Ne @ 10-8 mbar injected at interaction volume Should allow beam spot size (and hence ε) measurements with precision <10% (5 minutes integration time) Demonstrator built around Beam 2, in Pt4 Expect first real-time beam profile measurements for 2017 pp runs 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Beta functions in LHC point 4 at ~ -220m , beam 2 has x  y  150 m at 7TeV and N  2.5μm, beam  0.22 mm 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

More information Details on detector requirements and description of subsystems can be found at: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/BGV/Presentations/2015_11_1 9--BITechBoard.pdf (BE-BI TB presentation Nov 2015) In addition all BGV information can be found in the dedicated twiki page : https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/BGV/WebHome 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

DETECTOR STATUS 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

BGV Status and Plans Summary Demonstrator Status Detector fully commissioned SciFi detector planes Read-out chain and CPU farm Trigger system Control and DAQ s/w Cooling system functional, detector @ -25℃ Dead channels ~ 0.3% Gas injection system operational Several data-taking campaigns during 2016 with various beam conditions Off-line analysis in good progress Next steps Offline analysis: high precision track and vertex reconstruction Implement analysis software in the BGV online CPU farm for real-time beam profile measurement Establish data logging and measurement publishing towards CCC Further upgrades for BGV demonstrator: Faster trigger electronics + extra scintillators for optimal Beam2 identification Additional fast detector plane (time resolution ~40ps) for z profile reconstruction 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

BGV Control and Operation A typical entry from the BGV e-log: 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

(i.e. 25ns coincidence window) BGV Trigger Veto Counters L0 Counters (i.e. 25ns coincidence window) 1500V 1800V Scintillator Relative timing Scintillator Amplitudes 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

BGV read-out TELL1 : Cluster finder (zero-suppression) HLT farm : Full reconstruction program Currently reading out non zero suppressed data to define optimal algorithms (hence R/O rate limited to ~ 1KHz) Full (16 blades) HLT farm and ZS data will allow a DAQ rate of ~1MHz 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Cooling System Julabo Chiller in service tunnel and all piping to BGV detector installed. Detector currently operating @ -25℃ Cooling fluid leak rate < 200ml/month : Can safely operate between TSs Next steps: Incorporate Chiller control in BGV WinCC system for monitoring and data logging Dry Air interlock Cooling system Upgrade if lower temperatures are needed: Install closed circuit for C6F14 with heat exchanger and secondary cooling with chiller   24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

DATA ANALYSIS 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Estimation of beam spot size Three methods under study to analyze BGV data Approximate beam-gas vertices by finding close-by tracks (fastest approximation) Use track and impact parameter correlations to measure beam position and width (accurate measurement without vertex fitting) Exact vertex reconstruction(most precise method) 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Track reconstruction – Real data 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Distance of closest approach (DOCA) ɸ d (Distance Of Closest Approach) x y REAL DATA This is a x-y projection of the beam-gas interaction volume. DOCA is calculated in 3-d and hence one obtains also a POCA (Point of Closest approach) : (x,y,z) Calculation done with respect to (0,0,z) 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Beam-gas interactions POCA z-distribution 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

DOCA based vertex approximation Vertex seed : a pair of tracks with relative DOCA < 1mm Add tracks with relative DOCA < 1mm and form new seed until list of tracks is exhausted Use each track only once Monte-Carlo Simulation Beam @ (1,1) with σ = 0.15mm Real Data Blue: Generated, Black: Reconstructed (x,y) 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Beam position and DOCA-ɸ correlation Real primary vertex position (instead of (0,0)) ɸ DOCA y0 DOCA = x0sin(ɸ) – y0cos(ɸ) x0 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Simulation results DOCA vs ɸ Beam spot generated @ (0,0) Reconstructed @ x = 0.001 mm y = 0.005 mm Beam spot generated @ (1,1) Reconstructed @ x = 0.84 mm y = 0.81 mm Note: Outliers cause underestimation of (x,y). Need better fitting function or calibration 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Real Data measurement: DOCA vs ɸ NO ERROR ESTIMATION GIVEN PRELIMINARY Beam spot reconstructed @ ~(o.01mm, 0.01mm) NOTE: No alignment corrections implemented yet 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

DOCA correlation vs σbeam The event-by-event displacement due to finite σbeam affect all particles of a beam-gas interaction in the same way. Hence their DOCAs are correlated: <DOCA1DOCA2> = (σx2+σy2)cos(ɸ1-ɸ2)/2 + (σy2-σx2)cos(ɸ1+ɸ2)/2 σx (σy) being the beam spot variance along x (y) Assuming σx = σy : <DOCA1DOCA2> = (σbeam2)cos(ɸ1-ɸ2) Correlation does not depend on DOCA resolution (assuming all tracks come from the interaction vertex) 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

DOCA correlation → σbeam Monte Carlo Simulation Real Data NO ERROR ESTIMATION GIVEN PRELIMINARY Generated σbeam = 0.15mm Fitted σbeam = 0.2mm REAL DATA Fitted σbeam = 0.2mm (Above distribution is yet an other indication of reconstructed tracks far from the interaction vertex) 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Analysis Next steps Refine tracking performance – reduce outliers, improve efficiency Use MC samples to estimate error and systematics on beam spot size and position estimation Study detector coverage and method efficiency Implement all necessary alignment corrections Increased statistics and z-segmentation In addition: Verify zero-suppression algorithm to be implemented in h/w 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Plans for 2017 Collect large data samples (with correct timing and trigger settings) Optimize beam spot measurement Implement measurement algorithm in HLT farm Set-up communication with CCC Increase number of CPU blades in HLT farm to allow for real-time measurements Finalize ZS algorithm and program it in VHDL 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

BGV UPGRADES 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

BGV Upgrades Trigger Upgrade New front-end electronics CF discriminators VME logic board for coincidence in narrow time window Additional Scintillators Downstream to identify B2 (and separate from B1) Additional fast detectors: MicroMegas based strip detector with ~40ps time resolution to allow reconstruction of beam bunch along z 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

BGV Trigger Upgrade L0 Counters Veto Counters L0 Confirm New trigger electronics CF Discriminators Delay and coincidence logic (~10ns coincidence window) Additional scintillators (L0 confirm) 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

MicroMegas ps detector For reconstructing the z profile of a beam bunch : need ~60ps resolution MM: small amplification gap (50-150 μm) fast signals (~ 1 ns) short recovery time (~50 ns) high rate capabilities (> MHz/cm2) high gain (up to 105 or more) Time resolution already achieved: <50ps Anode can be in the form of wide (~cm) strips to match the BGV geometry To be placed possibly at the L0 confirm support frame For more details see BE-BI seminar: MicroMegas detector applications for beam diagnostics https://indico.cern.ch/event/540799/ 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Summary BGV H/W fully deployed – commissioned Beam spot reconstruction Encouraging first results Expected optimal resolution with full vertex reconstruction Open issues: Transport offline code to online system Communication with CCC BGV upgrades and deployment for B1 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

BackUp 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

Radiation monitoring 6 PIN Diodes measuring directly on detector modules Expected dose ~10Gy/year (more details: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/BGV/Radiation 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

BGV module Test Beam Measurements Courtesy: O. Girard - EPFL 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos

DOCA – phi projection MC(1,1) 24/11/2016 S. Vlachos