Metadata Data & Services Informatie Vlaanderen (BE)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEOSS AIP Phase 2 Kickoff Workshop September, Boulder Colorado, USA AP ISO 1.0 Jürgen Walther Office of the Interministerial Committee for Geo Information.
Advertisements

Web Services Architecture An interoperability architecture for the World Wide Service Network.
CAR Training Module PRODUCT REGISTRATION and MANAGEMENT Module 5-Register the Web URL for a CAR Document Type (Run as a PowerPoint show)
Proposed update of Technical Guidance for INSPIRE Download services based on SOS Matthes Rieke, Dr. Albert Remke (m.rieke, 52°North.
INSPIRE Service Architecture
TC3 Meeting in Montreal (Montreal/Secretariat)6 page 1 of 10 Structure and purpose of IEC ISO - IEC Specifications for Document Management.
Brokering Mathematical Services Through a Web Registry.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory SKOS Ecoterm 2006 Alistair Miles CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Semantic Web Best Practices and Deployment.
Data on the Web Life Cycle Bernadette Farias Lóscio March, 2014.
UWG 2013 Meeting PO.DAAC Web Services Demo. What are PO.DAAC Web Services?
ET-ADRS-1, April ISO 191xx series of geographic information standards.
INSPIRE drafting teams work versus practical INSPIRE implementations, theory and practice Marek Brylski, Intergraph Polska Enviro-i-Fórum – Zvolen – Slovakia.
Understanding resource coupling CSW Kristian Senkler
GeoViQua-PTB December 2011: GEOPortal implementation status 7 December 2011 AUTHOR: Nicola Trocino (Sapienza Consulting)
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Workshop on the INSPIRE registry and registers Paul Janssen - Geonovum.
6 February 2008 Michel Grothe INSPIRE DT NS IR1 on Discovery Services.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
SCORM Course Meta-data 3 major components: Content Aggregation Meta-data –context specific data describing the packaged course SCO Meta-data –context independent.
19-October th FIG Regional Conference, Hanoi Developing Vietnam’s Cadastral Data Standards based on ISO
ISO 191** Overview A “Family” of Standards. Resources ISO Standards Web Page – Technical.
© Copyright 2015 STI INNSBRUCK PlanetData D2.7 Recommendations for contextual data publishing Ioan Toma.
COMPASS09 Annual Conference of Compass Informatics.
WISE GIS/IT Workshop, Dublin January INSPIRE Architecture & WISE Steve Peedell Spatial Data Infrastructures Unit European Commission Joint.
Ideas on Opening Up GEOSS Architecture and Extending AIP-5 Wim Hugo SAEON.
Beyond simple features: Do complex feature types need complex service descriptions?' B.N. Lawrence (1,2), D. Lowe (1,2), S. Pascoe (1,2) and A. Woolf (1).
Linking Big Data from Space to Apps on Earth
ESA-FAO GEOPortal STATUS & PLANS
European Monitoring Platform for Mapping of QoS and QoE
EO OpenSearch GeoJSON Encoding
Workflow on publishing monitoring data using INSPIRE
CEN 202 “Space Standardisation”
Digital AIM “D-AIM” Sam Van der Stricht EUROCONTROL
Sabri Kızanlık Ural Emekçi
Brokering Agreement process Stefano Nativi and Mattia Santoro ESSI-lab of CNR-IIA San Petersburg (Russia), 07 Nov 2016.
Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ)
Java Beans Sagun Dhakhwa.
Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ)
GEOSS Air Quality Community Infrastructure
Tools and guidance for data providers
GeoJSON(-LD) Encoding of Granule Metadata
CEOS OpenSearch Project II
Julia Powell Coast Survey Development Laboratory
(Former GEOSS Common Infrastructure)
Spatial Data on the Web :
CEOP/IGWCO Joint Meeting, Feb.28  March 4, University of Tokyo, Japan
Geonovum Wideke Boersma 48th MIG-T meeting, April 2018
MIG-T meeting, Ispra MIWP action End user applications 21 April 2016.
INSPIRE – What if...? Workshop at OGC meeting in Delft
Design central EMODnet portal Objectives and Technical description Initial draft prepared by the Flanders Marine Institute.
SDI from a technological perspective: Metadata
Ola Nordbeck Statistics Norway
Role Models and Lifecycles in IoT and their Impact on the W3C WoT Thing Description Michele Blank.
Geraldine Nolf, Dirk De Baere, Mathias De Schrijver, Bart Cosyn
Session 2: Metadata and Catalogues
Web services, Geospatial processing models, Workflows, and Virtualization of Geospatial Products Liping Di Laboratory for Advanced Information Technology.
Digital AIM “D-AIM” Sam Van der Stricht EUROCONTROL
LOD reference architecture
The concept.
W3C Recommendation 17 December 2013 徐江
MSDI training courses feedback MSDIWG10 March 2019 Busan
4/5 May 2009 The Palazzo dei Congressi di Stresa Stresa, Italy
Geoscience Australia Service Metadata
WISEds Implementation plan: proposal
Workpackage Infrastructure
Access to Base Registries ISA2 action
QoS Metadata Status 106th OGC Technical Committee Orléans, France
Which INSPIRE download service to implement?
Australian and New Zealand Metadata Working Group
Introduction to reference metadata and quality reporting
WISE and INSPIRE By Albrecht Wirthmann, GISCO, Eurostat
Presentation transcript:

Metadata Data & Services Informatie Vlaanderen (BE)

Metadata – data & services Use case How can one find our data and services? Metadata Data & Services

Search >> Catalogue >> Geoportal Only when you describe your data and service through metadata your data sets & services enter the catalogue on the Geoportal in Flanders (BE) Metadata Data & Services http://www.geopunt.be/catalogus

Search >> Catalogue >> Geoportal Proposal In case of the proposed simplification : no one will be able to find services independantly but will be obliged to look for them via data Metadata Data & Services

Search >> Catalogue >> Geoportal Need for service catalogue exists Developers need a service catalogue  current proposal ignores this use case Services that combine several datasets are not discoverable without service catalogue E.G. : Geolocation Service: When implemented a user can search via adresses, parcels, cross border …  a search over a combination of data sources The existence of such services is best described through a service catalogue (without having to go through all data that might be served through this service). Metadata Data & Services

Search >> Catalogue >> Geoportal W3C … : there is a need for service catalogues W3C via it’s Dataset Exchange Working Group is looking into the use case of how developpers can directly find services instead of finding them as distributions of datasets ! Extract from the Use Case Description: “Users often access datasets via web services. DCAT provides constructs for associating a resource described by dcat:Dataset with dcat:Distribution descriptions. However, the Distribution class provides only the dcat:accessURL and dcat:downloadURL properties for users to access/download something. It would be useful for users to gain more information about the web service endpoint and how users can interact with the data. If information about the web service is known with appropriate identifiers for the data, then users can understand additional context then invoke a call to the web service to access/download the dataset resource or subsets of it.” https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/ >> DCAT Distribution to describe web services [ID6] Metadata Data & Services

Search >> Catalogue >> Geoportal W3C via it’s Dataset Exchange Working Group is looking into the use case of how developpers can directly find services instead of finding them as distributions of datasets ! https://w3c.github.io/dxwg/ucr/ Metadata Data & Services

Search >> Catalogue >> Geoportal Is there an alternative ? Simplification capabilities of geo-services = “source” + mapping these to metadata providing future services with a standardisation for MD elements/capabilities => IV is currently drafting an API standard (DCAT-AP to MD) This offers a way to ensure that services can be discovered individually in a catalogue Simplification by considering the capabilities of the current geo-services (WMS, WMTS, WFS, CSW, …) as “source” and mapping these to metadata (IV reads out the capabilities to service MD) by providing geo-services (& other services like API’s) with a standardisation for crucial MD elements/capabilities so that these can be mapped to MD => we are currently drafting an API standard to ensure that the API’s themselves have enough MD elements that are conformant to DCAT-AP so that a mapping to service MD is possible. Metadata Data & Services

Questions ? CC: Ouns Kissiyar: Ouns.Kissiyar@kb.vlaanderen.be

End User (data provider, developer, …) Search >> Catalogue >> Geoportal End User (data provider, developer, …) - SEARCHING FOR - Operates on: UUIDREF: id van data UUID + xLINK: href: ID v metadata UUID MD DS MD SRV MD DS ISO-coupled R = id v data UUID DS SRV DS FC FC DISTR DISTR Metadata Data & Services