External model validation of binary clinical risk prediction models in cardiovascular and thoracic surgery  Graeme L. Hickey, PhD, Eugene H. Blackstone,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac risk models predict in-hospital mortality of heart valve surgery in a Chinese population: A multicenter study 
Advertisements

Lost in translation The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc 
Stephen R. Broderick, MD, MPHS 
Lars G. Svensson, MD, PhD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD 
Rounding numbers The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Prediction of severe acute kidney injury after pediatric cardiac surgery with the use of novel biomarkers: A new trend in clinical research and risk stratification 
Improving health care by embracing Systems Theory
Building a bioartificial heart: A 3-song saga
Intrinsic cardiac stem cells are essential for regeneration
Centers for Disease Control “increased-risk” organ donor: Not so risky?  Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Simulation of single-ventricle physiology … a start
Abracadabra I, II…HeartMate 3?
Assessing surgical risk for adults with congenital heart disease: Are pediatric scoring systems appropriate?  Brian Kogon, MD, Matthew Oster, MD, MPH 
Victor van Berkel, MD, PhD 
Clinical-Pathologic Conference: Use and choice of statistical methods for the clinical study, “Superficial adenocarcinoma of the esophagus”  Eugene H.
William M. DeCampli, MD, PhD 
Multilevel data analysis: What? Why? How?
How should we treat air leaks?
Basic and translational research careers as early faculty cardiothoracic surgeons— perspectives from 2 young investigators  Keshava Rajagopal, MD, PhD,
Go on-pump or off-pump in diabetic patients?
New treatment approaches create new disease processes: A short guide on how to reduce unexpected events to a minimum  Martin Czerny, MD, MBA  The Journal.
Bigger The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Commentary: Pursuit of the green jacket: Mastery of the long and short games  Daniel P. Raymond, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
The lord of the rings  Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD 
The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology
Support Your Specialty
Innovation and science: The future of valve design
Comparative glycomic profiling in esophageal adenocarcinoma
The assessment of cost effectiveness and the effectiveness of cost assessment in cardiothoracic surgery  Vinay Badhwar, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and.
It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…
Fixing the supply problem
Military surgeons just want to have fun
Experience from an American Association for Thoracic Surgery Foundation for Thoracic Surgery Training Fellowship: Lung transplantation in Toronto General.
A first start for lung transplantation?
Jules Lin, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Stephen R. Broderick, MD, MPHS 
Get it right the first time
Yoan Lamarche, MD, Mahsa Elmi-Sarabi, MSc, Lillian Ding, MSc, James G
Joseph A. Dearani, MD, Michael J. Ackerman, MD, PhD 
Choice of second pericardial drainage tube for posterior placement
Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, PhD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD 
The diabetes epidemic and its effect on cardiac surgery practice
Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD 
Niv Ad, MD, Lawrence M. Wei, MD 
Pharmacokinetic characteristics and microbiologic appropriateness of cefazolin for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in elective cardiac surgery  Christian.
Instrumental variable methods in clinical research
Attachment disorder in thoracoabdominal surgery
Internal validation of risk models in lung resection surgery: Bootstrap versus training- and-test sampling  Alessandro Brunelli, MD, Gaetano Rocco, MD 
Cardiac surgery in patients with a porcelain aorta
Passing the torch The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Prognosis and “granularity”: Building on staging foundations?
First nights, the adrenal axis, and steroids
The origins of open heart surgery at the University of Minnesota 1951 to 1956  Richard A. DeWall, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide
The continuing challenge of congenital heart disease in China
Ralph E. Delius, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
After neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, predicted pulmonary function may be reduced by 10%  Benny Weksler, MD, MBA  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.
“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead
Why arch curvature affects arch resistance
Ryan R. Davies, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 
Preoperative PFTs: The answer is blowing in the wind
European Society of Thoracic Surgeons preoperative mediastinal staging guidelines: From face validity to external validity  Alessandro Brunelli, MD  The.
Identifying risk factors: Challenges of separating signal from noise
Did you like Terminator 3 better than Terminator 2
How do we follow up our patients
Journal changes and initiatives
Deciding how much to pay for effective care
Presentation transcript:

External model validation of binary clinical risk prediction models in cardiovascular and thoracic surgery  Graeme L. Hickey, PhD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 152, Issue 2, Pages 351-355 (August 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.04.023 Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Calibration plot for simulated data (n = 500). The green triangles denote the mean predicted and observed event probabilities for patients grouped into tenths using deciles. The gray dashed line denotes perfect calibration. A smoothing curve (blue dotted line) and the calibration curve (red solid line) are also overlaid. The distribution of calculated predicted probabilities is overlaid along the horizontal axis. A subset of various statistics useful for validating the model are also shown. This figure was generated using standard statistical software: the rms package for R version 3.1.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). More details have been provided by Harrell.38,46 Code to reproduce this plot is given in Appendix 1. ROC, Receiver operating characteristic curve. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 152, 351-355DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.04.023) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

A calibration plot. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 152, 351-355DOI: (10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.04.023) Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions