Development and Evaluation of a Hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian Modeling Approach Beata Czader, Peter Percell, Daewon Byun, Yunsoo Choi University of Houston.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 AirWare : AirWare : C OMPREHENSIVE A IR QUALITY M ODEL WITH E X TENSIONS VERSION 4.30, PBM DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352.
Advertisements

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1 Modeling of 1,3-Butadiene for Urban and Industrial Areas B. Rappenglück and B. Czader.
MODELING CHEMICALLY REACTIVE AIR TOXICS IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA USING CAMx Chris Emery, Greg Yarwood and Ed Tai ENVIRON International Corporation.
TCEQ Air Permits Division Justin Cherry, P.E. Ahmed Omar Stephen F. Austin State University February 28, 2013.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
Evaluation of the AIRPACT2 modeling system for the Pacific Northwest Abdullah Mahmud MS Student, CEE Washington State University.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
Session 9, Unit 17 UAM and CAMx. UAM and CAMx UAM - Urban Airshed Model Currently available versions:  UAM-V 1.24  UAM-V 1.30  Available from Systems.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Simulation of Houston-Galveston Airshed Ozone Episode with EPA’s CMAQ Daewon Byun: PI Soontae Kim, Beata Czader, Seungbum Kim Emissions input Chemical.
Emission processing methodology for the new GEM-MACH model ABSTRACT SMOKE has recently been adapted to provide emissions for the new Meteorological Service.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
©2005,2006 Carolina Environmental Program Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions SMOKE Modeling System Zac Adelman and Andy Holland Carolina Environmental.
Krish Vijayaraghavan, Prakash Karamchandani Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA 3rd Annual CMAS Models-3 Conference October 18-20, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC.
1 CCOS Seasonal Modeling: The Computing Environment S.Tonse, N.J.Brown & R. Harley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University Of California at Berkeley.
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
STUDY OF SOURCE ATTRIBUTION OF UNSATURATED HYDROCARBONS FOR OZONE PRODUCTION IN THE HOUSTON-GALVESTON AREA WITH THE EXTENDED SAPRC99 CHEMICAL MECHANISM.
Ams/awma_ PROCESS-BASED ANALYSIS OF THE ROLE OF THE GULF BREEZE IN SIMULATING OZONE CONCENTRATIONS ALONG THE EASTERN GULF COAST Sharon G. Douglas.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 Long range transport of air pollution service: Part 1: Trajectories Bart Dils, M. De Mazière, J. van Geffen,
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
Combining HYSPLIT and CMAQ to resolve urban scale features: an example of application in Houston, TX Ariel F. Stein (1), Vlad Isakov (2), James Godowitch.
Soontae Kim and Daewon W. Byun Comparison of Emission Estimates from SMOKE and EPS2 Used for Studying Houston-Galveston Air Quality Institute for Multidimensional.
Fine scale air quality modeling using dispersion and CMAQ modeling approaches: An example application in Wilmington, DE Jason Ching NOAA/ARL/ASMD RTP,
10/28/2014 Xiangshang Li, Yunsoo Choi, Beata Czader Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Houston The impact of the observational meteorological.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CMAQ Tagged Species Source Apportionment (TSSA)
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
Georgia Institute of Technology Initial Application of the Adaptive Grid Air Quality Model Dr. M. Talat Odman, Maudood N. Khan Georgia Institute of Technology.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Application of Models-3/CMAQ to Phoenix Airshed Sang-Mi Lee and Harindra J. S. Fernando Environmental Fluid Dynamics Program Arizona State University.
New Techniques for Modeling Air Quality Impacts of DoD Activities Talat Odman and Ted Russell Environmental Engineering Department Georgia Institute of.
ARCTAS-CA June 2008 Air Quality Simulations. July 1, 2009 ARCTAS-CA Data Analysis Workshop 2 Collaborators Ajith Kaduwela, Chenxia Cai, Dazhong Yin, Jin.
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © A high-order accurate and monotonic advection scheme is used as a local interpolator to redistribute.
Impact of high resolution modeling on ozone predictions in the Cascadia region Ying Xie and Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Department of.
Session 5, CMAS 2004 INTRODUCTION: Fine scale modeling for Exposure and risk assessments.
Statewide Protocol: Regional Application August 27, 2003 Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Luis F. Woodhouse.
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Boundary layer depth verification system at NCEP M. Tsidulko, C. M. Tassone, J. McQueen, G. DiMego, and M. Ek 15th International Symposium for the Advancement.
1 Prakash Karamchandani 1, David Parrish 2, Lynsey Parker 1, Thomas Ryerson 3, Paul O. Wennberg 4, Alex Teng 4, John D. Crounse 4, Greg Yarwood 1 1 Ramboll.
___________________________________________________________________________CMAQ Basics ___________________________________________________Community Modeling.
Intro to Modeling – Terms & concepts Marti Blad, Ph.D., P.E. ITEP
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Implementation of an Online Photolysis Module in CMAQ 4.7 Christopher G. Nolte.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx Sensitivity Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
The application of Models-3 in national policy Samantha Baker Air and Environment Quality Division, Defra.
Assessment and Calculations of Plume Rise for Forest Fires during Texas Air Quality Study period. Uarporn Nopmongcol Dept. of Chemical Engineering The.
PREMAQ: A New Pre-Processor to CMAQ for Air Quality Forecasting Tanya L. Otte*, George Pouliot*, and Jonathan E. Pleim* Atmospheric Modeling Division U.S.
Off-line Air Quality Modeling Paradigms:
Types of Models Marti Blad PhD PE
Mobile Source Contributions to Ambient PM2.5 and Ozone in 2025
High-resolution air quality forecasting for Hong Kong
Forecasting the Impacts of Wildland Fires
17th Annual CMAS Conference
Matthew J. Alvarado, Benjamin Brown-Steiner,
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
Sensitivity Analysis of Ozone in the Southeast
Models of atmospheric chemistry
SELECTED RESULTS OF MODELING WITH THE CMAQ PLUME-IN-GRID APPROACH
Some thoughts on future air quality models from a WRF-Chem modeler
REGIONAL AND LOCAL-SCALE EVALUATION OF 2002 MM5 METEOROLOGICAL FIELDS FOR VARIOUS AIR QUALITY MODELING APPLICATIONS Pat Dolwick*, U.S. EPA, RTP, NC, USA.
PM modelling assessment in Northern Italy
Presentation transcript:

Development and Evaluation of a Hybrid Eulerian-Lagrangian Modeling Approach Beata Czader, Peter Percell, Daewon Byun, Yunsoo Choi University of Houston

Motivation and Goal UH Air Quality Forecasting system provides 48-hour ozone and PM2.5 everyday over the US (12km) and Southeast Texas (4km) based on CMAQ 5.0.1 (http://spock.geosc.uh.edu). Sometimes we have high biased ozone and PM2.5. What can we do after finding extremely high biased ozone and PM2.5? Is there a timely cheap trajectory model with reasonable chemical boundary condition and detailed chemistry?

Motivation and Goal Air pollution can be numerically simulated using Eulerian or Lagrangian approach. Eulerian models have fixed frame of reference with a modeling domain divided into many grid cells. They account for transport processes and detailed chemistry but simulations are time consuming. Lagrangian models operate in moving coordinates. They have simplified chemistry and static boundary conditions. They are fast. An ideal air pollution model would combine the computational efficiency of a Lagrangian model with the chemistry details of a chemical-transport model (Eulerian). The goal of this work was to develop a hybrid Euleran – Lagrangian modeling approach able to quickly simulate source-receptor relationships.

Conceptual model In the simplest application, CMAQ domain is reduced to only one cell in the horizontal direction, which corresponds to a 2D column. This sub-domain (nest) travels with the averaged wind inside CMAQ domain but do not necessarily align with the CMAQ grid cells. The vertical layer structure and the physical and chemical processes in STOPS are the same as in the full domain CMAQ model. Exception is calculation of advection fluxes that are obtained utilizing difference between a cell horizontal wind velocity and averaged velocity of STOPS.

Conceptual model Initially developed for ozone pollution applications was named the Screening Trajectory Ozone Prediction System (STOPS) But it is not limited to ozone prediction but similarly to CMAQ it can simulate concentrations of many species, including particulate matter and some toxic compounds, such as formaldehyde and 1,3-butadiene. STOPS is a moving nest (Lagrangian approach) inside CMAQ structure (Eulerian model). STOPS is a stand-alone tool, but it needs CMAQ simulated concentrations for boundary and initial conditions as well as emission and meteorological files that are prepared for CMAQ.

Domain set up The initial location of the STOPS domain can be defined by choosing position of the domain middle cell in terms of latitude and longitude coordinates or in terms of the column and row number corresponding to the CMAQ full domain. The modeling domain can be extended with a few horizontal layers of cells padding the middle cell. Name Column and row in host grid Number of padding cells in each direction Number of rows Number of columns Houston 25, 30 10 21 Urban 21, 30 2 5 Industrial 29, 30 Purple dots correspond to a location of point sources.

Comparison to CMAQ results Given that STOPS is based on the CMAQ source code and uses the same input files its results shall closely approximate those obtained with the 3-D CMAQ model. To assure the correctness of the algorithm’s implementation, the results were compared with the CMAQ simulation results. Comparison of STOPS in a static mode OUTPUT TIME STEP CMAX SMAX MAXD MIND MB MAE 1h 128.43 129.69 2.84 -6.17 -0.79 0.92 5 m 130.38 130.79 1.79 -3.36 -0.27 0.38 1 m 129.42 129.57 0.79 -1.19 -0.06 0.12 The differences comes from boundary conditions.

Trajectory The trajectory for STOPS movement is calculated based on the mean wind that is mass averaged up to the Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL) height. b) a) Details of trajectory on Aug. 25, 2000 Aug. 28 Aug. 30 Aug. 25 filled circles - trajectories determined based on the winds in the middle column, open circles - trajectories determined based on the average winds in the whole STOPS domain.

Comparison to CMAQ results Aug. 25 Aug. 28 Aug. 30 starting position at urban domain starting position at industrial domain triangles - trajectories determined based on the winds in the middle column (mwind), crosses - those determined based on the average winds in the whole sub-domain (awind).

Comparison to CMAQ results Aug. 25 Aug. 28 Aug. 30 starting position at urban domain Better agreement between CMAQ-STOPS concentration pairs was found when the STOPS trajectory was calculated based on the winds in the middle column. Under uniform winds STOPS results are close to CMAQ while for complicated meteorological conditions, such as wind recirculation, the results deviate from CMAQ. starting position at industrial domain triangles - trajectories determined based on the winds in the middle column (mwind), corsses - those determined based on the average winds in the whole sub-domain (awind).

Applications Ozone mixing ratios August 28, 2000 6 CST 9 CST 15 CST 12 CST August 25, 2000 August 30, 2000 Ozone mixing ratios for August 25, 28, 30 of 2000 from the base case simulations.

Applications Changes in pollutant mixing ratios along STOPS trajectories for different starting positions and days. VOC NOx Changes in pollutant mixing ratios along STOPS trajectories. Changes in O3, NO, and NO2 along STOPS trajectory for August 25.

Applications Re-simulations for different emissions events such as ‘upset’ emissions from industrial facilities or wild fire emissions. Additional emissions are directly ‘injected’ into STOPS without the need of SMOKE processing. Amount, species name(s), and time of release are set up in the run script. Here, STOPS re-simulations were performed with an extended SAPRC99 chemical mechanism that explicitly treat emissions and chemistry of many VOCs. Additional emission spike of several individual VOCs was added one at the time, imitating ‘upset emission’ release. Changes in ozone occurring along trajectory downwind from emission source on August 25 upon addition of individual VOC (one at a time) Different compounds affect ozone concentration to a different extent. The low reactive i-butane (I_BUTA) has a small effect on ozone, which is in contrast to other more reactive VOCs that have potential of increasing ozone locally, close to the emission source, and with higher magnitude.

Additional applications When implemented into the real-time air quality forecasting STOPS can be used as time efficient re-simulations tool that can utilize the same inputs as already prepared for the forecasting and forecasted concentrations.

Implementation A Fortran-90 module was created to hold the additional data structure related to STOPS and subroutines associated with a coordinate conversion, position and velocity along the trajectory. The SUBHFILE subroutine was modified. This subroutine determines the spatial relationship between the CMAQ grid and grids of input data, e.g., inputs with emission or meteorological data may have different horizontal domains that the CMAQ domain. SUBHFILE subroutine was enhanced to support a moving horizontal sub-domain, whose grid points do not necessarily coincide with grid points of the input data, and may have different locations at every synchronization time step. The boundary subroutine, RDBCON, was modified to support a boundary thickness of 3 cells and to get boundary values for changing locations directly from the CMAQ full-grid concentrations. The netCDF output file, CONC, saves only STOPS grid concentrations. In addition, an ASCII output file is generated that holds trajectory information, this is latitude and longitude of the middle point of the STOPS domain for each output time step, along with the corresponding column and row numbers of a full CMAQ domain. For source-receptor applications the STOPS code was modified in a way that additional emissions can be directly injected into STOPS without a need of reprocessing an emission inventory. A name of the emitted compound(s) (in terms of model species), a location of emission release, starting and ending times, and the emission rate need to be specified by the user in the STOPS run script. For the purpose of comparing STOPS results against CMAQ results the post processing program was developed and incorporated into the STOPS build and run scripts. With this, additional file, HCONC, is generated from the STOPS simulations. It holds CMAQ concentrations from grid cells that correspond to the current location of STOPS.

Conclusions STOPS performance depends on the trajectory calculations and the atmospheric conditions occurring during the simulation period. The limitation of STOPS is due to the Lagrangian movement when applied for non- uniform winds for which the plume might be dispersed outside of STOPS domain. This is a limitation of every Lagrangian approach. The advantages of STOPS: usage of realistic boundary conditions at every simulations time step, which is not a case in Lagrangian models detailed treatment of chemistry; therefore, it can be used to simulate secondary species such as ozone and fast reacting VOCs, such as ethylene or 1,3-butadiene, fast.