Red Blood Cell Membrane Dynamics during Malaria Parasite Egress

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Molecular Model of a Cell Plasma Membrane With an Asymmetric Multicomponent Composition: Water Permeation and Ion Effects Robert Vácha, Max L. Berkowitz,
Advertisements

A Multiscale Red Blood Cell Model with Accurate Mechanics, Rheology, and Dynamics Dmitry A. Fedosov, Bruce Caswell, George Em Karniadakis Biophysical Journal.
Volume 111, Issue 10, Pages (November 2016)
Coarse-Grained Model of SNARE-Mediated Docking
Thomas J. English, Daniel A. Hammer  Biophysical Journal 
Dejun Lin, Alan Grossfield  Biophysical Journal 
Peter J. Mulligan, Yi-Ju Chen, Rob Phillips, Andrew J. Spakowitz 
Diffusion in a Fluid Membrane with a Flexible Cortical Cytoskeleton
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Molecular Dynamics Simulation Analysis of Membrane Defects and Pore Propensity of Hemifusion Diaphragms  Manami Nishizawa, Kazuhisa Nishizawa  Biophysical.
SAXS versus FRET: A Matter of Heterogeneity?
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
A Temporal Model of Cofilin Regulation and the Early Peak of Actin Barbed Ends in Invasive Tumor Cells  Nessy Tania, Erin Prosk, John Condeelis, Leah.
Volume 107, Issue 11, Pages (December 2014)
Pulsatile Lipid Vesicles under Osmotic Stress
Volume 103, Issue 7, Pages (October 2012)
Nucleosome Repositioning via Loop Formation
DNA Translocation Governed by Interactions with Solid-State Nanopores
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Jai A. Pathak, Rumi R. Sologuren, Rojaramani Narwal 
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Ion Specificity and Nonmonotonic Protein Solubility from Salt Entropy
Cholesterol Depletion Mimics the Effect of Cytoskeletal Destabilization on Membrane Dynamics of the Serotonin1A Receptor: A zFCS Study  Sourav Ganguly,
Mesoscale Simulation of Blood Flow in Small Vessels
Malaria: Surprising Mechanism of Merozoite Egress Revealed
H.M. Seeger, G. Marino, A. Alessandrini, P. Facci  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Dmitry A. Fedosov, Bruce Caswell, George Em Karniadakis 
Michael Katzer, William Stillwell  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 111, Issue 10, Pages (November 2016)
Membrane Elasticity in Giant Vesicles with Fluid Phase Coexistence
Shamik Sen, Shyamsundar Subramanian, Dennis E. Discher 
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 100, Issue 7, Pages (April 2011)
S. Majid Hosseini, James J. Feng  Biophysical Journal 
Strongly Accelerated Margination of Active Particles in Blood Flow
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 114, Issue 2, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 107, Issue 11, Pages (December 2014)
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 99, Issue 12, Pages (December 2010)
Amir H.G. Isfahani, Jonathan B. Freund  Biophysical Journal 
Hung-Yu Chang, Xuejin Li, George Em Karniadakis  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Osmotic Pressure in a Bacterial Swarm
K.A. Riske, L.Q. Amaral, H.-G. Döbereiner, M.T. Lamy 
Felix Kohler, Alexander Rohrbach  Biophysical Journal 
Jing Chen, John Neu, Makoto Miyata, George Oster  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages (December 2011)
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 105, Issue 11, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Modeling of Mitochondrial Donut Formation
The Mechanism of Phagocytosis: Two Stages of Engulfment
Dependence of Protein Folding Stability and Dynamics on the Density and Composition of Macromolecular Crowders  Jeetain Mittal, Robert B. Best  Biophysical.
Volume 107, Issue 9, Pages (November 2014)
Transfer of Arginine into Lipid Bilayers Is Nonadditive
Alexander Spaar, Christian Münster, Tim Salditt  Biophysical Journal 
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Frequency-Dependent Shear Impedance of the Tectorial Membrane
Malin Persson, Elina Bengtsson, Lasse ten Siethoff, Alf Månsson 
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Biophysical Journal 
Dynamics of Snake-like Swarming Behavior of Vibrio alginolyticus
Quantitative Modeling and Optimization of Magnetic Tweezers
Dmitry A. Fedosov, Bruce Caswell, George Em Karniadakis 
Border Forces and Friction Control Epithelial Closure Dynamics
Dynamic Role of Cross-Linking Proteins in Actin Rheology
Huan Lei, George Em Karniadakis  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Red Blood Cell Membrane Dynamics during Malaria Parasite Egress Andrew Callan-Jones, Octavio Eduardo Albarran Arriagada, Gladys Massiera, Vladimir Lorman, Manouk Abkarian  Biophysical Journal  Volume 103, Issue 12, Pages 2475-2483 (December 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.008 Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Merozoite egress from RBCs. Differential interference contrast microscopy reveals sequence of events leading to merozoite egress: a pore in the plasma membrane opens, allowing the first parasites to leave; next, the pore rim curls outward, causing further parasite escape; and finally, the remaining membrane cap everts, leading to complete egress. Biophysical Journal 2012 103, 2475-2483DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.008) Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Illustration of membrane dynamics. (a) Curling of the membrane, starting at the free edge, occurs at early times after pore formation; feeding of the membrane cap into the rim occurs at later times. (b) At a given moment, the RBC membrane can be described as a toroidal rim connected to a spherical cap. The arrows around the rim represent the direction of lipid flow in the membrane during feeding; the changing direction of the lipid flow gives rise to surface viscous dissipation. Biophysical Journal 2012 103, 2475-2483DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.008) Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The rim energy, Frim′, as a function of pore opening angle. Frim′ is plotted in units of 2π2κR0/e and θ is in rads. The maximum in Frim′ near θ=π represents the nucleation barrier for pore opening; the minimum is a result of axisymmetry of the problem, and indicates that pure curling will stop near θ=θ∗. Parameter values: β=10 and γ˜=1. (Inset) Frim′/β versus θ for β = 10, 100, 1000, and 10,000, illustrating the convergence of θ∗ toward π/3. Biophysical Journal 2012 103, 2475-2483DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.008) Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Membrane dynamics during parasite egress. (a) The pore opening angle, θ, and cap radius, R, versus t. θ is shown for different values of the ratio of surface to bulk viscosities, ηs/η0, ranging from 0 to 500 μm, in increments of 100 μm. R is shown for ηs/η0=100 μm. (Inset) Zoom of the early time behavior. θ is shown for ηs=0, revealing a smooth change from curling to feeding. R is shown for ηs/η0=100 μm, showing a small decrease, expected initially during feeding based on the geometry. The other parameter values are c0=10 μm−1, R0=3 μm, e=0.05 μm, ln=5, κ/η0=0.2 μm3/ms, γ˜=1, and η/η0=100. (b) The cap depth, h, and number of turns in the rim, N, versus t. h is shown for different values of the surface/bulk viscosity ratio, ηs/η0, ranging from 0 to 500 μm, in increments of 100 μm. N is shown for ηs/η0=100 μm. The other parameters are the same as in a. Biophysical Journal 2012 103, 2475-2483DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.008) Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Model fit to experimental results. The cap depth, h, versus t during parasite egress from RBCs. Data from Abkarian et al. (1) (circles) is fitted with the model developed in this work. The fit parameters are c0=13±4 μm−1 and ηs/η0=1400±400 μm. Deviation between the data and the model is expected for small h; the arrow indicates the expected shift in the model when the constraint of axisymmetry is relaxed (see text). The other, fixed parameters are: R0=3 μm, e=0.05 μm, ln=5, κ/η0=0.2 μm3/ms, γ˜=1, and η/η0=100. Biophysical Journal 2012 103, 2475-2483DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.008) Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Final stage of parasite egress: eversion of the cap. As feeding ends, further elastic energy can be released by everting the cap, thus breaking the axisymmetry. For clarity, after eversion, the cap bends mainly along the x-direction. Eversion leads to a lateral displacement of the rim, denoted u. Biophysical Journal 2012 103, 2475-2483DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.008) Copyright © 2012 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions