High School to Postsecondary Alignment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C OMMON C ORE S TATE S TANDARDS I NITIATIVE March 2010.
Advertisements

Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Focus Grade 3.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor Grade 2 Overview.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Rigor Grade 5.
CCSS Mathematics Instructional Shifts 2 nd Grade Overview.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence Grade 5.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Coherence Grade 3.
A Guide to Implementation
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Alan Bancroft UCMO PLC Resource Specialist
Common Core State Standards What’s It All About? Karen Kennedy, Ed.D. Mathematics Consultant.
Why move to Common Core?  Preparation: The standards are college- and career-ready. They will help prepare students with the knowledge and skills they.
A Presentation of the New Hampshire State Task Force on Mathematics Instruction Report to the State Board of Education, March 2012 Patty Ewen (603)
Professional Development System Tutor Coordinator CCRS Institute 9:30 am – 4:00 pm October 29, 2014 Kim Rossman Tutors of Literacy.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS OVERVIEW The Shifts: What they are and why they are important.
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
Roberta L. Wohle, Ed.D., Assistant Professor Fairleigh Dickinson University 1.
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Building Community within the Mathematics Classroom Unit of Study 0 Global Concept Guide: 1 of 1.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
TOTOM 2014 WOU EMIL PROGRAM wou.edu/EMIL Cheryl Beaver, Math Laurie Burton, Math Rachel Harrington, Education.
Launching the Common Core State Standards Embrace Initiative Presented by Brittany Austin Literacy Interventionist.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
A transitional approach. REPORT CARDS PHONE CALLS TO PARENTS S PARENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES STUDENT-TEACHER CONFERENCES EVALUATED STUDENT WORK STANDARDIZED.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
COLLEGE AND CAREER READY Mathematics - English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects 1.
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
Session 2 Objective You will synthesize your knowledge of Mathematical Practice Standard 4 Model with Mathematics.
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Katie had a pack of twenty cards numbered from 1 to 20
The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving Misfer AlSalouli May 31, 2005.
Common Core State Standards Introduction and Exploration.
Oregon Response to Intervention Mathematics and RTI Research, Review, and The Beginning of State Support Tammy Rasmussen Oregon RTIi.
1 Draft Content Standards for High School Mathematics Helen Maguire for Paul Hibbard Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation Oregon Department.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
MTT Standard 5, Competency 9 Final Assessment Click to begin.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
Supplemental Math Digital Tool: Dreambox
Common Core State Standards: Myths vs. Facts
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
New York State Learning Standards 2011 (Common Core State Standards)
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Western Teaching of Mathematics
It’s Not Just Course Design… It’s EPIC
K-8 Math Acceleration Presentation
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Mathematics Specialist Specialization Proposal
its MANY benefits of investing time and effort
Building Community within the Mathematics Classroom
Curriculum and Instruction BOOTCAMP! CCRS Session
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Fractions A Vertical Look 3-8.
Why some schools succeed ?
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Testing and assessment
Beecher Hills Elementary School (Mays Cluster)
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Essential Skills Last updated: 09/19/09.
MRHS Math Department Course Registration Information
Overview of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) for
Come Together, Right Now, Over me
HOW WE TEACH CAN CHANGE LIVES
Promoting a Collaborative Assessment Culture among Faculty
Presentation transcript:

High School to Postsecondary Alignment Building a Foundation: Rethinking Elementary Math Teacher Certification High School to Postsecondary Alignment

Huddle 2: Professional Development for Mathematics Teachers The ability of students to learn algebra and beyond starts with a strong foundation in the basic skills: adding, subtracting, multiplying, dividing, decimals, fractions, percents, basic geometry, and statistics. Students need a teacher with strong math skills, mathematical pedagogy, and a general enjoyment of mathematics to help them build that strong foundation.

Goals: Discussion of ideas to increase teacher preparedness to provide students with more knowledgeable teachers. Discussion will include a shift in strategy for teaching assignments to provide students with highly credentialed math teachers.

Introduction: Rationale for Our Choice Research says... A key component in preparing students to succeed in mathematics in high school and beyond is to have effective elementary school teachers. (NMAP, 2008) (Georges, 2010) The NMAP Report concluded that students’ preparation for successful completion of algebra implies that students should be fluent with whole numbers, fractions, geometry, and measurement. On the basis of this recommendation elementary teachers must be able to provide the conceptual and procedural knowledge for students to develop these skills. (Georges, 2010)

Research continued... Yet despite widespread recognition that teachers need to learn more in order for students to learn more, there is little consensus about what it is teachers should be learning.(Lewis, 2015) One must conclude that, given all the efforts to reform the delivery of mathematics content along with maintaining the status quo traditional model of elementary school instruction for so many years, the generalist approach is clearly not working. (Gerretson, 2008)

Research cont... Subject matter knowledge is essential in teaching. (Lee, 2010) Being an effective mathematics teacher requires mathematics content knowledge as well as an understanding of the instruction processes needed to efficiently transfer this knowledge to students.(Lee, 2010) In depth mathematical training is significantly associated with high quality of teaching in mathematics. (Lee, 2010) It is evident that professional development and training are important to improve teaching of mathematics. (Lee, 2010)

Plan for Improving Elementary Math Instruction Develop a Mathematics Endorsement modeled after the Reading Endorsement Develop a badging system for instructors in the middle grades domains Develop scheduling to allow dedicated mathematics teachers/content specialists at each grade level

Elementary Mathematics Endorsement Foundations of Math Instruction (60 hours) Application of Research-Based Instructional Practices (60 hours) Foundations of Assessment (60 hours) Foundations and Applications of Differentiated Instruction (60 hours) Demonstration of Accomplishment (60 hours)

Badging System for Elementary Teachers Focus on the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics and Florida Standards Domains Teachers earn badges in middle grades domains Domains would include: Number Sense Operations Algebraic Thinking Measurement Data Geometry Fractions Decimals Problem Solving

Dedicated Math Teachers Math teachers selected based on proficiency teaching math and content knowledge Teachers earn Math Endorsement Teachers become grade level Math Teachers Teachers only teach math and remediation of students Math teachers collaborate across grade levels to ensure quality of instruction, delivery strategies, and standards coverage

Next steps... Bring together a group of highly experienced, successful math teachers, math coaches, and higher education faculty to develop the Math Endorsement Program Create pathways (Train-the-Trainer through statewide training opportunities) for current elementary teachers to earn the Math Endorsement Educate stakeholders (superintendents, principals, higher ed faculty) on the expected goals/outcomes of the Math Endorsement Educate Colleges of Education on Math Endorsement as an add on to Elementary Teaching Certificate

Next steps, cont... Develop criteria for each domain of the NCTM/Florida Standards middle grades math Develop requirements for Badging in each domain Educate stakeholders on the purpose and intent of the badging system Create access points for teachers to earn badges through online platform, inservice programs, etc.

Next steps, cont... Suggest districts switch to dedicated math teachers at each grade level Provide funding to support additional teaching units as may be needed Select experienced, successful teachers to be leaders in the initiative Educate stakeholders in rationale for changes Provide support groups through online or inservice opportunities for teachers to have access to resources to promote lesson development and sharing across districts and the state

Projected Benefits to Students Increased and focused professional development will improve teachers’ classroom strategies and instructional methods Teachers focused on one subject will be able to gain more depth of content understanding Less teachers teaching the subject will improve consistency across grade levels ensuring more student success Increased availability of online resources for easy teacher access 24 hours a day to enable access to content review and standards explanations and/or examples

Projected Benefits, cont... Remediation provided by content experts with additional strategies for working with struggling students All elementary teachers will have “less on their plate” Teachers will be able to work across grade levels to ensure content/standards coverage Newly certified elementary teachers will be able to choose between Math Endorsement or Reading Endorsement based on their comfort level ensuring that teachers who choose math actually enjoy the subject Stronger students heading to middle school and high school

Questions

Bibliography Georges, Annie, et al. “Mathematics Reform and Teacher Quality in Elementary Grades: Assessments, Teacher Licensure, and Certification.” Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2010, www.academia.edu/26317053/Mathematics_Reform_and_Teacher_Quality_in_Elementary_Grades_Assessments_Teacher_Licensure_and_Certification. Gerretson, Helen, et al. “A Case for Content Specialists as the Elementary Classroom Teacher.” The Teacher Educator, vol. 43, no. 4, 2008, pp. 302–314., doi:10.1080/08878730802249866. Lee, Joohi. “Exploring Kindergarten Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Mathematics.” Exploring Kindergarten Teachers' Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Mathematics, 2010, mathedresearch.blogspot.com/2010/02/exploring-kindergarten-teachers.html. Lewis, Jennifer M., et al. “Defining, Developing, and Measuring ‘Proclivities for Teaching Mathematics.’” SpringerLink, Springer Netherlands, 5 Sept. 2015, link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10857-015-9321-z.