ERF12 Binds Directly to the DRE/CRT Element in the DOG1 Promoter.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Advertisements

Up-Regulation of Activating Transcription Factor-5 Suppresses SAP Expression to Activate T Cells in Hemophagocytic Syndrome Associated with Epstein-Barr.
by Kumar Kotlo, Douglas E. Hughes, Victoria L. M
by Toshibumi Shimokawa, and Chisei Ra
by Hong Hao, Huiling Qi, and Manohar Ratnam
MicroRNA-92a-3p regulates the expression of cartilage-specific genes by directly targeting histone deacetylase 2 in chondrogenesis and degradation  G.
MicroRNA-92a-3p regulates the expression of cartilage-specific genes by directly targeting histone deacetylase 2 in chondrogenesis and degradation  G.
MafB negatively regulates RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation
by Sanjai Sharma, and Alan Lichtenstein
Dual-Luciferase Activation Assay with Potential Targets of ZmbZIP22.
The interferon regulatory factor ICSBP/IRF-8 in combination with PU
M. Ushita, T. Saito, T. Ikeda, F. Yano, A. Higashikawa, N. Ogata, U
The 130-bp key region of the promoter of TsVP1 is a direct binding target of TsNAC1. The 130-bp key region of the promoter of TsVP1 is a direct binding.
Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara Birkaya, Satrajit Sinha 
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
by Kyounghee Lee, Ok-Sun Park, and Pil Joon Seo
C-MYC induces the transcription of LIG3 and PARP1 in FLT3/ITD- and BCR-ABL1–positive cells. c-MYC induces the transcription of LIG3 and PARP1 in FLT3/ITD-
AGL15 Interacts in a Sequence-Specific Manner with a Noncanonical CArG Motif Present in the Regulatory Region of AtGA2ox6.(A) Enrichment of the AtGA2ox6.
ATF5 transactivates Egr-1 via the ATF5CON sites in the Egr-1 promoter.
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
Regulation of CSF1 Promoter by the SWI/SNF-like BAF Complex
Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the promoter region influence the expression of the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor  Alain Wunsch, M.Sc.,
RNA-Guided Genome Editing in Plants Using a CRISPR–Cas System
Phosphorylation of Serine 2 within the RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain Couples Transcription and 3′ End Processing  Seong Hoon Ahn, Minkyu Kim, Stephen.
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2017)
BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis  Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,
Zhong Ruiqin , Lee Chanhui , Ye Zheng-Hua   Molecular Plant 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Loss of E2F7 Expression Is an Early Event in Squamous Differentiation and Causes Derepression of the Key Differentiation Activator Sp1  Mehlika Hazar-Rethinam,
Validation of ChIP-seq reads.
Arabidopsis MSBP1 Is Activated by HY5 and HYH and Is Involved in Photomorphogenesis and Brassinosteroid Sensitivity Regulation  Shi Qiu-Ming , Yang Xi.
Mapping of the FD binding site in the AP1 promoter.
Distinct Pathways for snoRNA and mRNA Termination
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Schematic drawing of alternatively-spliced GFP reporter gene.
Arabidopsis WRKY45 Interacts with the DELLA Protein RGL1 to Positively Regulate Age-Triggered Leaf Senescence  Ligang Chen, Shengyuan Xiang, Yanli Chen,
Arabidopsis NF-YCs Mediate the Light-Controlled Hypocotyl Elongation via Modulating Histone Acetylation  Yang Tang, Xuncheng Liu, Xu Liu, Yuge Li, Keqiang.
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
IFN-γ Represses IL-4 Expression via IRF-1 and IRF-2
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (April 2006)
Recognition of GCC-box of BT4 promoter by ERF11 in vitro and in yeast cells. Recognition of GCC-box of BT4 promoter by ERF11 in vitro and in yeast cells.
Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages (October 2000)
Defining the Regulatory Elements in the Proximal Promoter of ΔNp63 in Keratinocytes: Potential Roles for Sp1/Sp3, NF-Y, and p63  Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara.
Expression of SENP2 mRNA is regulated by palmitate-induced NF-κB activation. Expression of SENP2 mRNA is regulated by palmitate-induced NF-κB activation.
ZPR3 interferes with the DRN/DRNL-REV interaction and inhibits STM expression. ZPR3 interferes with the DRN/DRNL-REV interaction and inhibits STM expression.
The NF-κB-binding site of the uPAR promoter is required forβ 3-endonexin-mediated downregulation of the uPAR gene transcription. The NF-κB-binding site.
DRN and DRNL regulate STM expression via binding to a conserved promoter motif. DRN and DRNL regulate STM expression via binding to a conserved promoter.
Bart A. Jessen, Marjorie A. Phillips, Robert H. Rice 
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Supershift assay of the Pax4 are shown.
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
OsSHI1 Binds Directly to the Promoter Regions of OsTB1 and OsDEP1.
Influence of RdDM on DCL4 Transcript Isoform Expression.
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
NF-kB binds to the NF-κB binding site immediately adjacent to the AT-rich regulatory region. NF-kB binds to the NF-κB binding site immediately adjacent.
MTB1 Antagonizes MYC2 for DNA Binding.
MTB Proteins Lack a Canonical MID and Act as Transcriptional Repressors. MTB Proteins Lack a Canonical MID and Act as Transcriptional Repressors. (A) Y2H.
OsbZIP46 Binds to the OsPM1 Promoter and Activates OsPM1 Expression in Vivo. OsbZIP46 Binds to the OsPM1 Promoter and Activates OsPM1 Expression in Vivo.
Interaction of Cdx1 and Cdx2 with the putative Cdx-binding sites of the human DSC2 promoter. Interaction of Cdx1 and Cdx2 with the putative Cdx-binding.
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2019)
CCA1 Binds the Promoter of GI in Vitro and in Vivo.
The bHLH Transcription Factors MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4 Are Required for Jasmonate- Mediated Inhibition of Flowering in Arabidopsis  Houping Wang, Yang Li,
MTB1 to MTB3 Are Direct Transcriptional Targets of MYC2.
MLK4 Is Required for H2A.Z Deposition and H4 Acetylation.
Comparison of Different Systems for Expressing Multiple gRNAs.
Clade 2 ERFs Differentially Bind and Activate a PMT2 Promoter
MTB1 Interacts with MYC2 and Disrupts MED25-MYC2 Interaction.
PIF3 Inhibits the Binding of TCP4 to the Promoters of SAUR Genes and Represses Their Expression. PIF3 Inhibits the Binding of TCP4 to the Promoters of.
Binding of TCP4-Like Proteins to the SAUR Promoters Is Enhanced by Light Signal or the Lack of PIFs. (A) and (B) Light increases the binding of TCP4 to.
Presentation transcript:

ERF12 Binds Directly to the DRE/CRT Element in the DOG1 Promoter. ERF12 Binds Directly to the DRE/CRT Element in the DOG1 Promoter. (A) EMSA of the oligonucleotide DRE/CRT with GST-tagged ERF12 protein. The 22-bp wild-type DRE/CRT fragment labeled with biotin probe was shifted by the GST-ERF12 protein, but this shift disappeared when unlabeled probe was added. The arrow shows the shifted band; free probe is distributed at the bottom. Biotin-labeled probe was used at a final concentration of 20 nM. (B) Schematic diagram of the DOG1 promoter structure. The dotted line indicates the ∼2000-bp promoter sequence, and the black line between the vertical dashes represents the first 500 bp of the open reading frame. The relative positions of the PCR-amplified fragments (P1 to P5) for each tested region are depicted below the gene structure. P6 in a 211-bp fragment located in the untranslated region of AT5G45820, which is located 4397 bp away from ATG of DOG1 (AT5G45830); this fragment was used as the negative control. Bar represents 500 bp. (C) ChIP-qPCR analysis of YFP-ERF12 levels on DOG1. Immunoprecipitates were obtained from freshly harvested seeds of Col-0 and Pro12S:YFP-ERF12 using YFP antibody. ACTIN8 was used as a negative control. The experiment was repeated three times with independent samples. The numbers on the x axis represent the PCR-amplified sites described in (B). **P < 0.01, based on Student’s t test. (D) Relative activity of the ProDOG1:LUC reporter in Arabidopsis protoplasts cotransformed with the indicated effector constructs. M represents a mutated DRE/CRT element (GGC to TTC), which was introduced into ProDOG1:LUC. The activity of the LUC reporter driven by the DOG1 promoter was measured by assaying LUC/REN ratios × 1000. Data are shown as means ± sd, different letters denote significant differences (n = 3, one-way analysis of variance test, P < 0.05). Xiaoying Li et al. Plant Cell 2019;31:832-847 ©2019 by American Society of Plant Biologists