New Orleans Demand Response Potential Study: DRAFT RESULTS

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

In the Post 06 Environment November 9, 2006 Jim Eber Demand Response.

Advertisements

Recent Successes in Demand Response

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.

Dynamic Pricing - Potential and Issues Joe Wharton and Ahmad Faruqui Kansas Corporation Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency March 25, 2008.

BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.

January 20, 2004 California’s Statewide Pricing Pilot Larsh Johnson – President and Chief Technical Officer, eMeter Sanjoy Chatterjee – Principal, Chatterjee.

TRUST Fall Meeting November , 2010 │Stanford, California A Privacy-Aware Architecture For Demand Response Systems Steve Wicker, Bob Thomas School.

HISTORICAL GAINS IN ENERGY EFFICIENCY, Ahmad Faruqui Sanem Sergici Lafayette, California February 8, 2008.

1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.

PUC of Texas EEIP Meeting Residential A/C Load Control Program ©2012 Comverge – Confidential and Proprietary

Smart Meters, Demand Response and Energy Efficiency GRIDSCHOOL 2010 MARCH 8-12, 2010  RICHMOND, VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC UTILITIES ARGONNE NATIONAL.

Developing Critical-Peak Pricing Tariffs with the PRISM Software Ahmad Faruqui May 30, 2007.

System Reliability Procurement: Non-wires Alternatives in Rhode Island Tim Roughan National Grid.

1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.

California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.

DNV GL © SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER DNV GL © Second Annual Utility of the Future Pulse Survey Key Findings 1 July 15, 2015 Presentation to C/CAG RMCP.

+ Customer-side Smart Grid Technologies How will they change utility offerings? Karen Herter, Ph.D. Association of Women in Water, Energy, and Environment.

George Bartlett Director, Transmission Operations Economic Transmission Projects Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 8, 2004.

1 EIA’s Electricity Forecasting for the U.S. and the South By: Marilyn Brown, Matt Cox, Alex Smith, and Xiaojing Sun Georgia Institute of Technology July.

Pricing Enabled by AMI What Types? What are the Benefits? Dr. Steven D. Braithwait Christensen Associates Energy Consulting EUCI Webinar September 12,

Innovative approach to DSM through Open Access Jayant Deo MD & CEO, Indian Energy Exchange

Demand Response Research and Capabilities at LBNL Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Midwest Demand Response Initiative.

MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse Langston, OG&E Oct 20 th 2013.

Retail Smart Grid Trends Paul Wattles Senior Analyst, Market Design & Development UT Energy Week: “How Smart Grids Enable Consumers” Feb. 18, 2015.

FERC Assessment of Demand Response & Advanced Metering 2006 APPA Business & Financial Conference September 18, 2006 – Session 11 (PMA) Presented by: Larry.

Demand Response: The Other Side of the Market Assessing the Potential for Demand Response Programs Springfield,IL May 12, 2006 Richard E. (“Rick”) Morgan.

Results from the California Energy Efficiency Potential Study – Existing Residential and Commercial Jean Shelton July 27, 2006 San Francisco, California.

California Energy Commission - Public Interest Energy Research Program Demand Response Research Center Research Overview Load Management Informational.

1 Energy Efficiency Program Status Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates On Behalf of the Electric Utility Marketing Managers of Texas (EUMMOT) Organization.

Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N NEET Work Group 6 Update: BPA Demand Response April 21 st Karen Meadows Pam Sporborg.

Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.

Leading the Way in Electricity TM Tariff Programs & Services Customer Services Business Unit Overview of Demand Response At Southern California Edison.

March 1, 2011 Load Analysis Update Calvin Opheim Manager, Load Forecasting and Analysis.

CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.

Updated 1/28/2011.

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Energy Efficient Buildings In California by Randel R. Riedel Residential Buildings & Appliances Office.

Idaho Power Company Demand Response & Dynamic Pricing Programs PNDRP December 5, 2008 Darlene Nemnich Pete Pengilly.

NARUC/FERC COLLABORATIVE: DEMAND RESPONSE Paul Suskie, Chairman, Arkansas Public Service Commission July 15, 2007.

DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.

The Power of Data October 2013 Abhay Gupta 1.

© 2004 San Diego Gas and Electric. All copyright and trademark rights reserved Demand Response Programs Backup Material.

FERC Staff’s Report on Demand Response and Advanced Metering.

Residential and Small Commercial/Industrial Standard Offer Program Billy G. Berny American Electric Power 13th Symposium on Improving Building Systems.

An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.

Demand Response

Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.

Long Term Study Task Force Update Modeling Emerging Resources Through 2030 January 13, 2012 LTSTF.

ERCOT Public 1 Project Panel 1 Dan Woodfin Director, System Operations August 15, 2014.

Overview Review results Statewide Pricing Pilot Review results Anaheim Rebate Pilot Compare performance of models used to estimate demand response peak.

CEC Load Management Standards Workshop March 3, Update on the CPUC’s Demand Response and Advanced Metering Proceedings Bruce Kaneshiro Energy Division.

Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.

PSE Conservation Resource Potential Assessment: Consistency with Power Council’s Methodology November 17 th, 2009.

1 BGE Smart Energy Pricing Program: Update to Maryland Public Service Commission April 23, 2008 Wayne Harbaugh VP – Pricing & Regulatory Services.

Workshop February 4, Idaho Power Smart Grid Vision At Idaho Power, our smart grid vision remains focused on seven major characteristics : 1.Enhance.

SMECO Demand Response filing

Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes

NW Demand Response Symposium

Time of Use Rates: A Practical Option – If Done Well

National Grid Rhode Island: Piloting Wireless Alternatives

Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program

Demand Response in the 7th Power Plan

Demand Response in the NW: Overcoming Barriers

Electricity Demand Response and Advanced Metering for Integrated Utilities Arkansas Public Service Commission Lonni Dieck AEP May 24, 2007.

Howard Geller Workshop on Energy Efficiency Opportunities

3 Year Plans for Energy Efficiency: lessons learned and forging forward Christina Halfpenny Director, Energy Efficiency Division

Retail Rate Options for

Demand Side Management Potential Study Methodology Overview

Demand Side Management Potential Study Measure List Overview

Watt, Why and How of Energy Efficiency Programs Available

Presentation transcript:

New Orleans Demand Response Potential Study: DRAFT RESULTS American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE) July 2018

Methodology Literature review Determine taxonomy of programs to examine Create database of demand response programs & data In region Out of region Collect data from Entergy New Orleans Estimate program savings per participant, participation rates,& costs based on program research Input data to demand response models

DR Programs Residential incentive-based DR Direct load control (DLC) program Automated DR -bring your own device (BYOD) program, which incentivizes wifi-enabled thermostats that trigger AC cycling Residential time-based pricing DR, including peak time rebates (PTR) with and w/o enabling technologies critical peak pricing (CPP) with and w/o enabling technologies Commercial and industrial (C&I) Standard offer program Direct load control

Data Sources Entergy New Orleans data Utility demand response program filings from in-region Entergy Louisiana Entergy Arkansas Arizona Public Service Oklahoma Gas & Electric AEP Texas Central and other TX programs Etc. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) national demand response potential study Arcturus study on dynamic pricing

Draft Results: Scenario 1 “Base case” and Peak-Time Rebates (PTR) Program Metric 2018 2027 2037 Residential direct load control (DLC) and bring your own device (BYOD) Peak demand savings (MWs) 1.97 13.6 16.8 Cost $207,249 $940,836 $1,126,367 NPV B/C ratio 1.37 Residential peak time rebate w/ and w/o tech. 5.17 9.54 10.6 $171,212 $315,827 $351,929 1.89 Commercial & industrial Standard Offer Program (SOP) 0.35 3.63 7.50 $13,103 $135,296 $279,416 2.67

Draft Results: Scenario 2 “High case” and Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) Program Metric 2018 2027 2037 Residential direct load control (DLC) and bring your own device (BYOD) Peak demand savings (MWs) 3.94 27.3 33.6 Cost $414,499 $1,881,673 $2,252,735 NPV B/C ratio 1.37 Residential critical peak pricing w/ and w/o tech. 5.83 10.8 12.0 *draft results not yet available Commercial & industrial Standard Offer Program (SOP) 2.46 6.79 11.9 $83,780 $241,111 $426,359 2.75