Prepared for: California Water & Environmental Modeling Forum

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emerging Challenges for LDCs due to Climate Change
Advertisements

WATER FOR THE 21 st CENTURY ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENT Santa Ana River Watershed Conference April 11, 2013.
Safe and Sustainable Water Resources Research Integrate the existing Drinking Water and Water Quality research programs into one holistic program that.
Integrating Water Management The Future of Integrated Water Management: Moving the Program Forward Gary Bardini, Deputy Director CA Department of Water.
Alberta’s Strategy for Sustainability presented to Prairie Water Policy Symposium Beverly Yee, Assistant Deputy Minister Alberta Environment September.
1 Preparing Washington for a Changing Climate An Integrated Climate Change Response Strategy Department of Ecology Hedia Adelsman, Executive Policy Advisor.
NOAA’s Habitat Blueprint- a multiagency approach to climate adaptation and increasing resiliency along the Sonoma coast Sonoma Adaptation Forum April 8,
1 Measuring Performance of Resource Management Responses Rich Juricich (DWR) David Groves (RAND)
2 1)Familiarize State agency staff with Water Plan Update 2013 information, tools and resources 2)Identify opportunities for State agencies to derive.
Bay Area IRWMP Public Workshop #1 July 23, OBJECTIVES I BAIRWMP-Goals and Objectives II. DWR Guidance- “Measures” III Process IV. Proposed.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation & Open Space District Integrated Approach to Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation.
Regional Flood Plain Management Council April 15, 2015 H-GAC December 2nd.
SWRR on the Potomac Rhonda Kranz and John Wells Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable April 25, 2006 Measuring the Sustainability of Water Management.
Water in the West and California Jim Sedell Station Director Pacific Southwest Research Station Centennial Forum November 2004.
Natural England State of the Natural Environment, Strategic Direction refresh, and Manifesto Dr Helen Phillips, Chief Executive, Natural England.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk National Association of Flood & Stormwater Management Agencies December 10,
Hazard Resilient Coastal Community Index Keelin Kuipers WAS*IS Workshop II March 13, 2006.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
CLIMATE CHANGE AT THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES Climate Change Adaptation Across the Landscape Michelle Selmon Regional Climate Change Specialist June.
Governor’s Strategic Growth Plan Flood Protection and Clean, Safe, Reliable Water Supply Bond and Financing Acts of 2006 and 2010 Southern California Water.
Community Resilience Planning in Coastal North Carolina Sixth Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012 Linda B. Rimer Ph.D. 10/20/20151 U.S.
Briefing to the Central Valley Flood Protection Board June 28, 2013 Status of State-Led Basin-Wide Feasibility Studies.
Minnesota Water 2005 John R. Wells Minnesota Environmental Quality Board & Sustainable Water Resources Roundtable October 26, 2005 Measuring the Sustainability.
SECTION IV: GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF STEPS TAKEN OR ENVISAGED BY NON-ANNEX I PARTY TO IMPLEMENT THE CONVENTION Workshop on the Use of the Guidelines for.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
A Vision for the Future Presented to the North Bay Watershed Association by the Sonoma County Water Agency and Zone 7 Water Agency.
Why Does NOAA Need a Climate & Ecosystem Demonstration Project in the California Current System? Capabilities and Drivers La Jolla, CA 6 June, 2005.
Sierra Water Workgroup Water Summit Kings Beach, California June 11, 2013 Barry Hill, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Region USDA Forest Service.
California Water Plan Update 2005 Draft Slides for Public Hearings in June April 14, 2005.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
Health Emergency Risk Management Pir Mohammad Paya MD, MPH,DCBHD Senior Technical Specialist Public Health in Emergencies Asian Disaster Preparedness Center.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Terri Wegener, P.E., DWR Briefing for Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Is the Mid-Atlantic Region Water Rich? Presentation to 5 th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable November 7, 2008 Joseph Hoffman, Executive Director.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
California Water Plan Update Advisory Committee Meeting January 20, 2005.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
AUDRA LUSCHER-AISSAOUI NOAA CO-OPS RESILIENCE PROGRAM MANAGER HSRP APRIL 9, 2015 Coastal Resilience.
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
2015 Snohomish County Hazards Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting Snohomish County Department of Emergency Management, Everett, WA October 23, :00.
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
Md. Nurul Alam. ◦ What is Disaster? ◦ Idea regarding various terminology used in Disaster Management.
Draft Central Valley Flood Protection Plan Investment Strategy
2017 HAMPTON ROADS HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE BRIEFING
South Dakota Department of Health
Validating Integrated Assessment Framework
Athabasca Watershed Council Athabasca Watershed Planning and Advisory Council Water for Life.
Green and Sustainable Remediation (GSR) Overview
Cary A. Talbot, PE, PhD Program Manager
Clayton Cox, AAAS Science & Technology Policy US EPA
Enabling Government - Empowering Communities National Implementation of the New Song M J Amos.
Place your logo here Sierra Meadow Strategy: A Process and Outcome Centered on Increasing Pace and Scale of Meadow Restoration Mark Drew, Ph.D. Nina Hemphill,
Assessing the Los Angeles River Watershed
Challenges in a Changing World
Cascade Pacific Action Alliance
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Agriculture and Land Stewardship Planning
Species at Risk (SAR) Legislation & Program Renewal Project
MARINE EXCHANGE Consider Your Audience: Communicating Effectively About Coastal Resilience Zach Ferdaña, Senior Marine Conservation Planner Cara Byington,
Fostering Dialogue to Support Community Resilience
Regional Collaboration on Water Supply Issues
Societal resilience analysis
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.4 Protecting citizens from environmental hazards European.
A Blueprint to safeguard Europe’s waters
Investing in Source Water Protection
Responding to Changing Climate Washington State Department of Ecology
Challenges in a Changing World
Can insert photo or graphic in this space
Presentation transcript:

Prepared for: California Water & Environmental Modeling Forum CA Water Plan Update 2018 Managing Water Resources for Sustainability – Sustainability Outlook Prepared for: California Water & Environmental Modeling Forum April 22, 2019

California Water Plan Update 2018 Focus & Features CA Water Today -- accomplishments -- challenges & drivers Understanding sustainability Actionable recommendations Sustainability Outlook to track progress & adapt Investment strategy & funding scenarios You have just heard about the overall features of the 2018 Update. My talk is to focus on our progress around what we are calling the sustainability outlook. As is says here the outlook is intended as a method or framework to track progress and adapt as needed as we journey towards sustainability…..

Sustainability Requires Consistency with Values The combined effect of actions and projects within watersheds and groundwater basins is consistent with societal values, while fostering trust and promoting equity. The Sustainability Outlook is a method to track our progress at achieving our intended outcomes organized around four societal values.

The Sustainability Outlook Demonstrate Return on Investment Sample Value Sample Intended Outcome Public Health & Safety Sample Sustainability Indicator An adequate water supply for domestic needs, sanitation, and fire suppression Number of public water systems (population served) not in compliance with drinking water standards This is a example at a high level for understanding of how this methodology works by nesting the various outcomes under the four societal values and finally getting to indicators which will allow us to measure the progress toward those outcomes. One thing we saw when we started to look at possible indicators was that scale is critical. At a statewide scale for example some indicators do not provide meaningful information. However this same indicator may provide valuable insight at the correct regional or local scale. 4 1 dozen 3 dozen 4

Sustainability Requires Tracking & Adaptive Management It is part of a journey toward sustainability. It helps us with evaluating our effectiveness of our actions and takes into consideration that our societal values will change over time……

Indicator Screening Process One of our supporting documents is titled “Sustainability Outlook Indicator Descriptions and Methodology and will be posted with the Update. In this document we start with a definition of each of the societal values. I think for todays audience I want to give a flavor of some of the indicators under each societal value. There is much work to be done and for all of you looking for opportunities for further research to assist there is need for further work in identifying indicators with supporting data to be able to track our progress.

Indicator Screening Process Criteria for screening: • Representative • Data Viability • Cost • Longevity • Supportive of Decision Making

Data Viability Note that we have data types from I to IV. Type I is adequate data readily available, Type II data available but maybe not geographically complete or further analysis is needed to ues, Type 3 is usually non-continuous or piecemeal data to Type IV No data collected

Public Health and Safety Public health and safety is defined as prevention of, protection from, and mitigation of events that could harm or injure people. Events that can pose a risk of harm or injury include accidents, outbreaks, illnesses, crimes, and disasters (natural or man-made). The vision for this societal value is that all Californians are protected from public health and safety threats and emergencies. The intended outcomes that represent Public Health and Safety include: A reliable water supply for domestic needs, sanitation, and fire suppression; Reduced number of people exposed to waterborne health threats such as contaminants or infectious agents; Reduced loss of life, injuries and health risks caused from extreme hydrologic conditions, catastrophic events and/or system failures (including infrastructure).

Public Health and Safety PHS 3: Number of Public Water Systems Not in Compliance with Drinking Water Standards Scale: Statewide Data Sources: State Water Board DDW Data Availability: Type I Metric: Population served by public water systems and number of MCL violations by public water systems Screening Status: Basic Representative of Outcome: High Data Viability: Medium Cost: Medium-High Potential Longevity: Supportive of Decision Making:

Ecosystem Vitality Ecosystem vitality describes the healthy functioning and lasting resiliency of diverse communities of interconnected aquatic, riparian, and wetland organisms across California. Ecosystem resilience is defined as the ability of an ecosystem to withstand or respond to disturbances without undergoing major or irreversible changes in identity, function, or structure. The vision for this societal value is for thriving ecosystems to exist throughout the state. The intended outcomes that represent Ecosystem Vitality include: • Maintained and increased ecosystem and native species distributions in California while sustaining and enhancing species abundance and richness; • Maintained and improved ecological functions and processes vital for sustaining ecosystems in California; and • Achieved designated beneficial uses for water bodies throughout the state.

Ecosystem Vitality EV 6: California Stream Condition Index Scale: Statewide Data Sources: State Water Board Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP); CWP Update 2013 Data Availability: Type I Metric: California Stream Condition Index Screening Status: Basic Representative of Outcome: High Data Viability: Cost: Medium Potential Longevity: Supportive of Decision Making:

Healthy Economy A healthy economy would include stable, positive, and responsible economic development; strong commitments to the long-term health of people and the environment; government encouragement of job-creating investments; and removal of excess regulations that may throttle economic development. The vision for this societal value is that California has a healthy economy and that all Californians have opportunities for economic prosperity. The intended outcomes that represent Healthy Economy include: • Reliable water supplies of suitable quality for a variety of productive water uses are based on a reliable supply; • Consideration of economic risks and rewards on floodplains, rivers, and coastal areas; • More benefits from economics activities; • Reduced likelihood or occurrence of significant social disruption following a disaster.

Healthy Economy HE 9: Socioeconomic Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise Impacts Scale: Regional Data Sources: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); California Ocean Protection Council Data Availability: Type I Metric: Social Vulnerability Index and acreage of coastal land impacted by sea level rise Screening Status: Basic Representative of Outcome: High Data Viability: Medium-High Cost: Medium Potential Longevity: Supportive of Decision Making:

Opportunities for Enriching Experiences The vision for this societal value is that all Californians have opportunities for enriching experiences to add greater value or significance to their lives. The intended outcomes that represent Opportunities for Enriching Experiences include: • Preserved or enhanced culturally or historically significant sites and communities, including continued and enhanced access to water and land used for cultural practices, such as sacred ceremonies; • Preserved and increased natural areas with aesthetic or intrinsic value (including viewshed ); • Continued and enhanced access to resources that support education and learning; • Continued or enhanced recreational opportunities in waterways, reservoirs, or natural and open spaces.

Opportunities for Enriching Experiences OEE 3: Number of School Districts Using Water and Environmental Curriculum in K-12 Programs Scale: Statewide Data Sources: California Department of Education; DWR Project WET; Water Education Foundation Data Availability: Type II Metric: Number of School Districts Screening Status: Basic Representative of Outcome: High Data Viability: Medium Cost: Potential Longevity: Supportive of Decision Making:

Sustainability Requires Tracking & Adaptive Management It is part of a journey toward sustainability. It helps us with evaluating our effectiveness of our actions and takes into consideration that our societal values will change over time……

Update 2018 Watershed-Scale Pilots Outlook is Aggregate of Regional Sustainability Applying Sustainability Outlook locally Proof of concept & scalability of indicators Local/regional perspectives on impediments to sustainability Place-based solutions for governance, regulations & funding Initiated pilot projects in partnership with: California Forward Pacific Institute Water Foundation Sonoma County Water Agency Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority This prompted us to look at various pilots at a local/regional scale that could provide insight on how we might apply this methodology. These pilots have yielded some valuable lessons learned and will provide us with insight on our next efforts……

Next Steps Continue applying Sustainability Outlook at logical scales Refine the intended outcomes and the indicators Collect needed data to answer the question of progress toward the intended outcomes. 1 this could include additional pilot efforts, 2 We still may see better measurements of the outcomes and indicators which would track the progress. 3 Data is lacking on several of the indicators we have identified.

Ways to Access Water Plan Information Visit the Water Plan Web Portal Subscribe to Water Plan eNews

Questions & Comments Lewis Moeller, PE lewis.moeller@water.ca.gov Statewide Integrated Water Management CA Department Water Resources 28