SNS PPU Cryomodule Thermal Shield & MLI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Q1 for JLAB’s 12 Gev/c Super High Momentum Spectrometer S.R. Lassiter, P.B. Brindza, M. J. Fowler, S.R. Milward, P. Penfold, R. Locke Q1 SHMS HMS Q2 Q3.
Advertisements

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
N. Dhanaraj, Y. Orlov, R. Wands Thermal-Stress Analysis of CC1 Space Frame.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
FDR Station 3 lift fixture, laser screens and brackets T. Brown and L. Morris with analysis support from A. Brooks December 3, 2007.
A. Bross Imperial College – 9/04 Status of VLPC Cryo-Cooler Cryostat Design Russ Rucinski (Alan Bross) Fermilab.
Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.
1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.
Status of VLPC Cryo-Cooler Cryostat Design Russ Rucinski (Alan Bross) Fermilab.
CRYO PIPING & INTER-MODULE CONNECTIONS Yun He, Daniel Sabol, Joe Conway External Review of MLC Daniel Sabol, MLC External Review 10/3/2012.
Internal Cryomodule Instrumentation Sensors, Actuators, Heaters, and Wiring ERL Main Linac Cryomodule 9/5/2012 Peter Quigley Internal Design Review.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe MLC external review October 03, 2012.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MAP Winter Collaboration Meeting at JLab, Virginia February 28, 2011.
LBNL Test Cryostat Preliminary Design Review Tuning – Field Correction Soren Prestemon, Diego Arbelaez, Heng Pan, Scott Myers, Taekyung Ki.
MQXF Cold-mass Assembly and Cryostating H. Prin, D. Duarte Ramos, P. Ferracin, P. Fessia 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014.
NCSX Vacuum Vessel Joint Design Mike Viola PPPL July 1 st, 2003.
SCU Segmented Cryostat Concept M. Leitner, S. Prestemon, D. Arbelaez, S. Myers September 2 nd, 2014.
Work toward Stainless Steel SRF Helium Vessels at Fermilab Tom Peterson (presenter), Information from Jeff Brandt, Serena Barbanotti, Harry Carter, Sergei.
Mechanical Design of Main Linac Cryomodule (MLC) Yun He, Dan Sabol, Joe Conway On behalf of Matthias Liepe, Eric Smith, James Sears, Tim O’Connell, Ralf.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM29 at RAL, UK February 17, 2011.
Cold Magnetic Shield Update
NCSX VACUUM VESSEL HEATING/COOLING PL Goranson Preliminary Results February 17, 2006 MDL Testing of Coolant Tracing NCSX.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
LAV construction: Status and overview Matthew Moulson (Frascati) for the LAV Working Group NA62 Photon-Veto Working Group Meeting Brussels, 8 September.
SCH Controls Readiness Review- Cryostat Nov 4-5, 2015 Kurt Cantrell.
Main features of PETS tank J. Calero, D. Carrillo, J.L. Gutiérrez, E. Rodríguez, F. Toral CERN, 17/10/2007 (I will review the present status of the PETS.
LMQXFA Cold Mass Assembly Antonios Vouris Fermilab February 3, 2016.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe.
JLAB Pressure Systems Considerations Ed Daly. Outline Introduction Federal Law - 10CFR851 Compliance JLAB Pressure Systems Program –Complies with 10CFR851,
MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Recovery Review - December 3-4, Steve Virostek MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Assembly.
CM2 Helium Circuit Vacuum Leak & Repair Tug Arkan, 6/18/
HL-LHC-UK Thermal Shield Update Niklas Templeton 07/03/2016.
MICE Coupling Coil Fabrication Steps to Complete Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Coupling Coil Working Group January 28, 2014 January.
Cryomodules Matthew Howell and Stephen Stewart Cryomodule Design Team Members.
Cryomodule Interconnect Installation Issues A Comparison of XFEL to LCLSII Karen Fant 7/29/2015.
Prototype Cryomodule FDR Ken Premo 21 – 22 January 2015 High Power Coupler Design.
LCLS-II 3 rd Harmonic Dressed Cavity Design Review Chuck Grimm November 20, 2015.
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
Service channels between Tracker and PP1
Status of design and production of LEP connection cryostat
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
Overview of Mechanical Design
Niklas Templeton – STFC – UK Collaboration
MICE Coupling Coil Update
SC1R Cold Box PDR Mechanical Design
SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation
Cryomodule Assembly Plan
SNS PPU Cryomodule End Cans
Senad Kudumovic Design engineer
SNS PPU Helium Vessel Design and Assembly
The Mechanical Engineering & Technology (MET)
CRYOMODULE FINAL ASSEMBLY
SNS PPU Cryomodule Thermal Shield
SNS PPU Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel
SNS PPU Cryomodule Space Frame
SNS PPU Cryomodule Magnetic Shields
Bunker Wall Design Wall ESS
SNS PPU Cryomodule Shipping Plans
Work Unit AIK 11.2 CDR of the CDS-SL Mechanics
SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation
SNS PPU Helium Vessel Design and Assembly
SNS PPU Cryomodule Space Frame
SNS PPU CRYOMODULE FDR Magnetic Shields Gary Cheng June 10, 2019.
SC1R Cold Box PDR Assembly Sequence
SNS PPU Cryomodule Design Overview
CRYOMODULE FINAL ASSEMBLY
SNS PPU CRYOMODULE PDR Cleanroom Assembly Katherine Wilson
JLAB CHL 2K COLD BOX REPLACEMENT
Presentation transcript:

SNS PPU Cryomodule Thermal Shield & MLI SNS PPU CRYOMODULE PDR SNS PPU CRYOMODULE PDR SNS PPU Cryomodule Thermal Shield & MLI Matt Marchlik Matt Marchlik Monday, June 10 2019

Response to PDR Recommendations and Comments Remaining Tasks Summary Outline Requirements Design Procurement Response to PDR Recommendations and Comments Remaining Tasks Summary

Requirements Thermal Shield Provide 50 K thermal radiation shielding to the cold mass Allow for thermal contraction from 300 – 50 K Handle the shipping design loads (4 vertical, 5 longitudinal, 1.5 transverse) The shipping design loads and geometry mass has not significantly changed from the original design. The design is assumed to be adequate based on past performance MLI Reduce thermal radiation heat load to the cold bodies within the CM

The existing SNS drawings will be used for unchanged components Design The existing SNS drawings will be used for unchanged components JLab drawings have been created to capture any changes from the original designs. This section primarily highlights any design changes

Design – Assembly Overview Supply End Shield Extension With support Shield segments Axial nitronic rod patch panels Tuner access Panels Shield to space frame supports 30 K Helium line Field probe cable Heat intercept blocks Return End Shield Extension With support Beamline Thermal Intercept * All shield segments and patch panels are made from (C11000 ETP Cu)

Design – Field Probe Cable Heat Intercept The field probe cable thermal intercept blocks have been moved to align with instrumentation ports Allows more access to intercept block in case need for cable replacement arises Cable length and block design remains unchanged since the PDR

Design – Nitronic Rod Clearance Axial and transverse rod clearance slots contain plenty of clearance between shield and nitronic rods Thermal contraction clearance verified

Design – Shield/Space Frame Support Shield support bands (G11) G11 band Corner support clamps (304 SS) Bolt Washer Pem nut G11 Standoff

Design – Nitronic Rod Intercepts Each transverse nitronic rod is heat intercepted inside of the thermal shield Axial rods are not intercepted in the original design It is assumed that previous calculations showed that the heat leak through the longer rods is negligible The original strap was made from solid copper sheet. An equivalent capacity braided copper strap was selected to replace the solid one TIG braze

Design – Helium Line 7/8 in OD, .045 in wall copper tubing runs along the length of the shield Tubing is segmented into 4 pieces by bellows assemblies The tubing segments are torch brazed to the shield segment’s strain relief cut outs Verified the wall thickness is acceptable per ASME B31.3 Verified that the SS to Cu adapter is acceptable per ASME B16.22

Design – Shield Subassembly Bellows lock rods prevent over stretch SS to SS weld TIG braze Bellows assemblies integrated between each shield segment SS to Cu socket braze Tube brazed to the strain relief fingers of the shield segments

Design – Bellows DESIGN PRESSURE _ _ _ _ _ 200 psig Design pressure is specified on the drawing and bellows will be pressure tested to 1.1 * design pressure = 220 psig Note added to dwg: “Bellows squirm shall not be present during the ASME B31.3 pressure/leak test” The bellows manufacturer shall meet the design requirements There is only .015” radial clearance between the support rods and bracket through holes. This will minimize the angle that the bellows can be bent and decrease the chance of squirm Locking nuts are used to limit the axial travel to +/- .5” Compliance to the requirements will ensure that the bellows will perform under all operating conditions PDR D&MR Comment 12: Evaluate the thermal shield bellows performance under all potential operating scenarios. Bellows Squirm.

Design – Shield Extensions PDR Current design replaces the flat G11 band shield mount with a stiffer G11 angle member Extension ~ 50 lb A simple FEA model was evaluated under the 4 g vertical shipping load. Max stress ~ 15 ksi Very conservative analysis, neglects the support from the main shield body PDR D&MR Report Comment 3 : Perform FEA on simplified models where appropriate

Design – Thermal Contraction The shield assembly mounts “rigidly”(some flexibility in G11 supports) to the spaceframe. 300 – 50 K thermal contraction is ~.8 in Hardware will be omitted at two seams of the assembly to allow each segment to contract individually. Done procedurally during assembly. Some thermal contraction relief provided by twist in the 3/16” thick G11 bands

(2 blankets, 7 segments along length, 12 layers ea.) Design – Cold Mass MLI Nitronic Rod Ends (1 blanket, 15 layers) He Vessel Ends (1 blanket, 15 layers) Main Blankets (2 blankets, 7 segments along length, 12 layers ea.) Ends (1 blanket, 15 layers) Original CRM MLI assembly being used Removed the piezo penetration from ends

Design – Thermal Shield MLI Main Blankets (4 blankets, 15 layers ea.) Tuner access port slits Shield Extension End MLI Shield extension MLI Bottom segments Very similar to existing design Some extension and edge staggering employed May get first blanket assembly alone for fit/verification in first CM. Possibly have slits added to the design to aid in assembly for remaining blankets.

Design – Thermal Shield MLI Blankets staggered Shield Extension

Procurement The entire thermal shield assembly, including extensions, will be procured as a complete assembly. The Thermal Shield SOW (104211100-M8U-8200-A002- SOW) is complete and has been approved All of the MLI blankets will be procured together Each MLI blanket will arrive individually packaged and labeled The MLI SOW (104211300-M8U-8200-SOW) is complete and has been approved

Summary Thermal shield and MLI designs are established Additional slits may be added to the MLI design if the first MLI set installation deems it necessary Shield and MLI drawings are >90% complete and have been through preliminary checking Shield and MLI drawings are in final checking Interfaces with other subsystems have been verified PDR D&MRR comments/suggestions have been addressed and are considered closed

Backup Shield cooling line code calcs

Backup

Backup