J. Andrew Pruszynski, Roland S. Johansson, J. Randall Flanagan 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Advertisements

Journal of Vision. 2011;11(10):16. doi: / Figure Legend:
Backward Masking and Unmasking Across Saccadic Eye Movements
Context-Dependent Decay of Motor Memories during Skill Acquisition
Ian S. Howard, Daniel M. Wolpert, David W. Franklin  Current Biology 
Decision Making during the Psychological Refractory Period
Aaron R. Seitz, Praveen K. Pilly, Christopher C. Pack  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e4 (December 2017)
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Ian S. Howard, Daniel M. Wolpert, David W. Franklin  Current Biology 
Enhanced Muscle Afferent Signals during Motor Learning in Humans
Representation of Object Weight in Human Ventral Visual Cortex
G. Lorimer Moseley, Timothy J. Parsons, Charles Spence  Current Biology 
Context-Dependent Decay of Motor Memories during Skill Acquisition
Colin J. Palmer, Colin W.G. Clifford  Current Biology 
Malcolm Burrows, Darron A. Cullen, Marina Dorosenko, Gregory P. Sutton 
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Archerfish Actively Control the Hydrodynamics of Their Jets
Spatial Coding of the Predicted Impact Location of a Looming Object
Responses of Collicular Fixation Neurons to Gaze Shift Perturbations in Head- Unrestrained Monkey Reveal Gaze Feedback Control  Woo Young Choi, Daniel.
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (February 2017)
Lisa M. Fenk, Andreas Poehlmann, Andrew D. Straw  Current Biology 
Visual Control of Altitude in Flying Drosophila
Gal Aharon, Meshi Sadot, Yossi Yovel  Current Biology 
Rapid Innate Defensive Responses of Mice to Looming Visual Stimuli
Volume 18, Issue 15, Pages (August 2008)
Nicolas Catz, Peter W. Dicke, Peter Thier  Current Biology 
A Dedicated Binding Mechanism for the Visual Control of Movement
Volume 27, Issue 23, Pages e4 (December 2017)
Jennifer L. Hoy, Iryna Yavorska, Michael Wehr, Cristopher M. Niell 
Vision Guides Selection of Freeze or Flight Defense Strategies in Mice
The Occipital Place Area Is Causally Involved in Representing Environmental Boundaries during Navigation  Joshua B. Julian, Jack Ryan, Roy H. Hamilton,
Walking Modulates Speed Sensitivity in Drosophila Motion Vision
Rapid Automatic Motor Encoding of Competing Reach Options
Opposite Effects of Recent History on Perception and Decision
Near-Real-Time Feature-Selective Modulations in Human Cortex
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Visual Sensitivity Can Scale with Illusory Size Changes
Optic flow induces spatial filtering in fruit flies
Social Signals in Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex
Caudate Microstimulation Increases Value of Specific Choices
Dissociable Effects of Salience on Attention and Goal-Directed Action
Masaya Hirashima, Daichi Nozaki  Current Biology 
Centrosome Size: Scaling Without Measuring
Malcolm Burrows, Darron A. Cullen, Marina Dorosenko, Gregory P. Sutton 
Visual Adaptation of the Perception of Causality
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (February 2017)
Computer Use Changes Generalization of Movement Learning
Dongjun He, Daniel Kersten, Fang Fang  Current Biology 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Manual Chronostasis Current Biology
Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically
Encoding of Stimulus Probability in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Environmental Consistency Determines the Rate of Motor Adaptation
Visually Mediated Motor Planning in the Escape Response of Drosophila
Ian C. Fiebelkorn, Yuri B. Saalmann, Sabine Kastner  Current Biology 
When Correlation Implies Causation in Multisensory Integration
Daniela Vallentin, Andreas Nieder  Current Biology 
Volume 18, Issue 20, Pages (October 2008)
Kazumichi Matsumiya, Satoshi Shioiri  Current Biology 
Manuel Jan Roth, Matthis Synofzik, Axel Lindner  Current Biology 
Sharing Social Touch in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (March 2012)
Gaby Maimon, Andrew D. Straw, Michael H. Dickinson  Current Biology 
James N. Ingram, Ian S. Howard, J. Randall Flanagan, Daniel M. Wolpert 
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Visual Crowding Is Correlated with Awareness
Matthis Synofzik, Axel Lindner, Peter Thier  Current Biology 
Head-Eye Coordination at a Microscopic Scale
Presentation transcript:

A Rapid Tactile-Motor Reflex Automatically Guides Reaching toward Handheld Objects  J. Andrew Pruszynski, Roland S. Johansson, J. Randall Flanagan  Current Biology  Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 788-792 (March 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.027 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Apparatus and Experimental Methodology (A) Side view of the apparatus. On perturbation trials, the object rotated (and thus the reach target moved) when the finger had moved 5 cm from the start position. On touch trials, vision was occluded until the finger had moved 22.5 cm from the start position. (B) Schematic top view of the apparatus. (C) On half of the trials, the object did not rotate. On the other half of the trials, the object moved over 50 ms with a sigmoidal trajectory to one of four possible target locations with equal probability. Current Biology 2016 26, 788-792DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.027) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Behavioral Results (A) Spatial hand position averaged across participants. Small dots on each trace provide timing information relative to the instant the finger moved 5 cm from start position, i.e., the point of onset of target movement on perturbation trials. (B) Velocity vector direction averaged across participants. Data are aligned as in (A). Shaded areas represents ±1 SEM. (C) Lateral displacement of the finger 100 ms after it had moved 22.5 cm from the start position. Gray traces represent averages across trials within single participants. Black traces represent averages across participants. See also Figures S1 and S2. Current Biology 2016 26, 788-792DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.027) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Muscle Activity. (A) Pectorals major muscle activity averaged across participants for touch trials. Data are aligned as in Figure 2A. Shaded areas represent ±1 SEM. (B) Same format as (A) but for vision trials. (C) Time when muscle activity and kinematic responses began to diverge according to a time-series receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for target displacements of equal magnitude but opposite direction (for details, see the Supplemental Experimental Procedures). Time is relative to perturbation onset for each individual muscle sample. Data are pooled from ±10° and ±20° conditions. (D) Magnitude of muscle activity averaged between 75 and 100 ms after perturbation onset relative to unperturbed trials as a function of target displacement. Error bars represent ±1 SEM. Current Biology 2016 26, 788-792DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.027) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Responses when Final Target Position Is Fully Predictable (A) Same format as Figure 2B but for experiment 2, where participants could predict the target’s final position on perturbation trials. (B) Same format as Figures 3A and 3B but for the labeled conditions associated with experiment 2. See also Figure S3. Current Biology 2016 26, 788-792DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.027) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions