by Andreas Keiling, Scott Thaller, John Wygant, and John Dombeck

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Fig. 4 Altitudinal distributions of ice thickness change (m year−1) for the 650 glaciers. Altitudinal distributions of ice thickness change (m year−1)

Advertisements

Fig. 4 3D reconfiguration of liquid metals for electronics.

Fig. 4 Sequence divergence based on RAD sequences in five scaffolds containing genital QTL candidate genes between parapatric species with diverged genital.

Fig. 4 Cross sections across-strike and along-strike of the collision zone (for profile locations see Fig. 3). Cross sections across-strike and along-strike.

Fig. 2 CFD results. CFD results. Results of CFD simulations in horizontal (left column) and vertical (right column) cross-sections. All models oriented.

Fig. 1 Solar cycle and experimental setup.

Fig. 1 Reaction investigation using single-molecule charge transport measurement and simultaneous NMR characterization. Reaction investigation using single-molecule.

Fig. 1 Evolution of magnetic field lines around a foreshock bubble in the GSE-XY plane (z = 0): Results of a hybrid simulation. Evolution of magnetic field.

Fig. 5 Morphology of in situ peak Poynting flux during storm periods.

Fig. 1 Map of water stress and shale plays.

Fig. 2 Zeeman splitting of the plateau and associated Kondo feature.

Fig. 3 Tracing Poynting flux along Polar’s orbit during a period of 28 days, which includes a moderate storm and a major storm. Tracing Poynting flux along.

Origin of the asymmetry and determination of the critical angle

Fig. 3 The three novel indicators of ecosystem overfishing, for example large marine ecosystems in the tropical, temperate, and polar regions. The three.

Fig. 1 NP-free Ch-CNC droplets.

Fig. 3 Electron PSD in various regions.

Fig. 4 Morphogenesis in the Ch-CNC host droplets and NP assemblies.

Experimental supercurrent and corresponding quantum dot modeling

Fig. 3 Observed and modeled basal tilt rates.

Fig. 2 Reference-fixing experiment, results.

Fig. 2 Ferroelectric domains resolved in WTe2 single crystals.

Fig. 3 Scan rate effects on the layer edge current.

Interactive morphogenesis in Ch-CNC droplets laden with magnetic NPs

Fig. 3 Rotation experiment, setup.

Fig. 5 Panel appearance computation.

Fig. 1 Reference-fixing experiment, setup.

Fig. 1 Concept of the livestock transition in China between 1980 and Concept of the livestock transition in China between 1980 and The left-

Fig. 2 Four types of MJO propagation patterns along the equator.

Fig. 5 Conceptual diagram of the impact of acid deposition on calcium cycling and subsequent plant water use. Conceptual diagram of the impact of acid.

Fig. 1 Phase diagram and FS topologies.

Mechanical spectroscopy of insect swarms

Fig. 2 Configuration and composition of urban green space.

Fig. 2 EUV TG signal. EUV TG signal. Black lines in (A), (B), and (C) are the EUV TG signals from Si3N4 membranes at LTG = 110, 85, and 28 nm, respectively,

Fig. 3 ET dynamics on the control and treatment watersheds during the pretreatment and treatment periods. ET dynamics on the control and treatment watersheds.

Fig. 2 Gate and magnetic field dependence of the edge conduction.

by Hansjoerg J. Seybold, Edwin Kite, and James W. Kirchner

Fig. 2 Nanoparticle logic gates.

Fig. 1 Structure and absorption spectra of the P

Fig. 2 Results of the learning and testing phases.

Fig. 2 Folding motions of the TCO with strain-softening behavior.

Fig. 2 NH3, NOx, SO2, and NMVOC emission changes triggered by the JJJ clean air policy. NH3, NOx, SO2, and NMVOC emission changes triggered by the JJJ.

Fig. 1 Schematic view and characterizations of FGT/Pt bilayer.

Fig. 1 Empirical probability density functions of the estimated climatic drivers. Empirical probability density functions of the estimated climatic drivers.

Fig. 2 Asymmetric MR of LMO within the ac plane.

THz pulse-pump optical reflectivity probe spectroscopy on Nd2CuO4

Fig. 4 Relationships between light and economic parameters.

Relationships between species richness and temperature or latitude

Fig. 1 The calculation of STF moment acceleration, using the 2010 Maule, Chile M8.8 earthquake as an example. The calculation of STF moment acceleration,

Fig. 4 CO2 emission changes triggered by the JJJ clean air policy.

Fig. 1 Structural and electrical properties of Bi2Se3/BaFe12O19.

Fig. 4 Phase diagram showing significant order parameters ∣pk∣ versus T and wc. Phase diagram showing significant order parameters ∣pk∣ versus T and wc.

Fig. 5 3D MHD simulation of multiple plasmoid formation and ejection in the vertical current sheet spawned by an erupting flux rope. 3D MHD simulation.

Fig. 2 Mean field results. Mean field results. (A) Solutions P(x) to Eq. 4 for a range of T and wc = (B) Modulus ∣pk∣ of order parameters versus.

Fig. 2 Comparison of the observed DRs and the estimates by the VR model and FL. Comparison of the observed DRs and the estimates by the VR model and FL.

Fig. 4 The relationship between the total mean absolute momentum disturbance 〈∣p∣〉zB (in units of ℏ/D) and fringe visibility V. The relationship between.

Fig. 5 Simulation of the mechanical properties of the 3DGraphene foam in a wide temperature range down to the cryogenic region. Simulation of the mechanical.

Fig. 3 Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from 1982 to Comparisons of NDVI trends over the globally vegetated areas from.

Fig. 1 Global distribution of data.

Fig. 2 Polarized emission from printed perovskite nanocomposites.

Fig. 1 Example of diversified propagation patterns of the MJO.

Fig. 2 Finite element method (FEM) simulations of the photonic synapse with different structures. Finite element method (FEM) simulations of the photonic.

Fig. 5 Reconstitution of the dormant state using fetal ovaries.

Fig. 2 Comparison between the different reflective metasurface proposals when θi = 0° and θr = 70°. Comparison between the different reflective metasurface.

Height-dependent swarm response for a fixed amplitude of AM= 84 mm

Fig. 1 Conceptual diagram of warming effects on ecosystem C fluxes above and below the SWC optimum. Conceptual diagram of warming effects on ecosystem.

Fig. 1 Atomic structure of U1−xThxSb2.

Fig. 5 Schematics illustrating enhancement in April tornado activity due to SST. Schematics illustrating enhancement in April tornado activity due to SST.

Fig. 2 Analysis of 1PCTCO2 experiments (JJA seasonal means).

Imχ(3)(−ω; 0, 0, ω) spectra and their analyses in undoped cuprates

Fig. 5 Modeling of the ASE threshold using the kinetic equations and experimental parameter inputs. Modeling of the ASE threshold using the kinetic equations.

Presentation transcript:

by Andreas Keiling, Scott Thaller, John Wygant, and John Dombeck Assessing the global Alfvén wave power flow into and out of the auroral acceleration region during geomagnetic storms by Andreas Keiling, Scott Thaller, John Wygant, and John Dombeck Science Volume 5(6):eaav8411 June 26, 2019 Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

Fig. 1 Solar cycle and experimental setup. Solar cycle and experimental setup. (A) Top: Sunspot number versus time. The period under investigation in this study is shaded green, and the thick line is the averaged curve. Bottom: Global view of the initial development of the aurora during the Bastille Day storm observed by the IMAGE spacecraft’s Wideband Imaging Camera [from (4)]. The time in the lower right-hand corner of each image is in universal time. The arrow above the three images points at the date in the solar cycle when this storm occurred. (B) Auroral current circuit with key regions and spacecraft location [modified from (60)]. (C) Hypothetical orbital ellipsoid of the Polar satellite crossing different plasma regions of Earth’s magnetosphere during 1 year. The colored regions (yellow and red) illustrate regions through which Alfvén waves travel toward or away from the ionosphere in one particular instance. The hole in the ellipsoid reveals Earth with the aurora borealis. Green lines with arrows represent magnetic field lines. Andreas Keiling et al. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaav8411 Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

Fig. 2 Morphology of in situ Poynting flux during nonstorm and storm periods. Morphology of in situ Poynting flux during nonstorm and storm periods. (A) Global distribution of average wave Poynting flux, as a function of magnetic local time (MLT) and latitude, flowing toward Earth (labeled “Downward”). The view is onto the polar-auroral region, with the magnetic north pole in the center. The upper and lower halves correspond to dayside and nightside, respectively. The electric and magnetic field data for calculating Poynting fluxes were measured between 4 and 7 RE (geocentric distance) in the Northern Hemisphere over a period of 6 years (see Fig. 1B for the orbital ellipsoid). The Poynting fluxes shown were scaled along converging magnetic field lines to ionospheric altitudes (100 km) under nonstorm conditions (−20 nT < Dst < 0 nT). Each bin covers 2° magnetic latitude times 0.75 hour local time. Circles represent magnetic latitudes (60°, 70°, and 80°); radial lines indicate local times (e.g., 6, 12, 18, and 24). The black circle in the center was not analyzed. The number at the lower left corner of each panel is the total hemispherical (>60°) power for each distribution. (B) Same as (A) but under storm conditions (Dst < −40 nT). For a few bins (black), Polar did not encounter storm conditions; hence, no Poynting flux values are shown. The color scale is the same as in (A) for comparison purposes, which, however, causes some bins to saturate at the highest value. (C and D) Corresponding average Poynting flux distributions flowing toward the magnetosphere (labeled “Upward”). Andreas Keiling et al. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaav8411 Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

Fig. 3 Tracing Poynting flux along Polar’s orbit during a period of 28 days, which includes a moderate storm and a major storm. Tracing Poynting flux along Polar’s orbit during a period of 28 days, which includes a moderate storm and a major storm. (A) Peak values of Poynting flux binned by 0.5° magnetic latitude (y axis) versus days (x axis) and mapped using the T01 model. Each column represents the section of a Polar orbit within 50° and 90° magnetic latitude. Only values obtained when Polar was on the dayside are included. The Dst curve [from (B)] is overlaid (white line) with arbitrary scale for illustrative purposes. (B) Dst index versus time, with labels indicating a moderate and a major storm. Numbered vertical lines (1 to 5) refer to the features in the panels above and below (see text). The inset shows Polar’s daily orbits during the time period shown here projected onto the latitude-local time plane. (C) Same data quantity as in (A) but for the nightside and with the Dst curve overlaid. (D) Same data quantity as in (A) but for the nightside. However, the mapping was performed using the dipole model for comparison. Andreas Keiling et al. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaav8411 Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

Fig. 4 Alfvén wave power along MLT. Alfvén wave power along MLT. (A) Storm condition (Dst < −40 nT). (B) Nonstorm condition (−20 nT < Dst < 0 nT). In both panels, the solid line shows mean values, and the green-shaded area shows 1 SD away from the mean. Andreas Keiling et al. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaav8411 Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

Fig. 5 Morphology of in situ peak Poynting flux during storm periods. Morphology of in situ peak Poynting flux during storm periods. The global distribution of peak wave Poynting flux during storms (Dst < −40 nT) flowing toward Earth as measured at high altitude (4 to 7 RE geocentric) in the Northern Hemisphere obtained from 6 years of Polar measurements and scaled along converging magnetic field lines to ionospheric altitudes (100 km). Each bin covers 2° magnetic latitude times 0.75 hour local time. Circles represent magnetic latitudes (60°, 70°, and 80°); radial lines indicate local times (e.g., 6, 12, 18, and 24). The black circle in the center was not analyzed. For a few bins (black), Polar did not encounter storm conditions; hence, no Poynting flux values are shown. The two dashed oval-shaped curves delineate the statistical auroral oval for geomagnetically active periods (15). Andreas Keiling et al. Sci Adv 2019;5:eaav8411 Copyright © 2019 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).