Leading Implementation Means More Than “I SAID SO!”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Fostering A Positive School Culture Through Collaborative Administrative Practices A Framework for Excellence: The Role of Administration.
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
School Leadership that Works:
Purpose of Instruction
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Collaborative Data Teams
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
National Center for Urban School Transformation Improving Climate & Culture in Urban Schools National Center for Urban School Transformation.
Differentiated School Leadership Kentucky Principal’s Academy 2010.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Timberlane Regional School District
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP November 6, 2012.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Sparta High School Continuous School Improvement Plan.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.
ADVANCED (SACS) SYSTEM SUMMARY FY15. STANDARD ONE INDICATORS 1.1-The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Discipline Foundation Policy School-Wide Positive Behavior Support
Fostering a Culture of Data Use
Systematic Support for Students
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
Lorain City Schools 90 Day Entry Plan Update.
Mission Motto Learning for Life
Accreditation External Review
Introduction to Promoting Positive Behavior in Schools:
RECOGNIZING educator EXCELLENCE
Coaching for Math GAINS
Comprehensive Planning
STRATEGIC PLAN Understanding Our New Multi-Year Plan.
Themes Collaboration – vertical and horizontal Autonomy at all levels
Learning that deepens knowledge and understanding
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
What Does a 21st Century School Administrator Look Like?
Preston & Wingham Primary Schools Federation
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
Leadership of and for learning
Sylvan Hills Middle (Carver Cluster)
AND.
Aligning Assessments for Continued Implementation of an Equitable Multi-Level System of Support
Presentation transcript:

Leading Implementation Means More Than “I SAID SO!” Kent Smith Jill Koenitzer smithk@wisconsinpbisnetwork.org @kent1915 koenitzerj@wisconsinrticenter.org @jkoenitzer Dan Miller Sara Denure milleda@medford.k12.wi.us @twitterusername denurese@chipfalls.org @twitterusername

Assessments Connection The content of this session connects to SIR Leadership and Organizational Structures TFI Leadership team

Key Features Connection The content of this session connects to Data-based Decision-Making Systemic and Systematic Positive Culture Strong Shared Leadership

Outcomes Role of the principal Systems’ change Increased shared leadership Positive culture Strong systemic and systematic practices Solid data-based decision-making.

Where else in the conference they can attend to learn more about each outcome/key feature…

Role of the principal Schools with effective principals, are far more likely to positively impact student achievement. An effective principal: Recognizes that teaching and learning is central. Communicates the school vision clearly and consistently. Provides clear goals and monitors the progress of the goals. Spends time in classrooms coaching teachers to improve teaching. Nurtures and sustains a climate of trust. Lacks tolerance for ineffective teaching. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED538828.pdf

Systems’ Change Technical Adaptive Agreed upon problem Clearer path to solution Responds to traditional management approach Leader guides process Leader is ”in charge” Varied views of problem Different perspectives of solution Requires learning by all Often requires leadership at many levels Whenever an initiative is implemented, there are two types of change that are necessary - technical and adaptive: Technical change - Could be as simple as purchasing a resource like a new textbook. (read slide) Adaptive change - Using coaching as part of professional development. (read slide) Both are necessary, but technical change is traditionally the most closely planned for. We will encourage you to also plan for adaptive change. WI vision for RtI requires adaptive change, in addition to technical change. Optional: Mike Mattos quote: “…our current educational system is not designed for all students to learn.  It is designed to sort , select, and determine which students will be most successful.  All this, based upon the industrialized model. To implement RtI, your school needs to make an adaptive change of embracing the vision of higher levels of learning for all students. This is a pivotal change from the old vision of sorting and selecting to a new vision of learning for all.” Source: http://implementation.fpg.unc.edu/module-2/leadership-drivers

Increased Shared Leadership Representative teams with responsibility to lead and oversee implementation of an equitable multi-level system of supports at the school and district levels. All members advocate for equity Promote a vision of success for every learner Ensure the system is implemented with fidelity Provide support through resources, professional development, and coaching Use implementation and outcome data to action plan and monitor progress for continuous improvement Rely on internal and external coaches to provide valuable insight and feedback Ensure communication throughout the system

Positive Culture Leaders know meaningful change depends on the degree to which staff share a collective sense of purpose: an unwavering commitment to the success of every learner. the environment is predictable and safe: physically, socially, emotionally, intellectually, and culturally shared expectations among learners and adults foster a strong sense of community, identity, and belonging equity lens to ensure school structures benefit all learners, school policies promote every learner’s success

Strong Systemic and Systematic Practices Schools and districts can better meet the needs of every learner when policies, programs, practices, roles, and expertise are aligned and coordinated into an interdependent whole. Convey the importance and relationship of each staff member’s role and responsibilities toward the success of the system; Equip staff to skillfully fulfill their roles and responsibilities through strategic professional development, collaborative structures, and job-embedded coaching. Connect implementation with state and regional goals, mandates, and resources; Evaluate potential new initiatives in terms of alignment with, duplication of, and value added to existing initiatives

Solid Data-based Decision-making Teams, across the system, use both implementation data and outcome data in a continuous improvement problem-solving process to inform decisions and actions leading to college and career readiness for all. System Assessments (SIR, TFI, etc.) Outcome data (aggregated and disaggregated) Root cause analysis

Leading Implementation Means More Than “I SAID SO!” Dan Miller milleda@medford.k12.wi.us @twitterusername

Establishing a Strong System Three parts to our Systemic Approach Program (Instructional & Curricular) Data Viable/Reliable Curriculum (universal & intervention) Effective Staff Sufficient Resource Student Assessment Data Student Response Data - Child study team notes

Using the WISExplore process with our leadership teams to define our focus and to assure what we are doing is working.

The Leader’s Job Description Monitoring fidelity Provide staff training All while using student data to drive what to work on and when

How we plan for sufficient resources & staff development

Three parts to our Systemic Approach Program (Instructional & Curricular) Data Viable/Reliable Curriculum (universal & intervention) Effective Staff Sufficient Resource Student Assessment Data State Level data to see how we compare Universal data to guide what supports are needed Progress Monitoring data to determine what is working Student Response Data - Child study team notes

State / Universal data - tracked over multiple years

Progress Monitoring data: used for class placement / grouping

Behavioral Intervention Data

Three parts to our Systemic Approach Program (Instructional & Curricular) Data Viable/Reliable Curriculum (universal & intervention) Effective Staff Sufficient Resource Student Assessment Data State Level data to see how we compare Universal data to guide what supports are needed Progress Monitoring data to determine what is working Student Response Data - Decision Rules for the Process Child Study Team notes (recording the narrative) Keeping track of “who” we need to be talking about

Define the process for staff and parents

Child Study Team Notes A record of the narrative behind each student we support. Passes the “swivel test” Keeps everyone up to date Google’s Email collaborators Sample Save One Student Blank SOS Referral

Child Study Team Follow-up Dashboard To know who we need to talk about

Leading is more than, “I said so!” Developing a positive culture through shared leadership...

How do you get staff to see if a change is needed? Start with developing relationships - find out what is needed and support. Be the best helper you can be...give, give, and give some more. Then work with student data and ask staff to “define” what they are doing to meet the needs they have. (How are they being the best helper?) Don’t demand “some” curriculum change to fix a perceived issue...allow staff time to get there (understanding). Let the data do the talking! Provide information: Do a Report Card synopsis - to highlight different grading practice and point out our natural bias (not giving true scores because it will hurt kids/parent feelings) Ask staff, what are “you” doing to support fringe kids (Lowest / Highest) Let staff prove to themselves if what they are doing is truly working

3. Provide resources to allow staff to investigate their own practice time for conversation... Staff need: to be heard to feel they can defend their practice without getting defensive opportunities to push their thinking in a safe environment to feel legitimately empowered professional development in groups Groups create an environment where staff can defend, share, support, and celebrate their practice financial support Find a way...because this will remove the perceived barrier Be the “Yes” person!

Leading Implementation Means More Than “I SAID SO!” Sara Denure denurese@chipfalls.org @twitterusername

bsession.questionpro.com