Texas Disposal Wells And Seismicity Paul Dubois, P.E. May 2019.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPA’s Underground Injection Control Program
Advertisements

Changes to Statewide Rule 13 June, 2013 Texas Alliance of Energy Producers John Tintera, P.G. Sebree & Tintera, LLC.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS WEBSITE QUERIES FOR PRORATION HOW TO STAY IN COMPLIANCE Pamela Thompson, Well Compliance.
James Beckley. Virginia and DEQ Virginia has > 52,255 miles of rivers and streams 116,364 acres of significant lakes and reservoirs 2,684 square miles.
CWAG 2010 WATER LAW CONFERENCE The Broadmoor Colorado Springs, Colorado April 29 – 30, 2010.
Induced Seismicity Houston Bar Association Environmental Law Section Houston, Texas January 21, 2015 Mark K. Boling Executive Vice President and President,
Water Demands for Mining Richard Lowerre Adapted from presentation to Texas Groundwater Summit September 2013.
LOCAL REGULATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE QUICK TELECONFERENCE American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Climate Change, Sustainable.
IRENG07 1 Seismic Consideration Discussion for The Interaction Region Fred Asiri-SLAC.
Existing Infrastructure for International Exchange of Seismic Data Raymond J. Willemann GEM Technology, Washington, D.C. IASPEI:Includes commissions for.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
SDWA1 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS BACK TO THE BASICS : WELL COMPLIANCE FORMS AND PROCEDURES 1.
ETF – O IL AND G AS T RACT, M AY 5, 2015 GROUNDWATER AUTHORITY AND REQUIREMENTS.
Tsunami Warning System Elements IOC Assessment Mission to Indonesia 29 August-1 September 2005.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS CO 2 Storage Dave Hill 1.
Unit 8:COOP Plan and Procedures  Explain purpose of a COOP plan  Propose an outline for a COOP plan  Identify procedures that can effectively support.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS WELL COMPLIANCE FORMS AND PROCEDURES Austin Regulatory Conference September
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
NATO-CCMS Pilot Study Tour de Table - Greece Recent Developments on Contaminated Land in Greece Anthimos Xenidis Laboratory of Metallurgy National Technical.
DOE Program for Studying the Use of Salt Caverns for Oil Field Waste Disposal John Ford National Petroleum Technology Office.
EPA's Regulatory Approach : Climate Mitigation via Sequestration of CO2: by Rob Ferri (EPA - Underground Injection Control) This presentation has not been.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines January 19, 2010 Daniel Hall, Solid Waste Section Chief.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Inspection Part II.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
1 Waste Discharge Authorization Application - British Columbia WG6 Application Process WG Document Review presented by Helga Harlander October x, 2008.
NC Rules and Requirements: Certified Inspectors of Subsurface Systems NC Certified Inspector Training School.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS CO 2 Sequestration Dave Hill 1.
A Fiber-Optic Borehole Seismic
John James Tintera, PG #325 Texas Alliance of Energy Producers Injection Well Regulatory Update April, 2016.
North Texas Earthquake Study Group EARTHQUAKES AND FLUID DISPOSAL – A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE Acknowledgements: Cliff Frohlich and the USGS Earthquake Hazards.
Long-Term Stewardship: Institutional Controls on Department of Energy Sites Steve Schiesswohl, Senior Realty Officer November 2006.
Texas Inactive Well Regulations April Texas Inactive Well Regulations In September 2010, the RRC amended statewide rules 1, 14, 21, and 78 and adopted.
Oil & Gas Waste Stream Management and Permitting Options
Rules Waived - Part I Pupil Accounting Practices – Part II
WIGOS regulatory and guidance material
Title I Equipment Inventory Requirements
Chairman Christi Craddick
Title I Equipment Inventory Requirements
Class Synopsis This presentation will summarize the oil and gas well supplements, proration schedule, and online research queries associated with the Well.
Title I Equipment Inventory Requirements
Requirements for Low-Level Radioactive Waste Minimization Plans Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Groundwater Protection Determinations
DEP Legacy Well Emissions Study
Title I Equipment Inventory Requirements
Prioritizing Fossil Fuel Production over Drinking Water
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Class I Injection Well Application Issues
Does fracking cause earthquakes?
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Water Quality Rulemaking in Response to S.L
NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection Advisory Group (CIP AG)
Supporting a Commonwealth of Communities
Tom Wolf, Governor Patrick McDonnell, PA DEP Secretary
An Overview of the Current OCD Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Heather Riley, Director New Mexico Oil Conservation Division.
Butte County Board of Supervisors April 21, 2015
Dr. Jim Thomas Desert Research Institute
Workshop.
Title I Equipment Inventory Requirements
Garrett Kilroy EPA Research Fellow Shannon PRB
Breaking the Gridlock with Smart Regulations
Groundwater Contamination Cases in Texas
Wastewater Permitting Updates
Texas Disposal Well Rules And Seismicity Leslie Savage, P.G.
How Well is Your Well? UIC Class I Well Construction Standards
System Safety Regulation
Chapter PREDICTION AND ASSESSMENT OF RESOURCES
Lessons From Twenty Years of Environmental Law Practice at the RRC and TCEQ David W. Cooney, Jr. May 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Texas Disposal Wells And Seismicity Paul Dubois, P.E. May 2019

Railroad Commission of Texas Jurisdiction Permitting, monitoring & testing of injection wells Class II Enhanced recovery Disposal of oil and gas wastes Class III – Brine mining Class V – Geothermal

Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program Goals: Confine fluids to the permitted strata Protect groundwater (USDWs) Protect surface water Protect strata productive of hydrocarbons

Texas Disposal Well Rules Seismologist on staff since 2014 Amended disposal well rules November 2014 in 16 Tex. Admin. Code §§ 3.9 and 3.46 Required seismicity screen for all disposal well applications in Texas Historical USGS seismic events within a circular area of 100 square miles (5.64 mi or 9.08 km). Such conditions may include, but are not limited to complex geology proximity of the basement rock to the injection interval transmissive faults, and/or a history of seismic events in the area as demonstrated by information available from the USGS. Refinery explosion 2/18/2008, 40 miles NE of Midland, magnitude 2.1.

TexNet House Bill 2, 84th Texas Legislature (2016–17), Section 16 provides funding for TexNet: “…for the purchase and deployment of seismic equipment, maintenance of seismic networks, modeling of reservoir behavior for systems of wells in the vicinity of faults, …” Developed and operated by Bureau of Economic Geology (BEG), UT Austin

TexNet Seismic Monitoring System Denser seismic monitoring array will result in: Increased detection of smaller events More accurate location of suitably oriented, critically stressed faults More accurate location of epicenter/hypocenter Better definition of suitably oriented, critically stressed faults CISR

Science and Application The Long Run BEG Operates TexNet Conducts Basic Seismicity Research BEG, Academia, Industry Conducts Seismicity Research Conducts Related Studies RRC Regulates Industry Activity Permits Disposal Wells Immediate Need

Reeves County Year All Drilling Permits (injection wells) USGS Earthquakes >3.0 M 2012 433 (27) 1 2013 478 (27) 2014 652 (56) 2015 384 (30) 5 2016 466 (42) 6 2017 1082 (125) 37 2018 1211 (101) 36

We Need Guidelines Internal guidelines to assist RRC staff with administrative processing and permitting of disposal well applications in areas of the Permian Basin that are experiencing seismic activity. Not written to be guidance or instruction for industry applicants.

Guidelines Status Development began early 2018 Development accelerated Summer 2018 Aides briefings in September 2018 Limited external peer review Fall 2018 Continued peer review January 2019 Green light to pilot February 2019 Anticipate full implementation Summer 2019

UIC High-Level Processes

UIC Review Elements Administrative: Are the required elements of the application present and complete? Technical: Do the elements of the application meet the requirements of Rule & Statute? Seismic: Based on an assessment of potential seismic hazard, what is appropriate seismic mitigation? Manager: Final decision. Permit Disposition: Approve, deny, or refer to hearing.

Disposal Well Application Elements Rule 9 disposal well (non-productive zone) Rule 46 disposal well (productive zone) Notice and publication Well Log (preferably annotated) Groundwater Depth Letter No Harm Letter (W-14 applications only) Area of Review (“AOR”) Analysis Map Table of Wells Move quickly through these, Reference the online manual

Disposal Well Application Elements Seismicity screen See Statewide Rules 9(3)(B) & 46(b)(1)(C): Historical USGS seismic events within a circular area of 100 square miles (5.64 mi or 9.08 km). An earthquake event of 2.0 M or greater within the 5.64 km area of interest (“AOI”) will trigger the seismic review RRC Staff will consider both USGS and TexNet catalogs in assessing the seismic trigger. Move quickly through these, Reference the online manual

Elements of a Disposal Well Application If seismicity screen is positive, supplemental information is required to assess the state of the disposal zone and adjacent strata: Structure map(s) Isopach map(s) Cross-section(s) Other relevant information Fault stress analysis (may be required) Move quickly through these, Reference the online manual

Seismic Review The purpose of the supplemental information is to enable staff to conduct the seismic review. The seismic review is a scoring system that considers: 8 Faulting and Seismicity Factors 2 Operational Factors 3 Reservoir Factors

Seismicity and Faulting Factors Number of mapped faults in AOI Horizontal distance to nearest mapped fault Distance to basement Number of earthquakes in AOI Horizontal distance to nearest earthquake Maximum seismic event magnitude in AOI Years since last seismic event in AOI Data confidence

Seismicity and Faulting Factors (cont.) Seismicity & Faulting Data Confidence A: High Site specific, high resolution, compelling, and filed. B: Medium Intermediate resolution, interpreted derivatives from high quality data. C: Low Publicly available regional data with no new insights.

Operational Factors Combined Permitted Injection Rate within 2.8 mi Distance to Nearest Injection Well in Same Interval(s)

Reservoir Factors Disposal Zone Static Permeability Disposal Zone Cumulative Thickness Disposal Zone Lithology

Scoring Factor Category Scores (A, B or C) The non-numerical center of distribution of factor scores in each category. Overall Score (A, B or C) The non-numerical center of distribution of factor category scores, in which the seismicity and faulting factor category is weighted twice.

Fault Stress Modeling Is a known fault oriented to slip? For “B” Applications Fault stress analysis (for example, Fault Slip Potential) may be required if evidence of faulting (mapped faults or seismic event clustering) is within 2.8 mi. For “C” Applications Fault stress analysis is required if evidence of faulting is within the AOI.

Permit Conditions Score A: 30,000 bpd max Daily Records (volume, max pressure) Initial Static Bottom-hole Pressure Test Step Rate Test

Permit Conditions Score B: 20,000 bpd max Daily Records (volume, max pressure) Initial Static Bottom-hole Pressure Test Step Rate Test

Permit Conditions Score C: 10,000 bpd max Daily Records (volume, max pressure) Initial Static Bottom-hole Pressure Test Step Rate Test Seismologist Review and Approval with Additional Conditions as Necessary

Mitigation Opportunities Disposal wells scored as “B” or “C” may be authorized to inject an additional 10,000 bpd, provided: Operator actively implementing a seismic monitoring plan that augments the open public data network Operator develops and implements a seismic event response plan (submitted to RRC)

Seismic Monitoring Plan Implement a seismic monitoring plan that provides for the contribution of data to an existing public seismic network (e.g., TexNet). Monitoring to contribute to the body of public knowledge available to better resolve earthquake locations, especially depth. Include method of monitoring, type of instrumentation, reporting of data analysis, and an archive of the data in a public seismic database.

Seismic Monitoring Plan The minimal sensor and datalogger requirements for instrumentation are as follows. Sensor: 3 Component orthogonal axis Response: 1Hz to 100Hz Datalogger: 24 bit digitizer Sampling rate at least up to 200 sps Integrated seedlink server Timing using Global Positioning System (GPS).

Earthquake Response Plan Implement an earthquake response plan. Identify the actions that will be taken to inspect for damage, mitigate and/or manage risk by modifying operations, and establish thresholds for suspension of injection activity. Specific elements of the earthquake response plan should include: Monitoring plan will be filed with the Commission before disposal activities begin. Operator will monitor TexNet and USGS catalogs.

Earthquake Response Plan Elements of the response plan (continued): Response plan triggered when a 3.5 M event is detected with a reported hypocenter location within the 9.08 km AOI. Response plan will identify the actions the well operator will take when a 3.5 M event is detected with a reported hypocenter location within the 9.08 km AOI. Operator will notify the Commission within 24 hours of a seismic event posting on an earthquake catalog that triggers the response plan. Within 30 days of an earthquake trigger, the operator will file a report with the Commission documenting the event.

Guidelines – Going Forward Anticipate full guidelines implementation Summer 2019 RRC Response Plan design began March 2019 For General UIC Guidance: https://www.rrc.texas.gov/oil-gas/applications-and-permits/injection-permit-types-and-information/oil-and-gas-waste-disposal/