CLEPA comments on OBD II GTR 18 Draft

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regulation No. 96 Proposal for 03 Series of Amendments GRPE, January 2011 Informal document No. GRPE (61st GRPE, January 2011, agenda item.
Advertisements

Working group L-EPPR 03 June 2014 International environmental and propulsion performance requirements for L-category vehicles – OBD expert group On-board.
Informal document GRPE-70-14
Heavy Duty OBD Testing Requirements
“Laws are like sausages. It's better not to see them being made.” ― Otto von BismarckOtto von Bismarck WLTP-10-36e B. Coleman.
8th RESS IG IMMA contribution RESS-8-9. IMMA L6/L7 contribution IMMA has decided to provide the global expertise on L6/L7-vehicles at WP29 to address.
10/06/ GFV Task Force Heavy Duty Dual Fuel vehicles (HDDF TF) GRPE 62 – 10 June 2011 GRPE informal document 21 Informal document No. GRPE (62.
Report from IWG on Environmental and Propulsion Performance Requirements for Light vehicles (EPPR) 69 th GRPE 5-6 th June 2014 Geneva Chair Petter ÅSMAN.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ACCORDING TO ISO
Final??? Review of WLTP Definitions Bill Coleman – Tokyo Sept./Oct WLTP-12-20e.
General Requirements l MIL specifications and protocol l Fault code handling l Monitoring conditions l Other terminology/structure California Environmental.
1 Bernardo MARTÍNEZ Automotive Industry Unit Transposition of EURO VI requirements into UN/ECE R49 GRPE January 2012 Submitted.
Agenda item IV 5 th GFV meeting  2-days meeting on the 4 and 5 March 2009 in Brussels, (European Commission offices) 6 th GFV meeting  26 May 2009 in.
PVE Testing l Assurance that the OBD system is working properly in-use and meets the requirements of the regulation l Testing done close to the start of.
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Japan Japan’ position and proposal on draft of OBD-gtr 3 June 2014 Fuel system monitoring.
EPPR-05-13e Summary of recent discussions on evaporative emissions and OBD.
On-Board Diagnostics (OBD) II Regulatory Update Mobile Source Control Division California Air Resources Board April 25, 2002 Sacramento, California.
New COP for WLTP André Rijnders Senior advisor vehicle emissions and fuels Vehicle Standards Development RDW, The Netherlands 1 Conformity of production.
10/05/2010 UNECE-GFV-DF-power1 HDDF power issues – draft proposals to GFV outcome of the GFV meeting Draft amendments to R85.
WLTP gtr Annex 9 Determination of Method Equivalency - Progress Report
India Comments on EPPR-14-06e Proposal for a new Global technical regulation on the measurement procedure for two- or three-wheeled motor vehicles with.
Ministry of the Environment(MOE), Japan & Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLIT), Japan Japan’s position and proposal on draft.
Report from IWG on Environmental and Propulsion Performance Requirements for Light vehicles (EPPR) 72 nd GRPE th January 2016 Geneva Chair: Adolfo.
Japan’s proposal for EPPR (India comment for EPPR-14-06e) (India comment for EPPR-14-06e) 3/Mar/ 2016 JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION.
India Comments on EPPR-16-05e Proposal for a new global technical regulation on the measurement procedure for two- or three-wheeled motor vehicles with.
1 Proposed Amendments to the Verification Procedure for In-Use Diesel Emission Control Strategies August 23, 2012 California Environmental Protection Agency.
Dual-axis dyno Taskforce Status Report WLTP-IWG meeting April 2016 Iddo Riemersma (T&E) Christoph Lueginger (BMW) WLTP-14-04e.
TF#4 – Mechanical Integrity Approved Japanese proposal for addition of vehicle mechanical protection structure into mechanical integrity requirement. EVS-11-17e.
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-16-10
(After the EPPR telephone conference on 11/May/2016)
WLTP IWG ISC Taskforce: Starting note
India’s Comments on EPPR (Part-B2)
EPPR secretariat proposal
Motorola Solutions Internal Information
Regulation (EU) No 2015/1136 on CSM Design Targets (CSM-DT)
UNECE IWG on EPPR for L-category vehicles State of play
Informal document GRPE-73-21
India proposals on part B1 & B2 text
On-Board Diagnostics Chapter 18 Lesson 1.
21st EPPR Informal Working Group Meeting IMMA proposal on definition of OBD2 gtr 10/Jan/2018.
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 11/11/2018.
Regulation series WLTP-24-03e_Appendix 4
UNECE IWG on EPPR for L-category vehicles State of play
UNECE IWG on EPPR for L-category vehicles Status Report
Failure types, Codes, Clearing codes
UNECE IWG on EPPR for L-category vehicles State of play
CHAPTER 49 On-Board Diagnostics.
21st EPPR Informal Working Group Meeting IMMA proposal on definition of OBD2 gtr INDIA Comment: During study India observed that this document contains.
Virtual testing based approval
OBD Correspondence Group (CG)
21st EPPR Informal Working Group Meeting IMMA proposal on definition of OBD2 gtr INDIA Comment: During study India observed that this document contains.
Fuel Cell Vehicles - Required corrections in xxx-2016
Pilot phase - Learnings
UNECE IWG on EPPR for L-category vehicles State of play
21st EPPR Informal Working Group Meeting IMMA proposal on definition of OBD2 gtr Based on the regulation draft of EPPR-8-14e, IMMA has studied definitions.
WLTP-24-03e_Appendix 3a Transposition of GTR15 (WLTP) and GTR19 (Evap) into UN Regulations Update from WLTP Transposition Task Force September.
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 February 5, 2015.
on the definitions of OBD2 gtr
Japanese position and proposal on draft of OBD-GTR
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 6/10/2019.
OBD2CG OBD2 Phase 1 consolidated draft
OBD CG comments are in: this format & this format
Adolfo Perujo (IWG chairman)
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 8/20/2019.
Proposed changes / additions are given in BLUE colour
UNECE IWG on EPPR for L-category vehicles
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-16-05
Access to data requirementS
Request for Clarifications by IWG-IWVTA
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Presentation transcript:

CLEPA comments on OBD II GTR 18 Draft Reference: OBD2CG-10-05 OBD2 phase-1 consolidated draft 20190302.docx. 1) Use the term “ OBD threshold limits” throughout the regulation, e.g. in Definition 3.15 3.15.               “Permanent emission default mode” refers to a case where the engine management controller permanently switches to a setting that does not require an input from a failed component or system where such a failed component or system would result in increasing emissions from the vehicle exceeding the OBD threshold limits set out in this gtr. 2) Use the term “Generic scan tool” throughout the regulation, e.g. in Definition 3.18. The definition clarifies that the scan tool must be standardized – align with industry wide used term “Generic scan tool”.                3.18.      “Generic Scan tool" means an external test equipment used for standardized off-board communication with the OBD system in accordance with the requirements of this gtr.

CLEPA comments on OBD II GTR 18 Draft Reference: OBD2CG-10-05 OBD2 phase-1 consolidated draft 20190302.docx. 3) Requirement missing: § 5.3.8. as based on § 3.36 of Reg. (EU) 44/2014 which is based on R83 Annex XI § 3.3.3.5. 5.3.8.  a) Unless otherwise monitored, any other powertrain component connected to a computer relevant for the environmental performance, [requirement]. wWithout prejudice to the Table 1 of Annex 2, the relevant diagnostic trouble code shall be stored.                        b) A Contracting Party may require in addition that any other powertrain component connected to a computer relevant for the functional safety, and/or triggering of any programmed 'limp-home' operating mode which significantly reduces engine torque, e.g. to safeguard powertrain components, [requirement]. Wwithout prejudice to the Table 1 of Annex 2, the relevant diagnostic trouble code shall be stored. 3.3.6. Unless otherwise monitored, any other powertrain component connected to a computer relevant for the environmental performance and/or functional safety, triggering any programmed ‘limp-home’ operating mode which significantly reduces engine torque, e.g. to safeguard powertrain components [requirement]. Without prejudice to the list Ap2- 1 the relevant diagnostic trouble code shall be stored. 3.3.3.5. Unless otherwise monitored, any other emission-related power-train component connected to a computer, including any relevant sensors to enable monitoring functions to be carried out, shall be monitored for circuit continuity.

CLEPA comments on OBD II GTR 18 Draft Reference: OBD2CG-10-05 OBD2 phase-1 consolidated draft 20190302.docx. 4) Usage of default modes add emission in a) add (limp home mode) in b) 5.3.12.2.               For strategies requiring more than two preconditioning cycles for MI activation, the manufacturer shall provide data and/or an engineering evaluation which adequately demonstrate that the monitoring system is equally effective and timely in detecting component deterioration. Strategies requiring on average more than ten driving cycles for MI activation are not accepted. a) The MI shall also activate whenever the powertrain control enters a permanent emission default mode of operation if the OBD emission thresholds in paragraph 5.5. are exceeded or if the OBD system is unable to fulfil the basic monitoring requirements laid down in points 5.3.4 or 5.3.5. b) A Contracting Party may require in addition that the MI shall activate whenever the powertrain control enters a permanent default mode of operation (limp home mode)  leading to a significant torque reduction.

CLEPA comments on OBD II GTR 18 Draft Reference: OBD2CG-10-05 OBD2 phase-1 consolidated draft 20190302.docx. 5) Comment 1 below table 1 in Annex 2: Amendment comment 1 to align with accepted IMMA proposal Feb 2019 Comments :                        (1)   a) Only in case of an activated default mode leading to a significantly reduced propulsion torque or if a throttle by wire system is fitted.                        [b) A Contracting Party may require in addition that this is only required in case of if an activated default mode leading to a significantly reduced propulsion torque.]

CLEPA comments on OBD II GTR 18 Draft Reference: OBD2CG-10-05 OBD2 phase-1 consolidated draft 20190302.docx. 6) Text contained twice: in 1.2. and 1.3 of Annex 6. Amend by deleting second paragraph in 1.2.  1.2.         The manufacturer shall make available the defective components or electrical devices to be used to simulate failures. When measured over the appropriate test type I cycle, such defective components or devices shall not cause the vehicle emissions to exceed by more than 20 percent the OBD thresholds set out in paragraph 5.5. of general requirements. For electrical failures (short/open circuit/ [rationality/basic monitoring requirement]), the emissions may exceed the limits of set out in paragraph 5.5. of general requirements by more than twenty per cent. When the vehicle is tested with the defective component or device fitted, the OBD system shall be approved if the MI is activated. The OBD system shall also be approved if the MI is activated below the OBD threshold limits. 1.3.          When the vehicle is tested with the defective component or device fitted, the OBD system shall be approved if the malfunction indicator is activated. The system shall also be approved if the indicator is activated below the OBD thresholds.

CLEPA comments on OBD II GTR 18 Draft Reference: OBD2CG-10-05 OBD2 phase-1 consolidated draft 20190302.docx. 7) CLEPA proposal for Annex 6. OBD demo. Amendment proposals in bold / strike out   3.1.2.   [In case of applying the durability test procedure set out in [section B.4. of Revision 1 of GTR No 2], or SBC, the test vehicles shall be equipped with the aged emission components used for durability tests as well as for the purposes of this Annex and the OBD environmental tests shall be finally verified and reported at the conclusion of the Type V durability testing. At the request of the manufacturer, a suitable aged and representative vehicle or method may be used for these OBD demonstrations test. The method includes carrying out of OBD test using the deterioration value obtained from the actual durability test to avoid damage during misfire test to the deteriorated CAT created through durability test.]                                 3.1.4. In case of applying the fixed deterioration factors (DF) set out in GTR No.2, the applicable deterioration factors set out in this gtr of fixed DF shall be multiplied with the emission test results. If the type approval authority allows, in case of misfire demonstration, alternatively experimentally determined durability deterioration factors from the durability test may be used.  This demo Such method includes carrying out of OBD test using the deterioration value obtained from the actual durability test may be used to avoid damage during misfire testing to the deteriorated catalyst created by through durability testing and may be used on request of the manufacturer if it submits data and/or an engineering evaluation which adequately demonstrates the risk of damage to the deteriorated catalyst.

CLEPA comments on OBD II GTR 18 Draft Reference: OBD2CG-10-05 OBD2 phase-1 consolidated draft 20190302.docx. 8) Missing numbering and text in Annex 6: Add bold text and numbers 5. Test vehicle and fuel   5.1. The test vehicles shall meet the requirements of GTR No. 2. The manufacturer shall set the system or component for which detection is to be demonstrated at or beyond the criteria limit prior to operating the vehicle over the emissions test cycle appropriate for the classification of the vehicle. To determine correct functionality of the diagnostic system, the test vehicle shall then be operated over the appropriate type I test cycle according to its classification set out in GTR No. 2. 5.2.        Test fuel The reference fuel to test the vehicle shall be specified by the Contracting Party and be of the same specification as the reference fuel used to conduct the type I tailpipe emissions after cold start. The selected fuel type shall not be changed during any of the test phases