ISENTROPIC ANALYSIS using Theta and Theta-E (Equivalent) surface

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What we now know: Difference between weather and climate.
Advertisements

Weather Essentials Concept Map
Atmospheric Destabilization Processes Upper Level Mixed Layer Synoptic Lifting Dynamic Destabilization Differential Advection.
Visualizing Physical Geography Copyright © 2008 John Wiley and Sons Publishers Inc. Chapter 5 Winds and Global Circulation.
General Circulation and Kinetic Energy
Chapter 8 Coordinate Systems.
Tephigrams ENVI1400 : Lecture 8.
AOSC 200 Lesson 14. Fig Subtropical and Polar jet streams in relation to the three cells.
General Circulation and Climate Zones Martin Visbeck DEES, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Atmospheric Analysis Lecture 2.
AOSS 401, Fall 2006 Lecture 8 September 24, 2007 Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB) Derek Posselt (Room 2517D, SRB)
II. Synoptic Atmospheric Destabilization Processes Elevated Mixed Layer (EML) Synoptic Lifting Dynamic Destabilization Differential Advection.
Lapse Rates and Stability of the Atmosphere
General Circulation of the Atmosphere Lisa Goddard 19 September 2006.
Thermodynamics, Buoyancy, and Vertical Motion Temperature, Pressure, and Density Buoyancy and Static Stability Adiabatic “Lapse Rates” Convective Motions.
1 Introduction to Isentropic Coordinates: a new view of mean meridional & eddy circulations Cristiana Stan School and Conference on “the General Circulation.
PRECIPITATION PROCESSES AT FRONTS. POSSIBLE CONDITIONS PRESENT AT FRONT 1.Air ahead of the front is stable to all forms of instability Forcing mechanism.
Fronts and Frontogenesis
Advanced SynopticM. D. Eastin Isentropic Analysis.
Isentropic Analysis Techniques: Basic Concepts March 5, 2004 Adapted from Professor Jim Moore of St. Louis University.
The troposphere, except in shallow, narrow, rare locations, is stable to dry processes. For the purpose of synoptic analysis, these areas can be ignored.
Isentropic Analysis Techniques: Basic Concepts
Planetary Atmospheres, the Environment and Life (ExCos2Y) Topic 6: Wind Chris Parkes Rm 455 Kelvin Building.
1 IPV and the Dynamic Tropopause John W. Nielsen-Gammon Texas A&M University
COMET Feb. 20, 2002 IPV and the Dynamic Tropopause John W. Nielsen-Gammon1 Outline PV basics Seeing the world through PV Waves and vortices Nonconservation.
What set the atmosphere in motion?
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology
Synoptic Scale Balance Equations Using scale analysis (to identify the dominant ‘forces at work’) and manipulating the equations of motion we can arrive.
METR February Why use Temp. Advection? The temperature at a location may change in two ways: –The air parcel which is being sampled might.
Idealized Tropical Cyclone Structure. Tropical Cyclone Extension of the Warm Core middle –level vortex to the surface. Inducement of Ekman pumping Non-linear.
A stable atmosphere. An absolutely stable atmosphere exists when a rising air parcel is colder and heavier (i.e., more dense) than the air surrounding.
Cross-Section Analysis metr2413 April 2, Cross-Section Analysis Illustrates the vertical structure of the atmosphere (2D vs 1D) Compliments horizontal.
Potential vorticity and the invertibility principle (pp ) To a first approximation, the atmospheric structure may be regarded as a superposition.
Atmospheric Stability and Air Masses
To View Slide Show Click on “Slide Show” above –Click on “From Current Slide”
PV Thinking and the Dynamic Tropopause
PRESSURE & WIND, GENERAL CIRCULATION, JET STREAMS.
Unit 6: Atmosphere Part 1.
For a barotropic flow, we have is geostrophic current.
GCM’s Heating of the Earth
Stability and Introduction to the Thermodynamic Diagram
Condensation in the Atmosphere
ATM S 542 Synoptic Meteorology Overview
TC Structure Theta_e Structure Grid 3: Vertical motion surfaces 15:30 UTC 26 August, m/s – red -1 m/s -blue +0.5 m/s – red -0.5 m/s -blue.
Synoptic Scale Balance Equations
Lecture on Atmospheric Pressure
A Compare and Contrast Study of Two Banded Snow Storms
Section 1.2 The Causes of Weather
Stability and Cloud Development
CONCEPT OF CONVEYER BELT IN FRONTS AND WAVES
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology
Atmospheric Destabilization Processes
AICE EM: Atmosphere Key Content 2
Thermodynamics, Buoyancy, and Vertical Motion
For a barotropic flow, we have is geostrophic current.
METR March 2004 Thermodynamics IV.
Chapter 3 Thermodynamics.
What direction do high and low pressure systems spin
Condensation in the Atmosphere
Section 2: Fronts Preview Key Ideas Fronts Types of Fronts
Stability and Cloud Development
The Course of Synoptic Meteorology
Atmospheric Moisture Atmospheric moisture is a very important topic under the theme of climatic system. In this presentation, you can make use of photos.
1. Transformations of Moist Air
Unit 6: Atmosphere Part 1.
Water Vapour Imagery and
Richard B. Rood (Room 2525, SRB)
Isentropic coordinate
The Course of Synoptic Meteorology
AIR MASS SOURCE REGIONS
Presentation transcript:

ISENTROPIC ANALYSIS using Theta and Theta-E (Equivalent) surface Special Thanks to Prof James Moore, Saint Louis Univ COMET Introduction of isentropic analyses Montgomery streamfunction Geostrophic balance Vertical Motion in isentropic analysis Advantages and Disadvantages of isentropic vertical coordinates The temperature,pressure, and moisture characteristics of the atmosphere arise in large part from the continuous exchange of energy and water vapor near the surface. When energy inputs exceed energy losses, the temperature of the air increases. In the same way, when there is more evaporation than precipitation, the moisture content of the atmosphere increases. But because the heat and water are not uniformly distributed across the globe, the cooling and warming of the atmosphere vary from place to place, as does the net input of water vapor. Thus, air over the tropical Pacific, for example, takes on different characteristics from air over northern Canada. [Understanding Weather and Climate, 2001]. 1

Parcel does not exchange heat with its surroundings Conduction Convection Temperature Advection Latent Heating Adiabatic (heating-cooling) Radiative Heat Transfer Latent Heat release Atm Avg Lapse rate ~6.5 °C/km Expansion cooling  Compression warming Parcel does not exchange heat with its surroundings 2

Visualizing Static Stability – Vertical Gradients of  Vertical changes of potential temperature related to lapse rates: U = unstable N = neutral S = stable VS = very stable

Neutral-Superadiabatic Lapse Rates SA=superadiabatic and N=neutral

Vertical Gradient is a Function of Static Stability LS = less stable (weak static stability) and VS = very stable (strong static stability)

vertical motion & diabatic processes layer perspective parcel perspective

Slope of Isentropes WARM COLD COLD WARM Isentropes slope toward cold air CONTRARY to isobaric surface, isentropic surfaces are further from the earth’s surface when cold (dense) air is located between the isentrope and earth’s surface. COLD WARM 7

Three-Dimensional Isentropic Topography cold     DOC     NOAA     NWS     Info Quality     Data Disclaimer     Privacy     Feedback ----------Quick Zooms----------North AmericaPacific North WestSouth WestMid- WestSouth EastNorth EastAlaskaHawaiiPuerto Rico           Density: 1x 2x 3x All Mouse Scroll Zoom: warm 8

Isentropes near Frontal Zones

Thermal Wind Relationship in Isentropic Coordinates Isentropic surfaces have a steep slope in regions of strong baroclinicity. Flat isentropes indicate barotropic conditions and little/no change of the wind with height. Frontal zones are characterized by sloping isentropic surfaces which are vertically compacted (indicating strong static stability). In the stratosphere the static stability increases by about one order of magnitude.

Isentropic Mean Meridional Cross Section

Advantages of Theta Analysis Under adiabatic conditions, air parcels remain on isentrophic surfaces. The conserve their potential temperature Air parcel trajectories on theta surfaces are more accurate because they capture the adiabatic component of the vertical motion.

Elements of Isentropic Chart Winds on theta surface are 3D in Pres Height Pressure contours on theta surface are Isotherms Montgomery stream function – used to compute geostrophic wind (similar to Heights on P surface) Mixing ratio (g/kg) moves on Theta/ThetaE surfaces Pressure difference between theta surface (measure of static stability)

Montgomery Streamfunction Similar to Height Field in pressure coordinates “M” is the Montgomery streamfunction is equal to the dry static energy of a parcel “CpT” is the enthalpy and “g0 Z” is the potential energy of a parcel Dry static energy is conserved following a parcel in adiabatic and frictionless motion In absence of horizontal motion, vertical velocity would be negative if a cold dome of air arrived at a given location (Term A negative) 14

Geostrophic Balance “M” is the Montgomery streamfunction In absence of horizontal motion, vertical velocity would be negative if a cold dome of air arrived at a given location (Term A negative) “M” is the Montgomery streamfunction “f0” is the Coriolis parameter at a single latitude (constant) 15

Advection of Moisture on an Isentropic Surface Moist air from low levels on the left (south) is transported upward and to the right (north) along the isentropic surface. However, in pressure coordinates water vapor appears on the constant pressure surface labeled p in the absence of advection along the pressure surface --it appears to come from nowhere as it emerges from another pressure surface. (adapted from Bluestein, vol. I, 1992, p. 23)

Moisture transport and lift along an isentropic surface 6 8 Isentropic mountain Warm moist air

Cross section of isentropes and mixing ratios: 12 UTC 12-24-02

X . A B

Subjective Analysis for 12 UTC 24 December 2002

294 K G-R streamlines/isobars: 12 UTC 24 Dec 2002

294 K G-R omega: 12 UTC 24 Dec 2002 Advective component of Vertical Motion

System-Relative Flow on Isentropic Surfaces A key assumption is that the weather system translates horizontally without change in shape or intensity (anticyclone or cyclone changes only slowly over synoptic time scales). We subtract the speed of the system, C, from the ground-relative wind, V. V – C then becomes the system-relative flow on the isentropic surface, i.e., it is the flow relative to the moving system and takes into account the change in the isentropic topography. C is computed by tracking a feature on the isentropic surface, e.g., a vorticity maximum, a short-wave trough axis, or some identifiable feature that can be reliably tracked. Streamlines of system-relative wind are identical to trajectories relative to the moving system!

Computing Isentropic Omegas Essentially there are three approaches to computing isentropic omegas: • Ground-Relative Method (V • ∇P) : • Okay for slow-moving systems (∂P/∂t term is small) • Assumes that the advection term dominates (not always a good assumption) • System-Relative Method ( (V-C) • ∇P ) : • Good for situations in which the system is not deepening or filling rapidly • Also useful when the time step between map times is large (e.g., greater than 3 hours) • Brute-Force Computational Method (∂ P/ ∂ t + V • ∇P ):

System-Relative Flow: How can it be used? Carlson (1991, Mid-Latitude Weather Systems) notes: Relative-wind analysis reveals the existence of sharply-defined boundaries, which differentiate air streams of vastly differing moisture contents. Air streams tend to contain relatively narrow ranges of Theta and Thetaw peculiar to the air stream’s origins. Relative-wind isentropic analyses for synoptic-scale weather systems tend to show well-defined air streams, which have been identified by the names – warm conveyor belt, cold conveyor belt and dry conveyor belt. Thus, a conveyor belt consists of an ensemble of air parcels having nearly the same Thetaw (or Thetae) value, starting from a common initial location, which travel over synoptic-scale time periods (> 18 h).

294 K G-R streamlines/isobars: 20 UTC 24 Dec 2002

294 K S-R streamlines/isobars: 20 UTC 24 Dec 2002 Subtract C = 243.1deg at 13. 6 m s-1 Tracking the circulation center Streamlines in System Rel Coord are like Trajectories

294 K G-R omega: 20 UTC 24 Dec 2002 Advective component of Vertical Motion

294 K S-R omega: 20 UTC 24 Dec 2002

Choosing the “Right” Isentropic Surface(s) The “best” isentropic surface to diagnose low-level moisture and vertical motion varies with latitude, season, and the synoptic situation. There are various approaches to choosing the “best” surface(s): Use the ranges suggested by Namias (1940) : Season Low-Level Isentropic Surface Winter 290-295 K Spring 295-300 K Summer 310-315 K Fall 300-305 K

Isentropic Analysis: Advantages For synoptic scale motions, in the absence of diabatic processes, isentropic surfaces are material surfaces, i.e., parcels are thermodynamical bound to the surface Horizontal flow along an isentropic surface contains the adiabatic component of vertical motion often neglected in a Z or P reference system Moisture transport on an isentropic surface is three- dimensional - patterns are more spatially and temporally coherent than on pressure surfaces Isentropic surfaces tend to run parallel to frontal zones making the variation of basic quantities (u,v, T, q) more gradual along them.

Disadvantage of Isentropic Vertical Coordinates* Atmosphere is not completely adiabatic Regions of strong vertical mixing or convection Isentropic surfaces may intersect the ground Isentropic surfaces are not quasi-horizontal Meteorologists are unaccustomed to interpreting isentropic weather maps *Carlson (1998) “Mid-Latitude Weather Systems” 32