MT1-MMP-Dependent Invasion Is Regulated by TI-VAMP/VAMP7

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tension and Force-Resistant Attachment Are Essential for Myofibrillogenesis in Drosophila Flight Muscle  Manuela Weitkunat, Aynur Kaya-Çopur, Stephan W.
Advertisements

Colleen T. Skau, David R. Kovar  Current Biology 
Vesicle Docking Is a Key Target of Local PI(4,5)P2 Metabolism in the Secretory Pathway of INS-1 Cells  Chen Ji, Fan Fan, Xuelin Lou  Cell Reports  Volume.
Volume 19, Issue 23, Pages (December 2009)
Dynamics of cell–cell repulsion regulated by PYK2 localized at focal adhesions in migrating cells. Dynamics of cell–cell repulsion regulated by PYK2 localized.
Volume 22, Issue 17, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 20, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Rab6 Regulates Transport and Targeting of Exocytotic Carriers
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 136, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Synaptotagmin SYTA Forms ER-Plasma Membrane Junctions that Are Recruited to Plasmodesmata for Plant Virus Movement  Amit Levy, Judy Y. Zheng, Sondra G.
Volume 24, Issue 15, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Single-Molecule Microscopy Reveals Plasma Membrane Microdomains Created by Protein-Protein Networks that Exclude or Trap Signaling Molecules in T Cells 
Nimish Khanna, Yan Hu, Andrew S. Belmont  Current Biology 
Role of bud6p and tea1p in the interaction between actin and microtubules for the establishment of cell polarity in fission yeast  Jonathan M. Glynn,
Role of Tetraspanins CD9 and CD151 in Primary Melanocyte Motility
Nonmuscle Myosin II Isoforms Coassemble in Living Cells
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Zhang-Yi Liang, Mark Andrew Hallen, Sharyn Anne Endow  Current Biology 
Dan Zhang, Aleksandar Vjestica, Snezhana Oliferenko  Current Biology 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Distinct Autophagosomal-Lysosomal Fusion Mechanism Revealed by Thapsigargin- Induced Autophagy Arrest  Ian G. Ganley, Pui-Mun Wong, Noor Gammoh, Xuejun.
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 22, Issue 24, Pages (December 2012)
Sarmad Al-Bassam, Min Xu, Thomas J. Wandless, Don B. Arnold 
A Molecular Pathway for Myosin II Recruitment to Stress Fibers
Volume 16, Issue 22, Pages (November 2006)
The Formin FMNL3 Controls Early Apical Specification in Endothelial Cells by Regulating the Polarized Trafficking of Podocalyxin  Mark Richards, Clare.
Volume 19, Issue 13, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 21, Pages (November 2013)
EB1-Recruited Microtubule +TIP Complexes Coordinate Protrusion Dynamics during 3D Epithelial Remodeling  Sarah Gierke, Torsten Wittmann  Current Biology 
Volume 26, Issue 24, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages R362-R364 (May 2008)
Marko Kaksonen, Christopher P. Toret, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
Structure and Function of an Actin-Based Filter in the Proximal Axon
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (December 2013)
Gloria Slattum, Yapeng Gu, Roger Sabbadini, Jody Rosenblatt 
Amphiregulin Exosomes Increase Cancer Cell Invasion
Mariana Melani, Kaylene J. Simpson, Joan S. Brugge, Denise Montell 
Arthur Millius, Sheel N. Dandekar, Andrew R. Houk, Orion D. Weiner 
Kinesin-5 Is Essential for Growth-Cone Turning
Volume 17, Issue 22, Pages (November 2007)
Loss of Scar/WAVE Complex Promotes N-WASP- and FAK-Dependent Invasion
Kari Barlan, Wen Lu, Vladimir I. Gelfand  Current Biology 
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
DDR1 kinase is required for tubulogenesis and polarity-dependent MT1-MMP localization at the basal surface. DDR1 kinase is required for tubulogenesis and.
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Virtual Breakdown of the Nuclear Envelope in Fission Yeast Meiosis
Volume 15, Issue 14, Pages (July 2005)
DDR1 kinase is required for tubulogenesis and polarity-dependent MT1-MMP localization at the basal surface. DDR1 kinase is required for tubulogenesis and.
Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Promotes Invadopodia Activity
Cargo Regulates Clathrin-Coated Pit Dynamics
Twist1-Induced Invadopodia Formation Promotes Tumor Metastasis
ECM Cross-Linking Regulates Invadopodia Dynamics
The Kinesin-8 Kif18A Dampens Microtubule Plus-End Dynamics
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (June 2010)
CDCP1 is required for invadopodia formation and ECM degradation by human breast cancer cells. CDCP1 is required for invadopodia formation and ECM degradation.
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (June 2011)
Marko Kaksonen, Yidi Sun, David G. Drubin  Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 15, Pages (August 2006)
Nimish Khanna, Yan Hu, Andrew S. Belmont  Current Biology 
Sandeep Kumar, Alakesh Das, Amlan Barai, Shamik Sen 
Presentation transcript:

MT1-MMP-Dependent Invasion Is Regulated by TI-VAMP/VAMP7 Anika Steffen, Gaëlle Le Dez, Renaud Poincloux, Chiara Recchi, Pierre Nassoy, Klemens Rottner, Thierry Galli, Philippe Chavrier  Current Biology  Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages 926-931 (June 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.044 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 MT1-MMP Is Trafficking in VAMP7-Positive Compartments (A–A″) MDA-MB-231 cells stably expressing MT1-MMP-mCherry ([A′] and [A″] in red) were counterstained for VAMP7 ([A] and [A″] in green). (B) GFP-VAMP7 and MT1-MMP-mCherry are cotrafficking in MDA-MB-231 cells. (B′) Time lapse of the boxed region in (B). Note that the slight shift of the mCherry/GFP signals is due to consecutive imaging of GFP-VAMP7 and MT1-MMP-mCherry (see also Movie S1). Time is given in seconds. The scale bar in (A″) and in (B) represent 10 μm. The scale bar in (B′) represents 1 μm. Current Biology 2008 18, 926-931DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.044) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 VAMP7 Colocalizes with MT1-MMP-mCherry at Focal Sites of Degradation MDA-MB-231 cells ectopically expressing GFP-VAMP7 (A and E) and MT1-MMP-mCherry (B and F) on fluorescently labeled gelatin (C) were imaged by TIRF (A and B) and wide-field (WF) microscopy (E and F). In (D), a merged image of GFP-VAMP7 in green and MT1-MMP-mCherry in red by TIRF reveals a high degree of colocalization of both proteins at the ventral plasma membrane. The arrowhead points to a GFP-VAMP7 vesicle not colocalizing with MT1-MMP-mCherry and gelatin degradation. (G) shows enlargements of the boxed region in (D). In (H), measurements of fluorescent intensities on the line depicted in (G) on the merged image shows concomitant increase of intensities of GFP-VAMP7 (green line) and MT1-MMP-mCherry (red line) correlating with loss of fluorescent intensity of the gelatin (blue line). The scale bar in (E) (valid for [A]–[F]) represents 5 μm, and the scale bar in (G) represents 1 μm. Current Biology 2008 18, 926-931DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.044) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 GFP-VAMP7 Is Dynamically Recruited to Active Sites of Proteolysis GFP-VAMP7 was visualized by wide-field (WF) (A) and TIRF (B) microscopy in MDA-MB-231 cells coexpressing MT1-MMP-mCherry on fluorescently labeled gelatin (C). TIRF microscopy of GFP-VAMP7 (B) reveals small vesicles close to the ventral plasma membrane, whereas wide-field (A) microscopy visualizes bigger compartments in the cytoplasm. (D) shows a merged image of GFP-VAMP7 by TIRF (green) and gelatin (red). (E) shows a time lapse of the boxed region in (D). The arrow indicates movement of a GFP-VAMP7 vesicle toward an accumulation of vesicles marked by an asterisk at sites of degradation (see also Movie S2). Time is given in seconds. The scale bar in (B) (valid for [A]–[D]) represents 10 μm; the scale bar in (E) represents 2 μm. Current Biology 2008 18, 926-931DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.044) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Interference with VAMP7 Expression Impairs Degradation Capacities of Breast Cancer Cells through Reduced MT1-MMP at Invadopodia (A–I′) MDA-MB-231 cells treated with mock (A–C′), VAMP7 (duplexB) (D–F′), and MT1-MMP siRNA (G–I′) were plated on fluorescently labeled gelatin (C, C′, F, F′, I, and I′) and stained with phalloidin (A, A′, D, D′, G, and G′) and cortactin antibodies (B, B′, E, E′, H, and H′). Enlargements of boxed regions are shown in (A′), (B′), (C′), (D′), (E′), (F′), (G′), (H′), and (I′) for the corresponding image. The scale bar in (A) (valid for [A], [B], [C], [D], [E], [F], [G], [H], and [I]) represents 10 μm; the scale bar in (A′) (valid for [A′], [B′], [C′], [D′], [E′], [F′], [G′], [H′], and [I′]) represents 2 μm. (J) Quantification of gelatin degradation of MDA-MT1ch and MDA-MB-231 cells. Values are means ± standard errors of means (percentage ± SEM) of normalized degradation area. (K) Results of transwell migration and invasion assay. MDA-MB-231 cells treated with mock and VAMP7 (duplexB) siRNA and mock-treated MDA-MT1ch cells as indicated were quantified after Transwell migration and invasion through Matrigel. Values are means ± SEM of normalized percentage. (L) Results of invadopodia quantification. MDA-MB-231 cells of siRNA-treated populations as indicated were scored for the presence of invadopodia identified as bright actin spots regardless of degradation and further classified according to the number of invadopodia per cell. Values represent means ± SEM (percentage). (M–P′) MDA-MB-231 cells treated with mock (M–N′) or VAMP7 siRNA (duplexB) (O–P′) were subjected to surface labeling with MT1-MMP antibodies. Enlargements of regions boxed in (M) and (O) are shown in (M′), (N′), (O′), and (P′) for the corresponding image. The scale bar in (M) (valid for [M], [N], [O], and [P]) represents 10 μm, and the scale bar in (M′) (valid for [M′], [N′], [O′], and [P′]) represents 2 μm. (Q) Quantification of surface MT1-MMP accumulation. MDA-MB-231 cells of siRNA-treated populations as indicated were scored for the presence of surface MT1-MMP clusters at the ventral plasma membrane in contact with the matrix, regardless of degradation. Values represent mean percentage ± SEM. Differences between all siRNA-treated populations and respective mock populations from all quantifications were confirmed to be statistically significant (see Table S1). The number of experiments (N) and total number of cells (n) are indicated. Current Biology 2008 18, 926-931DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.044) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions