Dan McKenzie ORD Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon Sept. 10, 2004 Dan McKenzie ORD Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon Sept. 10, 2004 Increasing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustainable Rangeland Roundtable EPAs Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program – the Western Incarnation. EMAP-West Roger Blair, Technical Director,
Advertisements

Benthic Assessments One benthic ecologists concerns and suggestions Fred Nichols USGS, retired.
Prioritized Sites for Amphipod TIE Study Identify 12 potentially toxic inter-tidal sites Sample four sites at a time to find two suitable sites for amphipod.
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Salmonid Population and Habitat Monitoring in the Lower Columbia/Columbia Estuary Provinces Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Water Monitoring and Assessment Alfred L. Korndoerfer Jr., Chief Bureau of Freshwater & Biological Monitoring Water Monitoring and Standards NJDEP Presented.
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
1 Watershed Planning: A Key to Integrated Planning FHWA Environmental Conference Ann Campbell Wetlands Division.
Integrated State-Federal Partnership for Aquatic Resource Monitoring in the United States Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division.
Yakama Nation Pacific Lamprey Recovery Project Core Data And Monitoring Framework.
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
Lake Status Indicator Selection and Use in SLICE David F. Staples.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
Lake Status Indicator Selection David F. Staples Ray Valley.
Adem.alabama.gov Incorporating NPS Intensive Surveys into ADEM’s Monitoring Strategy Southeastern Water Pollution Biologists’ Association Meeting Lake.
PAGE # 1 Presented by Stacey Hancock Advised by Scott Urquhart Colorado State University Developing Learning Materials for Surface Water Monitoring.
Analyzing Stream Condition Using EMAP Algae Data By Nick Paretti ARIZONA PHYCOLOGY ECOL 475.
Lecture ERS 482/682 (Fall 2002) TMDL Assessment ERS 482/682 Small Watershed Hydrology.
Water Quality Monitoring The Role of the Clean Water Act.
Alabama’s Water Quality Assessment and Listing Methodology ADEM QA Workshop February 13, 2006.
Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Division Assessing the Effectiveness of Restoration Technologies Elise Striz and Joe Williams.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.
Headwater Stream Restoration in Mined Watersheds of the MAH Todd Petty, Mike Strager WVU Division of Forestry and Natural Resources Paul Ziemkiewicz WV.
1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys National Coastal Condition Assessment – 2010 Sarah Lehmann.
ORD’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) Sound Science for Measuring Ecological Condition
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
Water Quality Associated with Urban Runoff: Sources, Emerging Issues and Management Approaches Martha Sutula and Eric Stein Biogeochemistry and Biology.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
Information and international biodiversity conventions Eliezer Frankenberg Nature and Parks Authority.
1 The National Rivers and Streams Survey – An Overview and Results.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
NWQMC May 8, 2006 KEY ISSUES AND UNDERLYING CONCEPTS IN USE ATTAINABILITY ANALYSES FOR AQUATIC LIFE DESIGNATED USES Chris O. Yoder Center for Applied.
Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.
The Importance of Healthy Riparian Areas and their Current Status in Wisconsin Tim Asplund, Buzz Sorge (WI DNR) Advanced Lake Leaders – Green Lake Sept.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Sustaining Lakes in a Changing Environment - SLICE.
South Carolina Surface Water Monitoring: Different Designs for Different Objectives Presented by David Chestnut.
Response of benthic algae communities to nutrient enrichment in agricultural streams: Implications for establishing nutrient criteria R.W. Black 1, P.W.
Freshwater and Society Module 1, part C. Developed by: Updated: U?-m1c-s2 Water quality degradation
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Ranking Stressors: Prevalence & Relative Risk Based on work by John Van Sickle US EPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division.
ORSANCO Biological Programs Extra-curricular Updates EMAP-GRE ORBFHP NRSA.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
1 Defining Least-Impacted Reference Condition for the National Wadeable Streams Assessment Alan Alan Herlihy (Oregon State University), John Stoddard (U.S.
National Monitoring Conference May 7-11, 2006
Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
A Tool to Evaluate the Health of Streams and Rivers within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman 1, Claire Buchanan 2, Adam Griggs 2, Andrea Nagel.
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
1 Collaboration on EMAP Stream Condition Assessments in EPA Region 8 Thomas R. Johnson and Karl A. Hermann EPA Region 8.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Climate Change Adaptation Indicators. Adaptation Indicators- Origin and Purpose Adaptation Indicators.
Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland1 Classification and monitoring of the surface waters of Finland National.
Aquatic Resource Monitoring Overview Anthony (Tony) R. Olsen USEPA NHEERL Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon (541)
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
US Environmental Protection Agency
Challenges Facing Riparian Ecosystems
Request Approval of (d) Listing Methodology
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
Watershed Literacy & Engagement
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach
Presentation transcript:

Dan McKenzie ORD Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon Sept. 10, 2004 Dan McKenzie ORD Western Ecology Division Corvallis, Oregon Sept. 10, 2004 Increasing the Role of Statistic in Water Quality Management Decisions

Outline Clean Water Act Requirements Past – Before EMAP Present – Transition (Implementation) Future – Opportunities (Needs)

Clean Water Act (CWA) Objective: restore and maintain the physical, chemical, and biological integrity of the Nations waters Section 303(c) – State Water Quality Standards, Designated Uses & Criteria Section 305(b) – Report Condition of Nations waters Section 303(d) – List of Impaired waters and Restoration Plans

Past CWA Reports EPA Reports to Congress (2 yrs) 305(b): State Data – Inconsistent (Designated Uses, Criteria, Indicators, Methods) 303(d): States Assessed Waters (Selected Sites, Listing Criteria) All Reviews Identified Major Shortcomings

Florida – Summary The state has approximately 50,000 miles of streams, 3,000 square miles of lakes, and 4,000 square miles of estuaries. For this report, water quality was summarized by determining the degree of attainment for designated use for the states different water body types. FDEP assessed 9,016 miles of rivers and streams, 1,302,976 acres of lakes, and 3,658 square miles of estuaries. Of the assessed miles, 29 percent of total river miles, 20 percent of total lake areas, and 69 percent of total estuarine areas clearly attain their designated use (Figure 1).

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP) Estimate Current Status, Trends and Changes – Regional Basis – Known Confidence Estimate Geographic Coverage and Extent – Known Confidence Seek Associations – Indicators of Stresses and Condition Statistical Summaries & Assessments

EMAPs Original Guiding Figure Nominal Unknown Acidity Toxicity Eutrophication Habitat Status & Association Questions Extent of Resource (number, length, area) Status Condition Good Fair Poor Associations

Valleys North-Central Appalachians Ridge and Blue Ridge Geographic Targeting Where does Fish IBI suggest problems? Western Appalachians (Insufficient Data)

Relative Ranking of Stressors Proportion of Stream Length (Insufficient Data) Good Fair Poor Fish Index of Biotic Integrity EMAP Probability Survey Example Results (complex) 4

2002 State Report Included: Basin - % Stream Impairment <25% >74 No Est

CWA 305(b) -- Status States Implementing Probability Surveys Streams (30+ States) Estuaries (Coastal States) EPA Office of Water Probability Survey or Census Integration of 305(b) and 303(d) Conducting National Stream Survey Aquatic Resources Monitoring

Target Population Condition & Stressors (status) Where do I need to do follow up monitoring? (2) Estimated Status [Probabilities] Spatially Explicit Estimation Aggregation Classification Modeling 305(b) Report NAS planning list 303(d) Assessment Process (1) EMAP Design (probability survey) (3) Targeted Surveys waterbody attaining some uses, no threatened uses waterbody has high probability of impairment Attainment-Impairment Insufficient, No Information waterbody attaining all uses Integrated Monitoring – Part 1 Found Sites Impaired waterbody

Example: Extending EMAP Status Estimated IBI Condition at Reach Scale Good Fair Poor

Extending EMAP Associations Stressors Associated with IBI Status at Reach Scale Nominal Unknown Acidity Toxicity Eutrophication Riparian Habitat

Potential Areas for Target Surveys High Prob. Non-Impairment Riparian Habitat Associations Acidic Associations Eutrophication Associations Toxicity & Eutrophication Associations

Potential Target Survey Design Target Population: Stream Reaches within Area Associated with Acidic Stressors Survey Design: Weighted by Estimated IBI Condition (Good, Fair, Poor)

waterbody attaining some uses, no threatened uses (3) Targeted Surveys Results: Combining intensified survey designs, gradient sampling, site-specific designs as appropriate Waterbody impairment confirmed 303(d) List TMDL development 303(d) Assessment Process Management Action Is there an existing TMDL, or impairment not caused by pollutant? Other Plans Expected to Achieve Attainment? (4) Probability survey designs to establish attainment How to delist? Attainment-Impairment waterbody attaining all uses Integrated Monitoring – Part 2 ?

Key Concepts & Elements 303(d) Requires Site Scale Information Observations, Estimates, Forecasts Objective Basis to Categorize all Waters, Assign Priorities Known Confidence – Uncertainty Sequential Processes

Information sources Probability Survey Results Existing Non-Probability Stations Fixed Station (Intensive, Few Sites) Traditional Monitoring Program (Extensive, Few Observations) Special Study & Research Areas Complete Coverage (LuLc, etc.)

Potential Strategies Sequential Estimation Approaches (WQ, Stressors, IBI) Endpoint Estimation (IBI) Estimate Probability of Condition (Good, Fair, Poor)

Some Challenges Cause and Effect Relationships What to Fix/Change to Restore or Protect Assignment of Sources Impairment Decisions (10% Obs. Exceed Criteria) De-Listing Criteria

Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Original Focus: Point Sources Issues Shifted to Non-Point Sources Multiple Sources & Stressors ~10,000 TMDLs Completed Substantial Workload Implementation, Effectiveness (?)

FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS OF A STREAM ECOSYSTEM WATER TABLE WATER TABLE ATMOSPHERE LAND USE STREAM USE RIPARIAN Producer: woody plants 1° Consumer: birds 2° Consumer: birds Decomposers Producer: woody plants 1° Consumer: birds 2° Consumer: birds Decomposers BENTHIC Producer: algae 1° Consumer: benthos 2° Consumer: benthos, herptiles, fish Decomposers: microbes Producer: algae 1° Consumer: benthos 2° Consumer: benthos, herptiles, fish Decomposers: microbes WATER COLUMN Producer: macrophytes 1° Consumer: fish 2° Consumers: herptiles, fish Decomposers Producer: macrophytes 1° Consumer: fish 2° Consumers: herptiles, fish Decomposers Stressor Sources Movement of Materials RELEVANCE TO ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION

CONCEPTUAL MODEL: WADEABLE STREAMS HUMAN USES Consumption Waste Receptor Recreation/Aestethics Harvesting HUMAN USES Consumption Waste Receptor Recreation/Aestethics Harvesting HABITAT INTEGRITY HABITAT INTEGRITY BIOTIC INTEGRITY BIOTIC INTEGRITY ANTHROPOGENIC STRESSORS Agriculture Manufacturing Mining Forestry Practices Population Density Road Density Channelization Dams ANTHROPOGENIC STRESSORS Agriculture Manufacturing Mining Forestry Practices Population Density Road Density Channelization Dams ANTHROPOGENIC STRESSORS Angling Pressure Stocking Agriculture Manufacturing Mining Riparian Alterations Invasion of non-native spp. ANTHROPOGENIC STRESSORS Angling Pressure Stocking Agriculture Manufacturing Mining Riparian Alterations Invasion of non-native spp. ABIOTIC CHARACTERISTICS BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS ECOSYSTEM SUSTAINABILITY WATER QUALITY Temperature Turbidity Nutrients Organic/inorganic Chemicals Toxics pH WATER QUALITY Temperature Turbidity Nutrients Organic/inorganic Chemicals Toxics pH HABITAT QUALITY Substrate type Depth and Velocity Volume Flow regime Habitat heterogeneity Instream Cover HABITAT QUALITY Substrate type Depth and Velocity Volume Flow regime Habitat heterogeneity Instream Cover RELEVANCE TO ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION

CONCEPTUAL RELATIONSHIP: STRESSORS vs. RICHNESS, ABUNDANCE, AND HABITAT METRICS Stressor SO 4 NO 3 Population Roads Livestock Row Crops Logging Dams Population Roads Livestock Row Crops Logging Dams Chemicals Ichthyocides Stocking Chemicals Ichthyocides Stocking pH Metals Nutrients Exposure Measurements Riparian Modifications Turbidity, Sedimentation Response Metrics Temp O 2 Instream Fish Cover Family, Spp. Richness Long-lived spp. Non-indigenous spp. Sensitive spp. Benthic spp. Abundance Water Column spp. Tolerant spp. RELEVANCE TO ECOLOGICAL FUNCTION

Opportunities Incorporation of Conceptual Model Information Objective Evidence on Causes – Sources Multiple Stressors Epidemiological Tools? Forecast Restoration – Effort/Change, Time Sequences

Summary Major Improvements Occurring Significant Short Term Contributions Possible Longer Term Opportunities Require Innovation and Creativity Statistical Foundation Critical