The 1/Vmax SMF for the high-redshift samples.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dark energy workshop Copenhagen Aug Why the SNLS ? Questions to be addressed: -Can the intrinsic scatter in the Hubble diagram be further reduced?
Advertisements

Constraining Astronomical Populations with Truncated Data Sets Brandon C. Kelly (CfA, Hubble Fellow, 6/11/2015Brandon C. Kelly,
Bayesian Analysis of X-ray Luminosity Functions A. Ptak (JHU) Abstract Often only a relatively small number of sources of a given class are detected in.
Bell, E. F et al “Nearly 5000 distant Early-type galaxies in COMBO-17: A Red Sequence and its evolution since z~1” Presented by: Robert Lindner (Bob)‏
Advanced Methods for Studying Astronomical Populations: Inferring Distributions and Evolution of Derived (not Measured!) Quantities Brandon C. Kelly (CfA,
What can we learn from the luminosity function and color studies? THE SDSS GALAXIES AT REDSHIFT 0.1.
RADIO OBSERVATIONS IN VVDS FIELD : PAST - PRESENT - FUTURE P.Ciliegi(OABo), Marco Bondi (IRA) G. Zamorani(OABo), S. Bardelli (OABo) + VVDS-VLA collaboration.
Luminosity Functions from the 6dFGS Heath Jones ANU/AAO.
The star formation history of the local universe A/Prof. Andrew Hopkins (AAO) Prof. Joss Bland-Hawthorn (USyd.) & the GAMA Collaboration Madusha L.P. Gunawardhana.
Measuring the UV Luminosity Function of High Redshift Galaxies DAVID SETTON.
The HerMES SPIRE Submillimeter Luminosity Function Mattia Vaccari & Lucia Marchetti & Alberto Franceschini (University of Padova) Isaac Roseboom (University.
Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. A graph of the structure factor at volume fractions fv=0.001, 0.2, and 0.5 as a.
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Figure 1. Orbital evolution of the planetesimals and Jupiter-mass planet in simulation S1. The solid points show the planetesimals. The radii of the planetesimals.
Panel C plots the effect of changes in employer pensions on total pension contributions and total saving using a threshold approach. The lower series (triangles)
Figure 1. HATLAS J (z = , marked with vertical line)
Table 1. Empirical MSE to estimate the CP distribution parameter λ
From: Ion chemistry in the coma of comet 67P near perihelion
Figure 2. A comparison between the modern PMS spectral type-to-effective temperature conversion scales of Pecaut & Mamajek (2013, solid red line, labelled.
Figure 1. Left – a small region of a typical polarized spectrum acquired with the ESPaDOnS instrument during the MiMeS project. This figure illustrates.
From: Blue-Light Hazard From Gas Metal Arc Welding of Aluminum Alloys
From: Discovery of carbon-rich Miras in the Galactic bulge
Figure 2. Number of cases required in a Mendelian randomization analysis with a binary outcome and a single instrumental variable for 80% power with a.
Figure 10. The logarithm of the ratio of Σ2 density parameter between the QSO-like (open red) and Seyfert-like (filled blue) and non-AGN (black)
From: The VISTA Deep Extragalactic Observations (VIDEO) survey★
Model validation and prediction
Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.
From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups
Figure 1. Three light curves of IRAS 13224–3809 in 600-s bins
Figure 2. The residuals to a phenomenological continuum model, revealing strong features at the iron L, iron K, and Compton hump bands. The data are from.
Fig. 2. Leaf area (A), dry (B) and fresh mass (C) in relation to leaf volume in all studied species. The inset in (B) demonstrates the correlation between.
Figure 3. Inclination instability in the outer Solar system
Figure 5. Time-series and spectra of a noise-only record before (a and c) and after (b and d) model-based subtraction of powerline harmonics. The model.
Galaxy populations within clusters in the 2PIGG catalogue
Fig. 2. Semi-major axis vs. eccentricity (left) and semi-major axis vs
Biases in Virial Black Hole Masses: an SDSS Perspective
Fig. 1 Map of Europe presenting the three ringing stations (black circles, Hel: Heligoland; Chr: Christiansø; and Jur: Jurmo) and locations of the eight.
Figure 1. A decay chain normalized by the total number of nuclei in the chain. The dashed line depicts e−1/t, where e is Euler number. From:
Figure 6. Electron energy spectrum in equation (5) in units of 1047 multiplied by γ2 (solid line) at γ > γ0 compared with.
From: Refugee Migration and Electoral Outcomes
PLGEM fits equally well on NSAF and GeneChip datasets
Some issues in cluster cosmology
Speaker: Longbiao Li Collaborators: Yongfeng Huang, Zhibin Zhang,
Spectral Energy Distributions of a Hard X-ray Selected AGN Sample in the Extended Groth Strip Cristina Ramos Almeida1, Jose Miguel Rodríguez Espinosa1,
(Research Center for Space and Cosmic Evolution, Ehime University)
Figure 1. Procedures for assigning confidence and likelihood qualifiers to the scientific evidence for anthropogenic ... Figure 1. Procedures for assigning.
Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal success of hatchling turtles as a function of the interaction between hatchling body ... Figure 1 (a) Predicted dispersal.
Static Light Scattering From Concentrated Protein Solutions II: Experimental Test of Theory for Protein Mixtures and Weakly Self-Associating Proteins 
Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PDc) estimated for each of 23 cohorts by MasterBayes ... Figure 1 Top: Annual modal paternity distance (PDc)
Direct imaging discovery of a Jovian exoplanet within a triple-star system by Kevin Wagner, Dániel Apai, Markus Kasper, Kaitlin Kratter, Melissa McClure,
On the
Demographics of SDSS Quasars in Two-Dimension
Black: diagnosis ... Black: diagnosis from any department; grey: diagnosis at a rheumatology department. Unless provided in the caption above, the following.
The observed X-ray coronal line ratios O vii (f+i)/r (G ratio) versus O vii f/i (R ratio), overlaid with curves of constant ionization parameter (log U = −1,
Figure 1 Immunohistochemistry for human cell differentiation molecules in samples of the right ventricular septum from ... Figure 1 Immunohistochemistry.
Fig. 1. Descriptive statistics for pre-drinking by country
Figure 1. Observed mean (SD) micafungin plasma concentrations.
by S. van Velzen, G. E. Anderson, N. C. Stone, M. Fraser, T. Wevers, B
Quantification of Fluorophore Copy Number from Intrinsic Fluctuations during Fluorescence Photobleaching  Chitra R. Nayak, Andrew D. Rutenberg  Biophysical.
Cosmological Evolution of the Duty Cycle of Quasars
Figure 1 Changes in average first serve speed (km/h) over age in women (dark gray; online version red) and men (light ... Figure 1 Changes in average first.
The Fisher information predicts the experimentally measured sensitivity. The Fisher information predicts the experimentally measured sensitivity. A, Sensitivity.
Montage of HST ACS colour postage stamps of the BCGs of the constituent clusters and groups of the Cl1604 supercluster. Montage of HST ACS colour postage.
Normalized radial cumulative stellar mass distribution centred on the BCG (left-hand panel) and the MMCG (right-hand panel) for the MCXC/SDSS comparison.
Image stamps of an example fit for a bulge+disc object with B/T = 0
Top: probability distribution of the mass-to-light ratios observed when nebular emission is included in the fitting, stacked across all of the MC samples.
Nine examples of MCXC MMCGs which were not also selected as MCXC BCGs
Comparison between MIPS/24 μm and HST/WFC3 H-band (F160W) images for objects #427 and #428. Comparison between MIPS/24 μm and HST/WFC3 H-band (F160W) images.
Calculating the overall accuracy in different samples using the V-plot
Table 2. Mean noise level results for hand dryers in dBA
Presentation transcript:

The 1/Vmax SMF for the high-redshift samples. The 1/Vmax SMF for the high-redshift samples. Error bars take into account random Poisson noise as well as the scatter between the MC samples due to photometric redshift uncertainty. The black circles show the mass bins included in the χ2 fitting to the Schechter (1976) functions based on the stellar mass limits described in the text. The dashed and dotted lines show the SMF calculated by applying the best-fitting mass-to-light ratio (including nebular emission, see Table 3) to the literature LF at each redshift with a scatter of 0.2 (dashed) and 0.5 (dotted) dex. For the z ∼ 4 bin, the Schecter fit of Bouwens et al. (2007) was used, whilst at z ∼ 5 and 6 and z ∼ 7 the fits of Bouwens et al. (2012a) and McLure et al. (2013), respectively, were used to generate the luminosity distribution. We also show using the error bars at the top of each panel the cosmic variance expected for galaxies of stellar mass ≈109.5 M⊙, as predicted by the method outlined in Moster et al. (2011). K. Duncan et al. MNRAS 2014;444:2960-2984 © 2014 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society