Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of earthquake density derived from a catalog spanning 93 nights of the LB Array data set. Spatial distribution of earthquake.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Advertisements

Abstract The space-time epidemic-type aftershock sequence (ETAS) model is a stochastic process in which seismicity is classified into background and clustering.

Analysis of AFM data. Analysis of AFM data. (A) Image of cytoplasmic side of the NE recorded with PeakForce QNM (2 kHz), as recorded for maximum indentation.

What Color is it?.

by Asaf Inbal, Jean Paul Ampuero, and Robert W. Clayton

Highly Punctuated Patterns of Population Structure on the X Chromosome and Implications for African Evolutionary History Charla A. Lambert, Caitlin F.

ECOM method recovers time correlation with 2-ms precision from 219-ms imaging frames. ECOM method recovers time correlation with 2-ms precision from 219-ms.

A multitiered approach to characterize transcriptome structure.

Docking footprint of PG90 TCR on CD1b-PG.

Fig. 2 Model-data comparison for latest Paleocene (2240 ppm) and PETM (4480 ppm) CO2 scenarios. Model-data comparison for latest Paleocene (2240 ppm) and.

by Naoki Uchida, Takeshi Iinuma, Robert M

Spatial-temporal pattern of lower-crustal effective viscosities

Fig. 2 Changes in ice surface elevation, h, of Thwaites Glacier.

Fig. 4 Cross sections across-strike and along-strike of the collision zone (for profile locations see Fig. 3). Cross sections across-strike and along-strike.

Fig. 4 Power and wavelet spectra of benthic δ18O.

Seismotectonic map of Myanmar (Burma) and surroundings.

Fig. 4 Direct observation of Peltier, Joule, current crowding, and magneto-Peltier effects. Direct observation of Peltier, Joule, current crowding, and.

Fig. 1 Evolution of magnetic field lines around a foreshock bubble in the GSE-XY plane (z = 0): Results of a hybrid simulation. Evolution of magnetic field.

Fig. 3 Critical pressure analysis for reentrant and doubly reentrant geometries. Critical pressure analysis for reentrant and doubly reentrant geometries.

Fig. 5 Morphology of in situ peak Poynting flux during storm periods.

Fig. 7 Topographic profiles of Ahuna Mons and models.

Fig. 2 Zeeman splitting of the plateau and associated Kondo feature.

Fig. 3 Tracing Poynting flux along Polar’s orbit during a period of 28 days, which includes a moderate storm and a major storm. Tracing Poynting flux along.

Fig. 1 Map of the trifurcation area of the SJFZ.

Fig. 1 Fourteen-year postseismic GPS displacements following the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake. Fourteen-year postseismic GPS displacements following the 1999.

Fig. 1 Cryo-EM structure of yeast Elp123 showing its active site.

Distribution of signaling molecules in a section of P

Scattering and Interference in Epitaxial Graphene

Feature computation and classification of grating pitch.

Fig. 1 Phase diagram and FS topologies.

by Andreas Keiling, Scott Thaller, John Wygant, and John Dombeck

Fig. 4 Model of the average SSE.

Fig. 1 Time series and megadrought state changes.

Fig. 1 Sectional distributions of pigment concentrations measured along the Mediterranean Sea and in the Eastern Atlantic Ocean. Sectional distributions.

by Hansjoerg J. Seybold, Edwin Kite, and James W. Kirchner

by Jacqueline Austermann, Jerry X

Fig. 4 Evolution of fraction of sickled RBCs under hypoxia.

Fig. 2 Large-area and high-density assembly of AuNPs.

by Hiro Nimiya, Tatsunori Ikeda, and Takeshi Tsuji

Fig. 1 Empirical probability density functions of the estimated climatic drivers. Empirical probability density functions of the estimated climatic drivers.

Relative impacts of mitigation, temperature, and precipitation on 21st-century megadrought risk in the American Southwest by Toby R. Ault, Justin S. Mankin,

Dipole-like electrostatic asymmetry of gold nanorods

Fig. 1 Environmental conditions and concentrations of floating plastic debris in the Arctic Ocean. Environmental conditions and concentrations of floating.

Relationships between species richness and temperature or latitude

Microseismic monitoring data from a treatment associated with a Mw 4

Fig. 1 The calculation of STF moment acceleration, using the 2010 Maule, Chile M8.8 earthquake as an example. The calculation of STF moment acceleration,

Fig. 1 Observed postseismic DRs after the Tohoku earthquake through the repeated GPS-A observations. Observed postseismic DRs after the Tohoku earthquake.

Fig. 2 Evolution of seismic source and statistical properties of induced seismicity in response to fluid injection. Evolution of seismic source and statistical.

Fig. 4 City sectors ranked by per-industrial output emissions.

Fig. 6 MSC encapsulation in vitro within PdBT cross-linked gels.

Fig. 2 Comparison of the observed DRs and the estimates by the VR model and FL. Comparison of the observed DRs and the estimates by the VR model and FL.

Fig. 2 RVFV causes pathology within the liver, uterus, and placenta of pregnant dams. RVFV causes pathology within the liver, uterus, and placenta of pregnant.

Fig. 3 Depth-resolved structural characterization of perovskite nanocrystals in npSi films. Depth-resolved structural characterization of perovskite nanocrystals.

Interpreted seismic reflection image across reactivated fracture zones

Fig. 4 Seismic reflection data in the Venus, Texas, study area.

Fig. 2 Structural and spectroscopic characterization of 3D/2D perovskite bilayer. Structural and spectroscopic characterization of 3D/2D perovskite bilayer.

Fig. 5 Superpositions of OAM.

Fig. 2 Finite element method (FEM) simulations of the photonic synapse with different structures. Finite element method (FEM) simulations of the photonic.

Fig. 6 MD simulations of assembled binary supraballs.

Fig. 5 Distributions of cell nuclear area values and internuclear distances in the breast tumor specimens (Figs. 3 and 4), where bin interval = 8 and n.

Fig. 3 Daily tectonic release of slow slip along the Guerrero subduction interface, as tracked by LFEs. Daily tectonic release of slow slip along the Guerrero.

Coexistence of superconductivity and ferromagnetism in EuFe2(As0. 79P0

Fig. 5 Density plots showing the relationship between growth responses to extreme events and site-level mean precipitation from all sites (N = 1314). Density.

Fig. 10 Map of light pollution’s visual impact on the night sky.

The combined signal spectra of PSD for protons and helium nuclei

Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of five city groups.

Fig. 2 Data used to derive rate-state model parameters.

Fig. 2 DFT calculations of stability and bandstructure of gallenene polymorphs. DFT calculations of stability and bandstructure of gallenene polymorphs.

Fig. 3 Spatial distribution of the shoot density (high densities are represented in dark green and low ones in bright yellow) in a simulation of a P. oceanica.

Fig. 5 Modeling of the ASE threshold using the kinetic equations and experimental parameter inputs. Modeling of the ASE threshold using the kinetic equations.

Presentation transcript:

Fig. 2 Spatial distribution of earthquake density derived from a catalog spanning 93 nights of the LB Array data set. Spatial distribution of earthquake density derived from a catalog spanning 93 nights of the LB Array data set. (A to C) Map view of event density in the following depth ranges: (A) 5 to 12 km, (B) 12 to 20 km, and (C) 20 to 32 km. Densities in each panel were normalized by their maximum value. Areas with intense seismicity are shown in orange and red; areas devoid of seismicity appear in yellow and white. The NIF surface trace and the local oilfields are denoted by black and green dashed lines, respectively. LB, Long Beach oilfield; LBA, Long Beach Airport oilfield; WI, Wilmington oilfield. (D) Vertical cross section showing event density along the B-B′ line in (A). We normalized the counts in each 2-km depth bin by their maxima. The Moho depth (47) is indicated by a green curve, and the uncertainty on this estimate was determined using previously published results (26, 38, 48). (E) Seismicity depth distribution in the LB Array data set. Asaf Inbal et al. Science 2016;354:88-92 Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science