Modeling highly stratified regimes in the Columbia River estuary

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OSE meeting GODAE, Toulouse 4-5 June 2009 Interest of assimilating future Sea Surface Salinity measurements.
Advertisements

Mercator Ocean activity
Coastal Downscaling: Can CESM fields successfully force regional coastal ocean simulations with strong freshwater forcing? (YES) Parker MacCready (U. of.
1 Understanding Salinity Variability in the Columbia River Estuary Sierra & Julia Observation ● Prediction ● Analysis ● Collaboration Frontline Mentor:
A Cloud Resolving Model with an Adaptive Vertical Grid Roger Marchand and Thomas Ackerman - University of Washington, Joint Institute for the Study of.
Turbulence and mixing in estuaries
Determination of Station Depths Relative to NGVD29 Methods and results Jan 24, 2003 Charles Seaton.
Today’s Lecture: Grid design/boundary conditions and parameter selection. Thursday’s Lecture: Uncertainty analysis and Model Validation.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 RF01/RF02: LES sensitivity studies Adrian Lock and Eoin Whelan.
Connecting the sound to the shelf: a numerical modeling study of estuarine exchange flow in the Salish Sea Dave Sutherland 1 Parker MacCready 1, Neil Banas.
On mixing and advection in the BBL and how they are affected by the model grid: Sensitivity studies with a generalized coordinate ocean model Tal Ezer.
Model Simulation Studies of Hurricane Isabel in Chesapeake Bay Jian Shen Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences College of William and Mary.
Hans Burchard Baltic Sea Research Institute Warnemünde, Germany Collaboration: Thomas Badewien, Karsten Bolding, Götz Flöser,
Optimization of pocket design for extrusion with minimal defects Kathirgamanathan, P., Neitzert, T.
SELFE: Semi-implicit Eularian- Lagrangian finite element model for cross scale ocean circulation Paper by Yinglong Zhang and Antonio Baptista Presentation.
1 Brainstorming for Presentation of Variability in Current Practices Scenario B. Contor August 2007.
Effects of Ocean-Atmosphere Coupling in a Modeling Study of Coastal Upwelling in the Area of Orographically-Intensified Flow Natalie Perlin, Eric Skyllingstad,
About the advantages of vertically adaptive coordinates in numerical models of stratified shelf seas Hans Burchard 1, Ulf Gräwe 1, Richard Hofmeister 2,
1.Introduction 2.Description of model 3.Experimental design 4.Ocean ciruculation on an aquaplanet represented in the model depth latitude depth latitude.
Response of Middle Atmospheric Hydroxyl Radical to the 27-day Solar Forcing King-Fai Li 1, Qiong Zhang 2, Shuhui Wang 3, Yuk L. Yung 2, and Stanley P.
Hans Burchard Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde How to make a three-dimensional numerical model that.
Hans Burchard 1,2, Joanna Staneva 3, Götz Flöser 4, Rolf Riethmüller 4, and Thomas Badewien 5 1. Baltic Sea Research Institute Warnemünde, Germany 2. Bolding.
Comparison of Different Approaches NCAR Earth System Laboratory National Center for Atmospheric Research NCAR is Sponsored by NSF and this work is partially.
Test of improved boundaries configuration for the Tagus Estuary Pre-operational Model (OM) Ângela Canas Maretec SANEST.
Modeling the upper ocean response to Hurricane Igor Zhimin Ma 1, Guoqi Han 2, Brad deYoung 1 1 Memorial University 2 Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
Sophie RICCI CALTECH/JPL Post-doc Advisor : Ichiro Fukumori The diabatic errors in the formulation of the data assimilation Kalman Filter/Smoother system.
High-resolution 3D modelling of oceanic fine structures using vertically adaptive coordinates Hans Burchard 1, Ulf Gräwe 1, Richard Hofmeister 2, Peter.
1 Columbia River Estuary (CRE) The bioreactor model Tools to implement the bioreactor model in the CRE. An estuarine biogeochemical model for the Columbia.
Yanjun Jiao and Colin Jones University of Quebec at Montreal September 20, 2006 The Performance of the Canadian Regional Climate Model in the Pacific Ocean.
Validation of decadal simulations of mesoscale structures in the North Sea and Skagerrak Jon Albretsen and Lars Petter Røed.
Development of an EnKF to estimate CO 2 fluxes from realistic distributions of X CO2 Liang Feng, Paul Palmer
What makes an ocean model coastal ?
S.A. Talke, H.E. de Swart, H.M. Schuttelaars Feedback between residual circulations and sediment distribution in highly turbid estuaries: an analytical.
Analysis of four decadal simulations of the Skagerrak mesoscale circulation using two ocean models Lars Petter Røed 1 and Jon Albretsen 2 Presented at.
Deguillaume L., Beekmann M., Menut L., Derognat C.
1 A brief introduction to UMCES Chesapeake Bay Model Yun Li and Ming Li University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science VIMS, SURA Meeting Oct
Prepared by Dusanka Zupanski and …… Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter: application to carbon problems.
Operational estuarine modeling: lessons learned from selected US and Portuguese estuaries Charles Seaton, Paul J. Turner, Gonçalo Jesus, Anabela Oliveira,
Hans Burchard 1,2, Joanna Staneva 3, Götz Flöser 4, Rolf Riethmüller 4, Thomas Badewien 5, and Richard Hofmeister 1 1. Baltic Sea Research Institute Warnemünde,
CHANGSHENG CHEN, HEDONG LIU, And ROBERT C. BEARDSLEY
Geolocation of Icelandic Cod using a modified Particle Filter Method David Brickman Vilhjamur Thorsteinsson.
Reduction of numerical mixing by means of vertically adaptive coordinates in ocean models Hans Burchard 1, Ulf Gräwe 1, Richard Hofmeister 2, Knut Klingbeil.
1 Foundations of circulation modeling systems EBS566: Estuary and Ocean Systems II – Lecture 3, Winter 2010 Instructors: T. Peterson, M. Haygood, A. Baptista.
Wind-SST Coupling in the Coastal Upwelling --- An Empirical Numerical Simulation X. Jin, C. Dong, and J. C. McWilliams (IGPP/UCLA) D. B. Chelton (COAS/OSU)
The effect of tides on the hydrophysical fields in the NEMO-shelf Arctic Ocean model. Maria Luneva National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool 2011 AOMIP meeting.
An oceanographic assessment of the GOCE geoid models accuracy S. Mulet 1, M-H. Rio 1, P. Knudsen 2, F. Siegesmund 3, R. Bingham 4, O. Andersen 2, D. Stammer.
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course Mar 2016.
Northwest Modeling Consortium
1st Argo Science Workshop
CO2 sources and sinks in China as seen from the global atmosphere
Bruce Cornuelle, Josh Willis, Dean Roemmich
Enhancement of Wind Stress and Hurricane Waves Simulation
33 (6 outlines) -> 27.
Change in Flood Risk across Canada under Changing Climate
“Consolidation of the Surface-to-Atmosphere Transfer-scheme: ConSAT
Nodal Methods for Core Neutron Diffusion Calculations
A NUMERICAL STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF DIFFERENT TURBULENCE CLOSURE MODELS ON SALINITY AND SEDIMENT DISTRIBUTION IN THE DELAWARE BAY by Kutay Celebioglu and.
Mark A. Bourassa and Qi Shi
IPCC Climate Change Report
Aquarius SSS space/time biases with respect to Argo data
Fluid Flow Regularization of Navier-Stokes Equations
*supported by the Army Research Office
I-IV: Physics & Biogeochemistry of Estuarine Turbidity Maxima
Hans Burchard, Elisabeth Schulz and Henk Schuttelaars
Xuezhu Wang, Qiang Wang, Sergey Danilov, Thomas Jung,
A Channel for 3D Environmental Shape in Anterior Inferotemporal Cortex
Low Order Methods for Simulation of Turbulence in Complex Geometries
CMOD Observation Operator
Baltic Sea Research Institute Warnemünde, Germany
Secondary Circulation in the Danish straits
Presentation transcript:

Modeling highly stratified regimes in the Columbia River estuary Updates from a humbling benchmark Modeling highly stratified regimes in the Columbia River estuary Charles A. Seaton, Paul J. Turner, António M. Baptista Oregon Health & Science University SCHISM Workshop Apr 2019 1

Virtual Columbia River (river-to-ocean modeling) Recent history: Switch from SELFE to SCHISM (Baptista et al. 2018 @ NSF Workshop) Optimization of SCHISM (the battle against over-diffusion) TVD2 To note: Observation set: Endurance stations (since 1996); select AUV tracks (2012) Two multi-year (1999-2017) reference simulation databases: DB33 (SELFE) and DB34 (SCHISM): same settings, different models Select benchmark period (period with highly stratified regime) Today’s focus: Discretization Handling velocity conversions

Broad context AUV Jetty A AUV SATURN-01 Beaver Army SATURN-01 May 2, 2012 BC WA SATURN-01 OR Time step: 36s Hor. grid resolution: Tens of meters to 3km ~180m in estuary channels Ver. grid: 37 S levels 17 Z levels Baptista et al. 2015 Bonneville Dam CA Willamette River Falls 3

AUV AUV data (May 2, 2012) DB33 AUV Dashed line is Gaussian error function fit to model or observations DB34 Along-track distance (Km) 4

Brief review (from DB33 to modestly beyond DB34) SELFE 11.3 SCHISM 7.2 Opt 1 5.0 DB33 DB34 Best of triang First quadrang (SHO21d) Obs 0.9 Images need work, better colors, larger fonts, remove 2 psu isoline panel Opt 1 is SHO053, which has the Richardson stability constant in GOTM changed to 0.001, and has Z0 = (H/16)/30 Quads is hbf009, which is the third iteration of the quad grid (which was the best for salinity) SELFE is db33, SCHISM is db34 Changing from Upwind (SELFE) to TVD2 (SCHISM) transport makes a transformative difference on vertical diffusion Parameter optimization within the same grid and algorithm can provide meaningful, but insufficient, additional improvement 5

Effect of quadrangles Triang 7.2 Quad1 5.0 Quad2 6.0 DB33 DB34 Best of triang First quadrang (SHO21d) Obs 0.9 Images need work, better colors, larger fonts Tri is db34 Quad1 is hbf009 is the best quad grid for salinity (not the one we’re currently using) Quad2 is hbf023b (the one we are currently using: much better elevation performance upriver) Hybrid grids with extensive use of quadrangles provide many local improvements (not shown), but—within a range of roughly equivalent resolution—are not on themselves transformative of skill. 6

Effect of vertical discretization 54 SZ 6.0 68 SZ 5.5 LSC2 4.3 Standard layers 68 layers (020?) LSC2 (025) 54SZ is hbf023b (grid used in 024-030 68SZ is hbf030 LSC1 is HBF025 Vertical resolution is much cheaper to vary than the horizontal one, can strongly impact residuals and local retention LSC2 achieves improves skill better than adding SZ layers (shown), or extensive parameter optimization on a 54 SZ grid (shown earlier) 7

Sensitivity to LSC2 choices b=3 4.3 b=6 4.6 b=6 alt 5.2 025 025a 025b Obs 0.9 LSC1 hbf025: theta_b = 3, 21 - 85 levels LSC2 hbf025a: theta_b = 6, 35-101 levels LSC3 hbf025b: theta_b = 6-9, 21-87 levels How to construct an effective LSC2 grid, particularly across the scales variability of river-to-ocean grids, remains an open question. We are just scratching the surface towards LSC2 guiding principles for the Columbia River 8

Conversion to nodal velocities MA 4.3 MB1 3.4 MB2 3.0 025 026 027? 028? Obs 0.9 MA = hbf025 MB1 = hbf026 MB2 = hbf028 Minimizing diffusion through a MB velocity conversion coupled with a Shapiro filter, reduces vertical diffusion and improves residuals Filtering can still be optimized (including hybrid diffusion/filtering methods in the eddying/non-eddying regimes)—after recalibration 9

Conclusions Simulation skill has substantially improved with SCHISM SELFE 11.3 TVD2 7.2 LSC2+MB 3.4 025 026 027? 028? Obs 0.9 Change to DB33 Simulation skill has substantially improved with SCHISM TVD2 was the most transformative factor LSC2 and MB are also significant factors 10

Conclusions Quadrangular/hybrid grids are useful, but (short of higher resolution) not transformative Parameter optimization around core choices (TVD2+LSC2+MB, on quads) will likely further improve skill Artificial vertical mixing remains an essential limitation in representing highly stratified estuarine regimes Needed in the SCHISM tool set: An embed (space-time) calculation of numerical diffusion (a la Hans Burchard) 11

Caveat … Triang (DB34) QUAD 1 Jetty A Jetty A QUAD 2 The grids we tested resolve some critical regions for salt propagation (as the one shown, where important mixing occurs) in an only modestly different manner. Jetty A Add labels Mark Jetty A Mention that this is a critical area for mixing 12

Early flood salinity Vertical layers (in grey) shown every fifth level 54SZ b=3 b=6 b=6 alt Jetty A AUV SATURN-01 13

Velocity conversion & filtering MB uses the shape function within each element MA uses inverse distance weighting No filtering Diffusion or filtering required 14

H-grids Tri (DB34) Jetty A

H-grids: Redesigned quads Jetty A Zoomed H-grid comparisons?

H-grids: Final quad grid Jetty A