Employee Engagement Survey 2015 Town of Chapel Hill

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Advertisements

2013 CollaboRATE Survey Results
CREATING A CULTURE THAT ENGAGES AND RETAINS MILLENNIALS Like us and check in on facebook at DaleCarnegieNY Tweet during the workshop at #DaleCarnegie.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Joseph G. Keary, MS, MBA JGK Leadership Consulting and Kansas City Chapter, CLMA.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Blended Learning: Finding the Right Mix Work Expectations Profile  Explores the “psychological contract” of needs and expectations between employees.
Mountain View College ModernThink © Survey Results Analyzed MVC College-wide Forum April 9, 2009 MVC Core Values: Celebration of Student & Employee Success.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
DGS Town Hall with Director Fred Klass October 3, 2011.
Background: -Quarterly survey; five rounds sent out thus far; 25% of the Lab polled each time. Consistencies are: -About a 40% response rate -Agree / Strongly.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE) Survey Summary of Fall 2014 Results Presentation to College Council Executive Cabinet August 5, 2015.
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
Overall NSW Health 2011 YourSay Survey Results YourSay - NSW Health Workplace Survey Results Presentation NSW Health Overall Presented by: Robyn Burley.
Northwest ISD Board Presentation Staff Survey
Mid Michigan Community College Prepared by President Christine Hammond March 31, 2016 PACE Survey Results Summary.
0 Faculty Senate October 17, 2006 Working at IOWA.
MAN-3/2 Erlan Bakiev, Ph. D. IAAU Spring 2015 Understanding Management’s Context: Constraints and Challenges.
The Many Faces of Employee Engagement Leisha DeHart-Davis, Associate Professor.
2016 Duck River EMC Employee Survey
CHW Montana CHW Fundamentals
2017 Great Colleges to Work for Survey: Main Takeaways
Office of Planning, Research, and Institutional Effectiveness
AAMC Faculty Forward Engagement Survey Results
Items in red require your input
Woodland Public Schools Staff Survey Results
UCLA Student Affairs Performance Management Program (PMP)
Performance Management System
Culture Survey This document provides examples of how we analyze and report our clients’ culture survey data. It includes data from several clients in.
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
©2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved
Chapter 2: Constraints and Challenges for the Global Manager
administered at MMCC six times:
Employee Engagement Survey Education Session #3
Survey of Organizational Excellence
Change is Hard! Incorporating Values to Keep Staff Motivated
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
The Business Case for Investing in Employee Engagement
The Manager: Omnipotent or Symbolic?
Employee Satisfaction Survey Report 2003
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT SURVEY RESULTS
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Leaders
Parent & Staff Survey Results
Items in red require your input
Employee Engagement Survey
Items in red require your input
Montana University System Staff Association (MUSSA) Board of Regents meeting May 25, 2017 John.
Just-in-Time Management Advice
UA Workplace Experience Survey - Chime in!
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
The Business Case for Investing in Employee Engagement
Empire Southwest 2017 Companywide EOS Results.
Before you begin… If you are prepared to share your team’s survey results prior to receiving the overall Business Unit results, simply modify this presentation.
ClimateQUAL at Illinois
ER What is ER The term 'employee relations' refers to a company's efforts to manage relationships between employers and employees. An organization.
Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees
Butler University Great Colleges To Work For
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
2018 Great Colleges Survey for Champlain College
TA Toolkit Teacher Session
2018 UNC System Employee Engagement Survey
Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees
2007 Faculty & Staff Denison Organizational Culture Survey
Employee Engagement Defined
2017 UC Staff Engagement Survey
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
Personal Assessment of the College Environment (PACE)
Presentation transcript:

Employee Engagement Survey 2015 Town of Chapel Hill Administered By The MAPS Group

Overview Purpose Design and Process Town-wide Results Comparisons to 2013 Summary Thoughts

Survey Purpose Employee views on Town as place to work and how organization values its employees Improvements since 2013 survey

Design and Process Employee and management feedback on 2013 survey Focus on improvements Employee identity concealed Surveys returned directly to The MAPS Group Internet survey (80%) and paper survey (20%) Employees completed May – June 2015 Promotion efforts

Topic Areas Employee and the Job Communications Trust Teamwork Employee and the Job Communications Trust Organizational Changes Job Satisfaction Mission and Values Employee and the Town Decision Making Improvements Over Time

Town-wide Results

Participation Demographics 50% participation rate 467 participants out of 928 employees

Participation Demographics (continued)

Participation Demographics (continued)

Participation Demographics (continued)

Employee and the Job

Communications

Top Down Communications Accurate 77% agree Timely, Complete, Open, Adequate, Written 53% to 60% agree

Town Organizational Changes

Town Mission and Values

Mission and Values Understanding Majority agree: Understand how their job helps achieve the Town Mission - 78% Understand the RESPECT Values – 76% Believe their attitude at work impacts the Mission - 90% View people service as a priority in the work place – 83%

Percentage of Employees Who Agree Consistently See the Values Exhibited in the Workplace Often and Always Sometimes, Often, and Always Safety 84% 97% Professional 69% 93% Ethics 65% 91% Teamwork 67% 90% Communications 49% 86% Responsibility 44% 81% Equity

Decision Making in the Workplace

Decision Making in the Employee’s Workplace I believe that I can influence work and how is work done. 72% agree I believe I am respected for who I am and for my contributions to organization. 61% agree

Decision Making in the Employee’s Workplace (continued) My input is sought on how things are done. 52% agree I understand how the mission influences decision for organizational initiatives and town resources. 49% agree I believe I can provide input in developing Town rules. 46% agree I am given opportunity to contribute to decision about workplace. 45% agree Employees wanting to make their own decision in workplace would be valued. 41% agree

Trust

Trust in the Workplace Other employees can trust me to do the right thing. 93% agree You can trust employees to do the right thing. 49% agree

Teamwork

Job Satisfaction

Working for the Town

Improvements Over Time

Employee Agree Improvements Since Last Survey Teamwork within department 42% Communications Town-wide 37% Communications within departments 39% Employee reflecting Town values 31% Teamwork across Town 31% Enjoy working for Town more than 2 years ago 33%

Supervisory/Non-Supervisor Generally close scores No significant difference in opinions Supervisors more familiar with new programs Supervisors participate more in decision-making processes

Comparisons to 2013 Survey Significant improvement in top down communications Significant improvement in employee understanding of mission and values Scores somewhat lower for likelihood new programs will bring change Empowerment scores slightly better

Job/Town Satisfaction Summary Thoughts Great response rate for a follow up survey; several departments improved participation Areas rated high Mission and Values Teamwork Job/Town Satisfaction

Summary Thoughts (continued) Areas of future concentration Continue to focus on communication efforts Engage employees early in decision making process Efforts to improve trust between employee and supervisor More advancement opportunities noted strongly in comments Maintain specific topic areas rated high