Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Advertisements

Figure 1. Structure of the fly LGR2 gene and the corresponding cDNA sequence. A, Derivation of the fly LGR2 full-length cDNA from the genomic sequence.
A Histone H3 Lysine-27 Methyltransferase Complex Represses Lateral Root Formation in Arabidopsis thaliana  Gu Xiaofeng , Xu Tongda , He Yuehui   Molecular.
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Autoinhibition of c-Abl
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (April 2002)
Shogo Ito, Young Hun Song, Takato Imaizumi  Molecular Plant 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2017)
Leaf Positioning of Arabidopsis in Response to Blue Light
Wenyan Du, Kentaro Tamura, Giovanni Stefano, Federica Brandizzi 
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Takatoshi Kiba, Kentaro Takei, Mikiko Kojima, Hitoshi Sakakibara 
Crystal Structure of Tetrameric Arabidopsis MYC2 Reveals the Mechanism of Enhanced Interaction with DNA  Teng-fei Lian, Yong-ping Xu, Lan-fen Li, Xiao-Dong.
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Silvia Bolland, Roger N Pearse, Tomohiro Kurosaki, Jeffrey V Ravetch 
Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 14 (UBP14) Is Involved in Root Responses to Phosphate Deficiency in Arabidopsis  Li Wen-Feng , Perry Paula J. , Prafulla Nulu.
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (July 2013)
Leaf Positioning of Arabidopsis in Response to Blue Light
BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF- Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis  Hui Li, Keyi Ye, Yiting Shi, Jinkui Cheng,
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (November 2013)
Structural Insights into the Inhibition of Wnt Signaling by Cancer Antigen 5T4/Wnt- Activated Inhibitory Factor 1  Yuguang Zhao, Tomas Malinauskas, Karl.
Rodríguez-Milla Miguel A. , Salinas Julio   Molecular Plant 
FLS2 Molecular Cell Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Kneissl Julia , Shinomura Tomoko , Furuya Masaki , Bolle Cordelia  
Volume 13, Issue 16, Pages (August 2003)
Jaimie M. Van Norman, Rebecca L. Frederick, Leslie E. Sieburth 
Kristoffer Palma, Yuelin Zhang, Xin Li  Current Biology 
Phytochrome Signaling in Green Arabidopsis Seedlings: Impact Assessment of a Mutually Negative phyB–PIF Feedback Loop  Pablo Leivar, Elena Monte, Megan.
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 21, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 3, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Arabidopsis MSBP1 Is Activated by HY5 and HYH and Is Involved in Photomorphogenesis and Brassinosteroid Sensitivity Regulation  Shi Qiu-Ming , Yang Xi.
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 73, Issue 3, Pages e3 (February 2019)
Dan Yu, Rongdiao Liu, Geng Yang, Qiang Zhou  Cell Reports 
HOS1 Facilitates the Phytochrome B-Mediated Inhibition of PIF4 Function during Hypocotyl Growth in Arabidopsis  Ju-Heon Kim, Hyo-Jun Lee, Jae-Hoon Jung,
Fang Chang, Ying Gu, Hong Ma, Zhenbiao Yang  Molecular Plant 
BRI1/BAK1, a Receptor Kinase Pair Mediating Brassinosteroid Signaling
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Allele-Specific Suppression of a Defective Brassinosteroid Receptor Reveals a Physiological Role of UGGT in ER Quality Control  Hua Jin, Zhenyan Yan,
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (July 2011)
Roles of Defense Hormones in the Regulation of Ozone-Induced Changes in Gene Expression and Cell Death  Enjun Xu, Lauri Vaahtera, Mikael Brosché  Molecular.
DET1 and COP1 Modulate the Coordination of Growth and Immunity in Response to Key Seasonal Signals in Arabidopsis  Sreeramaiah N. Gangappa, S. Vinod Kumar 
The Arabidopsis Homolog of the Mammalian OS-9 Protein Plays a Key Role in the Endoplasmic Reticulum-Associated Degradation of Misfolded Receptor-Like.
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 4-14 (January 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2018)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 115-130 (January 2012) Defense-Related Calcium Signaling Mutants Uncovered via a Quantitative High- Throughput Screen in Arabidopsis thaliana  Ranf Stefanie , Grimmer Julia , Pöschl Yvonne , Pecher Pascal , Chinchilla Delphine , Scheel Dierk , Lee Justin   Molecular Plant  Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 115-130 (January 2012) DOI: 10.1093/mp/ssr064 Copyright © 2012 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 MAMPs and DAMPs Induce Specific [Ca2+]cyt Elevations and Potentially Release of Vacuolar Ca2+ in Arabidopsis Seedlings. (A) [Ca2+]cyt elevations in Aeqcyt/Col-0 seedlings induced by the indicated MAMPs/DAMPs. Data are shown as L/Lmax-normalized values in the left graph and after conversion to [Ca2+]cyt in the right graph. (B) [Ca2+] elevations in Aeqvmd/C24 seedlings induced by the indicated MAMPs/DAMPs. Data are shown as L/Lmax-normalized values. To facilitate visualization, the lower part of the left graph is shown enlarged in the right graph. Arrows mark time of MAMP/DAMP application and data represent mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments (n ≥ 30) for both (A) and (B). Molecular Plant 2012 5, 115-130DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssr064) Copyright © 2012 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Ca2+-Based Screening Reveals Novel fls2 Alleles. (A) Schematic illustration of the fls2 mutations. Mutations in the Aeqcyt (Col-0) background are marked with black and mutations in the Aeqvmd (C24) background with gray arrowheads. Open arrowheads mark SNPs between Aeqvmd/C24 and Col-0. fs, frame shift; splice, mutation of exon-intron border; -, nonsense mutation; SP, signal peptide; LRR, leucine-rich repeat domain; NT/CT, N/C-terminal LRR domain; TM, transmembrane domain; JM, juxtamembrane domain; S/T kinase, serine/threonine kinase domain (gray bar = catalytic loop, dashed lines = proton and ATP binding sites). (B) FLS2 protein accumulation was analyzed by immunoblot using anti-FLS2 antibodies (targeted against the KANSFREDRNEDREV epitope sequence corresponding to the FLS2 C-terminus, as indicated by the ‘Y’ symbol). Amido-black-staining of the Rubisco large subunit is used as an estimation of equal loading. Three independent experiments revealed identical results. (C) [Ca2+]cyt elevations in Aeqcyt fls2 mutant seedlings induced by 1 μM flg22 each compared to its respective wild-type control. Arrows mark time of flg22 application. Data represent mean of calibrated [Ca2+]cyt ± SD of at least four independent experiments (n ≥ 30). (D) [Ca2+] elevations in Aeqvmd fls2 mutant seedlings induced by 1 μM flg22 each compared to its respective wild-type control. Arrows mark time of flg22 application. L/Lmax-normalized data are shown as mean ± SD of at least six independent experiments (n ≥ 45). (E) Root growth inhibition (1 μM flg22) of different fls2 mutants (black bars) each compared to its respective wild-type control (shaded bars). Data are given as percent inhibition compared to untreated control (the raw data of the root length and corresponding seedling photos are shown in Supplemental Figure 2); mean ± SE of at least three independent experiments (n ≥ 45); * indicates statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). Molecular Plant 2012 5, 115-130DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssr064) Copyright © 2012 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Ca2+-Based Screening Reveals Novel bak1 Alleles. (A) Schematic illustration of the bak1 mutations. Mutations in the Aeqcyt (Col-0) background are marked with black and mutations in the Aeqvmd (C24) background with gray arrowheads. Splice, mutation of exon–intron border; -, nonsense mutation; SP, signal peptide; LRR, leucine-rich repeat domain; NT, N-terminal LRR domain; PR, proline-rich domain; TM, transmembrane domain; JM, juxtamembrane domain; S/T kinase, serine/threonine kinase domain (gray bar = catalytic loop, dashed lines = proton and ATP binding sites). (B) BAK1 protein accumulation was analyzed by immunoblot using anti-BAK1 antibodies (directed against the DSTSQIENEYPSGPR sequence derived from the BAK1 C-terminus, as indicated by the ‘Y’ symbol). Amido-black-staining of the Rubisco large subunit suggests equal loading. Three independent experiments revealed identical results. (C, F) [Ca2+]cyt elevations in Aeqcyt bak1 mutant seedlings induced by (C) 1 μM flg22 and (F) 1 μM elf18 each compared to its respective wild-type control. Arrows mark time of MAMP application. Data represent mean of calibrated [Ca2+]cyt ± SD of at least three independent experiments (n ≥ 45). (D, G) [Ca2+] elevations in Aeqvmd bak1 mutant seedlings induced by (D) 1 μM flg22 and (G) 1 μM elf18 each compared to its respective wild-type control. Arrows mark time of MAMP application. L/Lmax-normalized data are shown as mean ± SD of at least five independent experiments (n ≥ 20). (E, H) Growth inhibition of different bak1 mutants (black bars) each compared to its respective wild-type control (shaded bars) was analyzed by (E) root length (1 μM flg22) or (H) fresh weight (100 nM elf18) examination. Data are given as percent inhibition compared to untreated control (the raw data and seedling photos are additionally shown in Supplemental Figure 3); mean ± SE of at least three independent experiments (n ≥ 24); * indicates statistically significant difference; ns, not significant (p < 0.001). Molecular Plant 2012 5, 115-130DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssr064) Copyright © 2012 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 cce Mutants Show Reduced or Enhanced Responses to flg22 and elf18. (A, G) [Ca2+]cyt elevations in Aeqcyt cce mutant seedlings induced by (A) 1 μM flg22 and (G) 1 μM elf18 each compared to its respective wild-type control. Arrows mark time of MAMP application. Data represent mean of calibrated [Ca2+]cyt ± SD of at least three independent experiments (n ≥ 45). [Ca2+] peaks chosen for calculation (D, J) are marked with (1) or (2). (B, C, H, I) [Ca2+] elevations in Aeqvmd cce mutant seedlings induced by (B, C) 1 μM flg22 and (H, I) 1 μM elf18 each compared to its respective wild-type control. Arrows mark time of MAMP application. L/Lmax-normalized data are shown as mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments (n ≥ 26). [Ca2+] peaks chosen for calculation (D, J) are marked with (1) or (2). (D, J) Statistical analysis of MAMP-induced [Ca2+] elevations in cce mutants. Amplitudes of the [Ca2+] peaks ([Ca2+] max) or the overall sum of the [Ca2+] elevation ([Ca2+] sum) induced by (D) 1 μM flg22 or (J) 1 μM elf18 were calculated for each cce mutant line and are given as percent of the respective wild-type control. Data represent mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments (n ≥ 26). * indicates statistically significant difference; ns, not significant (p < 0.001). [Ca2+] peaks chosen for calculation are marked with (1) or (2) in (A–C) and (G–I). (E, K) Growth inhibition of different cce mutants (black bars) each compared to its respective wild-type control (shaded bars) was analyzed by (E) root length (1 μM flg22) or (K) fresh weight (100 nM elf18) examination. Data are given as percent inhibition compared to untreated control (the raw data are additionally shown in Supplemental Figure 4); mean ± SE of at least three independent experiments (n ≥ 24); * indicates statistically significant difference; ns, not significant (p < 0.001). (F) FLS2 and BAK1 protein accumulation was analyzed by immunoblot using anti-FLS2 and anti-BAK1 antibodies. Amido-black-staining of the Rubisco large subunit suggests equal loading. Three independent experiments revealed identical results. Molecular Plant 2012 5, 115-130DOI: (10.1093/mp/ssr064) Copyright © 2012 The Authors. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions