Craig Schwartz, Glen Romine, Ryan Sobash, and Kate Fossell

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Advertisements

5 th International Conference of Mesoscale Meteor. And Typhoons, Boulder, CO 31 October 2006 National Scale Probabilistic Storm Forecasting for Aviation.
Report of the Q2 Short Range QPF Discussion Group Jon Ahlquist Curtis Marshall John McGinley - lead Dan Petersen D. J. Seo Jean Vieux.
Storm Prediction Center Highlights NCEP Production Suite Review December 3, 2013 Steven Weiss, Israel Jirak, Chris Melick, Andy Dean, Patrick Marsh, and.
Louisville, KY August 4, 2009 Flash Flood Frank Pereira NOAA/NWS/NCEP/Hydrometeorological Prediction Center.
Gridded OCF Probabilistic Forecasting For Australia For more information please contact © Commonwealth of Australia 2011 Shaun Cooper.
Operational Forecasting and Sensitivity-Based Data Assimilation Tools Dr. Brian Ancell Texas Tech Atmospheric Sciences.
Improving Excessive Rainfall Forecasts at HPC by using the “Neighborhood - Spatial Density“ Approach to High Res Models Michael Eckert, David Novak, and.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
NWP Verification with Shape- matching Algorithms: Hydrologic Applications and Extension to Ensembles Barbara Brown 1, Edward Tollerud 2, Tara Jensen 1,
Convection-permitting forecasts initialized with continuously-cycling limited-area 3DVAR, EnKF and “hybrid” data assimilation systems Craig Schwartz and.
Performance Characteristics of a Pseudo-operational Ensemble Kalman Filter April 2006, EnKF Wildflower Meeting Greg Hakim & Ryan Torn University of Washington.
Initializing a Hurricane Vortex with an EnKF Yongsheng Chen Chris Snyder MMM / NCAR.
Update on the Regional Modeling System NASA Roses Meeting April 13, 2007.
ASSIMILATION of RADAR DATA at CONVECTIVE SCALES with the EnKF: PERFECT-MODEL EXPERIMENTS USING WRF / DART Altuğ Aksoy National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Exploring the Use of Object- Oriented Verification at the Hydrometeorological Prediction Center Faye E. Barthold 1,2, Keith F. Brill 1, and David R. Novak.
1 st UNSTABLE Science Workshop April 2007 Science Question 3: Science Question 3: Numerical Weather Prediction Aspects of Forecasting Alberta Thunderstorms.
Ensemble Post-Processing and it’s Potential Benefits for the Operational Forecaster Michael Erickson and Brian A. Colle School of Marine and Atmospheric.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Evaluation and Comparison of Multiple Convection-Allowing Ensembles Examined in Recent HWT Spring Forecasting Experiments Israel Jirak, Steve Weiss, and.
The Impact of GPS Radio Occultation Data on the Analysis and Prediction of Tropical Cyclones Bill Kuo UCAR.
WWOSC 2014 Assimilation of 3D radar reflectivity with an Ensemble Kalman Filter on a convection-permitting scale WWOSC 2014 Theresa Bick 1,2,* Silke Trömel.
Warn on Forecast Briefing September 2014 Warn on Forecast Brief for NCEP planning NSSL and GSD September 2014.
Ensemble Numerical Prediction of the 4 May 2007 Greensburg, Kansas Tornadic Supercell using EnKF Radar Data Assimilation Dr. Daniel T. Dawson II NRC Postdoc,
Observing Strategy and Observation Targeting for Tropical Cyclones Using Ensemble-Based Sensitivity Analysis and Data Assimilation Chen, Deng-Shun 3 Dec,
WWOSC 2014, Aug 16 – 21, Montreal 1 Impact of initial ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model.
ISDA 2014, Feb 24 – 28, Munich 1 Impact of ensemble perturbations provided by convective-scale ensemble data assimilation in the COSMO-DE model Florian.
Toward a 4D Cube of the Atmosphere via Data Assimilation Kelvin Droegemeier University of Oklahoma 13 August 2009.
How can LAMEPS * help you to make a better forecast for extreme weather Henrik Feddersen, DMI * LAMEPS =Limited-Area Model Ensemble Prediction.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High-resolution data assimilation in COSMO: Status and.
Data assimilation and observing systems strategies Pierre Gauthier Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Division Meteorological Service of Canada.
Assimilating Reflectivity Observations of Convective Storms into Convection-Permitting NWP Models David Dowell 1, Chris Snyder 2, Bill Skamarock 2 1 Cooperative.
© Crown copyright Met Office Probabilistic turbulence forecasts from ensemble models and verification Philip Gill and Piers Buchanan NCAR Aviation Turbulence.
Potential Benefits of Multiple-Doppler Radar Data to Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting: Assimilation of Simulated Data Using WRF-3DVAR System Soichiro.
Performance of the Experimental 4.5 km WRF-NMM Model During Recent Severe Weather Outbreaks Steven Weiss, John Kain, David Bright, Matthew Pyle, Zavisa.
SPC Ensemble Applications: Current Status, Recent Developments, and Future Plans David Bright Storm Prediction Center Science Support Branch Norman, OK.
The EnKF Analyses and Forecasts of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell Storm By Nusrat Yussouf 1,2 Edward Mansell 2, Louis Wicker 2, Dustan.
NOAA Hazardous Weather Test Bed (SPC, OUN, NSSL) Objectives – Advance the science of weather forecasting and prediction of severe convective weather –
Spatial Verification Methods for Ensemble Forecasts of Low-Level Rotation in Supercells Patrick S. Skinner 1, Louis J. Wicker 1, Dustan M. Wheatley 1,2,
DRAFT – Page 1 – January 14, 2016 Development of a Convective Scale Ensemble Kalman Filter at Environment Canada Luc Fillion 1, Kao-Shen Chung 1, Monique.
Trials of a 1km Version of the Unified Model for Short Range Forecasting of Convective Events Humphrey Lean, Susan Ballard, Peter Clark, Mark Dixon, Zhihong.
Comparison of Convection-permitting and Convection-parameterizing Ensembles Adam J. Clark – NOAA/NSSL 18 August 2010 DTC Ensemble Testbed (DET) Workshop.
Extracting probabilistic severe weather guidance from convection-allowing model forecasts Ryan Sobash 4 December 2009 Convection/NWP Seminar Series Ryan.
Assimilation of Pseudo-GLM Observations Into a Storm Scale Numerical Model Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter Blake Allen University of Oklahoma Edward Mansell.
Michael Coniglio NSSL Stacey Hitchcock CSU Kent Knopfmeier CIMMS/NSSL 10/20/2015 IMPACT OF ASSIMILATING MPEX MOBILE UPSONDE OBSERVATIONS ON SHORT- TERM.
Overview of SPC Efforts in Objective Verification of Convection-Allowing Models and Ensembles Israel Jirak, Chris Melick, Patrick Marsh, Andy Dean and.
RUC Convective Probability Forecasts using Ensembles and Hourly Assimilation Steve Weygandt Stan Benjamin Forecast Systems Laboratory NOAA.
Multi-scale Analysis and Prediction of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City Tornadic Supercell Storm Assimilating Radar and Surface Network Data using EnKF Ting.
Xuexing Qiu and Fuqing Dec. 2014
A few examples of heavy precipitation forecast Ming Xue Director
Tadashi Fujita (NPD JMA)
CAPS is one of the first 11 NSF Science and Technology (S&T) Centers
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2013
A dual-polarization QPE method based on the NCAR Particle ID algorithm Description and preliminary results Michael J. Dixon1, J. W. Wilson1, T. M. Weckwerth1,
Systematic timing errors in km-scale NWP precipitation forecasts
Course Evaluation Now online You should have gotten an with link.
University of Washington Ensemble Systems for Probabilistic Analysis and Forecasting Cliff Mass, Atmospheric Sciences University of Washington.
Dan Petersen Bruce Veenhuis Greg Carbin Mark Klein Mike Bodner
Yuanfu Xie, Steve Albers, Hongli Jiang Paul Schultz and ZoltanToth
Radar Data Assimilation
Communicating Uncertainty via Probabilistic Forecasts for the January 2016 Blizzard in Southern New England Frank M Nocera, Stephanie L. Dunten & Kevin.
Winter storm forecast at 1-12 h range
CAPS Real-time Storm-Scale EnKF Data Assimilation and Forecasts for the NOAA Hazardous Weather Testbed Spring Forecasting Experiments: Towards the Goal.
New Developments in Aviation Forecast Guidance from the RUC
14th Cyclone Workshop Brian Ancell The University of Washington
2018 EnKF Workshop Development and Testing of a High-Resolution Rapid Refresh Ensemble (HRRRE) David Dowell, Trevor Alcott, Curtis Alexander, Jeff Beck,
Impact of Assimilating AMSU-A Radiances on forecasts of 2008 Atlantic TCs Initialized with a limited-area EnKF Zhiquan Liu, Craig Schwartz, Chris Snyder,
Christoph Gebhardt, Zied Ben Bouallègue, Michael Buchhold
Cliff Mass and David Ovens University of Washington
SUPERCELL PREDICTABILITY:
Presentation transcript:

Toward Operational Convection-Allowing Ensembles over the United States Craig Schwartz, Glen Romine, Ryan Sobash, and Kate Fossell The National Center for Atmospheric Research ensemble@ucar.edu How many of you know about the NCAR ensemble? And to those forecasters: how many of you have used the NCAR ensemble as part of preparing your forecasts? Are probabilities the dominant thing you look at? NCAR is sponsored by the National Science Foundation This work partially supported by NOAA Grant No. NA15OAR4590238

Real-time 3-km ensemble forecasts Since April 7, 2015, we have been producing real-time, 10-member, 48-hr ensemble forecasts 3-km horizontal grid spacing Initialized at 0000 UTC daily www.ensemble.ucar.edu

Why are we doing this work? One of the forefronts of NWP model research is how to design high-resolution ensembles Also verification and data visualization challenges Demonstrate feasibility of real-time convection-allowing ensemble forecasting over large areas The USA currently does not have an operational convection-allowing ensemble

Challenge with high-resolution ensembles How to design high-resolution ensembles? Vary just initial conditions? Configure different members with different physics or dynamics? We only vary initial and boundary conditions Single set of physics and dynamics for all members Equal likelihood among ensemble members Facilitates investigation of model deficiencies

Components of the NCAR ensemble 1) Ensemble analysis system Assimilate real observations every 6 hours with an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) 80 ensemble members 15-km horizontal grid spacing 2) Ensemble prediction system 10-member, 3-km ensemble forecasts 48-hr forecasts initialized at 0000 UTC WRF-ARW model

Continuously cycling EnKF Continuous cycling 6-hr WRF model forecast ens mem 1 background EnKF ens mem 1 analysis … … (Members 2-79) Observations ens mem 80 background ens mem 80 analysis 6-hr WRF model forecast

NCAR ensemble analysis domain 15-km Obs at 0000 UTC 24 May 415 x 325

Observations used in the analysis system Radiosonde Aircraft Satellite wind METAR Oklahoma MESONET 1200 UTC October 23, 2016 Marine GPSRO

EnKF-initialized 3-km ensemble forecasts Dynamically consistent initial conditions 6-hr WRF model forecast Observations Downscale to 3-km and initialize forecast ens mem 1 background EnKF ens mem 1 analysis … … (Members 2-79) Downscale to 3-km and initialize forecast ens mem 80 background ens mem 80 analysis 6-hr WRF model forecast

NCAR ensemble forecast domain 48-hr, 10-member, 3-km forecasts 15-km 3-km initial conditions from downscaled 15-km analyses Obs at 0000 UTC 24 May 3-km 1581 x 986 415 x 325

How to initialize high-resolution ensembles? Use ensemble data assimilation (NCAR way) Ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) Use existing operational ensembles Cheap and easy but potential for mismatches Add random noise to a single field A bit ad hoc Derive perturbations from external models and add to a single field Potential for mismatches

“Snowzilla” East coast blizzard of January 22-24, 2016 Forecast uncertainty about the northern extent of heavy snow

Forecast initialized 0000 UTC 22 January Ensemble mean 24-hr accumulated snow between 0000 UTC 23 – 0000 UTC 24 January 24-48-hr forecast inches

Forecast initialized 1200 UTC 22 January Ensemble mean 24-hr accumulated snow between 0000 UTC 23 – 0000 UTC 24 January 12-36-hr forecast inches

Forecast initialized 0000 UTC 23 January Ensemble mean 24-hr accumulated snow between 0000 UTC 23 – 0000 UTC 24 January 0-24-hr forecast inches

“Plume diagram” for New York City Forecast initialized 0000 UTC 22 January

“Plume diagram” for New York City Forecast initialized 0000 UTC 23 January

Forecast initialized 0000 UTC 22 January 48-hr accumulated snow between 0000 UTC 22 – 0000 UTC 24 January

Probabilities of 48-hr snowfall > 1 foot within 25 miles of a point Initialized 0000 UTC 22 January Initialized 0000 UTC 23 January Probability

Probabilities of 48-hr snowfall > 2 feet within 25 miles of a point Initialized 0000 UTC 22 January Initialized 0000 UTC 23 January Probability

Simulated reflectivity > 40 dBz Error initializing convection 6-hr forecast Initialized 0000 UTC 22 January

Severe weather guidance Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period May 25, 2015 Note probability scales correspond roughly with SPC thresholds. Do a 6-panel. Probability

Severe weather guidance Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period June 20, 2015 Note probability scales correspond roughly with SPC thresholds. Do a 6-panel. Probability

Severe weather guidance Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period June 23, 2015 Note probability scales correspond roughly with SPC thresholds. Do a 6-panel. Probability

Severe weather guidance Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period Feb. 23, 2016 Note probability scales correspond roughly with SPC thresholds. Do a 6-panel. Probability

Severe weather guidance Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period Feb. 24, 2016 Note probability scales correspond roughly with SPC thresholds. Do a 6-panel. Probability

Severe weather guidance Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period July 8, 2016 Note probability scales correspond roughly with SPC thresholds. Do a 6-panel. Probability

Severe weather guidance Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period July 18, 2016 Note probability scales correspond roughly with SPC thresholds. Do a 6-panel. Probability

Severe weather guidance Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period July 25, 2016 Note probability scales correspond roughly with SPC thresholds. Do a 6-panel. Probability

Severe weather guidance Smoothed probabilities of the union of hail > 1 inch, wind exceeding 25 m/s, and 2-5-km updraft helicity > 75 m2/s2 within 25 miles of a point over a 24-hr period Aug. 13, 2016 Note probability scales correspond roughly with SPC thresholds. Do a 6-panel. Probability

NCAR ensemble bias Aggregate biases over 451 forecasts 0.25 mm/hr Obs at 0000 UTC 24 May 5.0 mm/hr 10.0 mm/hr 20.0 mm/hr

NCAR ensemble ROC areas ROC areas for 24-hr forecasts of 1-hr accumulated precipitation aggregated over 451 forecasts Obs at 0000 UTC 24 May

NCAR ensemble calibration Attributes diagrams for 24-hr forecasts of 1-hr accumulated precipitation aggregated over 451 forecasts Obs at 0000 UTC 24 May

Seasonal forecast skill 24-hr fractions skill scores (50-km radius of influence) between June 15, 2015 – June 15, 2016 0.25 mm/hr 1.0 mm/hr Date Date

Other research activates Compare EnKF-initialized ensemble forecasts with other, more traditional, methods of initializing high-resolution ensemble forecasts Objective verification against National Weather Service watches and warnings Ensemble sensitivity analysis e.g., relate Snowzilla displacement errors to the initial conditions

Toward 1-km ensembles Fractions skill scores over 32 1-12-hr forecasts

Future work 3-km analysis on current 3-km forecast grid More frequent analyses (at least hourly) Assimilate radar, satellite, lightning observations Requires substantially more computational resources Post-processing and interpretation New tools to interpret predictions of hazards Calibration

AMS tweeted about our paper Documentation Paper in Weather and Forecasting describes the system (Schwartz et al. 2015) AMS tweeted about our paper

Summary NCAR ensemble represents a glimpse of future operational systems We have demonstrated convection-allowing ensembles are operationally feasible over the U.S. Contact us if you’d like to collaborate or want real-time data: ensemble@ucar.edu

Surrogates for tornado forecasting Observed tornadoes 2-5-km AGL updraft helicity 0-3-km AGL updraft helicity 1-km AGL relative vorticity Sobash et al. (2016), Wea. Forecasting

Why ensemble forecasts are desirable Quantification of uncertainty Naturally produces probabilities! Allows forecasters to forecast their “true beliefs” Allows users to make decisions based on expected value and cost-loss scenarios Forecasts combining information across all members are usually more skillful than single deterministic forecasts

NCAR ensemble forecast domain 15-km 3-km initial conditions from downscaled 15-km analyses Obs at 0000 UTC 24 May 3-km 1581 x 986 415 x 325

NCAR ensemble forecast domain 15-km 3-km initial conditions from true 3-km analyses Obs at 0000 UTC 24 May 3-km 1581 x 986 415 x 325

Mean analysis increments August 2015 mean analysis increments at 0000 UTC Lowest model level temperature (K) Lowest model level water vapor (g/kg) Pattern not geographically uniform

Mean analysis increments December 2015 mean analysis increments at 0000 UTC Lowest model level temperature (K) Lowest model level water vapor (g/kg) Different characteristics compared to summer

Why ensembles vs. deterministic forecasts? These forecasts have proven quite popular with the broader community. Thanks to google analytics, we are able to track our site visits and find we have a consistent user base that spans across the country. Top user is NOAA, but we also have a number of private companies, NCAR, weather weenies, and university users. In addition to our web site, we also distribute binary data that goes to a number of additional government, university and private entities. You’ll note there was a recent spike in use in late January, that was the recent crippling snowstorm that impacted the Mid-Atlantic. Let’s take a look at some of the products from that event. Ensemble probabilistic forecast skill exceeds performance of deterministic forecasts from the same prediction system